Stream

#essaybyowen
Best of
 
Fly In The Ointment
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 030

Seriously Now. Enough is enough.
We all get it. TechCrunch (or as some like to call affectionately refer to them as TechHunch) wrote an insanely stupid article. So what? Is it the first time a journalistic article has been written that was subjectively false or misleading? Was it really anything more than on the surface an effort to gain traffic and traction? Probably not.

The irony, of course,  is that the article has been a fly in the ointment.  It is seen as a [small] defect in #authoring or #journalistic skills that just adds spoils something valuable (the experiences so many of us have in Google+ ) or is a source of #annoyance . And yes, it has been an annoyance. Continually ongoing noise. That annoying #BUZZ of  “they (TechCrunch and others) are so wrong.”

Someone very special (+Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales) made the observation recently that, “…letting [the] emotions dissipate and as critically and objectively as possible responding with your own evidence is taking the high road.”

No greater insightful and wisdom filled words could be uttered.
Days have been wasted responding to #badpress . People still have to go about making a living and addressing the tasks, problems, and joys that come with the dawn of each day…. And HELPING OTHERS SUCCEED!

That is, Unless YOUR FOCUS HAS BEEN ON THE FLY!

Where has your focus been?

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 030
6
Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales's profile photoOwen Ellis's profile photo
3 comments
 
A balance between the subjective and acceptance of other subjectives is tough +Owen Ellis... Many times I get lost in opinions because I refuse to choose just one... I have the opposite problem to yours.
Add a comment...
 
play at your own risk: The Series
Imagine - If You Will...

Imagine
 If you could build a playground that is shared,
Where children are fostered to become citizen-entrepreneurs.
And the wisdom of “the mom and pops” eras before them flourished.

Imagine a playground that fosters community,
where space isn't wasted, but shared openly with others.
A playground that produces more, but without more waste.

This may seem a radical ideal — but one that is not new.
Playgrounds are the original sharing platforms;
the ancient crossroads of the young,
which grew through collaboration and shared experience.

Committed to being good neighbors,
sharing with those in need,
fostering and strengthening community…,

Imagine — if you please.

Where has your focus taken you today?
Has it taken you away from the playgrounds of your youth?

~ owen

#payor003   #essaybyowen  
Imagine — If You Will…
3
2
Colin Walker's profile phototodd l lebeauc's profile photo
Add a comment...
 
Play At Your Own Risk
Preface: Do you really want to play!?

As a wondering wordsmith,  this past month has been filled with perils and pot-holes, thanks to my multi-colored  view of the world around me. I am most certain however; if you seek The Holy Grail  of being #authentic   (or  genuine ),  - Best Have a THICK SKIN.

My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard,
and they're like It's Better Than Yours,
Damn right it's better than yours,
I can teach you, But I have to charge... ♫

Those lyrics make me laugh each time I think of them, and relate the message to communications in social environments such as this. Companies and small enterprises attempting to find a voice; aspiring writers and gifted artists grapple with balancing artistic intent  with the subjective and sometimes damning voice of a larger Playground.

The reality is everyone struggles. Moreover, people and companies alike are just plain scared to have a viewpoint at one point or another. No one wants to face the wrath, or isolation outside of a socially accepted norm. Until you do find your voice, know that you are not alone. Yup..., Been there - Done that.

This is a Series; an anthology of and provided by the author - and the experiences which ensued while attempting to Play Nice In The Sandbox.

~ owen

Next Up: Introduction

#payor001   #essaybyowen  
6
Christine DeGraff's profile photoOwen Ellis's profile photo
2 comments
 
Good Morning +Christine DeGraff, and thanks. I certainly hope that I do not disappoint you with what I am attempting. Your time and encouragement are both appreciated, and I will endeavor to make this worthy of your trust placed herein.
Add a comment...
 
A Conversation
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 033

And so it goes….

Kayla: Dad, you really need to understand. People just cannot afford to be vocal. Employers scan your Facebook and Twitter feeds. They look at what you post on Google+ and who you engage with.

Me: So what you’re saying then is be guarded in everything you say and do online?

Kayla: Now you are putting words in my mouth. I didn't say that.

Me: But in essence you are? I have to watch everything I say. Then it is a misnomer to even consider the idea or ideals of transparency, is it not?

Kayla: You are again, taking this out of context Dad. That is not what I am saying. But, if I started spouting off that I support certain things, such as my support for Tim and Duane to be married — it can and would come back to bite me. You know this.

Me: Are you suggesting that because you are happy that two of your childhood friends are married and that because they are the same sex, you being happy for them can stop or inhibit your advancement at work? I do not get it. I thought you were hired because you went to two highly valued schools and got your degrees, and that you had a commodity that could be best utilized in their corporate setting?

Kayla: I did. But that is not to say that The Depository  isn't bound by what we both acknowledge as old world mentalities. For the same reason, I do not readily disclose you are my dad. You are too controversial, and I cannot afford to be associated with your radicalization.

Me: What?? Now I am a radical?  I am not sure If I should laugh or find that offensive. I suppose we should stick to Snapchat then huh? (sarcastic tone)

Kayla: Can you please? No. I do not believe that there is anything on the Internet that is truly private, and just because some of my friends think it is cool, or want to believe that those conversations and photos are private and destroyed… — it doesn't mean that they are.  You of all people know this. You taught me that, remember?

Me: Well, I’m glad you listened. But I did not teach you to be embarrassed either about who you are and what you believe in.

Kayla: It isn't about being embarrassed. It is about being aware.

Me: Aware of what? That people form irrational judgement based off of ignorance? We know this and we both do it ourselves from time to time each day.

Kayla: Dad, you are going off on another one of your tangents.

Me: No I am not. I am making a point.  You continually call me a radical, or a poster child for the flower power movement of a generation I grew up in. Yet you call me a radical as you guardedly spew out intangible hypocrisies. You welcome an open world of open dialogue and disclosure. Yet in the same breath, you warn of the evils of it. You make cautionary remarks like you did, and one minute you are saying I can have my cake and eat it too  —  while you rip it out of my hands as I bring it to my mouth? SO WHICH IS IT? Can I be who I am, or do I have to have the chill switch in place, so that you can talk to me online? Or acknowledge that I am your dad?

Kayla: (silent pause) I didn't say that I was embarrassed dad, I only said

Me: I know what you said sweetie. And that is my point. You called me a radical. I am just trying to understand your point. I want to protect you. I want you to advance in your career, and not have my opinions dictating what opportunities are presented to you. That’s what parents do.

Kayla: Yea. But you don’t. You keep going off. Just look at what you talk about and write about when it comes to religion! Do you think that will go over real well with my supervisor as she considers my background to know that you have visited a mosque or temple? Am I supposed to support that?

Me: Yes you are. It is about context. Of course I have gone to a mosque. Why would I not? I also have gone to a Lutheran and Catholic church and have also attended Rabbinical studies with a close friend. I still go to sweat lodges, and have done a vision quest. So what does that make me and what does that say 'bout you?

Kayla: You are just being facetious now. It doesn't mean anything about me except that I have a dad that is a little lost or off his rocker.  Hence the radical flower child. But that can hurt me if I acknowledge it, or endorse it.

Me: Great. So this great society that I and your mom handed down to you and your sister is just propagating more hypocrisy that your generation disguises with false and misleading “feel goods” of openness while you hide in your collective closets.  And how is it hurting you?

Kayla: Yea — you guys handed us a hornets nest (sardonic laugh). But think about it. Three years ago I split up with Danny and now I live with Nelia. Did you not think I had a hard time with that an my HR contact in getting coverage for her? And your reaction was

Me: Yes, I know. Priceless . But that was because I didn't understand. And I didn't see it coming. You were not sharing that part of you with me.  I was surprised.

Kayla: That is my point. You were challenged. You could have easily disowned me or been angry, right?

Me: You know I wouldn't…

Kayla: That’s not it. You could have. For a brief moment, your emotional response took over. Whether it was your ignorance and lack of empathy, or fear, or whatever. It happens. But it comes with consequences.

Me: Yes. It does, and it can. But now you are making my point. Step off the ledge.  You cannot have it both ways. Either you expect people to be real, or you don’t. You expect them to disclose pieces of their lives and take on the responsibility of having that disclosure part of a dialogue — a conversation.  *Or you don’t.*

Kayla: Dad. That is it. Sometimes I don’t. You are radical. That doesn't mean I do not love you, care about you, or that I do not understand your desire to seek out knowledge from experiences and challenging your own thoughts.  I think it’s great that you do. And I love you for it. But others looking through the glass do not see it that way. They get 3 second glimpses from their peripheral vision and make judgement.  *Neither you nor I can escape that.* But, I also cannot have it come into the field of vision when I am applying and interviewing for a regional management slot. These people will question me if you are a Muslim, or if you are out selling drugs because you chewed on some peyote. Or — they will dismiss me because of it, out of fear that I am like you.  But one thing for certain, people that deal with money like I do have to be aware of this. The last thing we want is to be labelled as being a complicit part of some radicalized faction, or tied to drugs  —  even when neither is true. So it is not about transparency or truth.

Me: But it is. About both. And much more.

Kayla: Your’e right dad. It’s about me and you. It is about me being supportive of you and how that reflects upon me.  It is about your truth or search for it, and the conversations you have — or don’t have. And it is definitely about how others looking thru their glasses at US.

Me: (silent )

Kayla: All I am doing is asking you to understand. I do support you and why you struggle with having intelligent conversations.  I know that you face others and face off with them about what to share and what not to. Maybe it will get better. And yes — maybe you are right too. In the meantime, I am stuck in a similar role that much like being the daughter of Copernicus, and we both know how well that went...

~ owen

[NOTE: Yes, I do have a daughter. Two actually. One of them is employed in a financial institution after obtaining her Masters from a very highly regarded educational institution. And yes, we do  have some very interesting conversations...]

Question: Where do your conversations lead you on and off-line?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds — 033
8
1
Owen Ellis's profile photoLance Fields's profile photoCharles Payet's profile photoKate Griffiths's profile photo
21 comments
 
+Owen Ellis now I know you are wise indeed!
Add a comment...
 
Continued Lessons
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 021

The challenge of doing this writing thing is...
that I’m going to ask you to turn off that part of your brain that automatically goes, “Yeah, well, but that doesn't apply to me.”  Actually, you don’t have to turn that part of your brain off. Just put it on vibrate. Let your objections go to voicemail.

Writing Matters
What I know is that writing matters. In spite of the buzz surrounding disruptive technologies, such as +David Amerland discusses in his newest book, “Google+ Hangouts™ For Business”, and the glut of people rushing to make use of interactive communication, writing — of any type, is more important now than ever before.  *ALL OF IT* — I’m talking about email, memos, and blogs. I’m also talking about what you wrote on your friend’s Facebook wall, a tweet, or a share in Google+.

Whether you want to or not, you and I are being judged on it.  And we’re being judged differently because of the era we live in.

Authority
In terms of writing, what really changed wasn't the computer, but what it was connected to. The Internet as we understand it now didn't exist when I graduated college. There weren't Wordpress blogs, or interactive websites like today, or Wikipedia. “Google” was still one followed by 100 zeroes. And if you knew that, you were probably one of the nerds I hung around with.

I’m referring to “authority” as sort of the confluence of expertise and reputation. Reputation only comes with time. It’s basically the degree to which people feel they can #trust you to be giving your honest opinion, and to be consistent from one day to the next.  There have always been experts. But writing now allows for extremely specialized authorities. Realistically, everyone is a potential authority on some subject.

But why would you want to be an authority? Because unlike expertise, #authority  is transferable. It’s a commodity. And I’d argue that today, it’s one of the most valuable commodities out there.  Authority is about a kind of emotional, qualitative process. You strive in writing to have credibility, but only others can give it to you.  So it had better be damn good or you will forever just be chasing a white whale.

Immediacy
I grew up assuming that news was something that happened once a day, which is incredibly naive now.  I am quite used to the idea that news is happening continuously: it’s a stream which You and I can jump into and out of. Life now resembles the annoying ticker that’s scrolling along the bottom.

But what happens is thirty minutes later, a day later — it is gone. It’s transient. It’s only important while it’s happening: which begs the question, was it ever really important and worth attention at all?

And I should stress, by immediacy, I’m not just talking about what I define as important, or a sense of timeliness. There’s also immediacy in the emotional sense. A sense of intimacy. A false intimacy, an informality.  If you look at writing over the last decade, it’s become much more casual. Not just grammatically, with its sloppy punctuation and really badly thought out emoticons, but tonally. I, like most, write everything as if we’re writing to our very best friends, whether it’s appropriate or not.

Permanence
Writing and publishing used to be something akin to Schrödinger’s cat, existing in a state of quantum uncertainty. And that’s the quality that I’m trying to describe: Permanence. Or more approriately, impermanence. Transience.

This never used to be the case. Only a few short years back you could shout “Stop the presses!” But there were huge costs to doing that. Now, those costs are essentially zero.  Particularly in a culture that values immediacy, it changes the dynamic between I as a writer and you, the reader. If I’m sharing something online, I can’t even be certain you’ll read the same thing I read.

This is a concern for all of us. Imagine if corporate annual reports could be revised that transparently. That’s dangerous.  Illegal. And inevitable.

Responsiveness
Writing used to flow in one direction. I wrote, you read. Sometimes, if you were incredibly motivated, you might respond: a letter to an editor, or a letter directly to the author. But the initial writing and the response weren't linked together.

Now they are. At the bottom of an entry, you can add comments, and they may travel with the original story forever. Newspapers and Magazines are adding comment sections directly to their articles online.

If you’re an author, ordinary readers will review your books on Amazon or Goodreads. Isn’t this good?  Isn't this freedom of speech—the ability to comment and disagree. Yes, certainly.

But this culture of being able to respond to anything is a bit dangerous too. These responses are writing, and they’re subject to the same new challenges as the original writing:

Authority — How do you know if this responder knows what he’s talking about? What if he’s anonymous?

Immediacy — You’re more rewarded for being the first person to respond to something, rather than the most eloquent or thoughtful.

Permanence — These comments You or I can be typing at 3 a.m. are forever linked to the original article. They become part of the original article. We may have no little or no control over them.

Response to the response — I’ve been in enough forums and threads where the original topic is long gone. It’s now just disembodied voices bantering at each other. If you’re the author of the original piece, how do you get control back? Are you even allowed to? Who owns the discussion?

A Call To Action

Authority I have had to move beyond simply Questioning Authority in every attempt at writing and set a more ambitious goals: Become an Authority.  I’m not exaggerating to say that, everyone is a potential authority on some topic, no matter how esoteric. You become an expert by researching. You become an authority by writing. Writing consistently; writing fairly; and writing for an audience that is eager to hear about it.  It is a challenge to do this each day or even once a week. But one thing is certain, today’s society NEEDS writers who can actually write with authority.

Dealing with immediacy I had to accept never going to slow down culture. The cyclic motion seen today is only going to continue to accelerate.

I could not stop the madness, but I could step out of it. You and I could and can refuse to participate. I stop trying to “keep up with #caturday  shares,” because I find that they’re irrelevant. I am not saying I or you should be less informed, as that is heresy. I’m saying I had to dig deeper.

I found the only things I should follow closely are those things I actually find fascinating.  In them, I might just be an authority. That’s what offered me the only way out of the trap of immediacy.  I stopped reading populist crap, and start writing more. Endeavoring to provide context, criticism, and reflection. Organize my own thoughts, and if possible encourage the same in others.

Permanence The challenge today is that the things you or I wish would go away seem to linger like a cold sore — forever. What I discovered is what I write about doesn't have be acceptable to my mum, but it should accurately reflect how I would like the world to see me.

Response The Achilles Heal of today is offering both the best, and one of the worst in that everyone’s welcome to comment.

I could choose not to participate, being a passive consumer. I could close comments, so that what I write is simply my article, and not the launch pad for a protracted discussion.

But in order to become an authority, I knew I had to participate.  I have to offer thoughtful opinion when appropriate, and invite others’ responses. I had to remember: an expert is someone who knows something. *An authority is someone with the #reputation to back it up. I had get that reputation from my peers, and it will take time.

Final Thoughts [?]
Crappy writing is ugly, and bad writing is outright dangerous. And what I do not want is a digital historian reading my stuff and wondering, “WTF!? Didn’t he have spell check?”

I realized that whatever path is chosen for me by fate, I will be a writer for the rest of my life. As this age continues its acceleration, I’m convinced that writing is more important each day. It’s not a noun anymore. Writing is a verb. It’s an action. It’s a crucial way in which I and you process the world around us.

My Best Advice (and something I have to remind myself of each day ) is to do it well. Do it carefully. And do it like my life depends on it, because I’m convinced it does.

~ owen

*Question: Are you haphazardly sharing your thoughts on Google+, or are you taking into consideration Authority, Immediacy, Permanence, and Response to be a better writer?

Personal Note: I wanted to acknowledge the handful of people, who - over the last six months have been major contributory influence to my own development to return to writing in a pubic community;

+David Amerland and +Mark Traphagen for showing me by example and patiently providing the education I need (daily) to understand subtleties and engage in a social network. Your lessons provide the foundation in most everything I now do.

+Grizwald Grim, +John Kellden, and +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales for being my passionately patient teachers, over and over again. I will never forget that imprint on my psyche. 

And finally, +Lance Fields and +Gina Fiedel. Your eloquent words are inspiring. You offer a gift of inclusion to your world, and with it - I feel like a member of a close knit family, through moments of inner turmoil as well as enlightening and joyous self-discovery.

Thank You

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 021
5
Owen Ellis's profile photoJohn Kellden's profile photoGrizwald Grim's profile photo
17 comments
 
I hear you +Owen Ellis i recently realized that my more than 9k G+ posts can be distilled into five words:

data, metatags, metalogue, scenius, stewardship

I'm still picking up pieces of myself...   :)

The good side-effect is, I've solved the content firehose conundrum. Start by ignoring all of my posts.   :)
Add a comment...

Colin Walker

Shared publicly  - 
 
Playgrounds

Social networks are our 21st century playgrounds and +Owen Ellis advises us not to lose the wisdom of youth.

I've only just stumbled upon Owen but can already see that this is a great find.
 
play at your own risk: The Series
Imagine - If You Will...

Imagine
 If you could build a playground that is shared,
Where children are fostered to become citizen-entrepreneurs.
And the wisdom of “the mom and pops” eras before them flourished.

Imagine a playground that fosters community,
where space isn't wasted, but shared openly with others.
A playground that produces more, but without more waste.

This may seem a radical ideal — but one that is not new.
Playgrounds are the original sharing platforms;
the ancient crossroads of the young,
which grew through collaboration and shared experience.

Committed to being good neighbors,
sharing with those in need,
fostering and strengthening community…,

Imagine — if you please.

Where has your focus taken you today?
Has it taken you away from the playgrounds of your youth?

~ owen

#payor003   #essaybyowen  
Imagine — If You Will…
1
Add a comment...

Owen Kane

Shared publicly  - 
 
The hand you have, you dealt yourself - Sometimes it pays to read the entire article and this one was certainly thought provoking.
 
A Foolish (Fools) Endeavor
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 040

Many a time I have sat in a room full of people and more still, scattered across remote locales, who embraced the idea that when a project goes live — it is then and only then, the real joy of the work begins.  That is the defining moment, because in the blink of an eye, you become instantly aware your beloved project needs more work. Not because it was incomplete, or lacked quality. It is the exact opposite.

The creative, intellectual, and science minded grey spaces had produced was some of the best on which I've been fortunate enough to work alongside. It was good because we could test.

Optimize. Discover. Update in real time. Make it better. Iterate.

I hope you'll take the time to read  the balance of the latest edition to the #disseminatingseeds  series. Who knows, you may be surprised by the hand being dealt...

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 040
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoelizabeth shiflet's profile photo
2 comments
 
Thanks for sharing this +Owen Kane.
And +Elizabeth Shiflet - it's not the Aces I worry about. :-)
Add a comment...
 
Please, not that...
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 014

I could not believe it. In a matter of a couple of weeks...,
things that I had written about somehow had struck a nerve. My (idiotic) ramblings had gained some recognition. Some traction. And I am stuck scratching my head, thinking “WTH?”

Truth be told,
I oftentimes get ‘set in my ways’ or have certain prejudices established in my thoughts and beliefs. Changing my mind, disagreeing with what I’ve thought before, becomes important in critical thinking when I have clung far too often to out-moded or out-dated ideas, philosophies, laws, etc. which don’t stand up to current situations. Especially in social layers such as Google+.

What throws me is the attention.
Getting excited about being recognized as having any type of valued insight or consideration of ‘influencing others thoughts’ is understandable. Like most, I want to make a difference in our my own unique way and using social networks to influence behavior and opinions can work really well for campaigns whether moral, political or social.  *But me? PLEASE!*

Becoming a real mentor takes far more...
...than gathering followers, fans or arbitrary metrics. It’s not about the transitory nature of celebrity or seeming popularity but about establishing a reputation and becoming the person that others turn to when they want information they know they can trust. Unlike +David Amerland  , +Mark Traphagen  , +Larry Fournillier  , +John Ellis, +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales, +Gina Fiedel, +John Kellden, and others — I am but a learning student.

In Greek mythology, “to Odysseus, his son’s education was so important that he sought the help of a person he could trust with his own life- his friend Mentor.”  These are the qualities I seek out and find in others. Sometimes I am brash in my approach, and yet the replies from these special people (both public and private) have always been the same.

They challenge me with critical thinking :
Just because I put out an idea doesn't mean it’s true. I am asked to re-evaluate the idea, see if it’s logical and rational and beneficial to the greater good and then decide if it warrants further action, or even a reversal from my own folly [and even eat my words ].

Yes, these are the ones that encourage and inspire me. They repeatedly convey compelling vision, are always encouraging, engage with everyone, and are approachable in spite of harried schedules and commitments.

Albert Schweitzer once said, “The only ones among you that will achieve true happiness are those that have sought and found how to serve”.

In serving, each of these people...
add value to the lives of others and are willing to grow with others in the process. These are the highest values of any influencer, Mentor, and those I am privileged to call a FRIEND.

~owen

Question: Who do you look to as a Mentor, and are you following their examples set before you?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
dissemninating seeds 014
8
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoGina Fiedel's profile photoDavid Amerland's profile photoMick Fealty's profile photo
27 comments
 
+Richard Martin - any mention of works of yours is #worthwhile  due to the depth and breadth.  I had just begun to peruse and ponder yesterday... and was captivated (as well as deeply indebted and grateful to those who brought me to the Conversation Community, +John Kellden, +Mani Scienide, and many, many more). And then, just yesterday..., to your thoughts...

In quite reflection, it was interacting with those special #mentors  such as +Larry Fournillier, +David Amerland, and +Mark Traphagen who pointed out the disruptive paths available,  as they too appreciate it's sometimes subtle yet always resounding impact.

It really is interesting to see the comparison to building cathedrals, as you pint out the long and arduous process, seldom realizing the completion of the endeavor by their builders (Thank you for this).  It is both evolutionary and revolutionary.

And sometimes, it is a shame that #mentors  go unrecognized. In my case, a learned professor (Alex M) inspired me, and guided me (loosely) when I took "Mythology: A Cross-cultural Linguistic Analysis" at the same time as "Journalism Ethics" (both taught by him). It began a process of looking at things, the world I am a part of - on levels and planes that were unimaginable. Empowering. Humbling..., especially when one considers the impact of responsibility of encouraging disruption. Not simply in a physical/technological sense, but in "rewiring" the brains of students and masters (teacher/mentor) alike in a symbiotic relationship carried over a singe act, a reverberating thought string, or even an unproven premise...

My apologies. Got in over my head this morning (and a bit deep), and i have only had three minutes to glance and bookmark +David Amerland's Sunday Read....

It is going to be a beautifully enriching day indeed.
Add a comment...
 
The Perils of Writing in Social
aka AUTHENTIC ME: The Play
Follow up to 'The Dark Side of Social Media?' by +Iblis Bane 

I begins with a blank page - the very same page I leave for you, entitling you, the reader, with a brief glimpse into subtle nuances of who I may or may not be. It is a grand choice - a tease as it may be, of how much I choose to divulge.

#Authentic ? The question begs - to who? You or I?
You come to expect a standard in which to live, in this age of voyeuristic streaming bits; to be provided an intimate knowledge of my life, my household, my ups and downs, my states of "helpless confusion." And if this part or sum of parts of myself is not forthcoming - you pass upon me your objective judgement(s). My god, how arrogant of you to dare assume these things will be revealed?

I do what I do, when I feel the ability to sit at my desk, which some days is a frightening foreign place as it connects me to the endless stream. I am faced with my fictional disguises, and yet - there is a presumption that with each line, or each story - it is a reflection of who I am. The person writing has to be that person. What other assumption could be logical, correct?

