Post is pinned.Post has attachment
Some important reminders …

1) Please use one of the following categories when posting:

Community Guidelines: Please review and follow these when posting and engaging
Introduce Yourself: Briefly introduce yourself without any self promo links to your blog
Google+ Help: Anything to do with using Google+
Banking on New Mexico: ideas directly related to the WAPH! Public Banking Initiative
Global Banking: ideas about Large International Banks, its problems and potential solutions
Credit Card Debt: ideas about dealing with credit card debt
Mortgage Loans: ideas about dealing with foreclosure by large banks
Student Loans: ideas about dealing with student loans
Wealth Inequality: ideas about our large and growing wealth and income inequality and how that effects our society and government
Election Reform: ideas directly related to reforming our flawed electoral system
The Big Picture: how these topics fit together in our effort to restore a true democracy to our nation
Suggestions, Requests, and Questions

We will consider suggestions for other important categories as the community evolves. Place these suggestions in Suggestions, Requests, and Questions.

2) Please do not SPAM by posting just to promote your community, website, blog, or any other such links that do not add value to this GPC. _ All such posts will be removed without warning._

Post has attachment
The radix of our enslavement is the private central banking system.
My point of view about this is well expressed in the following two videos:

The first is half an hour.  The second is ....around a hour. 

The first was produced by a fellow who sells gold. It is Episode 4 of 7.  I recommend viewing the entire series, but the part on how the system is monetized  (a misnomer) is stunning. I have know the basics for years, but never seen it so clearly set forth.

The second is a film made by James Corbett, a YouTube current events analyst. 

This is a history of the Federal Reserve.

My goals: Educate people about the corporate nature of our present government and help build local financial concepts and institutions that avoid the inherent theft designed into the present system.

James Holmes 78
Film Student
I have professional video, sound, and lighting available to communicate good works.

I look forward to meeting people.

Post has attachment
This article entitled, "The Financial War Against the Economy at Large," at the link,

is suggested reading by Craig Barnes, who states that it “summarizes our position [at WeArePeopleHere!] as well as anything I have read.” I completely concur with that analysis. Please do read this. The link will also be posted on the web page. 

The article’s author, Michael has been working in the area of banking and income/wealth disparity for some time -- two topics that are intimately related. He is a Distinguished Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. His blog, at, has a long series of very informative, but often highly technical, posts on the world economy, banking and our economic woes. The NakedCapitalism link is an excerpt from a longer post by him at

Another of his interesting, but long, articles on banking is at

The Conclusion section of this article gives a nice view of why government and not banks should be in the business of creating money since, in principal, government is interested in lending for the public good, whereas global banks are lending for profit, which has not been, in the current economic  and social climate, in the public interest.

Post has attachment
I ran across the attached paper out of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Department that supports a plan suggested in 1936 by Professor Henry Simons of the University of Chicago (hence the name The Chicago Plan) and strongly supported by the prominent Yale University economist, Irving Fisher. These were two of the top economists of the time. Fisher pointed out that the plan, that separated money creation from from the credit function of banks, by demanding 100% backing of deposits by government-issued money, and ensuring that the financing of new bank credit can not happen through the creation of new deposits, out of then air. Fisher pointed out, and the IMF Dynamic, Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Model confirms, that this plan has four advantageous characteristics:

1. It would allow for a much better control of credit cycles, which were perceived to be the major source of business cycle fluctuations. 
2. 100% reserve backing would completely eliminate bank runs. 
3. It would lead to a dramatic reduction of (net) government debt by allowing the government to issue money directly at zero interest, rather than borrowing that same money from banks at interest. 
4. It would  dramatically reduce not only of government debt but also of private debt levels given that money creation would no longer require the simultaneous creation of mostly private debts on bank balance sheets.

The paper also gives a path, which has very little downside, of going from the current monetary system to The Chicago Plan system. While there would be considerable pushback from banks to the implementation of this plan, it seems to me that at some point politicians will see impossibility of paying off the outrageous debt most countries have amassed and accept something like this plan to move forward.

Although the paper does contain the disclaimer that it does not represent IMF official policy, which tends to push the status quo and austerity measures rather than increased government spending to stimulate the economy in times like these, it does show that even organizations like the IMF are considering alternatives to currently accepted thinking.

While the paper is not easy reading, I would suggest the reading of the Abstract and Introduction, which give the essence of the paper in rather straightforward language.

The paper can be found at

The Chicago Plan supports ideas that Ellen Brown puts forward in her recent book, "The Public Bank Solution: From Austerity to Prosperity."

Post has attachment
Welcome to WAPH-CID Google Plus Community (GPC)!

Our community experience can be informative and rewarding if we all follow certain decorum, ethics and rules. So please read the following carefully. In joining this GPC you agree to the following guidelines of participation:

1. Please introduce yourself and use the “Introduce Yourself” category for such posts. And, please, no self promo links to your blogs, sites, etc.

2. Please be respectful in your posts and comments. If you don’t know how to post or comment, please ask by posting a question in the Google+ Help category. Also, please review the Google+ Tips in that same category - we’ll be posting TIPs & Useful Resources regularly.

3. Please keep posts on-topic and please always post under appropriate categories. The categories are selectable from a pull down menu which appears below the compose space.

4. Please do not engage in any illegal, unethical, or otherwise ill-conceived conduct such as bullying, hate-speech, selling your products, or flooding posts with unrelated links.

5. Please do not SPAM by posting just to promote your community, website, blog, or any other such links that do not add value to this GPC. All such posts will be removed without warning.

6. Please provide context for all links in your post. Do not post without any information in the post ideas about what it is or why one should follow the link. Links should have relevance to the community’s purpose and the post should explain why it is important information.

7. All content is moderated to ensure safety, preserve continuity of conversation and to prevent spam and unsolicited communications not related to the community. 

8. If you have an issue or a problem with something that has been posted, please send a private message (via +mention technique) to the member personally. If you do not wish to contact the person directly or you cannot resolve the problem through private communication, please contact one of the moderators and we will do our best to help.

9. Although our principal purpose is to discuss relevant WAPH! issues, most of us are also learning ideas about how to function in this GPC, so please feel free to share tips and/or ask members for help. We will all benefit from these posts. Please use the appropriate categories for these posts. In general members of the Google+ community learn and share openly and are very collaborative. 

10. This is a place to interact ideas about issues relevant to WAPH!. It is not a place to sell and ask for followers. Members, who post/act inappropriately or offensively will be warned and any continued abuse will result in post removals and ban from the community.

11. Moderators will use their best judgement to set up and modify post categories. Suggestions will be taken from the community members for new categories.

12. Moderators will use their best judgement to ensure members are abiding by these Community Guidelines and are authorized to ban users at any time without prior notice for their violation.

13. These Community Guidelines are not a legal document, but merely a set of rules under which this community is moderated. For legal information pertaining to your use of Google's products, such as this GPC, please consult Google's Terms of Service (

14. These guidelines will be changed as deemed appropriate by the Moderators. Relevant suggestions will be taken under consideration by the Moderators.

15. Please always use appropriate attributions for your posts. Always credit the source of the text, images, or media and please honor copyrights.
Wait while more posts are being loaded