Stream

Join this community to post or comment

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Repealing the Second Amendment would change nothing: The Constitution does not grant Congress any authority to criminalize the possession of arms -- nor of anything else other than counterfeit US currency.
A professor of conflict resolution at Portland State University has written a blistering editorial calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. The professor is Tom H. Hastings. His op-ed was pu
14
3
Ian Branson's profile photoAlan Lovejoy's profile photoChris Dyer's profile photoShawn McFadden's profile photo
12 comments
 
The 2nd is the teeth in the 1st, 4th, and 5th. The Framers were banking on "the better angels of our nature," that good people will rise up to defeat evil where it stands. If a professor thinks it's high time to disarm the populace, let him be the first to be violated by someone willfully ignorant of the law. And see how quickly the police arrive to save him; yes, those same police he is quick to denounce as thugs; those same police who are only minutes away when seconds count. (Assuming they come at all...)

Personally, I have to ask the question: How does one get to be a tenured professor without a modicum of pragmatic common sense? Is the ivory in the tower they live in somehow bulletproof? Or just a damn good reality filter?
Add a comment...

marcus easterling

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"The 21st, the 18th, the 14th and the 2nd": http://youtu.be/R5AUPJDFMnw
1
Add a comment...

Ed Powell
moderator

Constitutional Law  - 
 
 
Landmark legislation supporting of 2A in Georgia. This bill allows GA CCW holders to carry almost everywhere AND the police can NOT stop someone just because they are armed.
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal expected to sign
28 comments on original post
11
1
Cynthia Gandy's profile photoDalieus Dakarn's profile photoDystopianEmpire01's profile photo
3 comments
 
While SC lets these bills die in subcommittee before they have a chance.
Add a comment...

Patricia Holloway

Constitutional Law  - 
 
ATF RAID ON ares: ask to pass this on.
6
Andreas Hoffmann's profile photoIan Branson's profile photo
2 comments
 
TownHall.com posts that the restraining order was reversed by the same judge, under pressure from the DOJ through an ex parte action. 

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/03/17/despite-restraining-order-atf-raids-ares-armory-over-plastic-parts-n1810321
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"A good cake being necessary to a wedding celebration, the right to buy and use an oven, shall not be infringed."

What is the goal of such a statement? As a Constitutional Amendment, whose right to 'buy and use an oven' does it recognize? That of the people, or only that of those participating in a wedding ceremony?

No self-defense denialists will address such questions because they have no answers that don't deserve extreme derision and disgust.
5
4
E F Tyson's profile photoJoshua Schmidlkofer's profile photo
Add a comment...

Ed Powell
moderator

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Please vote  Sen Tolman out of office as soon as possible. 
 
A Democrat running for Massachusetts attorney general has called for the use of fingerprint technology on all new guns sold in the state. Sen. Warren E. Tolman argued that the attorney general could issue regulations to require these so-called "smart guns" under the existing law.
BOSTON — In what is the latest wrinkle in gun control controversies expected to emerge among three Democrats running for attorney general, former state Sen. Warren E. Tolman has called for use of fingerprint technology on all newly manufactured guns sold in the state, as a way of preventing use of stolen guns by criminals.
View original post
9
2
Wes Tagawa's profile photoShawn McFadden's profile photo
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Addressing who can own guns, where they can carry them, and whether guns can be transported to a second home.
6
4
Wes Tagawa's profile photoBG Mack's profile photo
Add a comment...

Sandra Hunter

Constitutional Law  - 
 
I just found this. Maybe some of you gun owners would like to see this, especially if you live in NY. 
5
2
Igor Shabalov's profile photoNathan Warshaw's profile photoArthur M.'s profile photo
2 comments
 
As Californian I feel NY people pain. You cannot stay away from it, if we do nothing it will come after us state after state. Gun owners in america are under attack and we must fight in order to keep what we have now, otherwise we will loose.
Add a comment...

Lexa Merica

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Mayor Mary Lou Hannon, in a phone call with TheBlaze, said she considered it a “free speech” issue. In a ringing endorsement, she said, “If you were in trouble, he’s the kind of guy you would want by your side, protecting you. He’s a no-nonsense police officer.”

 
*WARNING: The video in this story contain graphic, profane, and offensive language.* Since July 24th, automatic-weapon-toting Gilberton, PA, Police Chief Mark Kessler has been in hot water when his uncensored videos saying things like "F**k all you libtards, went viral. Now we've learned the sage continues: the Gilberton...
5 comments on original post
7
3
Marv V's profile photoArthur M.'s profile photoBG Mack's profile photoWes Tagawa's profile photo
2 comments
Marv V
+
3
4
3
 
We back up dude clip to clip
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. the supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." ~ Noah Webster
8
5
Arthur M.'s profile photoWes Tagawa's profile photoShawn McFadden's profile photoR Graves's profile photo
4 comments
 
+Chad Miller The principle is what matters--the justification for why being armed is a right is not affected by the fact that the current population is not inclined to fight for their freedom.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
The meaning of "well-regulated militia" in the Second Amendment.
7
6
DystopianEmpire01's profile photoJim L.'s profile photoR Graves's profile photoKenneth D. Garner's profile photo
2 comments
 
The "civil power" did not and could not have meant the executive branch either as a lot of traitors would suggest today.  It was "We the People" instead.
Add a comment...

Andrew Abraham

Constitutional Law  - 
44
12
Michael Moore's profile photoG Mangos's profile photoJesse Bost's profile photoSam Converse's profile photo
14 comments
 
I private posted my location. Won't do it publically though I will say i'm not near there.
Add a comment...

Nikki Seymour

Constitutional Law  - 
 
THE 2nd AMENDMENT to THE CONSTITUTION is MY LINE IN the SAND!! GIVE me LIBERTY or GIVE me DEATH!!
16
2
Nikki Seymour's profile photoGeorge Hayes's profile photoJeremy Lee's profile photoHosein H's profile photo
11 comments
 
+Nikki Seymour I don't know if I wouldn't say I'm not doing anything. I created and currently working on making a number of changes to conservativesspace.com which is a social network for conservatives.

Besides putting SSL on the system I am looking to implement PGP into the messaging system so the messages send between people while stored on the site are encrypted.

But hey maybe you've took on a larger project than trying to make a social network that won't censor conservatives.
Add a comment...

Patricia Holloway

Constitutional Law  - 
 
This is an excellent article that tells us how our government was infiltrated from within. More important Saul Linsky's scheme is listed. Go to the bottom of the page and click onto "Communist Peace Offensive"  It may take a minute to pull up, but wait.  The April 1, 1951 booklet on "A Campaign to  "Disarm & Defeat" the United States of America." is there in the original version with notes. This is the reason that the Obama Administration has , and is fighting so hard to confiscate our guns, and they will not stop trying. Please share this with fellow Patriots, Veterans,  Military, Friends family and loved ones that are still sleeping. We were warned in the 1950's and 1960's but we slept through it.Glenn Beck tried to warn us the whole time he was on Fox News, and people called him crazy. He is still putting out the truth on his new network---the blaze.com. There are excellent documentaries on this site, Real news, the Beck Show, and it is free for two weeks. Also available on T.V. and other devices. The most important thing is that you read this article, discuss it. Pull up the "A Campaign to Disarm & Defeat the United States of America", it is 184 pages, so you might want to download, or print.Understanding the mind set for this President makes it easy to see why no matter what he will not give up on of confiscating guns from Law abiding Citizens. I have found many good post tonight ,but this one is the best.
In his book "Rules for Radicals," Saul Alinsky writes on the power tactics to be used against a political opponent for the purpose of breaking them down and destroying their reputation. One of these tactics characterizes nearly everything we have experienced since Barack Obama has been inaugurated as he and his administration have successfully used …
6
1
Wes Tagawa's profile photo
Add a comment...

Renee Kelley

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Here's what a crazy woman does
2
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
The terms 'militia' and 'national guard' are not synonyms.  One term occurs in the Constitution; the other does not. As a matter of Constitutional law, only the Constitution and the Supreme Court can define the meaning of terms that occur in the Constitution. That principle was a central component of the infamous Roberts' ruling that upheld the Constitutionality of ObamaCare by defining it as a tax for the purposes of Constitutional law, in spite of the fact that the law itself calls it a fine.

Constitutionally, the militia are all abled bodied male adults within a certain age range. And yes, that's the official definition specified by the Supreme Court.
Created in 1636 to defend the earliest American community, the Army National Guard celebrates its 377th birthday today.
5
2
Alan Lovejoy's profile photoArthur M.'s profile photo
Add a comment...

T.J. Hollidge

Constitutional Law  - 
 
This person has completely lost their mind!
2
JP Camacho's profile photo
 
👎
Add a comment...

Candice Lanier

Constitutional Law  - 
14
8
Wes Tagawa's profile photoSam Le's profile photoMamun Sarkar's profile photoMorgan Laco's profile photo
3 comments
 
+Michael Vanaric The problem is there are people trying to keep people from exercising their right to possess guns. If they don't want guns they don't want anyone else to have guns.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
3
2
Alan Lovejoy's profile photoPaul Henning's profile photoJoe A Merican's profile photoCollin C. MacMillan's profile photo
16 comments
 
+Alan Lovejoy Gotta rule 'em that way first and thats SCOTUS's job.

And they won't. Because they don't want to radically change ICC prescident. See: US .v Stewart and the Raich case, and Obamacase case.

And thats why this guys case is fuckin dangerous for us.
Add a comment...