And yet, some days I am not so nice in my fictional real life disclosures. Some say I am "not so polite", while others refer to me as #snarky  or #sarcastic . But, as a writer, with stockpiles of feverishly scribbled notes by my side, I am a different person.

What you seemingly don't consider is I am eyes and ears, absent of self (or attemtpting to be ), taking on #personas  and perspectives of the world befallen me. I bring with me a troupe of players, internalized, psychoanalyzed ad nasuem. Perspectives

While an assumption is made, I have an abundance of actors, pieces and parts which I call upon. Framing them with careful placement for maximum impact. Did you happen to even notice the lamp had moved from the left to the right side of the stage? I am a repertoire; a repository, I am both #marketer  and #theatre , presented for your discovery, amusement, abandonment, and scourge of your rebuffed commentary. Nothing More.

I am Owen 'Basturd' Ellis." The name is revealing in it's own right, carefully scripted and crafted. With added contributory components that I allow friends to add. Some days I am OBE-wan; Master of insight and wisdoms.  Other days, I am OBE-wiener, stemming from the mass consumption of my favorite food.  And still at other times, I am OBE-Wanker! This moniker, or badge - brings a heavenly laugh from deep inside - a reflection yet again or my humorous and longed for, missing heritage.

My life is one long performance. It is just the opposite of what you might expect. I am a playwright - a dramatist at work.  Building a crescendo upon truer and more complex inspirations -  reflected in the maxim of nosce te ipsum  (KNOW THYSELF). I am simply again, #beingmyself - while you see impersonations of what you think you may like to be or run away from, based upon YOUR STANDARDS and interpretive skill sets.

All of my endeavors are done so in earnest, so much in such, that you as the reader do not even realize it is an act.  A high spirited, bottom groveling, deluge of analysis of both arts and sciences. I will speak on sex, and morality. Politics, religion, superstitions and dogmatic assumptions. And with each letter, each formation - I weigh the power of the word. Negotiating metrically, this WILDNESS and WILDERNESS before me. This is not a 50/50 business transaction I involve myself in - _it is the chaos of Eros  A "Radical Destabilization" that is enthralling and terrifically horrifying.... Perpetuated imbalance. Dissections of hearing and seeing through my senses, and those of others - what dominance and yielding leads to.

Clearly - at the center of all of this is ME.
The writer. After a night of mathematical code disembowelment and rearrangement, tasked with explaining the processes and efficiency improvements in a second and third spoken language to partners across the landscapes and seas. Exhausted; I reach for the grounds to brew my third pot of coffee.

I have supplanted the means of engagement, and after 37 hours... my eyes begin failing me, the lids dropping as they scream for the coverlet of darkness required. Two long sessions of fixing code, five and a half hours of mind spinning boredom while a mechanic wields his wand to repair pothole damaged struts, and frenzied responses to passion inspired endeavors yet to be unveiled... I bit you adieu.

And be well informed, a disclosure is once again offered as the lights dim, and for many of you - the house light rise again:

There is no refund offered at the door
(Did you not read the fine print?)

So as you consider my prose, and attempt to discern the meaning... I leave you the blank page below. Sum all of this up in one sentence, if you dare.

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   #authenticme  

Respectfully pinging +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales +Grizwald Grim +John Kellden +David Amerland +Imran Sq +Gina Fiedel +Teodora Petkova +Christine DeGraff +Lee Smallwood +Leland LeCuyer +Lance Fields +Bruce Marko 

I am sure I left out some...
12
1
Bruce Marko's profile photoOwen Ellis's profile photoGina Fiedel's profile photoTeodora Petkova's profile photo
36 comments
 
What a fun ride you're giving us +Owen Ellis. I know now not to believe anything and at the same time to believe it all. Don't lie to me. Lie to me. Stop don't stop.

Sometimes, in these conversations we keep finding ourselves in about authenticity, I feel myself leaving my body and looking at it from the side like a girl who's frustrated with the boys' inability to identify, talk about and trust their feelings. And with that, I have this sense that this is really one of the most simple things going and yet there's this fascination with messing with its simplicity.

We can play with our behavior all we want but can we change our essence? Our character, temperament? Our disguises may cover who we really are but there's leakage. Eventually, there will be leakage.

+Bruce Marko your last comment. yes. GUT.
And so many really truly interesting things being said +Teodora Petkova, +Iblis Bane, +Leland LeCuyer +Grizwald Grim +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales and everyone.
Add a comment...
 
The Zelig Guide to Google+
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 038

“People, you got to be yourself."
" You know, you can’t act like anybody else, just because you think that they have all of the answers and you don’t. You have to be your own wo/man and learn to speak up and say what’s on your mind. Now maybe you’re not free to do that in other countries, communities, or virtualized social environments — but that is the Google+ way. And you can take that from <insert name from verified social media expert database>, because they all have evolved from the reptilian family.”

If one looks at Google+ today and then looks back upon U.S. History, you can see a correlation. The novelty-driven, fad-hungry culture of the 1920's is really not much different almost 100 years later.

Whether other-directed, or inner-directed, the end result is the same. A gigantic hodgepodge of idealistic, fuzzy kitten and coffee cup well-doer’s, enterprising and dream inspired capitalist types with absolute solutions to business model failures, and a sprinkling of the prophetic, philosophical, and educational stalwarts as they ponder the mystification of what is, as well as what will always (or never) be. As with most virtual social arenas (VSA), the undertone to maximizing one’s ability to “Fit In”  is quantified by an immediate review of Follower Counts and View Counts.

Welcome to the Zelig Guide to Google+
The entire motto of the Zelig Guide to Google+ is to Embrace the Chameleon.

GUIDELINE: Always Be Positive
Under no circumstance should you project anything other than a positive outlook. As Guy Kawasaki points out, “Focus on good will —that is, positive actions that make the world a better place. People distrust people who focus on bettering their own position and who denigrate others.”

Zelig Maxim to Always Be Positive
Understand satirical or sardonic commentary. If you find yourself in a negative mindset, or in an opposing position of a shared thought, be prepared to acquiesce with “Your Right.”  An alternative is to make use of “Bless Your Heart for <fill in the blank>”.  The fact is — most will never notice the use (more commonplace in the Southeastern geographic area of the U.S. ). let alone the satirical nature of commentary anyway. Chances are, you will perceived as being empathetic, supportive, or of obvious inferior intellect.

GUIDELINE: Be Interesting
The environment within Google+ wants you to be like “eHarmony-esque” for social media and sing kum-ba-yah as you gather by the green-aware, non-carbon emitting bonfire.  The reality is most of us teeter somewhere between Hot or Not. If you understand how people’s attention span works in Google+, you hold the key to the kingdom in your hand. Snap decisions to follow or not are made based on simple elements of your social media persona. Some go as far as suggesting it will be a long time passing before even a cursory glance beyond your profile picture and tagline as displayed in a hovercard.

Zelig Maxim to Be Interesting
Have at your ready a meme of anything relating to: Malady Mondays, Star Wars or Trivial Tuesdays, Humpday, Throwback Thursday, Caturday, or Coffee. If still failing, head to EXPLORE, and check for “What’s Hot” or “Trending” and perform a Google Image Search for the appropriate selection. Whether of original design, or re-purposed from years past — positive effects, plusses, and a healthy stream of approving commentary often follow.

GUIDELINE: Avoid Swearing
Again, Guy Kawasaki would advise, “Swear infrequently. Once or twice a year is the limit. Any more than this amount, and people will think you’re a crude, uncouth person. You can also soften your profanity with words like ‘crap’ and ‘suck’ which are strong enough to do the trick but much less likely to offend anyone. You can also do what I do and use ‘bull shiitake’ as my go-to swear word—it’s technically a special kind of bovine mushroom, not swearing.”

Zelig Maxim to Avoid Swearing
If you choose to use profanity, do not be the first.  It is better to not have that target on your back. The use of alternative special characters works (ie sh@t: easily confused with shut). Or creative use of carefully crafted  #goscrewyourself hashtags as EVERYONE LOVES HASHTAGS (and will appreciate, as well as be envious of, your whimsical use of them ).

GUIDELINE: Assist Others Each and Every Day
Everyone needs help now and then.  Understanding all that is Google+ is a daunting task. Rest assured, help is always available and just a few clicks of a mouse or taps on a keyboard. Just keep a bookmark to any of Google’s Top Contributors, the Google+ Helper Community, a quick notation of the #GoogleToolbox , or even +Helpouts by Google. You will be rewarded by untold expressions of gratitude and recognition of just being an “all-around good person.”

