Stream

Join this community to post or comment

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
What the historical evidence says about the Second Amendment and individual rights.
10
2
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
12
1
David Greifzu's profile photo
 
Now thugs won't be able to know if an old lady is packing 
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Neither the left nor the right will like this one.

Good. Let the butthurt flow through you. Rights are universal.
Illegal aliens can now claim Second Amendment rights to own guns in violation of federal law, according to a federal appeals court.
12
2
A. Joe's profile photoPeter William Lount's profile photo
37 comments
 
Nonsense.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
California's new law is a clear violation of Article III, Section 10, Clause 1 of the US Constitution, which prohibits the States from enacting bills of attainder => http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/bill_attainder.htm
18
10
Joel Moran's profile photo
 
So glad I don't live in that rat hole state!
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
“I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” ~ George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment during Virginia’s Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788
9
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"French citizens were sitting ducks last Friday. For at least 10 uninterrupted minutes, terrorists mowed down attendants at Paris' Bataclan Concert Hall. In five other coordinated attacks, terrorists were given far too much time to go about their business.

But European politicians are in denial."
12
4
Fran Mickelson's profile photo
 
How is it that people can look at these same facts and still conclude that we just need to get rid of more guns? I just don't understand.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
49
23
Mike Litoris's profile photoCharles Schluessler's profile photo
4 comments
 
Free to do what you will as long as it does not infringe on someone else's liberty. Whatever does not break my leg or rob my wallet.
Add a comment...

Donna Kay

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Donna Kay originally shared:
 
Well, the first thing that you need to know is that the U.S. Constitution would be “suspended”.
7
1
Donna Kay's profile photo
12 comments
 
I'm not saying Obama going to declare (((Martial Law))).
If Obama did declare (((Martial Law))):
Obama would remain President.
There be no elections.
The Constitution would no longer protect us.
We would lose our right to bear arms, freedom of speech, government can come into our home seize anything they want, etc. while the (((Martial Law))) is in effect.
When the (((Martial Law))) is no longer declare we have constitution to protect us, we have elections, all our rights back.
I'm only mentioning this because Obama has a bad habit of  bending laws to justify his damage, crap, etc. he's done to this country.
Obama has said he like to remain President but know he can't legally run again and he has said he like to take our guns from us.
Under (((Martial Law))) could do more damage, crap etc., to us and legally remain President and take our guns, etc.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
5
1
Perry Trevithick's profile photoJoseph Payne's profile photo
4 comments
 
Does the first amendment apply outside the home? The 4th, 5th, etc?
Add a comment...

2nd Amendment Fight

Constitutional Law  - 
 
9 Things You Didn't Know About The Second Amendment

http://2ndAmendmentFight.com/9-things-you-didnt-know-about-the-second-amendment/
In the 2008 Supreme Court case, D.C. v Heller, the court went into extreme detail with regard to the origin and meaning of every word in the Second Amendment. Here are 9 things you may not know abo...
2
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Repealing the Second Amendment would change nothing: The Constitution does not grant Congress any authority to criminalize the possession of arms -- nor of anything else other than counterfeit US currency.
A professor of conflict resolution at Portland State University has written a blistering editorial calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. The professor is Tom H. Hastings. His op-ed was pu
12
3
T Waite's profile photoIan Branson's profile photo
12 comments
 
The 2nd is the teeth in the 1st, 4th, and 5th. The Framers were banking on "the better angels of our nature," that good people will rise up to defeat evil where it stands. If a professor thinks it's high time to disarm the populace, let him be the first to be violated by someone willfully ignorant of the law. And see how quickly the police arrive to save him; yes, those same police he is quick to denounce as thugs; those same police who are only minutes away when seconds count. (Assuming they come at all...)

