- Renewable EnergyArchitecture PhotographyArticles To Get You ThinkingStar TrekVR & GamesSoccerEnvironmental DesignBasketballThe Ancient WorldGenealogyDoodling & DrawingIrelandSci-FiAndroidJapanBeautiful BritainRetrocomputingMilitary HistoryNorse Mythology80's and 90's Pop CultureLandscapingThe World of Maps and NavigationWoodworkingAmazing EarthChessThe Global EconomyToy Models & CraftsArtificial Intelligence & RoboticsWeddingsCookingCoffee & TeaCats and Dogs
Post has attachment
WhatsApp Messenger beta
https://www.testingcatalog.com/project/amp/103
2.18.121
No new changelogs
#wa #whatsapp #wabeta #social #messenger
https://www.testingcatalog.com/project/amp/103
2.18.121
No new changelogs
#wa #whatsapp #wabeta #social #messenger
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
What you eat can have a negative impact on your memory, cognitive function, and emotional health. Check out some of the worst foods for your brain and heart, which you should stop consuming right now.
https://www.hownutrition.info/5-foods-can-trigger-stroke/
https://www.hownutrition.info/5-foods-can-trigger-stroke/
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Google Photos is working on a more powerful movie editor expected to come in future updates- Technology News, Firstpost
Post has attachment
Best Natural #SourcesOfAntioxidants for Healthy Body and Skin!
Majority of the times people resort to artificial food sources which are available in the form of medicines, without being aware of the presence of abundant natural sources of antioxidants. If you wish to have a healthy body and glowing skin, then you must incorporate antioxidant-rich foods in your daily diet.
This article will enlighten you about some naturally occurring foods that can be a great source of antioxidants for your body, particularly your skin. - https://floradress.com/best-natural-sources-antioxidants/
Majority of the times people resort to artificial food sources which are available in the form of medicines, without being aware of the presence of abundant natural sources of antioxidants. If you wish to have a healthy body and glowing skin, then you must incorporate antioxidant-rich foods in your daily diet.
This article will enlighten you about some naturally occurring foods that can be a great source of antioxidants for your body, particularly your skin. - https://floradress.com/best-natural-sources-antioxidants/
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Brewing up Earth’s earliest life | #Geology #GeologyPage
Around 4 billion years ago, Earth was an inhospitable place, devoid of oxygen, bursting with volcanic eruptions, and bombarded by asteroids, with no signs of life in even the simplest forms.
Read more : http://www.geologypage.com/2018/04/brewing-up-earths-earliest-life.html
Around 4 billion years ago, Earth was an inhospitable place, devoid of oxygen, bursting with volcanic eruptions, and bombarded by asteroids, with no signs of life in even the simplest forms.
Read more : http://www.geologypage.com/2018/04/brewing-up-earths-earliest-life.html
Post has attachment
New research examines what goes on in the brain when people perform a task in front of an audience versus when they are not being watched. #NeurologyNeuroscience
Post has attachment
The Google Play Store Has Lax Quality Control and Malware Prevention, Across the Board, Because of Lack of Attention to Fundamentals
1. Applications are not required to have unique names.
2. Application names as they are used to sort lists of names and as they appear in menus, or identifiers are not equal.
3. Applications are allowed to use special characters in names which makes identification difficult.
...
n>10,000
1. Applications are not required to have unique names.
2. Application names as they are used to sort lists of names and as they appear in menus, or identifiers are not equal.
3. Applications are allowed to use special characters in names which makes identification difficult.
...
n>10,000
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Aduana Coach Calls For Support From Ghanaians - The head coach of Aduana stars football club, Coach Yusif Abubakar has called on Ghanaians to support the club as they continue their journey in Africa. Coach Abubakar made this plea today whiles addressing a few media personnel who were at the Kotoko International Airport today when they landed In Accra from Madagascar. The Dormaa club went away to play their second leg match versus ...
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Interesting legal facts:
1) The Constitution never mentions a darn thing about removing appointed officials.
2) The interpretation since forever is that if you can appoint, you certainly can remove.
3) But can you directly remove someone you didn't directly appoint, your appointee appointed them? This "removal of indirect appointments" might not have been litigated since 1839, but the answer appears to be "no".
4) There have been a number of court cases about whether and how Congress can limit the preexisting "removal of direct appointments" power. This is a different question that sometimes gets confused in discussions. Briefly the answer is "sometimes, it depends."
5) Another question is whether, assuming the President has "removal of indirect appointees" power, that's limited by the DOJ regulations saying the AG needs good cause to remove Mueller. The answer appears to be "maybe, but if so he can alter the regulations."
Looking at this item (3), of whether skip-level removal power exists, and setting aside (4) and (5) about how laws and regulations could affect it --
https://www.justsecurity.org/54727/once-again-trump-cant-fire-mueller/
Lederman says Trump can't legally fire Mueller, and comments "I am unaware of any case in all of American history in which a president has attempted personally to remove an inferior officer appointed by someone other than the president himself." Nixon didn't try it, for example.
Lederman opens with Ex parte Hennen (1839), and basically closes with it too.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/38/230.html
which said the President can't fire court clerks, and Lederman glosses to all inferior officers. That generalization isn't obvious to me, but it appears to be recent good law, as of 2010 (PCAOB v. FEF). Lederman found Hennen in a brief filed very recently by the current Justice Department, which summarizes its position:
> The President is accordingly authorized under our constitutional system to remove all principal officers, as well as all “inferior Officers” he has appointed. Other “inferior Officers,” whose appointments have been vested in “the Heads of Departments,” may be removed by those Department Heads ...
Charmingly, the top name on this brief is Noel Francisco, who would be in line to supervise Mueller if Rosenstein is fired. (Since Rachel Brand has no confirmed replacement. But apparently it's merely "DOJ practice" that her acting replacement wouldn't be in the line of succession?)
Any lawyers in the house, is this pretty settled law since 1839, or is there uncertainty in how the courts would rule? I believe there are "unitary executive" proponents who essentially say the President is the entire executive branch, but I haven't found their legal position laid out -- is Hennen bad law, or has it been overapplied (e.g. in PCAOB), and why? Why doesn't the Appointments Clause (says Congress controls who has the power of appointment) already say this isn't "unitary" like that?
1) The Constitution never mentions a darn thing about removing appointed officials.
2) The interpretation since forever is that if you can appoint, you certainly can remove.
3) But can you directly remove someone you didn't directly appoint, your appointee appointed them? This "removal of indirect appointments" might not have been litigated since 1839, but the answer appears to be "no".
4) There have been a number of court cases about whether and how Congress can limit the preexisting "removal of direct appointments" power. This is a different question that sometimes gets confused in discussions. Briefly the answer is "sometimes, it depends."
5) Another question is whether, assuming the President has "removal of indirect appointees" power, that's limited by the DOJ regulations saying the AG needs good cause to remove Mueller. The answer appears to be "maybe, but if so he can alter the regulations."
Looking at this item (3), of whether skip-level removal power exists, and setting aside (4) and (5) about how laws and regulations could affect it --
https://www.justsecurity.org/54727/once-again-trump-cant-fire-mueller/
Lederman says Trump can't legally fire Mueller, and comments "I am unaware of any case in all of American history in which a president has attempted personally to remove an inferior officer appointed by someone other than the president himself." Nixon didn't try it, for example.
Lederman opens with Ex parte Hennen (1839), and basically closes with it too.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/38/230.html
which said the President can't fire court clerks, and Lederman glosses to all inferior officers. That generalization isn't obvious to me, but it appears to be recent good law, as of 2010 (PCAOB v. FEF). Lederman found Hennen in a brief filed very recently by the current Justice Department, which summarizes its position:
> The President is accordingly authorized under our constitutional system to remove all principal officers, as well as all “inferior Officers” he has appointed. Other “inferior Officers,” whose appointments have been vested in “the Heads of Departments,” may be removed by those Department Heads ...
Charmingly, the top name on this brief is Noel Francisco, who would be in line to supervise Mueller if Rosenstein is fired. (Since Rachel Brand has no confirmed replacement. But apparently it's merely "DOJ practice" that her acting replacement wouldn't be in the line of succession?)
Any lawyers in the house, is this pretty settled law since 1839, or is there uncertainty in how the courts would rule? I believe there are "unitary executive" proponents who essentially say the President is the entire executive branch, but I haven't found their legal position laid out -- is Hennen bad law, or has it been overapplied (e.g. in PCAOB), and why? Why doesn't the Appointments Clause (says Congress controls who has the power of appointment) already say this isn't "unitary" like that?
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
When it comes to healthy-looking skin, what you put in your body may matter more than what you put on it. Here's what to eat for glowing skin.
http://www.healthyvogue.com/5-foods-best-glowing-skin/
http://www.healthyvogue.com/5-foods-best-glowing-skin/
Post has attachment
Post has attachment
Maintaining a well-balanced, healthy diet is key in protecting vision health. It may reduce your risk from developing serious eye conditions, including cataract, glaucoma, dry eyes, poor night vision, age-related macular degeneration, etc. Here are five best foods for your eyes.
http://www.herbsmedicines.com/eat-5-foods-improve-eyesight/
http://www.herbsmedicines.com/eat-5-foods-improve-eyesight/
Post has attachment
Deal: These True Wireless Earbuds Are Only $27.99 With This Code
#android #deals #sale #discounts #coupons
#android #deals #sale #discounts #coupons
Post has attachment
Why Donald Trump Denies Saying All Haitians Have Aids - Donald Trump 39;s careless talks always come back to haunt him Apart from Donald Trump 39;s tweets that often come back to haunt him, he has denied vehemently what he had previously said. His latest denial is saying everyone from Haiti 39;has Aids 39; and that Nigerian immigrants would never 39;go back to their huts. 39; The New York Times reveals that two anonymous offici ...
Post has attachment
Linux vs Message Queues and benchmarking
http://the-linux-channel.the-toffee-project.org/index.php?page=8-tutorials-research-socket-overhead-in-linux-vs-message-queues-and-benchmarking
http://the-linux-channel.the-toffee-project.org/index.php?page=8-tutorials-research-socket-overhead-in-linux-vs-message-queues-and-benchmarking
Wait while more posts are being loaded