At the risk of stirring up enmity between two people I admire and respect, I am going to test the claim of my friend +Adam Balm
that discussion of Bitcoin Unlimited gets "moderated" ("censored" is such an ugly word) from this community, while also testing the counter-claim by +Avatar X
that it does not.
First, here is a link to the Bitcoin Unlimited site: https://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/
Next, a link to the race between the supporters of Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoin Classic and Segregated Witness (Segwit), which Adam sent me earlier. It clearly shows BTCU in the lead, implying that whoever wins the block size dispute will fork the network. https://coin.dance/blocks
Really, I don't have a dog in the fight. I know less about Bitcoin Unlimited right now than I do about SegWit, so this will be a chance to educate myself about the advantages and disadvantages, and to prepare for a hard fork if that's what's going to happen.
What I don't like to see is two friends (albeit people I only know through this site) accusing one another of deceit, censorship, and libel. Come on, guys. We are stronger as allies than we are as adversaries.