Personally, I have to ask the question: How does one get to be a tenured professor without a modicum of pragmatic common sense? Is the ivory in the tower they live in somehow bulletproof? Or just a damn good reality filter?
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
 
Simply put, the federal government may not constitutionally act in any way that limits the right to keep and bear arms. That means all federal gun control measures, all of them, including the acts of 1934 and 1968 are unconstitutional, and they should be treated that way too.”

https://voicesofliberty.com/2016/05/23/how-many-federal-gun-control-measures-are-constitutional-zero/
May 23, 2016—Michael Boldin, founder and executive director of the Tenth Amendment Center, explains in less than a minute why every single federal gun control measure on the books is unconstitution…
9
Douglas Waterman's profile photo
18 comments
 
+John Lloyd Scharf , Angola made islam illegal. Other African countries may follow soon. North Africa has been taken over by muslims. They have slaves, and non-muslims have little to no human rights there. 
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
The same logic necessarily applies to ammunition.
Constitutional protections afforded by the Second Amendment include the right to buy and sell firearms, a federal appeals court ruled Monday in a decision that reinstates a lawsuit in which three California businessmen challenged zoning laws that limit where gun stores can be located.
14
5
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Background checks violate the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 10th Amendments, yet the president has no problem announcing executive orders to expand the system.
18
17
Gordon Gaines's profile photo
 
Good education. 
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Police in Arizona can no longer frisk anyone who appears to be carrying a gun. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that officers must first establish that a person is engaging in criminal behavior as well as armed and dangerous.

It's what the Fourth Amendment requires: A "search" or a "seizure" (e.g, an arrest) has to be "reasonable." That means searches for the purpose of discovering evidence of a crime can't be justified by the fact the police have no idea whether an activity is criminal. That's not "reasonable." To be "reasonable," there has to already be such evidence. And merely carrying a gun is not evidence of any crime.
The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that police cannot automatically frisk anyone they suspect has a gun unless "criminal activity is afoot."
11
4
Stephen Nelson's profile photo
 
Hello, felons are not allowed to carry a gun in the first place...
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
In late Eighteenth Century American English, a "militia" means all able-bodied males over 18, and a "well regulated" one is where the members of the militia are regularly trained, regularly taught how to act cohesively in a war situation under military discipline, who regularly rehearse the use of their weapons and effective joint action as military units, and who are well equipped to act as soldiers in defense of the nation.
we are in an ideological struggle with gun control advocates attempting to alter the meaning of the Second Amendment in order to allow for federal restrictions on our right to bear arms.
10
4
I AM THE BEAST Sssotlohiefmjn's profile photoJohn Lloyd Scharf's profile photo
9 comments
 
+I AM THE BEAST Sssotlohiefmjn The Geneva Convention says 15 qualifies for induction. Training can begin at eight under supervision. 
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Jimmy Carter appointee Cabranes clearly understands that the U.S. Supreme court held in Heller that firearms “in common use” by citizens “for lawful purposes like self‐defense” are clearly protected by the Second Amendment.

He then completely ignores that reality to come to his decision, and lies (makes a claim that is not remotely factually true) regarding their criminal use to support his decision."
2nd U.S. Circuit Judge Jose A. Cabranes ignored settled law and even lied to support blatantly unconstitutional gun laws, and should be impeached.
13
4
Matthew Oakey's profile photo
3 comments
 
And most of the Senate needs to be Impeached also !!!
ANY who are lawyers and members of the bar need to be cleansed from ANY Office of Government !!!
Add a comment...

DystopianEmpire01

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Published on Oct 14, 2015
Join TAC, Support Liberty!http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/members
Simply put, the federal government may not constitutionally act in any way that limits the right to keep and bear arms.
1
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
FTA: By using the Constitution in such a manner, the Court argues that the Due Process Clause extends “certain personal choices central to individual dignity and autonomy” accepted in a majority of states across the state lines of a handful of states that still banned the practice.

The vast majority of states are “shall issue” on the matter of issuing concealed carry permits, and enjoy reciprocity with a large number of other states.

My North Carolina concealed carry permit, for example, was recognized yesterday as being valid in 36 states, which just so happened to be the number of states in which gay marriage was legal yesterday. But 14 states did not recognize my concealed carry permit yesterday.

Today they must.

Using the same “due process clause” argument as the Supreme Court just applied to gay marriage, my concealed carry permit must now be recognized as valid in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
17
8
David Greifzu's profile photoAlan Lovejoy's profile photo
5 comments
 
+David Greifzu The latter. The legal system makes you litigate each application of the law to a new thing or circumstance all over again.
Add a comment...

Bear dog

Constitutional Law  - 
46
8
Stephen Nelson's profile photo
 
The second amendment, in our Bill Of Rights; STATES THIS VERY CLEARLY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Add a comment...