Post partagé.
#Richard_Dawkins and the other Atheists and scientific communities run away
Why do not the scientific communities and Atheists try to get away with answering what is mentioned in the book "Atheism Delusion"?
Have they turned out unable like religious scholars and resort to illogical and immoral things?
Is there an atheist who can defend his beliefs based in logic and proven scientific evidence? Or that he will go with the way of religious scholars in the face of scientific evidence and ideas like the church did to Galileo!!!?
Ahmed Al hasan is quoted as saying in the book Atheism Delusion that:
The theory of evolution is a scientific theory supported by a wealth of scientific evidence, including genetic evidence that cannot be rejected by any reasonable person who understands this evidence. As a result, there is no room for argument about the validity of the theory. It is a fact only refuted by ignorant people who don't comprehend what the theory says. Unfortunately, such people are numerous. I believe that Dawkins, as he has previously stated, and other atheist evolutionary biologists, are glad when men of religion insist that the theory of evolution is incompatible with religion. This is because as evolutionary biologists, they are actually capable of proving its validity beyond any doubt. Thus, when one says that religion and evolution incompatible with one another, this means that there is a major defect in religion, because the men of religion have admitted and insisted that religion conflicts with a theory proven with valid scientific evidence."
These fanciful ideas are absolutely incorrect. We have proven, and will further prove, that evolution is evidence for faith and for the existence of a god. The truth is, the idea that atheism and evolution are inseparable must be abandoned, because it is incorrect and delusional. Even if each and every aspect of the theory of evolution and abiogenesis is correct, it still doesn't conflict with the religious text.
The third chapter of the book Atheism Delusion by Ahmed Al hasan.
Read online: http://www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: http://www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be%0A#atheism%0A#Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Why do not the scientific communities and Atheists try to get away with answering what is mentioned in the book "Atheism Delusion"?
Have they turned out unable like religious scholars and resort to illogical and immoral things?
Is there an atheist who can defend his beliefs based in logic and proven scientific evidence? Or that he will go with the way of religious scholars in the face of scientific evidence and ideas like the church did to Galileo!!!?
Ahmed Al hasan is quoted as saying in the book Atheism Delusion that:
The theory of evolution is a scientific theory supported by a wealth of scientific evidence, including genetic evidence that cannot be rejected by any reasonable person who understands this evidence. As a result, there is no room for argument about the validity of the theory. It is a fact only refuted by ignorant people who don't comprehend what the theory says. Unfortunately, such people are numerous. I believe that Dawkins, as he has previously stated, and other atheist evolutionary biologists, are glad when men of religion insist that the theory of evolution is incompatible with religion. This is because as evolutionary biologists, they are actually capable of proving its validity beyond any doubt. Thus, when one says that religion and evolution incompatible with one another, this means that there is a major defect in religion, because the men of religion have admitted and insisted that religion conflicts with a theory proven with valid scientific evidence."
These fanciful ideas are absolutely incorrect. We have proven, and will further prove, that evolution is evidence for faith and for the existence of a god. The truth is, the idea that atheism and evolution are inseparable must be abandoned, because it is incorrect and delusional. Even if each and every aspect of the theory of evolution and abiogenesis is correct, it still doesn't conflict with the religious text.
The third chapter of the book Atheism Delusion by Ahmed Al hasan.
Read online: http://www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: http://www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be%0A#atheism%0A#Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
Public
🍃🥀🍃🥀🍃🥀🍃
👉Location: Torbat Heydarieh, in front of Enghelab courthouse
🕰Time: anniversary of Imam Mohammad Baqir's martyrdom
⚖In the courthouse: the trial of two of ahlelbeyt shias accused of commemorating for Imam Javad's martyrdom last week‼️
✊Outside the courthouse: gathering of the families and friends of the accused
#savior_of_mankind ...
🎥Sound, light, action
🗣The director orders attack 📌and suddenly in front of the courthouse, on one hand, firing tear gas and swinging batons ♨️and on the other hand, children and women shouting and crying and men becoming injured and wounded, spontaneously takes us to the desert of Karbala.😢
👉Location: Torbat Heydarieh, in front of Enghelab courthouse
🕰Time: anniversary of Imam Mohammad Baqir's martyrdom
⚖In the courthouse: the trial of two of ahlelbeyt shias accused of commemorating for Imam Javad's martyrdom last week‼️
✊Outside the courthouse: gathering of the families and friends of the accused
#savior_of_mankind ...
🎥Sound, light, action
🗣The director orders attack 📌and suddenly in front of the courthouse, on one hand, firing tear gas and swinging batons ♨️and on the other hand, children and women shouting and crying and men becoming injured and wounded, spontaneously takes us to the desert of Karbala.😢
Ajoutez un commentaire…
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
We are not talking about the altruism of relatives or reciprocal altruism, which can both be accounted for genetically. And we are not talking about altruism for the sake of repute, which may occasionally be genetically accounted for as well. These types of altruism can benefit the bodies that practice them because they provide them with a better chance of survival. Furthermore, we are not talking about altruism, whose basis is individual selfishness, that transfers among individuals and groups as a cultural unit, such as showing off or anything similar, meaning that the motive for it is a psychological need or desire of the altruist. If this is the case, then what altruism are we talking about and considering as evidence that the human being is special and morally unique with respect to the rest of the animals?
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
We are talking about altruism that cannot be accounted for biologically by tracing it back to the selfishness of the gene, which uses the bodies and body parts as an ideal machine for the survival and transmission of genes. We are talking about an altruism that cannot be accounted for by saying that the purpose of culture is to achieve some psychological benefit, even if in the long run.
We are talking about altruistic behavior that does not benefit the genes and that cannot be accounted for by the selfishness of genes, or considered to be merely a superficial, non-genuine altruism, as it is not based on a selfish biological origin. We are talking about altruism in which the altruist does not expect future benefit in return, or praise, or even a word of gratitude from others.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ce post a une pièce jointe.
The Genetic Plan
Propriétaire
our opponent, or whoever denies the existence of God, cannot prove with conclusive evidence his claim that genetic mutation, or the continuous change in genes around which evolution revolves, is always a random change or mutation. The point is that he considers it random because the non-randomness of it hasn't been proven. This means that both possibilities are scientifically plausible. Therefore, we can say it is random, or non-random and even law-abiding and organized, or we can say it is a combination of randomness and non-randomness within the vast spectrum of possibilities that amino acid chains can provide. To make this more clear , we begin with an equal probability that genetic mutation is either random or non-random. We can say that the possible number of potential genetic mutations in nature is enormous. We can even say that it is a number that the "age of life" cannot accommodate. In fact, the age of the universe is miniscule in comparison. I do not think it is necessary to repeat the massive and astronomical figures pertaining to genes, some of which I have demonstrated in the section regarding hemoglobin. This massive number makes it impossible for us-who are limited by this "age"-to perceive order and non-randomness if they exist.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Post partagé.
Public
💠💢💠💢💠💢💠💢💠💢💠
🔶Sayed #AhmedAlhasan (a.s) :
🔻Because Sayed Sistani call on demonstrators to overcome their anger and they did it in a highest level and despite they were under the oppression and compulsion for fifteen years.
#savior_of_mankind
🔰So for the sake of justice and equalty it is obligatory on the authority Sistani to call on his government, parties, mercenaries, militias to overcome their anger.
🔰Also it is not wisely that young Hareth be killed while orphaned his kids and broke his skull by batons in an inhumane and brutal manner and they left him in prison bleeding till he finally died.
📆Aug, 2018
https://goo.gl/RiUNev #Iraqi_Revolution_News
#JustForMyDad
🔶Sayed #AhmedAlhasan (a.s) :
🔻Because Sayed Sistani call on demonstrators to overcome their anger and they did it in a highest level and despite they were under the oppression and compulsion for fifteen years.
#savior_of_mankind
🔰So for the sake of justice and equalty it is obligatory on the authority Sistani to call on his government, parties, mercenaries, militias to overcome their anger.
🔰Also it is not wisely that young Hareth be killed while orphaned his kids and broke his skull by batons in an inhumane and brutal manner and they left him in prison bleeding till he finally died.
📆Aug, 2018
https://goo.gl/RiUNev #Iraqi_Revolution_News
#JustForMyDad
Ajoutez un commentaire…
Post partagé.
Professor Richard Dawkins gets away from answering
Do him and the other atheists have substantial and logical evidence for what the believe in? What is the reason for this getting away?
It's the time to answer
Ahmed Al hasan is quoted as saying in the book Atheism Delusion that:
Certainly, it can be said that science conflicts with the understanding of the religious text by some people who took it upon themselves to be clerics, including Sunni and Shia Muslims, Christians and Jews. This argument is to be directed at them, and not at divine religion in general, or divine, established religious text. They bear the consequences of their own opinions. Skeptics or atheists cannot hold the opinions of those clerics against the divine religion or the religious text. This is a great lie and a deception that atheists, or those who are skeptical of God's existence, deceive themselves with, namely that the divine religion and religious text are the same as the opinions of those clerics. If atheists wish to live this lie and deceive themselves with a delusional victory of atheism over religion, that is their business. However, I believe that, in this way they would be no better than the deceptive men of religion that they criticize. The religious texts not only agree with biology and modern science, but they have also mentioned conscious life forms, some of which of are known today through fossils, meaning the human-like beings like some types of Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and the Neanderthal. These texts have stated that human-like beings existed before humans, and some of them were rational, conscious beings, but less so than humans.
The third chapter of the book Atheism Delusion by Ahmed Al hasan
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Do him and the other atheists have substantial and logical evidence for what the believe in? What is the reason for this getting away?
It's the time to answer
Ahmed Al hasan is quoted as saying in the book Atheism Delusion that:
Certainly, it can be said that science conflicts with the understanding of the religious text by some people who took it upon themselves to be clerics, including Sunni and Shia Muslims, Christians and Jews. This argument is to be directed at them, and not at divine religion in general, or divine, established religious text. They bear the consequences of their own opinions. Skeptics or atheists cannot hold the opinions of those clerics against the divine religion or the religious text. This is a great lie and a deception that atheists, or those who are skeptical of God's existence, deceive themselves with, namely that the divine religion and religious text are the same as the opinions of those clerics. If atheists wish to live this lie and deceive themselves with a delusional victory of atheism over religion, that is their business. However, I believe that, in this way they would be no better than the deceptive men of religion that they criticize. The religious texts not only agree with biology and modern science, but they have also mentioned conscious life forms, some of which of are known today through fossils, meaning the human-like beings like some types of Homo erectus, Homo sapiens and the Neanderthal. These texts have stated that human-like beings existed before humans, and some of them were rational, conscious beings, but less so than humans.
The third chapter of the book Atheism Delusion by Ahmed Al hasan
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Ajoutez un commentaire…
Veuillez patienter pendant le chargement des autres posts.