Post is pinned.Post has attachment
Hey guys, I am glad to see more people posting their positions and making comments, but when you make it so that other people can't reply to your posts then I have to draw the line. The reason behind this community is so that we may share our opinions and views. From this point on if anyone blocks another person from commenting on posts because they get butt-hurt over another person's views; the former will be deleted from the community. It's time to put your big boy pants on now. Maybe listen to someone else and their view of the world as they see it instead of living inside your box of feelings.
Photo

Post has attachment
The blood brain barrier (BBB) proves evolution wrong. How?

The BBB filters most all harmful substances from entering into the brain. This is why some medications for the brain area has to be given up the nose because that area bypasses the BBB. But what if this brain barrier did not exist? Can you say: You're dead?

Also how would evolution work to know what to filter? If it filters the good things the brain starves. If it does not filter the bad things the brain gets damaged. And because the brain plays an important role in survival as a developing offspring all offspring that their brains got damaged would not survive. Which as evolution works means no offspring would survive. #EVOLUTIONISALIE

This problem is like the chicken and the egg question. The BBB would have to exist before the brain did. And why would it if it's not needed yet in the evolution process? ~ Issac

https://www.yecheadquarters.org/2011/04/01/does-the-blood-brain-barrier-prove-evolution-wrong/

Post has attachment
The 2013 Kyoto Prize Winner, Masatoshi Nei, said that he has been trying to prove that DNA mutations drive evolution but hasn't been able to for the past 40 to 50 years. Richard Dawkins said that evolution has not been observed while happening and evolution evidence are all circumstantial.
Evolutionary microbiologist James Shapiro says Neo-Darwinism ignores much contemporary molecular evidence and invokes a set of unsupported assumptions." He continues, "Moreover, some Neo-Darwinists have elevated Natural Selection into a unique creative force that solves all the difficult evolutionary problems without a real empirical basis."

See that? No empirical basis.

If macro evolution was happening, it should be easy to prove. That is IF...If is a big two letter word. Let me explain how evolution is proven or disproven by looking at the known DNA sequences of chimpanzees and humans with the 6 million year divergence in view along with it. In an older study from 2002, it was reported that there was a 5.3% total difference between our two species comprised of 1.4% DNA substitutions and 3.9% of insertions and deletions. [Indels] Doing the math roughly that is 5% times a 3 billion DNA sequence and that comes to 150 million in the differences in 6 million years.

Richard Dawkins. Masatoshi Nei. James Shapiro. What's the problem? That's enough mathematic facts to work with to prove your theory or...have your theory go down in flames.
So we have 150 million inferred evolutionary mutation changes in 6 million years. That comes to a pace of 25 per year or 500 per 10-year generation or 250 per 20-year generation. How many DNA mutations do we see between parents and offspring today? It's sixty. Whoa, big difference of 4.25 to 6.5 times in numbers in the past versus today.

What about fixation of mutations into a population? Most mutations are weeded out in the next offspring because mutations are destructive. Parents share DNA in a fertilization so that a healthy version takes the place of a defective one. If there was a 10% fixation rate [a miracle if it was...not seen even close today] then we would need 5000 or 2500 mutations to 'naturally select' from per generation. We see sixty today.

So...Richard Dawkins, Masatoshi Nei, and James Shapiro...your theory of evolution go down in flames. That amount of mutation would cause species collapse from mutative overload.

Not only that, if we have a 5% difference today with a 10% fixation rate from a large pool to pull from, that would mean that our genomes have had a 50% mutation rate. That would be 1.5 billion of the 3 billion DNA nucleotides have mutated. Not possible. This means evolution has not happened. This means the DNA differences between chimps and humans are because of an all-at-once creation. Case closed.

Below is a 2002 link and folks...the 'similarity' of chimps has gotten even better for the case for creation since then.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/09/0924_020924_dnachimp_2.html

Post has attachment
Claims that can be observed do not need belief. Who observed the claims made about the skull fossils below? Anyone? Names please? 不不不 Unobserved claims does not = overwhelming evidence. it equals opinions that cannot be confirmed. Learn the difference. ~ Issac
#EVOLUTIONISALIE
Photo

Post has shared content

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Fake science?

Post has attachment
Science vs religion
Photo

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded