Stream

Willie HavMire

Discussion  - 
 
Add me to a circle(^;
 
MESSAGE TO MEN: Go for that premium!

I used to think the only thing better than "Cookies" is NEW "Cookies"

Now I realize, the only thing better than new "Cookies" is EXCLUSIVE Cookies...

The kind that only I can have...
The kind that everybody ain't sampled...

Apply that wherever you like(^;

View original post
1
1
Children's Rights Florida's profile photo
Add a comment...

Toby igniter

Tips and Tricks-Quick snippets of wisdom to save you time  - 
 
 
I Agree Men Have To Fight A Up Hill Battle Starting Out In Custody Battle. It Is Hard To Find A Court That Gives Them A Equal Shot. But They Should Never Give Up their Rights. They Should Fight For Their Kids No Matter What Is Set Against Them!!! http://www.childcustodyarrangements.com/

#childcustody #fathersrights fathersrightsmovement #custody #familylaw #familycourt #divorce
View original post
1
Add a comment...

Toby igniter

Tips and Tricks-Quick snippets of wisdom to save you time  - 
 
 
Some Things Don't Make Sense In A Child Custody Arrangement. Who Do you think Your Kids Would Want To Be With The Other Parent Or A Babysitter. If The Other Parent Has Done Nothing Wrong. Why Not Be The Bigger Person And Let Them Watch The Kids If You Need A Babysitter. http://www.childcustodyarrangements.com/


#childcustody #familylaw #familycourt #divorce #custody
View original post
1
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Must See Videos  - 
2
1
Children's Rights Florida's profile photo
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Family Law Reform  - 
 
 
In 1923, the Supreme Court pronounced parental rights worthy of protection under the 14th Amendment in Meyer v. Nebraska. The Court has recognized that parents have a “fundamental and protected liberty interest” in the government not intruding into their families and that fit parents are deemed to make decisions in the best interest of their child.

In 2000, Troxel v. Granville changed the court's position. No majority of Supreme Court justices agreed that parental rights deserved “strict scrutiny” protection. The plurality decision in Troxel held that the court must merely grant “some special weight to” a fit parent’s decisions for their child. “Special weight?” That is a far cry from “strict scrutiny.” http://ow.ly/i/2Q4OL
View original post
1
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Causes.com  - 
2
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Tips and Tricks-Quick snippets of wisdom to save you time  - 
3
1
Corrupt CT's profile photo
Add a comment...

About this community

The father's rights movement isn't an anti-mom or anti-woman movement; it's an anti-unfairness movement. Our aim is to champion the cause of equal parenting, family law reform and equal contact for divorced/separated parents with their children. The fathers' rights movement is a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children. Many of its members are fathers who desire to share the parenting of their children equally with their children's mother—either after divorce or as unwed fathers, and the children of the terminated marriage. The movement includes women as well as men, often the second wives of divorced fathers or other family members of men who have had some engagement with family law. Most of the members of the fathers' rights movement had little prior interest in the law or politics. However, as they felt that their goal of equal shared parenting was being frustrated by the family courts, many took an interest in family law, including child custody and child support. Though it has been described as a social movement, members of the movement believe their actions are better described as part of a civil rights movement. Objections to the characterizations of the movement as a social movement are related to the belief that discrimination against fathers moves beyond the social sciences and originates in government intervention into family life. The movement has received international press coverage as a result of high profile activism of their members, has become increasingly vocal, visible and organised, and has played a powerful role in family law debates. The child is not the mere creature of the State; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations." - Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925) "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.... It is in recognition of this that these decisions have respected the private realm of family life which the state cannot enter." - Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944) "The Due Process Clause does not permit a State to infringe on the fundamental right of parents to make childrearing decisions simply because a state judge believes a 'better' decision could be made." - Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000) #StandUpForZoraya #EndParentalAlienation #ILoveAndNeedMyDaughter
 
No Contact for Daughter and Father. No Reason Needed - Judge Manno-Schurr. ~~ #StandupforZoraya... (31 signatures on petition)
1 comment on original post
3
1
Children's Rights Florida's profile photo
Add a comment...

Jeffry Munn

Discussion  - 
 
Hello everyone...
I am in dire need of aggressive representation in Colorado.
I was a stay at home father for the duration of my failed marriage, seven years, raising my son and daughter.
About four years in, I was diagnosed with Crohns disease, fell into a severe depression and was suddenly divorced.
In the time since I left my home and children, I have been "awarded" two weekend visits per month and have lost nearly all of my parental rights and the drama continues to this day.
Never has this entire process been effectively "in the best interests of the children," in fact, it has disregarded them altogether.
The judicial system for family law is an embarrassment to fathers who love their children.
Please help! Any information is appreciated. 
7
3
Laura Halligan's profile photoJeffry Munn's profile photoHannah Wallen's profile photoChildren's Rights Florida's profile photo
6 comments
 
Thank you Laura. Love for my children is why I have no choice but to fight. 
Add a comment...

David Inguanzo

Tips and Tricks-Quick snippets of wisdom to save you time  - 
3
Add a comment...
 
 
don't drink out the faucet if you are a man/boy and live in the ATL...
As a single mother raising sons, don't move to Atlanta unless you want to share beta penises and risk your son's booty hole. And don't let your sons drink the water.
2 comments on original post
1
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Family Law Reform  - 
 
 
Do we NEED the Parental Rights Amendment?

The courts can no longer seem to agree on the current status of parental rights under the law. Judges rule on a case-by-case basis, protecting the rights of some parents while disregarding the rights of others. http://4pra.us/needpra
View original post
2
Add a comment...

Scott Adams
moderator

Must See Videos  - 
2
1
Corrupt CT's profile photo
Add a comment...

Brian Scott

Discussion  - 
 
What not to Assume!
1
Add a comment...