Post has shared content
MUST WATCH this is east ghouta video of "assad gassing civilians" LMAOOO you cant make this shit up

Post has shared content
PhotoPhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto
4/8/18
21 Photos - View album

Post has shared content
"Israel has never false flagged the US into war, and anyone who says so is a anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist"
PhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto
4/8/18
4 Photos - View album

Post has shared content
PhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto
4/10/18
4 Photos - View album

Post has shared content
Last Syria post for now, but holy shit how can anyone believe Assad is doing these attacks anymore.
It's the same formula everytime.

US Leaving Syria~>Assad is winning~> Suddenly gas attack ~> US makes it worse for Assad ~> US Pushes more for Regime change (A year or two passes) ~> "Oh, our bad, maybe it was the rebels, who we pay off, who did this. Sorry assad" ~> REPEAT
Photo

Post has shared content
It is very easy for the mainstream media to lie about the affairs of foreign nations when there are very few ways for the public to find alternative information. This video is proof of that.

Post has shared content
Lunatic Ranting at the Security Council
by Stephen Lendman

US envoy Nikki Haley is a geopolitical pyromaniac, evident each time she addresses Security Council members.

On March 12 during a SC session on Syria, she recited her usual litany of Big Lies - bashing Russia, Syria and Iran irresponsibly, ignoring their involvement in combating US-supported terrorists, saying nothing about daily Pentagon-led terror-bombing massacring civilians.

Haley: Russia “did not keep (its) commitment…to stop the killing in Syria” - agreed on under SC Res. 2401.

False! Russia, Syria and allied forces fully observe the resolution - flagrantly violated by Washington, its imperial partners, Turkey, and US-supported terrorists.

Haley: Russian “bombs continue dropping on the children of eastern Ghouta. Today, we must ask whether Russia can no longer influence (Assad) to stop the horrific destruction of hospitals, medical clinics, and ambulances. To stop dropping chemical weapons on villages.”

Fact: Russian and Syrian bombs only strike US-supported terrorists. US-led coalition warplanes bear full responsibility for terror-bombing “ hospitals, medical clinics…ambulances” and other civilian targets.

Fact: US-supported terrorists alone used CWs numerous times, mainly against Syrian civilians. No evidence suggests government forces ever used banned toxic weapons throughout the conflict.

Haley: Is “Russia (a) tool of Assad? Or worse, Iran?”

The insolence of this remark warrants no response.

Haley: Russia “negotiated the wording of the ceasefire (in Syria) and…immediately disregarded it.”

A bald-face lie!

Haley: “There have been almost no deliveries of medicine and surgical equipment (to East Ghouta), because (Syrian forces) removed them from the UN’s humanitarian convoys.”

Fact: US-supported terrorists either blocked deliveries or stole what’s intended for civilians - liberated areas now beginning to receive humanitarian aid.

Haley: “Assad…Iran and Russia continu(e) to wage war against their political opponents.”

Fact: They’re waging war solely against US-supported terrorists.

Haley: Russia and Syria “label(ed) every opposition group in eastern Ghouta a ‘terrorist’ group. Why?”

Fact: Groups in East Ghouta holding defenseless civilians hostage as human shields are terrorists, not “rebels,” as falsely claimed.

Haley: “(T)he United States put all parties on notice that we needed to act if the ceasefire was not honored, and members of the Security Council agreed. And now that day has come.”

“The ceasefire has failed. The situation of the civilians in eastern Ghouta is dire. And the United States is acting. We have drafted a new ceasefire resolution that provides no room for evasion.”

“It is simple, straightforward, and binding. It will take effect immediately upon adoption by this Council. It contains no counterterrorism loopholes for Assad, Iran and the Russians to hide behind.”

Fact: The US draft resolution is an abomination, aiming to halt Syrian and Russian operations against US-supported terrorists in East Ghouta.

It represents a disgraceful attempt to keep countless thousands of civilians in the enclave kept captive, not liberated, what Syrian and Russian operations are committed to achieve.

Haley: “(T)he United States remains prepared to act if we must. It is not the path we prefer, but it is a path we have demonstrated we will take, and we are prepared to take it again.”

Russia warned it won’t tolerate an attack on Syrian forces endangering its personnel in the country.

Sergey Lavrov commented sharply, saying “(i)f a new (US) strike…takes place (against Syrian forces), the consequences will be very serious.”

The ball is in Washington’s court. Is it willing to risk confrontation with Russia by escalating aggression in Syria? The stakes are huge.

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html
Photo

Post has shared content
3 weeks ago: RT reports possible upcoming chemical false Flag

March 31st: The Syrian army has announced “full victory” against terrorist groups in Ghouta.

April 3rd: DonaldTrump announces he wants our troops out of Syria.

April 4th: Israel thinks pulling out of Syria is a problem

April 7th Assad gasses his own people? Again? For no reason?
PhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto
4/8/18
4 Photos - View album

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
[GENERAL WESLEY CLARK]
Well, in a way. But, you know, history doesn’t repeat itself exactly twice. What I did warn about when I testified in front of Congress in 2002, I said if you want to worry about a state, it shouldn’t be Iraq, it should be Iran. But this government, our administration, wanted to worry about Iraq, not Iran.

I knew why, because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” -- meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office -- “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”

+Mondas +Mom +Merryweather
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded