Post is pinned.Post has attachment
#Assange, #Manning Still Only Ones Imprisoned for #CollateralMurder --

April 5 marked the five-year anniversary of the release of the Collateral Murder video by #WikiLeaks. The shocking footage showed the entire world the 2007 US Apache attack helicopter airstrike on Baghdad that killed 12 people - including two Reuters staff members - and injured two small children.

Post has attachment
Speaking to the Gateway Pundit, Senator #RandPaul asserted that #Assange likely has important information about the hack and that it’s unlikely he would agree to testify without immunity.
“I think that he should be given immunity from prosecution in exchange for coming to the United States and testifying,” Senator Paul told the Gateway Pundit. “I think he’s been someone who has released a lot of information, and you can debate whether or not any of that has caused harm, but I think really he has information that is probably pertinent to the hacking of the Democratic emails that would be nice to hear.”

Post has attachment
The collapse of the main stream media - a failure to ask important questions.

The 9/11 commission report did not explain or mention one word about why World Trade Center building seven collapse yet it was not hit by an airplane.

The National institute of Standards and Technology did not explain why the Twin Towers collapsed, yet that was their job. They just ignored the why and how questions.

In 2002 the National Construction Safety Team Act mandated NIST to conduct an investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1 and 2 and the 47-story 7 World Trade Center. The "World Trade Center Collapse Investigation", directed by lead investigator Shyam Sunder. NIST employs about 2,900 scientists, engineers, technicians, and support and administrative personnel. Shyam Sunder stated he had heard no witness state seeing this melted steel and did not hear any witness who stated they heard explosions. There are photos and witness statements of steel beams white to yellow hot at least 1950 F°) being removed from the WTC wreckage. Given the jet fuel or office fires do not get hotter than some 1,000 degrees F. So where did the additional some 900 degree F come from to turn the steel yellow hot?

And there are video tapes of fire fighter stating they heard explosions. But NIST totally ignored this overwhelming evidence.

NIST claims their final report on the WTC Towers—including 30 recommendations for improving building and occupant safety—was released on October 26, 2005. This is a false statement. One may call these half-truths, but the issue was why WTC7 collapsed and it was only steel high rise building to ever collapse before or after 9/11 due to office fires, and wherein witnesses stated they saw pools of melted steel in the wreckage. NIST’s job was to determine why the WTC buildings collapsed. And they did not recommend any new standards or rules in the construction of steel high rise buildings to insure they do not collapsed in the future only due to office fires as occurred in WTC7.
Yes, molten steel seen in the wreckage of all three WTC buildings that normally it takes 2,750 degrees F. with oxygen being basted into the steel factory’s furnace.
Do you know how long it takes to bake a steel beam to make it turn yellow hot? Way over ten hours baked (re-heated) in a steel mill’s ovens using massive amounts of natural gas. But the wreckage pile with sand-like dust all over it was oxygen starved. No oxygen means no longer could any normal fire burn hydrocarbons, especially with all the water the fire department poured onto the wreckage.

• NIST presents a computer model of World Trade Center building seven (WTC7) collapsing, but their computer model does not agree with and contradicts all available photographs of the building collapsing . That is, the top of the building or roof fell down symmetrically (meaning the roof did not bend as NIST computer model depicts), rather the whole top floor and floors facing the camera(s) below all fell down in one complete section without any distortion as falsely shown in NIST computer model. Furthermore, NIST refused to release the data they used to make this computer model to engineers who alleged NIST’s computer model was false.

• NIST presented the now discredited “Thermal Expansion Theory” that fire caused WTC7’s symmetrical free-fall collapse on the fires inside the building. To do this, they ‘ginned up’ the inputs and methods behind the computer model to promote the appearance of a key girder initiating total collapse

• NIST made the false claim of missing shear studs in WTC7 between columns 44 and 79. In their August 2008 report, NIST simply omitted the existence of sheer studs to make the collapse of a key girder seem more feasible.

• NIST presented fictitious debris damage of WTC7. The supposed “10 Story Gouge” was based on a doctored photograph presented by Popular Mechanics to the television show, “Inside Edition” in 2006. After the Twin Towers collapsed, eyewitness testimony, citizen photographs and video footage are evidence that this specific area of the building was in tact (the outer face of the building not gouged out). Despite the available contradictory data, NIST actually constructed a graphic illustration derived from the bogus photograph in their report.

Specific engineering details exposing the Fraud in NIST’s WTC 7 Reports

• NIST fraudulently asserts that diesel fuel fires in diesel fuel storage tanks contributed to the collapse of WTC7. NIST continued to push the diesel fuel theory in 2004 and 2005 reports. In 2007, NIST finally had to admit that the diesel fuel had nothing to do with the collapse of WTC7. The diesel fuel storage tanks were in the building to run emergency electric generators.

NIST’s analysis… provides a timeline suggesting the “explosions” he heard were actually the collapse of WTC1

The NIST analysis stated that Barry Jennings and Michael Hess were rescued at around 12:00 to 12:15 p.m. However, as Dr. David Ray Griffin has demonstrated, the time Hess and Jennings were likely rescued was well before noon, meaning that NIST’s timeline is inaccurate and that the explosions that Jennings and Hess said they experienced could not have been the result of debris from the collapse of the North Tower.

One fact about the collapse of the Twin Towers is that the conversion of the concrete to a fine powdery dust started right at the top of the collapse and continued with the same high rate all the way down. In every other tall building collapse, nearly zero percent of the concrete was pulverized into powder/dust. Every floor in the Twin Towers had floors made up of four to five inches of concrete that was poured into a steel pan frame and therefore in the wreckage there should have been found whole concrete slabs, stacked like pancakes.

Also damning to the NIST and 9/11 Commission theories is the fact that the concrete added no impetus to the collapse (crushing weight), because all of the concrete floors were blown into the air as the building collapsed. All the weight of the floors blew away in the nine mph breeze.
Now take a look at the video tape* of the top floors of one of the Twin Towers as it collapses. Go to this website/URL and watch as the top section falls down, but section below does not move. All the weight of this top upper section is falling. There should have been some downward movement of the section below this falling section of upper floors. SHOULD HAVE BEEN SOME downward movement, but there is ZERO..NONE.. NADA, NYET. Impossible!
* Video is within this guys paper within this URL,
In 2007, a group of scientists, an architect, and two 9/11 family members filed a “Request for Correction” to the NIST report under the Information Quality Act. They argued that, among other things, NIST failed to establish the likely technical cause of the building failures because it did not explain why, after collapse initiation, total collapse had ensued. NIST has not offered any explanation as to why (i.e. the technical cause of) the story below the collapse zone was not able to arrest the downward movement of the upper floors.
The conservation of momentum principle) would dictate that the undamaged steel structure below the collapse zone would, at the very least, resist and slow the downward movement of the stories above…
In the four seconds before the upper section disappeared from view, the rate of acceleration remained constant and there was never an observable deceleration. What? Crushing the steel in the lower floors should have slowed down the falling, not allowed it to continue to accelerate.
NIST responded to the Request for Correction with the remarkable admission that it was not able to provide a full explanation of the total collapse. Translated: never able to explain it at ALL!
What the hell do we pay NIST for if this is the answer we get from them? We now have 3020 architects and engineers that believe NIST’s report is total BS and they demand a new public Congressional investigation. To put in plain language somebody is lying!
Now I am just trying to get your attention.
But there is more that you can see with your own eyes if you were not blinded by the disinformation from the main stream media and the AWOL Bush administration.

South Tower had liquid steel dripping of the side before the collapse. We know it is steel because aluminum is silver in color was a liquid, not orange in color like the sparks made by welding steel. Furthermore, the large orange flames seen in this video is burning thermite because no hydrocarbon material burns like that and most of the jet fuel burn up way before this video was taken or burned up in mid-air during the intial impact of the airplane. Even after the tower starts to collapse you can see even more orange steel go into the air around this corner of the tower. Next pay close attention to the clouds of brownish smoke billowing up. These brownish clouds are concrete from the concrete flooring exploding. As the upper section starts to fall, the center core columns have already started to fall and so pulling the outer box columns inward. You can see the outer steel box columns being bent inward. Pay close attention to the whitish colored smoke in and around the orange flaming corner of this tower. When terminate burns it produces white smoke which is aluminum oxide gas. Hydrocarbon office furnishing burn making black smoke as you can see in photo show of the downwind smoke clouds that day. SEE video and push the pause button to stop the video tape off and on, so you can better see what I am talking about.
I hope you looked at the video of a Twin Tower. Now I want you to look at the how the other Twin Tower collapsed wherein the top section was tipped over off the side of the building some 22 degrees. Not only was it photographed tipped 22 degrees but it was moving and should have fallen off the side of the Tower. Why? Because there was too much weight hanging over the side of the Tower.

Go to my FB page to see this photo of some 25 floors tipping 22 degrees

On 9/11 minutes after the first airplane hit the North Tower, a New Jersey citizen saw three Arab looking men who appeared happy (or dancing on the roof of their van) and were photographing the burning Twin Towers. This citizen called the cops.
At 3:31 p.m. the police broadcast an alert to stop and investigation the white van with a sign denoting Urban Moving Vans on it. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approached the stopped van (at a roadbock), demanding that the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, 23-year-old Sivan Kurzberg, refused and “was asked several more times … With guns drawn, the police then “physically removed” Kurzberg, while four other men were also removed from the van, handcuffed, placed on the grass median and read their Miranda rights. . We can assume two more men had joined the three guys reported by the citizen.
According to DeCarlo’s report, “this officer was told without question by the driver [Sivan Kurzberg], “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” One of the Israelis citizens said without prompting, told Officer DeCarlo ¬- “we were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident”. This was false of course because the van was reported by the citizen and she had taken down and reported the van’s license plate number.
The FBI quickly joined by these cops and these FBI special agents retrieved multiple passports and $4,700 in cash stuffed in a sock. They were carrying airplane tickets for immediate departure to different countries.
These five alleged tourists from Israel were held for 71 days in a federal detention center in Brooklyn, New York, during which time they were repeatedly interrogated by FBI and CIA officers. The FBI developed 76 photographs taken by these guys showed, as the citizen had noted, them were happy, hugging each other, and giving each other “high-fives.”
Some of them were placed in solitary confinement for at least forty days; some were given as many as seven lie detector tests. The men gave confused and conflicting accounts of when and how they arrived to the parking lot where the citizen reported seeing them dancing for joy, etc. One eye witness reported seeing their van at the parking lot at 8 a.m., some 30 minutes before the first Boeing 767 hit the North Tower. One of the Israelis, Paul Kurzberg, brother of Sivan, refused to take a lie-detector test for ten weeks. Then he failed it. The FBI confirmed that two of the men had ties to Israeli intelligence (aka Mossad).
According to the source at ABC News, FBI agents chafed at the denials from their FBI bosses. One source stated, “There is a lot of frustration inside the bureau about this case. Higher echelons torpedoed the investigation into the Israeli New Jersey cell. Leads were not fully investigated”. Author James Bamford has stated there was similar frustration within the CIA. He stated, “People I’ve talked to at the CIA were outraged at what was going on. They thought it was outrageous that there hadn’t been a real investigation, that the facts were hanging out there (leads not followed) without any conclusion.”
FBI spokesman James Margolin stated the Israeli men were cheering for political reasons because they knew it was not an accident. Everyone else in New York City thought it was an airplane accidently crashed into the North Tower. He said, “Their explanation of why they were happy that the United States would now have to commit itself to fighting [Middle East] terrorism, that Americans would have an understanding and empathy for Israel’s circumstances, and that the attacks were ultimately a good thing for Israel”.
After returning safely to Israel three of the five New Jersey Israeli men spoke on a national talk show in the winter of 2001. Oded Ellner, who on the afternoon of September 11 had, like his compatriots, protested to arresting officer Sgt. Dennis Rivelli that “we’re Israeli”, admitted to the interviewer: “We are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event”.
Two days after the men were picked up, the owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, an Israeli national, abandoned his business and fled the United States for Israel. The five dancing Israelis allegedly had worked for his company. Source:
Five days after September 11th and steel cooling being sprayed with tons of water by fire fighters, hot spots on the surface of the rubble that were above 1,292 degrees F. which is above the melting point of aluminum. This fact was determined by a thermal map of Ground Zero created from infrared data collected by a NASA plane that overflew the site on September 16th. The map was made by the U.S. Geological Survey. Almost 12 weeks there was at least one fire still burning in the oxygen starved rubble – it is the longest-burning structural fire in history.

Add to the tale of militarize anthrax only produced by a US germ warfare labs or DoD sub-contractor Bechtel Labs.

How did terrorist know so many Air Force War Games would be on-going on 9/11? War games that were putting false blips on air traffic controller’s radar screens?

Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Northern Vigilance, and Tripod II were on in progress on 9/11. All, except for Northern Vigilance and Tripod II had to do with hijacked airliners inside the continental United States, specifically within the northeast air defense sector where all four 9/11 hijackings occurred
Global Guardian is an annual command-level exercise organized by United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) in cooperation with Space Command and NORAD. US Space Command’s part of this was this exercise is called Apollo Guardian. The 2001 exercise started the week before September 11th that included Northern Guardian. This was an exercise to train to intercept Russian bombers heading for the US via the North Pole and putting too many Air Force jets up in Alaska and Canada and leaving the east coast of the US wide open to attack.

Vigilant Guardian was wrongly described as Northern Guardian. Was this done to hid from the 9/11 Commissioners the fact that Vigilant Guardian was hijack exercise also ongoing during the real jets role playing being used as missile like weapons? This exercise was a “live fly” exercise. It involved at least one real commercial or military aircraft being flown to simulate a hijack emergency that actually happened on 9/11, commercial jets. Major Don Arias of NORAD confirmed this information. Perfect timing by the terrorist, or was it?


In a videotaped interview of Richard Clark said that George Tenet, Cofer Black and/or Richard Blee -- knowingly withheld key information about Khalid al-Mihdhar from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments about the alleged 19 hijackers who were living in the United States months prior to September 11th 2001. Richard Clark was the White House guy in charge of counter terrorism and everyday he received 100 to 150 CIA intelligence reports on his computer. Someone high up in the CIA chain of Command had to have intentional intervened and prevented Clark from getting the message about these two bad boys in route to LA. For twelve months none of the top CIA leadership told Clark about these two bad boys living in the US. DCIA George Tenet had habitually had conversations with Clark several times a day and never said anything to Richard Clark.
Here is what the CIA knew.
NSA had been intercepted a call involving the hijackers was in early 1999, when the call involved Al Mihdhar and his fellow Flight 77 hijacker Nawaf al Hazmi. The NSA did not disseminate a report on this call, although the heavily redacted text of the Congressional Inquiry’s 9/11 report indicates it should have.
The NSA continued to intercept Al Mihdhar’s calls throughout 1999, when he apparently spoke to al-Qaeda leader Khallad bin Attash, American prosecutors at the Guantanamo military commissions allege that bin Attash helped in the preparation of the 1998 East Africa Embassy bombings and the USS Cole bombing. He is now in jail at Guantanamo Bay.

NOTE: I have one confidential source who has given me information that comfined with other new accounts has me questioning where or not the USS Cole attack was a false flag attack from an Israel cruise missile. My source is frightened because of pressure or harassment from Naval Intelligence.

In late December 1999 from this signal intercept, the NSA learned about a planned al-Qaeda summit meeting in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The NSA alerted both the CIA, and they latter of which monitored Khalid al Mihdhar, Nawaf al Hazmi and other associates and followed them afterwards. CIA lost them in Bangkok.
The Bangkok CIA officers send an email to CIA, HQ, stating that these bad boys have arrived in LA and this message was sent to 50 CIA officials.
On July 10, 2001 Director Tenet called an emergency meeting of the National Security Council (NSC) which Clark attended. This meeting was to get authorization to take some kind of action against terrorists. But Tenet, Black and Blee never mentioned this key threat intelligence about the two bad boys living within the US.
On August 21, 2001 the CIA finally tells FBI about the two bad boys. Al Hazmi and Al Mihdhar had been in the San Diego, California for the past 15 months. It is unclear to me when Richard Clark eventually learned about these guys, but he as stated had he learn about this earlier he would have started an investigation as to why he had not been informed as soon as they entered the US.
LTC Anthony Shaffer later claimed that he alerted the FBI in September 2000 and three meetings with the FBI were set up, but US Army lawyers blocked them. He tried to tell the FBI that Able Danger had identified two of the three terrorists cells before the 9/11 attacks occurred. Navy Captain Scott Phillport claimed that Able Danger was “discouraged from looking further into Atta.” Phillport and three other people confirmed LTC Shaffer’s statements. A civilian contractor James D. Smith stated that Able Dangers analyzed data from 20 to 30 individuals and confirmed that Able Danger had identified Mohammed Atta.


Five times that the Terrorist Alert System were used for political reasons

Sept 11 thru 24, 2002: Threat level raised to orange for the first time: Aschcroft said, "Al Qaeda cells in several South Asian countries have been accumulating explosives since January and may be planning car bomb or other attacks on US facilities". ," President Bush said at the Afghanistan Embassy in Washington. "We have no specific threat to America, but we're taking everything seriously," he said.

Comment: If no specific threat then why raise the threat level? (Did) Bush turned public anxiety into Republican votes (Nov 2002 elections) by arguing that the then-Democratic Senate was "not interested in the security of the American people."

For months, criticism of Bush was put on hold as Democrats scrambled to prove how cooperative and patriotic they were. But if it was unpatriotic to criticize Bush in the months after 9/11, when would criticism become patriotic again. Typical was House Speaker Dennis Hastert's comment about Daschle's criticism of Bush's diplomacy before the Iraq war. Daschle, he said, had "come mighty close" to "giv[ing] comfort to our adversaries."

Senators Back President Bush on Iraq Resolution (S. J. Res. 46), October 2, 2002:

March 17 thru Apr 16, 2003: Threat level raised to orange and activates Operation Liberty Shield: "While al-Qaida remains the principal concern, we are also concerned Iraqi state agents, Iraqi surrogate groups or ad hoc groups or disgruntled individuals might choose to use the time period as well to launch attacks against the United States or against our coalition partners," said Homeland Security spokesman Gordon Johndroe.

Comment: Still trying to sell the lies about links to Iraq and al-Qaeda using the raised terrorist alerts to scare Americans into supporting the war.

March 19, 2003, US military invades Iraq (D+1).

May 28, 2004 The latest hype from Ashcroft stating Al Quada's is now 90% ready to conduct their next attack on the US (up from the 70% intelligence agencies' estimate).

Attorney General John Ashcroft warned of an attack planned on America for sometime in the coming months. That may happen, but NBC News has learned one of Ashcroft's sources is highly suspect.

Comment: Bush's poll numbers are going down after the torture incidents are coming to light, so this is the time to put the fear of god into America. This is the perfect time to try to convince voters that violations of the Geneva Convention could be justified in the face of the new threats.

July 9, 2004 Ridge Warns of 'Credible' al-Qaida Plot

Today House GOP Defends Patriot Act Powers
House Republicans, under strong pressure from the White House, narrowly defeated an effort yesterday to water down the Bush administration's signature law to combat domestic terrorism.

