Post is pinned.Post has attachment
NEW MEMBERS  - EXPLORE THE  WORLDWIDE MYSTERIES - YOU ARE
Photo

Post has shared content

Post has attachment
Scientists Think Artificial Intelligence Could Kill Off All Humans

GabriellePickard
25 May 2017

From self-service checkouts in supermarkets with robotic assistants telling us to place items in the bagging area, to automatic messaging when we ring up call centres and fail to get through to a human voice, (1) concerns have long been made that the rise of artificial intelligence will mean humans become redundant from many jobs.

Though fears that artificial intelligence may wipe out many human jobs have been somewhat enfeebled by claims that AI could lead to the entire human race vanishing within our lifetime.

According to (2) Jeff Nesbit, former director of legislative and public affairs at the National Science Foundation, the human race may no longer exist, or may become immortal by 2050.

Nesbit points to a theory known as ‘artificial super-intelligence’ (ASI), which speculates AI will evolve into a supercomputer, which, being able to learn at incredible quick speeds, will be able to solve all problems and surpass human intelligence.

Human Race Could Vanish

Writing for (3) US News, Jeff Nesbit put forward the alarming hypothesis that:

“The human race could vanish in the blink of an eye within our lifetimes. Or we could just as plausibly see our species become immortal by the middle of the 21st century. That’s the promise, and the threat, posed by the accelerating pace of research around artificial intelligence. It may be an either/or proposition.”

Nesbit describes some of the early benefits of AI, using Google Maps as an example. The author says the next stage of AI will be the development of a supercomputer which is capable of recreating human intelligence. The final evolution of AI is, according to Nesbit, is that ASI learns so quickly, it ‘soars’ past the intelligence abilities of ordinary humans and is able to solve every problem which mankind is faced with.

So, what’s wrong with super intelligent computers being able to solve the world’s problems we might ask? Well according to Nesbit there is a “dark” and “threatening” side to the AI story, which is only beginning to be publicly discussed.

Humans Limited Evolution

Nesbit cites the views of physicist Stephen Hawking, who claims the evolution of AI could bring an end to mankind.

In an (4) interview with the BBC, the renowned British theoretical physicist warned that developing AI further could prove a pivotal mistake. Hawking cautions that when humans develop AI it will take off independently and “redesign itself at an ever-increasing rate.”

“Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn’t compete and would be superseded,” said Hawking.

Nesbit also cites warnings made by (5) Microsoft co-founder Bill gates. Gates reiterates Hawking’s concerns that by the mid-century, ASI may be so advanced it will either save or destroy human civilisation.

“I don’t understand why some people are not concerned”, says Bill Gates.

During an ‘Ask Me Anything’ session on Reddit, the billionaire philanthropist was asked what he thought computing would look like in 2045. Gates said the next 30 years will be a time of “rapid progress” for computing. Gates spoke about mechanical robots being able to solve problems and carry out tasks, such as moving patients in hospitals and picking fruit from fields.

“Once computers/robots get to a level of capability where seeing and moving is easy for them then they will be used very extensively,” said Gates.

AI Biggest Existential Threat

Tesla boss Elon Musk also expressed concerns about the evolution of AI. At the MIT Aeronautics and Astronautics Department’s Centennial Symposium in 2014, Musk referred to AI as “summoning the demon.”

According to Musk, artificial intelligence is our biggest existential threat and we need to be very careful of AI. Musk spoke of how scientists are increasingly believing there should be some kind of regulatory insight at a national or even international level to make sure “we don’t do something very foolish.”

Talking to the (6) BBC, British inventor Clive Sinclair also spoke of AI’s future capabilities of “dooming mankind.”

“Once you start to make machines that are rivalling and surpassing humans with intelligence, it’s going to be very difficult for us to survive. It’s just an inevitability,” said Sinclair.

Top Secret Writers (7) posed the question in a recent report – Is AI really too dangerous or can we control it?”