Zelig Maxim to Assisting Others 
The reality is that taking time out of your otherwise swamped schedule is a burden no one willingly takes on (unless you are stuck in a low salaried help desk position, and even then you are too busy preparing your Ramen Noodles ).

Diversion/Deflection is the key here. When someone reaches out to your for assistance, simply cut and paste the following (or a customized derivative substituting your favored genus of pet ) as a reply:

“My brother just beat me. My sister beat my brother. My father beat my sister, my brother, and me. My mother beat my father, my sister, my brother, and me. The neighbors beat our family. The family down the street beat the neighbors and our family.” 

How is this effective?  Every instinct of the chameleon comes into play with this unique change of color.  When you disclose your life is so terrible, people will immediately be empathetic, feeling their problems or difficulties pale in comparison to yours.  If you are concerned that the person on the other end of the monitor may be prompted to contact local social services or law enforcement, simply revert to “I’m sorry I didn't see your request” and immediately add that you are encountering connectivity issues with Verizon/AT&T/Sprint and are playing catch up with your stream and notifications.

Conclusion
Overall, the hive mindset of Google+ (and most other social networks for that matter ) would profess that “Anyone who’s willing to give up a personal identity just to be liked, plussed, favorited, or followed is trading something unique for something essentially valueless.”  The truth is, you have to pay to play.  The best way to “relate to the culture of complex online social environments” will be a clear indication that you can find contentment and the rewarding organically obtained metrics  sure to follow while taking advantage of your reptilian brain and abilities. One only need look to the traits of a chameleon to understand it’s value is actually of an intelligent non-conformist.

And if this still escapes you, adopt The Way of The Panda.
Often perceived as cute, cuddly, timid, and docile, one must also recognize that it is still a bear. With an seldom noticed chip on it’s shoulders stemming from the two blackened eyes; this creature with opposable thumbs, has the Janus-like qualities  and ability to take a ferocious swipe meant to disable or disembowel a threat, and then quietly lumber on with the daily tasks at hand.

Aphorism
Conformity, in its ultimate end, is blind acceptance of fascism.

~ owen

Have you Embraced the Chameleon?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen
#yesthisissatire   #zeligsocialculture  
disseminating seeds 038
7
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoLance Fields's profile photoGrizwald Grim's profile photoEdouard E's profile photo
8 comments
 
Oh +Grizwald Grim - the joy is in the discovery, and then watching an amazing movie  ;-)
Add a comment...
 
Lurking And Learning
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 022

Engagement. What an odd thing. Leaning more towards the introvert in myself, I tend to focus on reflection rather than active participation. The fact is, engagement scares the crap out of me some days.  It makes me question my own ability to add meaningful and thoughtful context to the subject matter at hand. 

Then there is the alternative. Sitting quietly in the corner. Listening. Reading. Watching. Oh Crap — someone just spotted me, and now they’re thinking me a “lurker,”  or worse. A Coward. A Troll, readying to attack.

A common metric of social engagement is the quantifiable volume of activity;  the time spent interacting with others. It may be something such as going to church or a PTA meeting, or the number of shared insights and opinion in an online forum. 

But each of us struggle with when to jump into the fray; which activity to attend, choices of a community to become a participant of, or which person to #engage  with. Sometimes it is simply a matter serendipity. Moments of hit n’ miss — other times it is in fact, not an issue of cowardice, but of reflection on common (or apposing) beliefs and interests prior to asking for entry.

Rest assured though, it is not a matter of cowardice, or of being a lurker, or a troll.  It is simply a point we each are at as we go through the process of discovering the world is much smaller thanks, in part, to social networks. And like a piece of darkened coal, time and pressures to explore the enlightenment others share, only comes with time…

And with it, deepening learning and advancement for all can begin.

~ owen

Question: What factors play a significant part in your development as #engagers  in Google+?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 022
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoLance Fields's profile photo
2 comments
 
Funny how it goes like that +Lance Fields ;-)
Add a comment...

Owen Ellis

Shared publicly  - 
 
The Window
INSTL 011 - disseminating seeds

How much is that doggy in the window…
The one with the waggly tail…

Jamie saw a doggy in the storefront window. What did Jamie want?

Some would quickly answer, “the doggy”. Yet the intersecting answer would be “the window”.  Windows look out unto the world. They are (sometimes) pretty, and oftentimes make you feel less alone….

This is the desire behind design of intelligent machines.
Build a device that has the capacity to not only process and parse vast amounts of data, but attach meaning to it.  #Relevance . Appropriate #context . It is also the flaw in the designing #HaP 's (*Homo as a Platform* ), as it it a reflective design #flaw in itself.

Like a window, each of us looks (I included) outward upon the world with prismatic perceptions.  Taking in our unique views and in turn making decisions based upon informed (and uninformed) analysis of the data. Once again, a flaw in the design becomes apparent, as the light from the data being provided has to have an originating source.  A neural base of #values  and understanding for what is right and wrong, good or bad. For what is immediately seen and what has yet to be seen from introspection.

So then, as we are adults, with responsibilities to untold generational changes before us…. Ask!

Are we providing a window, or just wagging the dog?

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #HaP   #essaybyowen  
INSTL 011 — disseminating seeds
2
1
Owen Ellis's profile photo
Add a comment...
 
Play At Your Own Risk
Introduction - Where do I begin?

Hello seems a good place to begin, as that is always where it begins, right? Maybe…. The difficulty one faces is always with introductions is one I face. Here, in writing, or elsewhere. It is that first awkward moment, where I attempt to say who I am, why I am here, and add a blurb or three of some significant or insignificant facts about myself.

That Awkward Moment
I face the awkward moment head on, attracted by the profusion of color. This is similar to my very first day of school, and I know — I will be schooled. I stand at the entry of what is proclaimed to be an exciting evolution to who I am as a person, if I can only get past my wariness and discomfort of describing myself to unknown others I see happily scurrying about on the playground before me.

all that is filled with colours can be deception in the making…
The colours of this world draw me closer to making the jump. Still, I must first accomplish a few simple tasks. Find a photo ( #selfie ) and add a few short words. Perhaps something whimsical? Maybe a proclamation of where I have lived and my educational accomplishments? I mustn't forget to add in the badges of honor I have amassed in my profession as well.

Then some advice from the other side of the fence was whispered from an unknown source:

“This is your story. If it is empty or lacking you are telling the playground community, and the world, that you are not very interesting and not worth befriending (a follow).  *Change this now!*”

Question: Is writing an effective introduction indicative of many challenges to gain entry and participate within a social environment?

NOTE:
You can follow the link to read the conclusion. This is part of the play at your own risk: The Series; an anthology of and provided by the author - and the experiences which ensued while attempting to Play Nice In The Sandbox.

~ owen

#payor002   #essaybyowen  
Introduction — Where do I begin?
2
Add a comment...
 
A Foolish (Fools) Endeavor
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 040

Many a time I have sat in a room full of people and more still, scattered across remote locales, who embraced the idea that when a project goes live — it is then and only then, the real joy of the work begins.  That is the defining moment, because in the blink of an eye, you become instantly aware your beloved project needs more work. Not because it was incomplete, or lacked quality. It is the exact opposite.

The creative, intellectual, and science minded grey spaces had produced was some of the best on which I've been fortunate enough to work alongside. It was good because we could test.

Optimize. Discover. Update in real time. Make it better. Iterate.

I hope you'll take the time to read  the balance of the latest edition to the #disseminatingseeds  series. Who knows, you may be surprised by the hand being dealt...

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 040
7
1
Gina Fiedel's profile photoOwen Kane's profile photo
 
I'm still asleep but this is really cool and I'll want to read it again after my caffeine fix.
Add a comment...
 
But Why? (aka Cogs)
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 025

“Why?” Yea. People ask that. Why do you do things for others?  Why do you not look for compensation? What is your angle?

Is it a problem? In all honesty — some days it can be
There is really no angle. There is no real agenda for seeking compensation; but I do not readily dismiss perceived rewards either.

The cogs that go into a collaborative economy
There are actually many parts, but a foundational one is motivation. I simply have come to a point in my life that helping others yields it’s own rewards. That feeling of value in giving back or paying it forward.  It is simply kindness, which is a powerful companion to have when looking in on an otherwise skeptical world.  If I can make someone feel better about a product or service they are providing, and I believe in its value — then their confidence level to move forward is strengthened. It is simply a matter of encouragement.

Cogs in the  #CollaborativeEconomy  
This brings me to another cog; #Value
Value is an awkward thing. Almost a misnomer really,  as value is based upon truth, and #trust . Attention (or how loudly someone/something resonates in my daily stream of data) may bring me to the window. It is the underlying truth, and trust valuation I place after the fact that gets me in the door.  Some relate this to authenticity, and to me — there is a connection. Yet it is only a minor one. I can see an authentic asshole.  *And I leave.* A value based upon trust is a different animal.

When I see others on Google+ as an example, expending vast amounts of time and energy on education others, informing others, bringing a greater value of education to a much larger community — I am empathetic to what it actually takes in time and energy. I see firsthand the truth in what they are portraying, and try it for myself. That is when I begin to trust what they are bringing to the table; to MY table. And I want to help others in the same way I have just been helped.

I am reminded of my youth, being a passenger in my dad’s Austin Healey 3000 Mark III, as we sped across the bi-ways in southern Florida on the way to MacDill Air Force Base. It was a beautiful car back in the mid 1960's. Some thirty plus years later, I was fortunate enough to find one again — and it was my dad’s dream car. So I bought it for him. But that was not enough. The truth is, we both loved the car (for different reasons). We both trusted our instincts in the value it brought to our lives…, the shear joy of driving through the mountains in such a machine. Stock, it came with a walnut veneer dash…, and I changed it. I replaced the veneer with a custom solid black walnut dash —  thereby adding my impression.  My contribution. My uniqueness, and influence (sic).

The same is true today. When I see people such as +David Amerland  , +Ronnie Bincer, +John Kellden, +Christine DeGraff, +John Ellis, +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales and many more spending unimaginable amounts of time and energy bringing a vision to others (like me) and the value, I am inspired. I want to be a part of this. I seek to fulfill that desire by adding in contributory comments, or promoting what they do — and do so through my lens.  *Freely.*

The “other” cog.

“The grand prize I give out every day, is every time someone comments on someone else’s post.”  ~ +John Kellden 

No truer words could be written than this. It resonated deeply with me. Sure I do benefit from what I do for others. It is a feeling of humbled gratification extended to me by others which I in turn desire to pass on. I am NOT by any measurement that I can perceive what is called an “influencer.” No. I just strive to contribute. In my own unique way. Whether it be by expressing an opinion (even if dissenting from the masses), or a piece of graphical representation, or finding a way of advancing the promotion of a product or service I have found value in, and trust that it stands on it’s merits. That feeling of belonging to a community of “givers” has been its reward and the truer compensation I receive.

THAT IS MY WHY.

~ owen

Have you discovered your "WHY"?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
disseminating seeds 025
10
4
Deborah Anne's profile photoGina Fiedel's profile photoLarry Fournillier's profile photoJohn Kellden's profile photo
13 comments
 
Hi +Owen Ellis I live by that phrase and thanks for the kind reference :)
Add a comment...
 
The Back End (Connecting The Dots)
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 020

Now comes the follow up. The boring stuff  encapsulated into the back end behind yesterday’s article, “Vision (Connecting The Dots)”.  In computer science, the front end  is responsible for collecting input in various forms from a user and processing it to conform to a specification the back end  can use. The front end is an interface between the user and the back end.

Written stories are similar in nature,
what is collected by the author in regards to opinion, insight, expertise, conjecture and more (front end), and then through imagination and word play, presented to an audience of readers in a way they can relate to (back end). A method of Connecting The Dots.

On the front end, let’s start with “I am a nerd.”  No, not the trendy geek type — that the world now has an odd affection for. I am the type who has post it notes next to the bed to quickly jot down random thoughts when awoken in the middle of the night. Likewise, I still have my slide rule, pocket protector, and a cassette from one of the very first programs I ever wrote for use in a Wang 2200 in the late nineteen seventies tucked away in a safe deposit box.

Forty Years Later
I am still nerdish; ingesting words and phrases such as #attentioneconomy , authority, leverage, authenticity, and #trust . I tend to read a lot, and watch countless hours of Google HoA’s ( Google+ Hangouts™ On Air), in particular those involving people such as +David Amerland, +John Kellden, +Mark Traphagen, and +martin shervington.

In Real Life, I am also privy to share my home with my fiance, who has worked for over two decades in the financial sector. Many evenings we have discussed this trend of a new economy, where value is placed less upon currency in paper forms (“Benjamins”) and much more on internalized perceptions of validation, whether they be virtual currencies  such as bitcoins, or collaborative barter economics.  My fiance and I also delve into discussions of history from time to time, with Benjamin Franklin being one of our early American favorites.

An Amalgamation of Thoughts
I approach thoughts of Benjamin Franklin from from the perspective of community, and his ability to bring people together of similar interests, aspirations, and endeavors. To connect dots, and in doing so — produce amazing results.

I also, being the nerd that I am, have an affection toward advanced mathematics, complex modelling of data, and the beauty of fractals. Much of my career path was based upon building, coding, and sorting data — then analyzing the results. The biggest challenge comes in finding new ways of making this information understandable and usable in a practical manner for the masses.

The Back End
Putting all of this together, is just a matter of association. And there are masters of this process, and powerful tools to use. It is simply a task of defining relationships, to whatever end that may be. I have a deepening and appreciative respect for those men and women of +CircleCount and +NOD3x — as they supply the tools to understanding these relationships. The weeks, months, and years that go into such tools is one I am familiar with. The passionate drive below the surface (and on the front end of the developers and entrepreneurs) is personally awe inspiring.

The undertaking then is to make use of these tools to build relationships, and foster an ever growing community of interest and value. These tools have allowed me to look at David, John, Mark, and Martin; and to see who they are relating to.  Who they are conversing with. Where the tribes they are joining reside. I venture forward, piecing together a puzzle of amazing thoughts, insights, and wisdom.

Some may say that the world we live in now is being transformed to that of an attention economy. While I understand the premise for this, I would have to interject an alternative. It is relational in both a broad and minute scale. One of the things that attracted me to Google+, was the idea being able to have conversations with people I wanted to meet,  and enjoy dialogues with them. The #value  is that there now have been many, with many more left yet to discover and engage with.

So for me, it is not an attention economy — but a connected dot economy. Yes, a matter of simply Connecting The Dots.

~ owen 

Question: What tools do you use to connect with others, tell your stories, listen and engage - and Connect The Dots?

#connecteddoteconomy   #disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen  
3
Add a comment...
 
Through Value Networks...
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 018

…Opportunity grows. People with good ideas, from vast experiences, and a willingness to share this information — they just tend to hang out with one another.

Verna Allee defines #valuenetworks  as any web of relationships that generates both tangible and intangible value through complex dynamic exchanges between two or more individuals, groups or organizations. Any organization or group of organizations engaged in both tangible and intangible exchanges can be viewed as a value network, whether private industry, government or public sector. (http://goo.gl/TQ9NL4)

Most who have studied history
think of Benjamin Franklin as driven, self-educated, and endlessly inventive — some even consider him to be the quintessential entrepreneur.  The paradox however, is that Franklin was less about being an entrepreneur, and more about networking with others.  He believed that if he brought people together in a relaxed atmosphere and let the conversation flow, opportunities would emerge. He set in motion a trend that the French writer Alexis de Tocqueville noted in Democracy in America, his 1835 classic assessment of the young United States; That nothing was as distinctive about America as its people’s proclivity to form associations around interests, causes, and values.

Fast forward to present day…
…and opportunities abound. I am not saying that they offer unharvested financial contingencies (although these do certainly exist ). I am talking about growth of relationships, or camaraderie, and the realization the impact from a changed geographic density. With this sharing of experiences, #trust  is developed — leading to further sharing of information and opportunity.

I have been the recipient of these opportunities
And with them — I grow. I sit this evening and reflect on recent interactions with +Gina Fiedel, +Grizwald Grim, +Charles Payet, +Colin Walker, and +Doug Breitbart. Each coming from differing venues, and brought together in unique interactions within Google+. And I am in a dumbstruck, OMFGWTF daze (which is not a bad place to be).

I sat this morning and enjoyed the blissful ruminations of Gina and I was right there with her. Beside her. Feeling the same awe inspiring moments of discovery. She even asked if one felt that the same discovery process was changing me. Changing US as a community and a tribe. I found I was at a loss for words as I struggled to find adequate adjectives to just simply say: YES, I am changed and changing. (http://goo.gl/y7huU0)

Grizwald challenged me in a manner I could never possibly express a humble appreciation for. Now I am tasked with moving from confrontational debate, to that of open, inclusional discussion and comparing notes. Of collaborative desire, and wanting much more. (http://goo.gl/Jr8V2I)

Charles brought a reminder of the need for peace. The value of #mindfulness , and acceptance to live in the moment — absorbing and rejoicing in the experience, and the folly of distraction. This was a catalyst for me to unplug. Live for other simple moments, thus enjoying more completely the time spent on each task, challenge, and moment of relaxation. (http://goo.gl/QQvZdN)

Colin gently reminded me that I must never be afraid or even ashamed to turn around and retrace my steps. The lesson in humility is one to understand stoicism is founded on walking so far down any particular path that it is impossible to turn.  *Rigidity forever be damned!*

And Doug. With his whimsical wit and sense of humor, he welcomed me with open arms to the land where I am embraced with the warmth of the sunny skies, the refreshing and intoxicating drink of vast knowledge, and that the land of the living was one of giving and sharing among all.

None of these experiences, and many more, would have been possible if it hadn't been for some simple foundational truths. As +David Amerland states in his new book, Google+ Hangouts™ For Business:

“We are hardwired to connect with those we trust, and this hardwiring has led to a constant push for greater interaction and connection on the web.”

Of course, I cannot leave out +martin shervington, who earlier this very day reminded me that “The model [of Google+] is, have conversations where people notice you.”

So as I close out the evening, I am reminded of the phrase, “Chance favors the connected mind.” The ability to connect your mind, as Benjamin Franklin did, is now abundantly clear in Google+. There is, in fact, endless opportunities for growth of all kinds within this valued network. It is just a matter of connecting with others.

~ owen

Question: Are you still finding untold opportunities for growth in Google+?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   
disseminating seeds 018
11
Joe Corneli's profile photoAlex Gagnon's profile photoColin Kilburn's profile photoMichael Josefowicz's profile photo
16 comments
 
that made me smile :)
Add a comment...
 
What If They Held A War…
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 017

What if they held a war..., …nobody came?
Connectedness and virtualized social networks are a place of war. But not in the traditional sense, although some may want it to stay that way as individuals and entities fight for your attention and your dollars. At the very least, they offer a battleground of debate — with each side meticulously preparing for the ensuing confrontation of ideas and ideologies.

Maybe Not
The real war waging is one behind the scenes in myself, and in the minds of every one of the other people I encounter online. It is also a battle of taking responsibility for changing ones own thoughts and perspectives when needed.

I believe to some extent, that we are hard-wired to look after our family and friends. I also believe that nepotism has produced both positive and negative results in everything from ancient Chinese clans to Renaissance papal lineages and American families like the Gores, Kennedys, and Bushes. But practiced badly or haphazardly, nepotism is just plainly embarrassing to everyone.

Networked Singularities
Perhaps, it is simply a matter of #unlearning  those lessons of failing systems. Of no longer measuring by #winloss  ratios. The other day, I wrote about Opportunities and Obligations (http://goo.gl/kiWNN1),  in which I held firmly to the belief and #value  of debate, especially in those worlds of social layers and networks. I did so, simply as I was finding myself annoyed at a growing number of interactions online where groups of people were busily extolling “at-a-boys” rather than asking difficult questions, or advancing continued (and sometimes heated) debate of critical challenges humanity was facing.

As I brought this piece into a growing community (http://goo.gl/qmUK1A) within Google+, I was greeted by a response I did not expect. I had written, “…And ultimately it will be paid by the blood, sweat, and tears of debate and disagreement.”  In a singular response came, “What an unpleasant belief to carry around.”

“WTF kind of response is that?,”  I muttered, as I prepared to defend my position with vim and vigor and certainty while I crafted a response. A short series of exchages ensued. I felt as my points were being met by a worthy adversary…, and then ... Everything changed.

“…my pressing desire is to lay down the podium, pull over a couple of chairs, and use it [the podium] as a coffee table. Have a seat Owen Ellis.”  ~ +Grizwald Grim 

“Huh? Coffee? We are in the midst of a debate???,” I questioned. In the blink of an eye, the debate ended. What came after was the transformation process [for me] in moving from the ‘this or that’ of debate to an advancement of communicative inclusion. Of comparing notes, of discussion over a virtual cup of coffee — and in his words “…more advanced communication enabling the result of ‘and’….”

A friend of great wisdom directed me to think of social layers as a beautiful lawn. He asked me what it took to get the lawn to its level of magnificence, and then asked me what the role was for each individual blade of grass?Obviously, a foundation of seed and rich dirt with the proper nutrients had to be laid. Then came the tendered and proper care. But each blade? How was I to answer that? The answer was provided by Grizwald, in the simple act of humility coupled with the offering of coffee.

This new architecture of social networks radically changes the Internet and human interaction because it allows the coexistence of different ideologies and experiences to run at the same time over the same virtual substrate. And lessons to be learned. No longer do I need to step up to a podium, or attend a strategic war [debate] planning party.

The wars are still being offered, but I am not going to be an attendee.
Thank You Grizwald.

~ owen

Question: Are you still hampered by war-like preparations when approaching social networks? Or are you being transformed?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   
disseminating seeds 017
8
2
Owen Ellis's profile photoVolker Harbecke's profile photoHeidi Bouman's profile photoGrizwald Grim's profile photo
22 comments
 
Always like a bit of detective work +Owen Ellis, apologies not needed :)
Add a comment...
 
Yet To Be Determined
AUTHENTIC ME: Deprogramming

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives."
- John Lennon

Imagine how the world might look if you could actually step back and observe the world today from an objective viewpoint. Since you are already an part of an evolved and sensitive species, you might record the following:

Humanity appear to be creatures of routine — a large majority wake up before they have rested sufficiently, needing a loud sounding device to prematurely stir them from their slumber, and a liquid stimulant to force them into unnatural alertness. They then get into small metal and poly-fiber vehicles, which emit toxic gasses and were assembled by and on mix of robotic and perceptually undervalued workers.

A larrg portion of humanity takes these small vehicles to smaller, sterile cubicles, where they stare as a small rectangular screen for hours, pressing buttons, with minimal time allotted to eat.

For their time in front of the screen, they receive tokens (some may have their own private cubicle and receive more tokens than the rest,) which they exchange for shelter (which is left empty most of the day, while they go off and earn the tokens which obtained it in the first place).

Other items of interest requiring tokens are packaged food of mostly poor quality and various large unnecessary upgrades to their stronghold of possessions, the desire for which is stimulated by large rectangular screens in their shelters, for which they exchange a large amount of tokens willingly.

On these screens (which most humans watch, mesmerized, for hours at a time, when they are not staring at the screen in the cubicle) they see images designed to simulate reality (a form of entertainment which has all but replaced the experience of reality) and stimulate covetousness, which seems to mesmerize them into exchanging their hard-earned tokens for items which appear to have social significance for them.

Such probing strikes close to home:
As every socially functional person is aware, there is no escape from the need to conform to the all-consuming demand of the token.  And so those who do put forth the effort to work are forced to ennoble their enslavement, calling it a good hard day’s work.

Though hard work is seen as virtuous,
there is a stickier truth surrounding this truth, which is more convenient to ignore.

If we are able to be an objective observer
We might have read up on the nature of cult indoctrination,  discovering the correlation of what writer Bettina Drew observes, “[…] there are similarities between [corporate] indoctrination and what’s thought of as organizational brainwashing.”

In her interesting article on the mind control techniques of cults, writer Amy Sillup  (http://goo.gl/J9wmhu) elaborates: “The victim must first be isolated from society, so that the cult or other coercive entity need not compete with outside influences. Access to outside information must be eliminated or at least rigidly controlled; the information is then reinterpreted according to the precepts of the cult. Questions from the victim are not be tolerated, nor are replies given.”

During the early isolation period, certain psychological pressure or even physical torture techniques are usually employed. These measures can include […] sleep deprivation […] humiliation […] and constant repetition of indoctrinating ideas. 

Repetitive tasks may be assigned to dull the senses and reasoning skills, while also hastening the breakdown of the will. Threats of violence, death, or destruction of the victim’s soul if s/he rebels against the “groupthink”( #hivemind ) are frequently utilized. A period of punishment followed by the doling out of small rewards or privileges keeps the victim off-balance.” 

Another look at history reveals:
[During the advent of the industrial revolution] gin carts filled the street of London, numbing the dehumanizing pain of mindless factory work into submission. The 1800′s lacquered workforce lubricated the march of industry […] As the efficiency of industrialized society produced more free time, the gin cart became television. This new lubricant oiled things into the late 20th century.

