Post is pinned.
I've made this community an ask to join community to mediate the influx of spambots.

Be forewarned any porn or spam like activities in this community will be met with an insta ban, no questions no repeals. We only have 10 months left I'm not going to let this community go into the toilet before then. Keep it classy G+

Keep on topic, science related posts.

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
With Google+ closing:

Data scientists, programmers and analysts are invited to join:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/Hadoopexpert/

Post has attachment
This one is time and place sensitive - you have to be in Australia and it starts today! 7 species for me this morning, how about you?
Aussie Backyard Bird Count
Aussie Backyard Bird Count
aussiebirdcount.org.au

Post has attachment

Post has shared content
Regarding what was mentioned above, my objective is not to reject the hypothesis of abiogenesis, or the formation of a self-replicating protein by some means if the material, conditions, and time are available. In fact, I believe in what the Imams pbut have said, and what cosmologists and biologists predict: that the universe is filled with organisms, and we are not alone. What I wanted to make clear is that abiogenesis is a dilemma that science has not solved, for it hasn't found a way around the problem of the availability of material and conditions suitable for the emergence of life, or let us say, as we believe, the implementation of the first genetic plan, or the seed of the genetic plan, out of inorganic chemical substances that evolved until it reached its purpose: the human being, and the human genetic plan.
In conclusion, there is no hypothesis of scientific value to explain the emergence of life on the earth in a logical and acceptable way without postulating the occurrence of things that are scientifically impossible. Therefore, there is a logical and acceptable opportunity, at least up to this point, to assume the intervention of a god along with the unseen aspect in order to explain abiogenesis alongside those unlikely, or quasi-impossible-to-occur hypotheses.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Photo

Post has attachment

Post has shared content
The issue of this evidence (nothingness does not produce) is bigger than terrestrial life, so it is not related to Darwin's theory. We can summarize by saying that "the effect indicates a cause" doesn't mean that every effect indicates God directly but rather, that the chain of effects and causes must end up at an original (old, eternal, and self-existent) cause, because nothingness does not produce. This cause is God Almighty and life on this earth is just a small link in this chain. Consequently, any debate to refute this evidence must be about the origin of matter and proving that it came from nothingness, or nonexistence, This has not been proven by anyone. Actually, scientists have more or less proven that the big bang is the beginning of the physical universe. As a matter of fact, there was a cause behind the big bang. As such, the sequence of causes will continue after it until they end at the original cause, which is God Almighty. God willing, we will discuss next the standard model or the big bang, and how it demonstrates the existence of God.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Photo

Post has shared content
However, the selfish gene theory cannot explain the sacrifice a person is willing to make in order to save a stranger, nor can it explain when someone gives the food or water they need to others, because in such cases, if it results in the demise of the altruist-or at the very least, the inability to multiply his own genes, or it diminishes his chances-then the genetic loss is greater than the gain regarding the genes he shares with one he rescued or fed, or favored, in general, over himself. To explain this further using numbers: my life is equivalent to a one hundred percent transfer and survival of my functioning genes, whereas the life of a stranger is equivalent to the transfer of a portion of my functioning genes, the genes we have in common, which is about five percent, so losing my life clearly means a greater loss of survival of my genes. Therefore the selfish gene theory is not able to explain these types of altruism in which genes of the altruist lose in a significant way. The explanation for this type of altruistic behavior cannot be based on gene selfishness. In addition, reciprocal altruism is not genuine altruism. Since it is a favored evolutionary strategy, it is expected to become prevalent when there is a need for it, as is the case with some animals that groom each other, or vampire bats regurgitating food for their neighbors, because the gene pool that carries its genes will be favored by selection and will inevitably prevail. The gene pool that does not carry this type of reciprocal altruism will leave the competitive race because the fate of the members of its species will be extinction. For example, vampire bats cannot survive more than two days without food, and reciprocal altruism is a lifeline for the numerous individuals who do not find food on a given night. Because of this, reciprocal altruism is a lifeline for the species as a whole, so it is certainly favored by natural selection. Generally, reciprocal altruism is well accounted for by science.
For more and detailed information on this, we recommend you to read the Atheism Delusion written by Ahmed Al-Hasan.
Read online: www.saviorofmankind.com/Atheism_Delusion
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Ahmed.Alhasan.10313
Facebook: www.facebook.com/The.Atheism.Delusion
Website: www.saviorofmankind.com
book introduction :www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFRTd_PAckw&feature=youtu.be #atheism #Ahmed_Alhasan
#savior_of_mankind
#science
#God
#Hawking
#Dawkins
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded