Post has shared content
Associations of ideas that leads to another (3/...) v0.2

(en français dans le commentaire ci-dessous, attention traduction de la v0.1, v0.2 à venir)
Here are some assumptions to date :
I think all is different, finite and dicret in an universe, so i have to start to reason with this axiom, which excludes equality, infinity, zero and continuity. (cf. the two previous article)
I think the universe may be generate by a finite number of instantiations issued by a primary class "f".
I think i might deduct all instance from any instance of a universe.
I need to define this primary class and the algorithm that governs its instantiations in a loop.
This loop might have no beginning and no end. And it's not a problem.
I think that each instantiation f(i) might accepte a transition state that could generate a new universe f' with the initial conditions of the instance f(i).
There might be have no end and no beginning for the generation of new universe since the primary class or one of its instanciations. As a perpetual loop as while (true).
I think an universe might have a beginning and an end , from big bang to big freeze or big rip or big crunch to big bang,...

The "universal" algorithm would be based on nested loops including a perpetual (while 1).
The iterations of the other loops would be based on what I think, might be the Fibonnacci sequence (life) and the collatz conjecture or the syracuse's problem (maximum entropy) or extensions of this sequence and algorithm , as the powers of primes to Syracuse (1 3 9, 1 5 25 , 1 7 49, ...) and P-Fibonacci sequence (0, 1, 3, 10, 33, 109, 360 for 3-Fibonacci sequence).
I need to find the greatest finished number that could be taken by f's instantiation. It may be define as “Max” where f(Max) would represent the greatest possible order at the beginning of a new universe.
I think “Max” might be around 10 ^ 500.

I might so define energy (and mass) as the measure of my biased observation of the state change of prime brane, which would give me the illusion of movement and energy's interaction effects.
I think the concept of "infinity" seems to be the remains and legacy of the beliefs of some of our scientific ancestors, especially some older mathematicians, probably strongly influenced and conditioned by centuries of beliefs and religious education.
I think that if i want to find a theory of everything, i must definitely give up all belief in my reasonnement.
The infinities seems to be like bridges between science and meta-science.
It seems to symbolize the faith and hope of believers to be able to meet their "creator" from their lifetime. I think this is probably unrealistic and utopian.
The Boltzmann equation seems to lead to the demontration that my universe seems to be toward maximum entropy, of order to disorder. And Landau dumping on plasmas, proved in 2010 by C. Villani and C. Mouhot, which seems to explain this exception that is life, mainly composed of plasmas, which appears to progress of disorder to order, on the contrary.

Here are some topics that i need to discuss and need help to advance this idea to a principle. :
1/ I need to prove the collatz conjecture and talk about possible extensions of this conjecture to the prime numbers (1 3 9, 1 5 25, 1 7 49, ...)
https://www.facebook.com/notes/jeremy-slavik/probleme-de-syracuse-projet-de-demonstration-v08/10207955087209708
Could you help me ?

2/ I need the definition ( geometric shape ) of a three-dimensional Gömböc in a Calabi–Yau mansfold with 11 dimensions ?
I need formal proof of the existence and its mathematical definition. :) http://www.gomboc.eu/100.pdf => with 11 dimensions.
"This will give you some insights: http://www.ams.org/notices/201108/rtx110801067p.pdf" (thanks to Moinak Banerjee)
I think this could be f(1).
I imagine a "Gomboc" stable condition with three equilibrium (swinging between its three points). Is it defined?

3/ I try to define a "universal" algorithm, based on nested loops including a perpetual (while 1). The iterations of the other loops are based on what I think is either :
- Fibonnacci sequence "life". Does it exist a relation between landau dumping and Fibonnaci sequence or p-fibonacci sequence ?
- and the conjecture of Syracuse (maximum entropy). Does it exist a relation between Boltzmann equation governing the maximum entropy principle of a gas in a closed system and Fibonnaci sequence or p-fibonacci sequence ?
- or an extensions, as the powers of primes to Syracuse (1 3 9, 1 5 25 , 1 7 49, ...) => does this extensions define ? exist ?

4/ I need to find the greatest finished number that could be taken by f's instantiation. It may be define as “Max” where f(Max) would represent the greatest possible order at the beginning of a new universe.
I think Max might be just near 10 ^ 500, equivalent to the specific number of possible solutions in M-theory. I haven’t this specific number. Do you know it ?
V0.2 : english reformulation and new precisions (p-fibonacci and "Gomboc" stable condition with three equilibrium)

Post has attachment
https://www.facebook.com/MPLHAC/

Enjeu : Préserver toutes formes de vie de la prochaine extinction massive.
Objectif : Faire émerger une intelligence humaine sur le réseau en vue de répondre collectivement à cet enjeu commun dans le respect de la vie et des libertés individuelles et inaliénables de toutes les formes de vie.

Issue : Preserve all forms of life of the next mass extinction.
Objective: To emerge a Human Intelligence on the network to collectively meet this common challenge in respect of individual and inalienable Freedom of all forms of life.

Problema: Preservar todas las formas de vida de una nueva extinción masiva programada.
Objetivo: emerge una inteligencia humana en la red para satisfacer colectivamente este desafío común en cumplimiento
con la vida y la libertad individual e inalienable de todas las formas de vida.

Post has attachment
Movement for the Coordination of World R&D.
Cela se passe sur Facebook. Je n'ai aucun problème avec G+, mais j'ai créé le groupe sur FB. Si seulement ces deux réseaux proposaient une synchronisation automatique de leur réseau. Cela serait plus facile pour les Hommes. ;)
A priori, paratge G+ vers FB possible, mais FB vers G+ ?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/MPLHAC.MCWRD/

"je ne sais qu'une chose, c'est que je ne sais rien" et encore moins ce que sais ou pense l'autre...mais j'ai cherché, je cherche et je chercherai, j'ai réalisé, je réalise et je réaliserai tant que je le pourrais.
Wait while more posts are being loaded