It is alarming that many of the biggest thinkers and leaders in science and computing are mutually warning that artificial intelligence’s rapid evolution will come at the peril of mankind.

References & Image Credits:
(1) The Independent
(2) Indy100
(3) US News
(4) BBC
(5) Washington Post
(6) BBC
(7) Top Secret Writers

Originally published on TopSecretWriters.com

http://www.topsecretwriters.com/2017/05/scientists-think-artificial-intelligence-kill-off-humans/

Post has attachment
Is the Phantom Planet Real?

The race is on to detect a giant on the other side of Neptune, and you could be the one to find it.

By Joe Sugarman
AIR & SPACE MAGAZINE |
JUNE 2017

Scott Sheppard and Chad Trujillo  aimed the 4-meter Víctor Blanco telescope at the night sky and hoped its wide-field camera would pick up something no one had seen before. Exactly what, they weren’t sure. “The people on committees that award observing time want to know what you’re looking for,” says Sheppard. “But we had written in our proposal, ‘We don’t know what we’ll find.’ ”

Sheppard and Trujillo used the Blanco, one of the telescopes at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile, to see way past the outer planets of the solar system and past the Kuiper Belt, a doughnut-shaped region beyond Neptune that is 30 to 55 times farther from the sun than Earth and inhabited by small, icy worlds, including Pluto. Objects that far away would be so faint they might not show up against the background stars, but then again, they might. As far as astronomers knew at the time, only a few objects reached orbital points beyond the Kuiper Belt: one of them, Sedna, discovered in 2004, is so far from the sun that it takes 11,400 years to complete its extremely elongated orbit. But almost as soon as they began observing in November 2012, Sheppard and Trujillo found another—one of the most remote bodies known in the solar system. They reported it to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center, which recorded it as 2012VP-113.

When the two astronomers published the announcement, in the journal Nature in March 2014, they noted something odd objects into these similar orbital configurations.”

Months later, Mike Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy at Caltech in Pasadena, walked from his office four doors down the hall to visit assistant professor Konstantin Batygin. “Have you seen this?” he asked, holding Sheppard and Trujillo’s article.

Batygin, who plays guitar in a rock band when he isn’t calculating planetary dynamics problems, was dismissive. “Every time somebody sees something unusual, everyone always thinks ‘planet’ and it never pans out,” says Batygin, then just 28 and a rising star in the field. “It is probably the most failure-rich idea that exists in astronomy today.”

For his part, Brown didn’t believe that a planet would cause the effects that the paper pointed out. Brown is a guy with a history of beating down planet theories, most notably in 2005, when his discovery of Eris, a Pluto-size body in the Kuiper Belt, effectively reduced everyone’s favorite planet to “dwarf planet” status. An athlete who has run triathlons and often wears shorts to the office, Brown enjoys his fame as an iconoclast. His twitter handle is @plutokiller. He is also the astronomer who discovered Sedna.

Brown and Batygin agreed that what Sheppard, a faculty member at Washington, D.C.’s Carnegie Institution for Science, and Trujillo, who had worked with Brown as a post-doc and is now a researcher at the Gemini Observatory in Hilo, Hawaii, were proposing couldn’t be a planet. Still, they decided to take another look at the data. They noticed two more strange uniformities: First, six of the most distant objects from Trujillo and Sheppard’s original collection all followed elliptical orbits that were physically aligned. It was like a bicycle wheel with six long spokes on one side of the hub (or the sun, in this case), when they should have been dispersed around it randomly. And the six orbits were also all tilted in the same way—pointing about 20 degrees downward relative to the orbits of the planets.

Normally, the objects in the Kuiper Belt follow orbits influenced by the gravitational pull of Neptune, but in the case of these super-distant objects, it was as if something other than Neptune was pulling on them. “There was this moment when we looked at each other and said, ‘Huh. That’s really odd,’ ” recalls Batygin. “We thought it could be a statistical anomaly, but the fact that they were both oriented and tilted in the same way, that dramatically reduced the chance of its being a statistical fluke.”

How much of a chance? Brown calculated the odds of such phenomena occurring randomly at .007 percent, or 7 chances in 100,000.

For the next 18 months, Batygin created computer models of the solar system, adding a ninth planet to the known objects, while Brown studied the models, trying to figure out what could be actually observed if the models were real. In the models, the team saw a set of Kuiper Belt objects in orbits perpendicular to the orbits of other far-off celestial bodies. In other words, if Planet 9 exists, so would these objects in perpendicular orbits.

Their eureka moment came in summer 2015. After carefully looking at the catalogue of known objects, Brown found five that did in fact follow orbits perpendicular to the others, and in exactly the directions predicted. “That’s the moment when we sat in silence and looked at each other in complete astonishment,” recalls Batygin. “It had solidified from a neat story into a theory.”

In January 2016, Brown and Batygin published a paper outlining the evidence for a hypothetical Planet 9. They described a world with a mass about 10 times that of Earth and two to four times its diameter. They defined its likely orbital path, postulating that it would orbit the sun every 10,000 to 20,000 years. (By comparison, it takes Pluto just 248 years.) They proposed that, like the solar system’s other giants, it was made up of a rocky, icy core enveloped by gas. They believe it is located in the direction of the Orion constellation, and is currently near its farthest point from the sun—as many as 1,200 astronomical units away (Earth’s distance from the sun, 93 million miles, is one astronomical unit, or AU).

The article was published in The Astronomical Journal, and in the first five days after its posting, it was downloaded from the journal’s website nearly a quarter-million times. News outlets all over the world covered the findings. Brown hadn’t received so much attention since he did away with Pluto.

The conspiracy theorists came out as well. The New York Daily News reported that some were claiming the new discovery was Nibiru, a cosmic object considered by “ancient alien architect” theorist Zecharia Sitchin to be the home of humankind’s creators, who visit Earth only once every 3,600 years.

Since their article appeared, Batygin and Brown have continued to ruminate on Planet 9. Last August, working with grad student Elizabeth Bailey, the team announced they had solved a long-held mystery about the solar system—and traced its roots to the elusive planet. Since the 19th century, astronomers have known that most of the planets orbit in a plane tilted six degrees relative to the sun, but no one has explained why or, frankly, shown much interest, according to Brown. “It’s just kind of ignored because nobody knows what to make of it,” he says.

But the Caltech researchers calculated that a giant planet at the edge of the solar system could be acting like a “huge lever bar,” its gravity torquing the solar system and causing its tilt. When the team plugged their calculations into a simulation, a six-degree tilt is exactly what they found.

The annals of astronomy are littered with the abandoned searches for planets orbiting beyond Neptune. Believing that the orbits of the outer planets were perturbed by a distant Planet X, 20th century astronomer Percival Lowell conducted a decade-long search for the mysterious perturber. The search turned up Pluto, now considered too small to have created the orbital anomalies of Uranus and Neptune that astronomers thought they detected. The U.S. Naval Observatory’s Robert S. Harrington searched again, unsuccessfully, in the 1980s. Not until 1989, when researchers recalculated Neptune’s mass and better understood its orbit and that of Uranus—courtesy of new data from the Voyager space probe—did that hunt end. As recently as December 2015, observers at the Atacama Large Millimeter Array in Chile detected what they thought could be a “super earth” beyond the Kuiper Belt. In that case, the astronomers posted their preliminary findings online in order to solicit opinions—and were quickly shot down.

Could the present-day search for Planet 9 also go down as just another swing and a miss? Or have Batygin and Brown succeeded in showing that something is there? JJ Kavelaars, an astronomer at the Canadian Astronomy Data Center, part of Canada’s National Research Council in Victoria, British Columbia, is not convinced by the evidence so far. When the first Kuiper Belt Object was discovered, in 1992, Kavelaars was a Ph.D. candidate, and he has studied the distant edge of the solar system ever since. The coordinator of the Canada France Imaging Survey (and of two prior surveys, the first of which turned up more than 200 Kuiper Belt Objects), he believes discussions of a giant, distant planet are premature. His team studied the simulations done by Batygin and Brown and concluded that their theory is clouded by observational bias. “Astronomers are great at seeing clusters of things when they may not really be there,” he says. “I think they’re seeing a pattern because they want to see a pattern. They have a beautiful systematic effect and they want to see a pattern that matches that effect, but when we look at the data, we just don’t see the same picture.”

Kavelaars’ collaborator, Cory Shankman of the University of Victoria in British Columbia, has created models based on the orbits of the six objects described by the Caltech team, but found that the clustering effect—based on such a small sample size—won’t necessarily hold up long-term. Once more objects are found, there’s a very good chance that they will not cluster with the others but will occupy orbits above, below, and opposite the current objects’ orbital paths.

David Jewitt, astronomy professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, is a pioneer of Kuiper Belt exploration. He co-discovered the region’s first object in 1992, then found 40 or 50 more objects over the next several years. He believes the region’s next big object will be found the same way: not by theorizing about it, but by looking for it. “There’s a bit of a frenzy going on, and I think it’s probably premature,” he says. “What we need is more evidence. That’s the thing we’ve known about for 500 years. You have to look at the world to figure out the world. You can’t just base your ideas on models.”

To people who are confused by the “yes it’s there; no it’s not” debate, Kavelaars says, “The kinds of objects that Trujillo and Sheppard and Batygin and Brown are discussing are ones that are found at the edge of detection capabilities. So it’s not completely inconceivable that they’re seeing the very beginning of such a signal,” that is, a pattern in the data. In the meantime, Kavelaars and his team on the Canada France Imaging Survey are continuing their work with the Canada France Hawaii telescope on Mauna Kea. “We’re trying to accumulate a larger and larger catalogue so we can tease out these weak [patterns],” he says.

There’s no question that the announcements by Brown and Batygin have spurred more and more astronomers to look for a planet. Sheppard and Trujillo are continuing the hunt. To search the northern sky, they use the Subaru Telescope, on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea summit. With its massive 8.2-meter mirror, Subaru specializes in far-reaching searches over wide swaths of sky—the perfect instrument for looking for celestial bodies when you’re not quite sure where to look. For the southern sky, where Orion is also visible, Sheppard has also been using the Magellan 6.5-meter Telescope in Chile as well as the Blanco 4-meter. Last August, the team announced the discovery of two additional super-distant objects, both of which exhibit orbital characteristics they say support the ninth-planet theory.

As the discoveries mount, Sheppard says he’s surer than ever that there is a Planet 9. “Now we have a total of 14 or 15 objects, and they all line up so nicely. [Planet 9] almost has to be there.”

What if the planet is there, but at the current stage in its orbit, it’s receding from Earth? Perhaps, when the planet was closer to Earth in the past, a telescope happened to capture it, but, not looking for it, astronomers didn’t pick it out. At the University of California at Berkeley, two post-docs, Michael Medford and Danny Goldstein, working under astrophysicist Peter Nugent, are mining more than 100,000 images taken over a seven-year period by the Samuel Oschin Telescope at the Palomar Observatory near San Diego, which boasts a relatively petite 1.2-meter mirror. But what Palomar lacks in depth, it makes up for in breadth; it’s capable of covering a region of the sky wider than Subaru’s field of view. What Medford and Goldstein are counting on is that Palomar has the faint signature of Planet 9 buried in some data set just waiting to be found. “There is a historical precedent for that,” says Medford, who points out that Neptune was observed by early astronomers long before it was officially declared a planet, as was Pluto, which later turned up in photographs taken prior to its 1930 discovery.

Finding Planet 9 would test Palomar’s resolving power, so the team has developed an algorithm that stacks multiple images of the same section of sky taken over a period of time. The idea is to amplify Planet 9’s signature above the background noise.

Also at Berkeley, post-doc Aaron Meisner has been searching through images taken by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), a NASA telescope launched in 2009. Optimized to detect brown dwarfs, WISE, with its infrared camera, has detected hundreds of them as well as what may be a rogue planet, a wanderer not gravitationally bound to a star. WISE may be just the ticket for detecting Planet 9. Models suggest that the planet is radiating energy in the region of the infrared spectrum that WISE can see.

Last February, as Berkeley’s supercomputer sifted through trillions of pixels, a new citizen-scientist program enlisted volunteers to help. At the website backyardworlds.org, a tutorial shows amateur planet hunters how to compare frames of WISE data in order to spot moving objects like asteroids…or a planet.

Astronomers working on the Dark Energy Survey, a five-year project to map hundreds of millions of galaxies, made a discovery last October that leads them to believe they may be the first ones to see Planet 9. The group, from the University of Michigan and led by David Gerdes, announced the discovery of a super-distant object in the solar system, which they dubbed DeeDee, for “distant dwarf.” At this point in its orbit, the icy ball of rock lies nearly 100 times farther from the sun than Earth. Gerdes says he and several undergraduates repurposed DES data in order to pick out DeeDee, as well as other objects in the Kuiper Belt. Last November he told Michigan Public Radio: “If Planet 9 happens to be out there, I believe it is bright enough to show up in our data, and in the next year or so we’ll know if it’s there or not. It’s a matter of months to a year, not decades.”

With so many astronomers now looking, Gerdes may be right about the timing. “Oh, it’s a race, but I’d definitely call it a friendly race,” says Sheppard, who believes that it will take four or five years before someone either finds the planet—or proves it doesn’t exist. So which is it?

Before the 1990s, scientists could only wonder if the outer solar system was really as empty as it seemed. Since that time, almost 2,000 objects have been discovered in the Kuiper Belt, and astronomers estimate that there are at least 100,000 more with diameters greater than 62 miles. Orbiting with them are trillions of smaller bodies left over from the formation of the solar system. Past them lies the Oort Cloud. Clearly, there’s a lot left to discover out there.about 2012VP, Sedna, and 10 other super-distant objects. They were all clustered in an unexpected way; their orbits all crossed the ecliptic plane—the conceptual flat disk around which the eight planets orbit the sun—very close to the spot where they came closest to the sun. So odd was the uniformity that the pair suspected something was causing it; they wrote, “[A]n unknown massive perturbing body may be shepherding these objects into these similar orbital configurations.”

Months later, Mike Brown, a professor of planetary astronomy at Caltech in Pasadena, walked from his office four doors down the hall to visit assistant professor Konstantin Batygin. “Have you seen this?” he asked, holding Sheppard and Trujillo’s article.

Batygin, who plays guitar in a rock band when he isn’t calculating planetary dynamics problems, was dismissive. “Every time somebody sees something unusual, everyone always thinks ‘planet’ and it never pans out,” says Batygin, then just 28 and a rising star in the field. “It is probably the most failure-rich idea that exists in astronomy today.”

For his part, Brown didn’t believe that a planet would cause the effects that the paper pointed out. Brown is a guy with a history of beating down planet theories, most notably in 2005, when his discovery of Eris, a Pluto-size body in the Kuiper Belt, effectively reduced everyone’s favorite planet to “dwarf planet” status. An athlete who has run triathlons and often wears shorts to the office, Brown enjoys his fame as an iconoclast. His twitter handle is @plutokiller. He is also the astronomer who discovered Sedna.

Brown and Batygin agreed that what Sheppard, a faculty member at Washington, D.C.’s Carnegie Institution for Science, and Trujillo, who had worked with Brown as a post-doc and is now a researcher at the Gemini Observatory in Hilo, Hawaii, were proposing couldn’t be a planet. Still, they decided to take another look at the data. They noticed two more strange uniformities: First, six of the most distant objects from Trujillo and Sheppard’s original collection all followed elliptical orbits that were physically aligned. It was like a bicycle wheel with six long spokes on one side of the hub (or the sun, in this case), when they should have been dispersed around it randomly. And the six orbits were also all tilted in the same way—pointing about 20 degrees downward relative to the orbits of the planets.

Normally, the objects in the Kuiper Belt follow orbits influenced by the gravitational pull of Neptune, but in the case of these super-distant objects, it was as if something other than Neptune was pulling on them. “There was this moment when we looked at each other and said, ‘Huh. That’s really odd,’ ” recalls Batygin. “We thought it could be a statistical anomaly, but the fact that they were both oriented and tilted in the same way, that dramatically reduced the chance of its being a statistical fluke.”

How much of a chance? Brown calculated the odds of such phenomena occurring randomly at .007 percent, or 7 chances in 100,000.

For the next 18 months, Batygin created computer models of the solar system, adding a ninth planet to the known objects, while Brown studied the models, trying to figure out what could be actually observed if the models were real. In the models, the team saw a set of Kuiper Belt objects in orbits perpendicular to the orbits of other far-off celestial bodies. In other words, if Planet 9 exists, so would these objects in perpendicular orbits.

Their eureka moment came in summer 2015. After carefully looking at the catalogue of known objects, Brown found five that did in fact follow orbits perpendicular to the others, and in exactly the directions predicted. “That’s the moment when we sat in silence and looked at each other in complete astonishment,” recalls Batygin. “It had solidified from a neat story into a theory.”

In January 2016, Brown and Batygin published a paper outlining the evidence for a hypothetical Planet 9. They described a world with a mass about 10 times that of Earth and two to four times its diameter. They defined its likely orbital path, postulating that it would orbit the sun every 10,000 to 20,000 years. (By comparison, it takes Pluto just 248 years.) They proposed that, like the solar system’s other giants, it was made up of a rocky, icy core enveloped by gas. They believe it is located in the direction of the Orion constellation, and is currently near its farthest point from the sun—as many as 1,200 astronomical units away (Earth’s distance from the sun, 93 million miles, is one astronomical unit, or AU).

The article was published in The Astronomical Journal, and in the first five days after its posting, it was downloaded from the journal’s website nearly a quarter-million times. News outlets all over the world covered the findings. Brown hadn’t received so much attention since he did away with Pluto.

The conspiracy theorists came out as well. The New York Daily News reported that some were claiming the new discovery was Nibiru, a cosmic object considered by “ancient alien architect” theorist Zecharia Sitchin to be the home of humankind’s creators, who visit Earth only once every 3,600 years.

Since their article appeared, Batygin and Brown have continued to ruminate on Planet 9. Last August, working with grad student Elizabeth Bailey, the team announced they had solved a long-held mystery about the solar system—and traced its roots to the elusive planet. Since the 19th century, astronomers have known that most of the planets orbit in a plane tilted six degrees relative to the sun, but no one has explained why or, frankly, shown much interest, according to Brown. “It’s just kind of ignored because nobody knows what to make of it,” he says.

But the Caltech researchers calculated that a giant planet at the edge of the solar system could be acting like a “huge lever bar,” its gravity torquing the solar system and causing its tilt. When the team plugged their calculations into a simulation, a six-degree tilt is exactly what they found.

The annals of astronomy are littered with the abandoned searches for planets orbiting beyond Neptune. Believing that the orbits of the outer planets were perturbed by a distant Planet X, 20th century astronomer Percival Lowell conducted a decade-long search for the mysterious perturber. The search turned up Pluto, now considered too small to have created the orbital anomalies of Uranus and Neptune that astronomers thought they detected. The U.S. Naval Observatory’s Robert S. Harrington searched again, unsuccessfully, in the 1980s. Not until 1989, when researchers recalculated Neptune’s mass and better understood its orbit and that of Uranus—courtesy of new data from the Voyager space probe—did that hunt end. As recently as December 2015, observers at the Atacama Large Millimeter Array in Chile detected what they thought could be a “super earth” beyond the Kuiper Belt. In that case, the astronomers posted their preliminary findings online in order to solicit opinions—and were quickly shot down.

Could the present-day search for Planet 9 also go down as just another swing and a miss? Or have Batygin and Brown succeeded in showing that something is there? JJ Kavelaars, an astronomer at the Canadian Astronomy Data Center, part of Canada’s National Research Council in Victoria, British Columbia, is not convinced by the evidence so far. When the first Kuiper Belt Object was discovered, in 1992, Kavelaars was a Ph.D. candidate, and he has studied the distant edge of the solar system ever since. The coordinator of the Canada France Imaging Survey (and of two prior surveys, the first of which turned up more than 200 Kuiper Belt Objects), he believes discussions of a giant, distant planet are premature. His team studied the simulations done by Batygin and Brown and concluded that their theory is clouded by observational bias. “Astronomers are great at seeing clusters of things when they may not really be there,” he says. “I think they’re seeing a pattern because they want to see a pattern. They have a beautiful systematic effect and they want to see a pattern that matches that effect, but when we look at the data, we just don’t see the same picture.”

Kavelaars’ collaborator, Cory Shankman of the University of Victoria in British Columbia, has created models based on the orbits of the six objects described by the Caltech team, but found that the clustering effect—based on such a small sample size—won’t necessarily hold up long-term. Once more objects are found, there’s a very good chance that they will not cluster with the others but will occupy orbits above, below, and opposite the current objects’ orbital paths.

David Jewitt, astronomy professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, is a pioneer of Kuiper Belt exploration. He co-discovered the region’s first object in 1992, then found 40 or 50 more objects over the next several years. He believes the region’s next big object will be found the same way: not by theorizing about it, but by looking for it. “There’s a bit of a frenzy going on, and I think it’s probably premature,” he says. “What we need is more evidence. That’s the thing we’ve known about for 500 years. You have to look at the world to figure out the world. You can’t just base your ideas on models.”

To people who are confused by the “yes it’s there; no it’s not” debate, Kavelaars says, “The kinds of objects that Trujillo and Sheppard and Batygin and Brown are discussing are ones that are found at the edge of detection capabilities. So it’s not completely inconceivable that they’re seeing the very beginning of such a signal,” that is, a pattern in the data. In the meantime, Kavelaars and his team on the Canada France Imaging Survey are continuing their work with the Canada France Hawaii telescope on Mauna Kea. “We’re trying to accumulate a larger and larger catalogue so we can tease out these weak [patterns],” he says.

There’s no question that the announcements by Brown and Batygin have spurred more and more astronomers to look for a planet. Sheppard and Trujillo are continuing the hunt. To search the northern sky, they use the Subaru Telescope, on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea summit. With its massive 8.2-meter mirror, Subaru specializes in far-reaching searches over wide swaths of sky—the perfect instrument for looking for celestial bodies when you’re not quite sure where to look. For the southern sky, where Orion is also visible, Sheppard has also been using the Magellan 6.5-meter Telescope in Chile as well as the Blanco 4-meter. Last August, the team announced the discovery of two additional super-distant objects, both of which exhibit orbital characteristics they say support the ninth-planet theory.

As the discoveries mount, Sheppard says he’s surer than ever that there is a Planet 9. “Now we have a total of 14 or 15 objects, and they all line up so nicely. [Planet 9] almost has to be there.”

What if the planet is there, but at the current stage in its orbit, it’s receding from Earth? Perhaps, when the planet was closer to Earth in the past, a telescope happened to capture it, but, not looking for it, astronomers didn’t pick it out. At the University of California at Berkeley, two post-docs, Michael Medford and Danny Goldstein, working under astrophysicist Peter Nugent, are mining more than 100,000 images taken over a seven-year period by the Samuel Oschin Telescope at the Palomar Observatory near San Diego, which boasts a relatively petite 1.2-meter mirror. But what Palomar lacks in depth, it makes up for in breadth; it’s capable of covering a region of the sky wider than Subaru’s field of view. What Medford and Goldstein are counting on is that Palomar has the faint signature of Planet 9 buried in some data set just waiting to be found. “There is a historical precedent for that,” says Medford, who points out that Neptune was observed by early astronomers long before it was officially declared a planet, as was Pluto, which later turned up in photographs taken prior to its 1930 discovery.