By a 210 to 210 tie vote that GOP leaders prolonged for 23 tumultuous minutes while they corralled dissident members, the House rejected a proposed change to the USA Patriot Act that would have barred the Justice Department from searching bookstore and library records. White House officials, citing the nearly three-year-old law's importance as an anti-terrorism tool, warned that an attempt to weaken it would be vetoed.

July 09, 2004: Is this the fifth time the Bush Crime family has raised the fear level about terrorism for political gain?

On August 1, 2004, just days after the Democratic National Convention nominated presidential candidate John Kerry on a national security platform, the Bush Administration raised its terror threat level to "Code Orange," or high, for certain cities with major financial institutions.

In a press conference to announce the change, which stepped on the Kerry storyline coming out of the convention, Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge described the source of the intelligence that led to the color change:

Ridge said at this time: [W]e must understand that the kind of information available to us today is the result of the President's leadership in the war against terror. The reports that have led to this alert are the result of offensive intelligence and military operations overseas, as well as strong partnerships with our allies around the world, such as Pakistan.

August 20,2009 Tom Ridge reveals that Attorney General John Ashcroft and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld argued in favor of raising the threat level by noting the correlation it had with Bush's approval rating:

Neither Mr. Ridge nor any of the department's security experts thought the message warranted any change in the nation's alert status.

To understand the import of this admission, we must remember the politically charged mood of national insecurity that dominated in 2004. For months, there had been significant buzz about a possible Al Qaeda attack, which never materialized. The issue became a regular topic of debate and discussion within the media, spreading a message of continuing insecurity that clearly aided President Bush's campaign themes.

A week after the alerts were raised in August, for instance, the discussion of another attack dominated the Sunday talk shows. As CNN noted at the time, "The decision to raise the alert level to orange, or elevated, for specific buildings in New York City; Newark, New Jersey; and Washington, D.C., has been criticized because it was based at least partly on information three or four years old."

By late October, The New York Times was writing about just how little was known about any possible plans for an attack.

On November 10, 2004 just eight days after President Bush (stole the election for his second term for the second time), the Department of Homeland Security downgraded the "orange" alert for the financial services sector back to "yellow," or elevated. The threat had apparently passed.

the end

Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
about 100 pages
send me an email at and I will reply with it attach for free.

or For sale at Amazon Kindle books

Richard McManus
Chief Warrant Officer-3/counterintelligence special agent, (counter terrorism analysis) and combat paramedic/LPN, Vietnam, US Army retired,
BS psychology and nursing
Everett, WA,

Post has attachment
BREAKING: US Senate Intelligence Committee calls editor Julian #Assange to testify. Letter delivered via US embassy in London. #WikiLeaks' legal team say they are "considering the offer but testimony must conform to a high ethical standard".


Post has attachment
If he accepts the Senate’s request to testify, Julian #Assange may provide evidence that would upend allegations that Russia hacked the DNC, putting to rest two years of #Russiagate hysteria, journalist #PatrickHenningsen told RT.

The #WikiLeaks founder should “absolutely” agree to speak with the US Senate Intelligence Committee – but his testimony may cause problems for devout followers of Russiagate’s main tenets, according to Henningsen, executive editor of 21st Century Wire.

Post has attachment
#BarrettBrown, publisher and journalist talks to #ChrisHedges about the US government’s war on #Wikileaks, Assange and other outlets exposing the inner workings of power.

Post has attachment
Who controls our government ??? Taxpayer money is spent purely without any liability, and this is not right; it has to get up and negate IT !!

Post has attachment
#Ecuador announced that whistleblower Julian Assange will eventually have to leave the country's embassy in London.

#JohnKiriakou: #Assange may be charged with espionage if US gets him

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
We are about to find out if this is the part of the movie where the empire rips off the mask of freedom and democracy and reveals its true tyranny.

#Assange is a soft target, a controversial figure who has been on the receiving end of wildly successful smear campaigns marketed to every major political faction across the western world.

He is the logical place to begin a crackdown on press freedoms and make a public example of what happens to those who shine the light of truth upon Big Brother.
Wait while more posts are being loaded