Stream

Eric Powell

Constitutional Law  - 
 
 
Landmark legislation supporting of 2A in Georgia. This bill allows GA CCW holders to carry almost everywhere AND the police can NOT stop someone just because they are armed.
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal expected to sign
11
1
Cynthia Gandy's profile photoDalieus Dakarn's profile photoDystopianEmpire01 .'s profile photo
3 comments
 
While SC lets these bills die in subcommittee before they have a chance.
Add a comment...

Patricia Holloway

Constitutional Law  - 
 
This is an excellent article that tells us how our government was infiltrated from within. More important Saul Linsky's scheme is listed. Go to the bottom of the page and click onto "Communist Peace Offensive"  It may take a minute to pull up, but wait.  The April 1, 1951 booklet on "A Campaign to  "Disarm & Defeat" the United States of America." is there in the original version with notes. This is the reason that the Obama Administration has , and is fighting so hard to confiscate our guns, and they will not stop trying. Please share this with fellow Patriots, Veterans,  Military, Friends family and loved ones that are still sleeping. We were warned in the 1950's and 1960's but we slept through it.Glenn Beck tried to warn us the whole time he was on Fox News, and people called him crazy. He is still putting out the truth on his new network---the blaze.com. There are excellent documentaries on this site, Real news, the Beck Show, and it is free for two weeks. Also available on T.V. and other devices. The most important thing is that you read this article, discuss it. Pull up the "A Campaign to Disarm & Defeat the United States of America", it is 184 pages, so you might want to download, or print.Understanding the mind set for this President makes it easy to see why no matter what he will not give up on of confiscating guns from Law abiding Citizens. I have found many good post tonight ,but this one is the best.
6
1
Wes Tagawa's profile photo
Add a comment...

Renee Kelley

Constitutional Law  - 
 
Here's what a crazy woman does
2
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
The terms 'militia' and 'national guard' are not synonyms.  One term occurs in the Constitution; the other does not. As a matter of Constitutional law, only the Constitution and the Supreme Court can define the meaning of terms that occur in the Constitution. That principle was a central component of the infamous Roberts' ruling that upheld the Constitutionality of ObamaCare by defining it as a tax for the purposes of Constitutional law, in spite of the fact that the law itself calls it a fine.

Constitutionally, the militia are all abled bodied male adults within a certain age range. And yes, that's the official definition specified by the Supreme Court.
5
3
alias inkhorn's profile photoAlan Lovejoy's profile photo
Add a comment...

T.J. Hollidge

Constitutional Law  - 
 
This person has completely lost their mind!
2
JP Camacho's profile photo
 
👎
Add a comment...

Candice Lanier

Constitutional Law  - 
14
8
Alan Lovejoy's profile photoMike Kabatt's profile photoMichael Vanaric's profile photoMorgan Laco's profile photo
3 comments
 
+Michael Vanaric The problem is there are people trying to keep people from exercising their right to possess guns. If they don't want guns they don't want anyone else to have guns.
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
3
2
Joe A Merican's profile photoPaul Henning's profile photoCollin C. MacMillan's profile photoAlan Lovejoy's profile photo
16 comments
 
+Alan Lovejoy Gotta rule 'em that way first and thats SCOTUS's job.

And they won't. Because they don't want to radically change ICC prescident. See: US .v Stewart and the Raich case, and Obamacase case.

And thats why this guys case is fuckin dangerous for us.
Add a comment...

Ryan Cristian

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin

http://thelastamericanvagabond.com/Change_is_Upon_Us.php
1
Add a comment...

Clint Poncy

Constitutional Law  - 
 
This video makes me sick... To think that law abiding citizens can be treated this way. I am going to help this video go as viral as possible, I suggest you do the same... Let our government know they cannot treat us like this.
8
1
D. W. Allison's profile phototerry diller's profile photo
9 comments
 
And they come with a a t t i t u d e
Add a comment...

Nikki Seymour

Constitutional Law  - 
 
THE 2nd AMENDMENT to THE CONSTITUTION is MY LINE IN the SAND!! GIVE me LIBERTY or GIVE me DEATH!!
17
2
George Hayes's profile photoJeremy Lee's profile photoHosein H's profile photoNikki Seymour's profile photo
11 comments
 
+Nikki Seymour I don't know if I wouldn't say I'm not doing anything. I created and currently working on making a number of changes to conservativesspace.com which is a social network for conservatives.

Besides putting SSL on the system I am looking to implement PGP into the messaging system so the messages send between people while stored on the site are encrypted.

But hey maybe you've took on a larger project than trying to make a social network that won't censor conservatives.
Add a comment...

Patricia Holloway

Constitutional Law  - 
 
ATF RAID ON ares: ask to pass this on.
6
Ian Branson's profile photoAndreas Hoffmann's profile photo
2 comments
 
TownHall.com posts that the restraining order was reversed by the same judge, under pressure from the DOJ through an ex parte action. 

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/03/17/despite-restraining-order-atf-raids-ares-armory-over-plastic-parts-n1810321
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"A good cake being necessary to a wedding celebration, the right to buy and use an oven, shall not be infringed."

What is the goal of such a statement? As a Constitutional Amendment, whose right to 'buy and use an oven' does it recognize? That of the people, or only that of those participating in a wedding ceremony?

No self-defense denialists will address such questions because they have no answers that don't deserve extreme derision and disgust.
5
4
Alan Lovejoy's profile photoLawrence Hart's profile photo
Add a comment...
 
Please vote  Sen Tolman out of office as soon as possible. 
 
A Democrat running for Massachusetts attorney general has called for the use of fingerprint technology on all new guns sold in the state. Sen. Warren E. Tolman argued that the attorney general could issue regulations to require these so-called "smart guns" under the existing law.
9
2
Wes Tagawa's profile photoShawn McFadden's profile photo
Add a comment...

Sandra Hunter

Constitutional Law  - 
 
I just found this. Maybe some of you gun owners would like to see this, especially if you live in NY. 
5
2
Arthur Mullin's profile photoNathan Warshaw's profile photoIgor Shabalov's profile photo
2 comments
 
As Californian I feel NY people pain. You cannot stay away from it, if we do nothing it will come after us state after state. Gun owners in america are under attack and we must fight in order to keep what we have now, otherwise we will loose.
Add a comment...

Lexa Merica

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Mayor Mary Lou Hannon, in a phone call with TheBlaze, said she considered it a “free speech” issue. In a ringing endorsement, she said, “If you were in trouble, he’s the kind of guy you would want by your side, protecting you. He’s a no-nonsense police officer.”

7
3
Wes Tagawa's profile photoMarv V's profile photoBG Mack's profile photoPat Edmond's profile photo
2 comments
Marv V
+
3
4
3
 
We back up dude clip to clip
Add a comment...

Alan Lovejoy
owner

Constitutional Law  - 
 
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. the supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States." ~ Noah Webster
8
5
Shawn McFadden's profile photoAlan Lovejoy's profile photoR Graves's profile photoChad Miller's profile photo
4 comments
 
+Chad Miller The principle is what matters--the justification for why being armed is a right is not affected by the fact that the current population is not inclined to fight for their freedom.
Add a comment...

John Halgren

Constitutional Law  - 
5
3
George Hayes's profile photoWes Tagawa's profile photoLauren Gilbert's profile photoPhil Logan-Kelly's profile photo
2 comments
 
+John Halgren Good post
Add a comment...

Bob Vincent

Constitutional Law  - 
 
The US Supreme Court is considering hearing a case that asks:
(1) whether the Second Amendment secures a right to carry handguns for self-defense outside the home; and
(2) whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by denying handgun carry licenses to responsible, law-abiding adults for lack of “proper cause” to bear arms for self-defense.
http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/kachalsky-v-cacace/
7
1
Daniel Atkinson's profile photoRodney Lawrence's profile photo
9 comments
 
Me too, if it comes down to that....
Add a comment...