Finding Planet 9 would test Palomar’s resolving power, so the team has developed an algorithm that stacks multiple images of the same section of sky taken over a period of time. The idea is to amplify Planet 9’s signature above the background noise.

Also at Berkeley, post-doc Aaron Meisner has been searching through images taken by the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), a NASA telescope launched in 2009. Optimized to detect brown dwarfs, WISE, with its infrared camera, has detected hundreds of them as well as what may be a rogue planet, a wanderer not gravitationally bound to a star. WISE may be just the ticket for detecting Planet 9. Models suggest that the planet is radiating energy in the region of the infrared spectrum that WISE can see.

Last February, as Berkeley’s supercomputer sifted through trillions of pixels, a new citizen-scientist program enlisted volunteers to help. At the website backyardworlds.org, a tutorial shows amateur planet hunters how to compare frames of WISE data in order to spot moving objects like asteroids…or a planet.

Astronomers working on the Dark Energy Survey, a five-year project to map hundreds of millions of galaxies, made a discovery last October that leads them to believe they may be the first ones to see Planet 9. The group, from the University of Michigan and led by David Gerdes, announced the discovery of a super-distant object in the solar system, which they dubbed DeeDee, for “distant dwarf.” At this point in its orbit, the icy ball of rock lies nearly 100 times farther from the sun than Earth. Gerdes says he and several undergraduates repurposed DES data in order to pick out DeeDee, as well as other objects in the Kuiper Belt. Last November he told Michigan Public Radio: “If Planet 9 happens to be out there, I believe it is bright enough to show up in our data, and in the next year or so we’ll know if it’s there or not. It’s a matter of months to a year, not decades.”

With so many astronomers now looking, Gerdes may be right about the timing. “Oh, it’s a race, but I’d definitely call it a friendly race,” says Sheppard, who believes that it will take four or five years before someone either finds the planet—or proves it doesn’t exist. So which is it?

Before the 1990s, scientists could only wonder if the outer solar system was really as empty as it seemed. Since that time, almost 2,000 objects have been discovered in the Kuiper Belt, and astronomers estimate that there are at least 100,000 more with diameters greater than 62 miles. Orbiting with them are trillions of smaller bodies left over from the formation of the solar system. Past them lies the Oort Cloud. Clearly, there’s a lot left to discover out there.

http://www.airspacemag.com/space/search-for-planet-180963187/

Post has attachment
Otherworldly Events Happening Right Now! Experts Come Forward! 2017 Everyone... keep your eyes to the sky we are not alone in the cosmos."

Post has attachment
A close #lightning strike at the #Athens airport about an hour ago (Greece, May 22, 2017)

https://twitter.com/WeatherRUS/status/866439896961085440

Post has shared content

Post has shared content

Post has attachment
MOTHER NATURE'S FURY. OKLAHOMA CITY, USA (Vonda took this pic in Moore, OK last night.) May 17-18, 2017, By @koconews @KOCOAbigail @KOCOmarkie
@KOCOdamonlane @KOCOJessica @KOCOBrad

https://twitter.com/KOCOAbigail/status/865693512297312256
Photo

Post has shared content
One of the most controversial Creature sighting videos on Youtube, with over more than 5.8 million viewers, featured on hundreds of websites, aired on Fox News and discussed in major newspapers across Europe. After more than 3 years on Youtube, this video is still kicking up dirt! Feel free to follow my research concerning this mysterious creature, and start by watching the first original video first. If you are interested in the whole story, and all the new available information, visit my channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCYA3axWZagHA0dt4pmAqAg Greetings Mike Soze (the Netherlands)
Wait while more posts are being loaded