Suddenly, in the role of objective observer,
The sensitive and saddened anthropologist role would have to report that humanity has essentially cornered itself into having to conform to an insane system, where they are required to spend the majority of their lives gritting their teeth through joyless activities to earn tokens to support their enslaved existence.

It appears humanity has built a society where, in order to survive, they [we] must, in effect, build our own cages, even paying to consume our own propaganda.

If one is to look back and researched earth’s database of great philosophers, the objective observer might compare the current situation of the humanity to the allegory of the cave, Plato‘s wisdom seeming more penetratingly apt now than ever.

It appears, none the less, that some individuals¹ are not entirely hypnotized. They still feel and turn inward to the private flickering of their dreams, which whisper of possibilities greater than the reality before them.

In an odd response, humanity may then brings about the ability to see the shadows on the walls for what they are and turn away, leaving the cave for the sunshine of fresh thought.

While I have had prior conversations with +Grizwald Grim about the nature of debate being combative,  there is still a value in which the battle and debate within the mind is The Great Redeemer. It is here, under fire and crucible and continual challenge, where all of humanity has the capacity of equality as well as advancement.

In this place, one acknowledges that with passivity NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE It is also the place, where the armor of courage is forged to change oneself  as well as challenge the status quo with honest reflection, courage to face the caveat emptor  indoctrination of past generations, and venture forward with vision and innovation of thought. 

“The world we see that seems so insane is the result of a belief system that is not working. To perceive the world differently, we must be willing to change our belief system, let the past slip away, expand our sense of now, and dissolve the fear in our minds.”  — William James

So as your Sunday morning begins,
I leave you with a familiar tune rising slowly in the depths of your subconscious memories and the thought that today could be The Same Ol' Song And Dance  or it could be something Different.

THAT IS YET TO BE DETERMINED

fate comes a-knockin', doors start lockin'
your old time connection, change your direction
ain't gonna change it, can't rearrange it
can't stand the pain when it's all the same to you, my friend ♫

~ owen

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   #satiricalsmoothie  

---------------------------------

¹Noted Individuals Include (but not limited to ): +David Amerland, +John Kellden, +Imran Sq, +Alex Schleber, +Ron Scroggin, +Gina Fiedel, +Grizwald Grim, +Alter Sewn, +Alexandra Riecke-Gonzales+Iblis Bane
13
Alex Schleber's profile photoAlexandra Riecke-Gonzales's profile photoOwen Ellis's profile photoGina Fiedel's profile photo
23 comments
 
+Alex Schleber - thanks for the earlier references (which I will happily be looking at today). As it is 2AM (local), it is now time to begin another day, as the balance of yesterday was spent in more noble of pursuits (gardening).

Alas, one has to commune and "connect with what is truly natural  in order to feel connected"  ;-)
Add a comment...
 
An Experimental Game
disseminating seeds: The Series - INSTL 039

“The student finds no means of involvement for himself and cannot discover how the educational scheme relates to his mythic world of electronically processed data and experience that his clear and direct responses report.”  — M. McLuhan

It begins simply enough, as most experiments do. A question:
What haven’t you noticed lately?

This is really an odd question, because, how can you notice that which you haven’t yet noticed? And if, as I am proposing to you, this is a key question for awareness in our complex interconnected society, even if we answer it once, how can we consistently continue to answer it? The famous saying that the Medium is the Message must now be countered with “The Medium Is A Mess.”

We are now equipped with both a visual and acoustic space that is expanding exponentially, as we make every attempt to find a commonality, a means, of absorbing the vast flow of data — and attach significant meaning thereto.

“One thing about which fish know exactly nothing is water, since they have no anti-environment which would enable them to perceive the element they live in.”  It is only when it is pulled from the water that the fish becomes acutely aware of its former environment. The challenge in achieving the awareness to notice the formerly unnoticed — what can be termed achieving “integral awareness” of a total environment — is to create an appropriate “anti-environment.”

Those who sharpen our skills
At absorption and observation are likewise perceived at times as anti-social in approach. Rarely accepted on the surface as “well-adjusted,” they are unable to go along with currents and trends. A strange bond often exists among antisocial types in their power to see environments as they really are — complete with what works and what doesn't. It simply comes as a natural state of curiosity, unadulterated from “Top 10 Methods to Succeed” models and practices of a mechanization era in it’s waning years.

This need to interface,
to confront environments with a certain antisocial power, is manifest in the famous story, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” “Well-adjusted” courtiers, having vested interests, saw the Emperor as beautifully appointed. Due to these vested interests, the new models of operating in an Attention Economy become bound to a currency of obedience.  Originated upon unique insights and experiences, they become mutated by follower counts and other metrics to prove validity,  and once accepted by a broader base —  this obedience currency becomes disingenuous and paradoxically less valuable. It also becomes problematic when influence, using the currency of obedience, is wielded blindly and haphazardly — extolling real life economic hardships brought by the acceptance of hivemind or group think acceptance from “The Emperor(s)” perceived  superiority.

The Challenge
The challenge was simple enough. Describe a relatively well known lab rat (in this case, +David Amerland, author of Google™ Semantic Search and the newest book, Google+ Hangouts™ for Business) within the social setting of Google+. The instructions were simple;

Comment, share, or reshare however you like. The only thing asked is that you use #davidintwowords  hashtag and then two words of your choosing (Hashtags preferred but not required as emoticons are also an option)

Three Days Later — The Results
Collectively, we tend to notice many things. In fact, we’re very good at noticing what is entirely obvious, to the extent that we often become obsessively focused on it. This is dangerously easy to do because in our world of instantaneous communications, everyone is vying for the most precious and valuable commodity to be sought — our attention.  If attention is the most valuable commodity, our most valued asset, it may be said that the most valuable personal skill to be effective these days is ignorance, literally ignore-ance — the ability to selectively and paradoxically ignore  that which is irrelevant or merely distracting within the Googol Globe — and attach meaning in a anti-social means.

That very same “antisocial” mindset, fighting against the current stream of the old environment modeling, clearly saw that the Emperors “ain’t got nothin’ on.” Yes — The new environment was clearly visible, and in this context, ignorance was not bliss — it was the practical manifestation of acute awareness and heightened perception (by attachment of simple yet meaningful labels and descriptions outside of the noise stream generated by digital distribution experts ). The results were wide and varied, from examples of poetry, to the asking of questions such as “What’s the word for ‘cares about the little guys’?”. While some did add short as well as lengthy descriptions, others used very personal adjectives such as “kind-to-all,” and still others responded with untold complexities in the form of unique hashtag combinations ( #HermesTrismegistus ). [A downloadable Adobe pdf of the experiment is available here: http://goo.gl/H1y7Lh ]

Conclusion
What then can be derived from such an experiment? Simply stated: What haven’t you noticed lately?

You have all noticed globalization and internationalism as the initial result of our ability to communicate instantly — anywhere and at anytime. You then noticed cultural diversity around the world and the need to localize media and content for indigenous markets. In short, you have noticed the world as it was.

The challenge with which we are now faced is to begin to notice the world as it evolves, as it truly is.   Not a list of top ten methods of conducting business by methods of bygone eras at all.  Globalism does not mean the end of indigenous culture, or the imposition of a mono-culture, but the emergence of new cultural forms. It does not mean the end of nations, or the imposition of a one-world government, but the emergence of trans-national institutions and ad-hoc organizations founded on relationships and reflexivity. It does not mean an end to localization, but the need to re-examine its underlying assumptions in light of the complexities, ambiguities and paradoxes that characterize the global citizen that lives anywhere and everywhere at precisely the same time.  *NOW.*

And Globalism of Communication within the NEW MEDIUM of Social Arenas means one more thing.

IT MEANS NOTICING

~ owen

What are you noticing? Are you empowering yourself with IGNORE-ance?

#disseminatingseeds   #essaybyowen   #davidintwowords  
disseminating seeds 039
12
2
Charles Payet's profile photoTeodora Petkova's profile photoGrizwald Grim's profile photoCherie Manifest's profile photo
8 comments
 
I may have to read this a few more times to grasp all that you are conveying here +Owen Ellis .... Here's where it takes me ...

Notice what you notice, notice what you don't notice, notice what you do or don't do once you've noticed ... notice what made you notice, why it made you notice and how it invites you to notice what you are now noticing :-)
Add a comment...