Post has attachment
6/16/17 - Before the victims had even been seen by the doctor… it began. Within an hour, they were calling for gun control. But these same people were NOT calling for border control after San Bernardino. Weird, huh? The narrative always changes depending who gets hurt, and who’s holding the gun.

Post has attachment
The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights.The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
Photo

Post has attachment
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
Photo

Post has attachment
Right to Keep and Bear Arms Secures the Right of Revolution - The presentation of the draft of the Declaration of Independence in Trumbull's Declaration of Independence depicts another idealization of the exercise of the right of revolution. On the eve of the American Revolution, for example, Americans considered their plight to justify exercise of the right of revolution. Alexander Hamilton justified American resistance as an expression of “the law of nature” redressing violations of “the first principles of civil society” and invasions of “the rights of a whole people.”
Photo

Post has attachment
"[T]he principal aim of society is to protect individuals in the enjoyment of those absolute rights, which were vested in them by the immutable laws of nature, but which could not be preserved in peace without that mutual assistance and intercourse which is gained by the institution of friendly and social communities. Hence it follows, that the first and primary end of human laws is to maintain and regulate these absolute rights of individuals. http://files.libertyfund.org/pll/quotes/215.html

Photo

Post has attachment
Raging Against Self Defense: A Psychiatrist Examines the Anti-Gun Mentality. "You don’t need to have a gun; the police will protect you." "I’m a pacifist. Enlightened, spiritually aware people shouldn’t own guns." How often have you heard these statements from misguided advocates of victim disarmament, or even woefully uninformed relatives and neighbors? How can you communicate with these people who seem to be out of touch with reality and rational thought? One approach is to understand their psychological processes. http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm


Photo

Post has attachment
The Seven Varieties of Gun Control Advocate - Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. We need to question their motives and mentalities. Weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty. http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/jp_seven.htm
Photo

Post has attachment
Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser. People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable. http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/marko.htm
Photo

Post has attachment
There is a way to test the sanity of your family, friends, and neighbors. You simply observe their reaction to this essay. If they “get it”, they are “curable,” or were mentally healthy in the first place. They may deserve the freedom that has been delivered to them on the blood of our forefathers. A while back I sent this essay to eight friends. Two of them actually mocked it. Sadly, those two people are “incurable.” Their common sense, their very self respect as human beings, has been bred out of them by our perverse, victim factory culture. http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/marko.htm
Photo

Post has attachment
When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gangbanger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender. http://jpfo.org/articles-assd02/marko.htm
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded