Post is pinned.Post has attachment
#Assange, #Manning Still Only Ones Imprisoned for #CollateralMurder -- http://sputniknews.com/us/20150407/1020551329.html

April 5 marked the five-year anniversary of the release of the Collateral Murder video by #WikiLeaks. The shocking footage showed the entire world the 2007 US Apache attack helicopter airstrike on Baghdad that killed 12 people - including two Reuters staff members - and injured two small children.

Post has attachment
Despite widespread speculation a few months ago that #WikiLeaks founder Julian #Assange may be kicked out of the Ecuadorian embassy by the country’s new leadership, his asylum seems to be safe for now, his lawyer told RT.

In recent months, Ecuador has made it clear that the asylum granted to Assange would not be revoked, Jennifer Robinson, a long-time lawyer for the activist, said. But he remains cut off from all communication and kept in what is effectively solitary confinement with no access to outdoor areas.

His health is deteriorating, and the UK authorities have made sure that he won’t get treatment without leaving the embassy, she said.

Post has attachment
Nobody has heard from cybersecurity expert and occasional #Wikileaks collaborator #ArjenKamphuis since he checked out of his hotel in Bodo, Norway one month ago.

In the intervening weeks, items purportedly belonging to Kamphuis, including his ID and a recently purchased kayak, were discovered by a local fisherman 50 kilometers from his hotel.

While this would at first seem to suggest some type of fatal accident, in a strange twist, authorities say that both Kamphuis' work and mobile phones were briefly switched on more than 1,700 km from Bodo 10 days after Kamphuis - who is Dutch and was purportedly traveling back to Amsterdam when he disappeared - was seen leaving his hotel.

Post has attachment
Ray McGovern on Russiagate, Iran, Trump --

Sep 7, 2018: Here are links/URLs to a couple of videos, a couple of hours worth of really good interviewing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzwyY66P7cc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F71mtPKbYwo

Here is a few truths told in this interview:

The State Department’s Assistant Secretary and head of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) C. Thomas Fingar saved the US from making war on Iran during the AWOL Bush year, because he was able to tell the press that America’s intelligence agencies knew Iran had not been working on building a nuclear weapon since 2003 when they stopped doing so. Therefore the question we need to think about is why has the-Trumpster placed sanctions on Iran?
Here is part of what was talked about in the above interview.

Journalist James Risen uncovered the illegal NSA wiretapping approved by the Bush Jr. administration (without probable cause). Here is a link to that story.
https://www.newsweek.com/whistleblower-who-exposed-warrantless-wiretaps-82805
While Bush was running for re-election in 2004. Bill Keller, at the time the executive editor of the New York Times, quashed the story after meeting with Bush. Over a year later (until Dec. 2005) and after Bush won re-election, Keller allowed the story to run, but only after Risen threatened to reveal the story in his book, State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. It’s in that same book he reveals the “bungled CIA operation” (is there any other kind?) that led to Eric Holder chasing him with subpoenas.
And how about Obama?

James Risen said; “A lot of people still think this is some kind of game or signal or spin. They don’t want to believe that Obama (and Attorney General Eric Holder) wants to crack down on the press and whistle-blowers. But he does. He’s the greatest enemy to press freedom in a generation.”

https://www.axios.com/how-james-risen-got-the-nyt-to-publish-his-nsa-bombshell-1515111006-8eeb7160-a6c4-49a9-8a07-c8dc247449c1.html
https://thinkprogress.org/risen-i-may-have-been-a-victim-of-the-nsas-program-spying-on-journalists-83d26365edee/

47% of Democrats view capitalism positively, down from 56% in 2016

These results are from Gallup interviewing conducted July 30-Aug. 5. Views of socialism among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are particularly important in the current political environment because many observers have claimed the Democratic Party is turning in more of a socialist direction.

The current survey is the fourth time Gallup has measured Americans' overall views of capitalism and socialism in this format. The question wording does not define "socialism" or "capitalism" but simply asks respondents whether their opinion of each is positive or negative.

Democrats, by contrast, are less unified in their views, but by 10 percentage points are more positive about socialism than about capitalism.

Fewer Than Half of Young Americans View Capitalism Positively
Americans aged 18 to 29 are as positive about socialism (51%) as they are about capitalism (45%). This represents a 12-point decline in young adults' positive views of capitalism in just the past two years and a marked shift since 2010, when 68% viewed it positively.

Taken as a Whole, Americans More Positive About Capitalism
A majority of Americans have retained a positive view of capitalism over the past eight years, but this year's 56% positive rating is by four points the lowest recorded since 2010. This modest drop in positive attitudes toward capitalism was driven, as reviewed above, by the less positive attitudes among Democrats.
Americans' positive views of socialism have varied only between 35% and 39%, with this year's reading of 37% right at the trend average.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/240725/democrats-positive-socialism-capitalism.aspx?utm_source=facebookbutton&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=sharing

Why didn’t the Senate Committee on the Judiciary prosecute AWOL Bush et al for war crimes, blame Nancy Pelosi. She felt Democrats would win the next election by a bigger number of votes by not doing so.

Post has attachment
Ray McGovern on Russiagate, Iran, Trump --

Sep 7, 2018: Here are links/URLs to a couple of videos, a couple of hours worth of really good interviewing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzwyY66P7cc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F71mtPKbYwo

Here is a few truths told in this interview:

The State Department’s Assistant Secretary and head of the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) C. Thomas Fingar saved the US from making war on Iran during the AWOL Bush year, because he was able to tell the press that America’s intelligence agencies knew Iran had not been working on building a nuclear weapon since 2003 when they stopped doing so. Therefore the question we need to think about is why has the-Trumpster placed sanctions on Iran?
Here is part of what was talked about in the above interview.

Journalist James Risen uncovered the illegal NSA wiretapping approved by the Bush Jr. administration (without probable cause). Here is a link to that story.
https://www.newsweek.com/whistleblower-who-exposed-warrantless-wiretaps-82805
While Bush was running for re-election in 2004. Bill Keller, at the time the executive editor of the New York Times, quashed the story after meeting with Bush. Over a year later (until Dec. 2005) and after Bush won re-election, Keller allowed the story to run, but only after Risen threatened to reveal the story in his book, State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration. It’s in that same book he reveals the “bungled CIA operation” (is there any other kind?) that led to Eric Holder chasing him with subpoenas.
And how about Obama?

James Risen said; “A lot of people still think this is some kind of game or signal or spin. They don’t want to believe that Obama (and Attorney General Eric Holder) wants to crack down on the press and whistle-blowers. But he does. He’s the greatest enemy to press freedom in a generation.”

https://www.axios.com/how-james-risen-got-the-nyt-to-publish-his-nsa-bombshell-1515111006-8eeb7160-a6c4-49a9-8a07-c8dc247449c1.html
https://thinkprogress.org/risen-i-may-have-been-a-victim-of-the-nsas-program-spying-on-journalists-83d26365edee/

47% of Democrats view capitalism positively, down from 56% in 2016

These results are from Gallup interviewing conducted July 30-Aug. 5. Views of socialism among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are particularly important in the current political environment because many observers have claimed the Democratic Party is turning in more of a socialist direction.

The current survey is the fourth time Gallup has measured Americans' overall views of capitalism and socialism in this format. The question wording does not define "socialism" or "capitalism" but simply asks respondents whether their opinion of each is positive or negative.

Democrats, by contrast, are less unified in their views, but by 10 percentage points are more positive about socialism than about capitalism.

Fewer Than Half of Young Americans View Capitalism Positively
Americans aged 18 to 29 are as positive about socialism (51%) as they are about capitalism (45%). This represents a 12-point decline in young adults' positive views of capitalism in just the past two years and a marked shift since 2010, when 68% viewed it positively.

Taken as a Whole, Americans More Positive About Capitalism
A majority of Americans have retained a positive view of capitalism over the past eight years, but this year's 56% positive rating is by four points the lowest recorded since 2010. This modest drop in positive attitudes toward capitalism was driven, as reviewed above, by the less positive attitudes among Democrats.
Americans' positive views of socialism have varied only between 35% and 39%, with this year's reading of 37% right at the trend average.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/240725/democrats-positive-socialism-capitalism.aspx?utm_source=facebookbutton&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=sharing

Why didn’t the Senate Committee on the Judiciary prosecute AWOL Bush et al for war crimes, blame Nancy Pelosi. She felt Democrats would win the next election by a bigger number of votes by not doing so.

Post has attachment
Petition for a federal special grand jury about 9/11


WE THE PEOPLE have more than three branches of our federal government, you can add one more and it is a federal special grand jury. The US Attorney of a Federal Judicial District must call to service a grand jury when citizens presented with a petition noted evidence of an alleged federal crime and she/he MUST present the petition to the grand jury. Of course the free press is also but the free press does not have subpoena power, the power to indict people for crimes bring the case to federal court for trial, and they can discover a crime due to their discovery of evidence.

The below URL/link is where you can read the petition written by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and which was submitted to the US Attorney. She/he is required present it a federal special grand jury which included exhibits /evidence that disagrees with the official story as to what caused the collapsing of three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11.


The sum total of this evidence proves that explosives and/or incendiaries were used to do a controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center buildings. To save your time, start reading at page 15 to see the listed evidence presented in the petition.

Therefore a special grand jury should find reason to investigate further in the hope of discovering the perpetrators who planted the explosives and/or incendiaries and who attempted to make it appear airplanes and fire were the only cause. Perpetrators who tried to make it appear the Al Qaeda terrorist organization did it and therein cause the United States government to conduct a war on terrorism.

After you read the case presented in this petition, keep in mind the special grand jury should be interested in why NIST did not include this evidence in their final report and why they failed to interview eye witnesses and follow up on other leads in this crime.

There is the questions about the Pentagon incident and the crime of sending letters containing militarized anthrax that contained writing linking them being sent in association with 9/11 airplane crimes.

There is the question as to how the alleged terrorists know all the US Air Force war game exercise would be on-going prior to and on 9/11 making it much more likely using hijacked commercial airplanes would reach their targets without being shoot down, especially the Pentagon given it was located in very restricted air space with great attention to preventing just such an attack on the US Capital buildings.


https://lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/lc-doj-grand-jury-petition/



Here is a good video regarding a federal special grand jury set in motion by the group Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.


It explains why the US Attorney is required to present evidence submitted as attachments (exhibits) regarding alleged federal crimes that occurred on 9/11.


go to this URL and hear and learn the details.

https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1383-lawyers-petition-for-9-11-grand-jury/

Tell me how the terrorist knew that all the war games would have been ongoing prior to and during 9/11 wherein false radar blips were inserted onto FAA and NORAD radar scopes? This was part of one war game. Secondly, the majority of the US Air Force fighter jets had been moved up to Alaska and Canada prior to 9/11 in another war game.

The best engineering explanation/proof that NIST lied
https://www.ae911truth.org/project-due-diligence
Some 100 floors made up of 4 inches of wire reinforced concrete that were in steel corrugated pans but no large pieces were found in the wreckage. It ALL turned to dust or sand!
Steel beams smoking as they fall to the ground – this is not concrete dust trailing behind the falling the large sections of outer columns. This is what you would see if tree logs were burning and falling.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0yujvp0ugY

Part 1: World Trade Center Building 7
Part 2: The Twin Towers’ Explosive Destruction
Part 3: The Twin Towers and Extreme Heat
https://www.ae911truth.org/continuing-ed/ae911-aag-l#p3

Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
about 100 pages
send me an email at dick.mcmanus@yahoo.com and I will reply with it attach for free.

or For sale at Amazon Kindle books
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-text&field-keywords=Some%20Unpopular%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States%20

Post has attachment
Be like Julian. #JustDoIt

Post has attachment
The U.S. was in talks for a deal with Julian #Assange but then FBI Director #JamesComey ordered an end to negotiations after Assange offered to prove #Russia was not involved in the #DNCleak ...

An explosive report by investigative journalist John Solomon on the opinion page of Monday’s edition of The Hill sheds a bright light on how Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) and then-FBI Director James Comey collaborated to prevent #WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange from discussing “technical evidence ruling out certain parties [read Russia]” in the controversial leak of Democratic Party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 election.

Post has attachment
New evidence about the Pentagon attack on 9/11


The following is my summary of a newly released video wherein analysis of the Pentagon incident (airplane impact) on 9/11. It has taken me about five hours to watch and understand this lecture of irrefutable scientific evidence.

For the past 17 years many people have collected and analyzed direct evidence and eyewitness statements. This is the best video of what really happened to the Pentagon and it disproves many wrong assumption made by honest people trying to get at the truth, but maybe at times assumed way too much. I do not expect you to spend five hours watching this video lecture, but given the fact that 3020 architects and engineers and myself have been demanding a new public Congressional investigation, the work of these researchers, I will now say a large commercial airplane hit the Pentagon, not a missile and the damage to the outer wall and C-ring exit hole were DONE by this airplane.

http://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/


The assumption that the hole in the outer wall of the Pentagon was too small to have been made by a large commercial airplane is FALSE. That wrong hypothesis ignores the continuous 100 foot wide opening in the first floor of the Pentagon and a detail analysis of physical damage to the first floor columns of the E-ring agrees with that of a large commercial size airplane.

The wall (façade) extending from columns 8 to 18 of the Pentagon was damaged and this outer wall was not made up of addition reinforced concrete, rather just a normal brick wall. This wall had limited structural resistance to an alleged impact by a large commercial size airplane.

The exterior Pentagon wall in question was retrofitted (re-constructed or new materials added) to make this wall blast resistant. This was done after an analysis of the deaths caused by flying window glass in a 1996 car bomb explosions next to a US Air Force building in Saudi Arabia. Blast resistance windows were one and ¼ inch thick glass were the main addition upgrading the exterior wall of the Pentagon, during the remodeling of this wedge of the Pentagon office space. Kevlar (bullet proof type) fabric was added to prevent fragments of brick from becoming flying projectiles similar to the flying glass that could kill people inside due to a car bomb next to the outer wall.

There is an exit hole in the C-ring’s wall (only two bricks thick) with airplane wreckage and body parts which were forced out of this hole at a 50 degree angle, consistent with the initial 50 degree impact of an alleged 757 airplane impact. The outer wall is the E-ring, moving in toward the center of the Pentagon is the D-ring, and next is the C-ring, B-ring and etc.

Photo confirm the impact from airplane’s aluminum hitting the interior columns agree with damage to just a few columns such that the aluminum made its all the way thru the first floor of the Pentagon to this exit hole. Photos of this wreckage on the ground outside the C-ring hole show a large amount of airplane parts, including an airplane wheel rims and attached steel landing gear.

Fire fighters who fought the fire at the Pentagon described seeing pieces of wreckage that they describe as looking like airplane seats and body parts. A first responder LTC ERCKENBRACK said inside he saw a pile of airplane wreckage about four to five feet high and ten feet wide, made up of “airplane pieces, plastic, bricks and people parts….a wheel and about ten feet of the landing gear… between the C-ring and the B-ring..and stopped against the wall of the B-ring.” The steel landing gear is one of the heaviest pieces of an airplane.

The interior concrete columns were 21 inches square; therefore the hypothesis that airplane wreckage could not have flown clean thru to exit at the C-ring exit hole was WRONG.

Eyewitness SEAN BOGGER said he saw “the nose and a wing of an airplane just coming right at us…I am watching the plane go all the way into the building… so once it went into the building it exploded.” At the point BOGGER went down onto the floor and did not see anything more of the impacting airplane.

Taxi cab driver LLOYD ENGLAND had part of a street light hit and break the front windshield of his cab as he was driving on the highway near the Pentagon. ENGLAND says he witnessed an airplane fly very low above his cab. He said he was driver about 40 mph and analysis of this event and the required stopping distance of his cab, agrees with the resulting downing of five street light poles by an airplane with a wing span of some 157 feet of an alleged large commercial size airplane.

Photos confirm that these five poles were knocked down and damaged likely by the left and right wings adding confirming the exact flight path of this airplane. Additionally photos of the top of a tree that was trimmed by one of the jet engine, adds to this evidence of an airplane and its flight path prior to impacting the Pentagon.

At 0942 a.m. and 40 seconds DARYL DONLEY photographed a fire ball from an explosion. In this photo small fires were already burning on the ground and lots of black smoke coming from a burning diesel fuel tank. By looking at the height of the smoke, the timing of the explosion does not agree with an explosion which had to have happened on impact, rather some number of seconds to a minute later. This diesel fuel fire located next to the generator trailer agrees with the likelihood of the left engine of the large airplane impacting this area starting the diesel fire.

A large commercial size airplane be control by the pilot at speeds any faster than some 360 mph at which point the nose of the airplane rise uncontrollably. However, this large commercial airplane hit at some 542 mph on impact, which is possible if the speed was increase just prior to impact.

There is 42 feet between jet engines of a 757 airplane and damage to the Pentagon first and second floor structure lines up with this 42 foot separation and does damage caused by the impact of the airplanes wings.

Post has attachment
Speaking to the Gateway Pundit, Senator #RandPaul asserted that #Assange likely has important information about the hack and that it’s unlikely he would agree to testify without immunity.
...
“I think that he should be given immunity from prosecution in exchange for coming to the United States and testifying,” Senator Paul told the Gateway Pundit. “I think he’s been someone who has released a lot of information, and you can debate whether or not any of that has caused harm, but I think really he has information that is probably pertinent to the hacking of the Democratic emails that would be nice to hear.”
Wait while more posts are being loaded