Post is pinned.
Ethnicity must go ! But first, we need to assure Political Correctness - let's roll :

Racism, the scourge of the Earth !  Are not all men and women exactly equal ? Can they not be easily gender-changed ? Do we not all have the exact same intelligence and abilities, as long as we refuse to accept the Bell Curve Facts? Do we not even look a lot alike ? Now that we proudly exterminated all other vertebrates on the planet (the ones we called 'animals', so we needn't give a shit), we can finally take care of ourselves, and we do it using a religious belief system called Marxism.

For starters, our goal should be to mix all the populations of Africa and Arabia into Europe to make the nasty so-called Caucasians go away, because they successfully tried to be better than everybody else, and once that's settled, we do the same to the Asian nations, mainly China, and make the nasty Mongolids go away - they have high IQs, and that's racist. 
This will be easy as Europe is rich and China is going to be rich, and the poor will always go to where the rich are living, so they can take part in all the nice accumulated wealth, and breed some more. Our success with Replacement Migration in the EU proves the theory.

You may object that humans are by nature competitive, and that they will always try to trump each other, and that this is simply evolution. That makes me think you didn't listen ! Marxism voids evolution. We don't give a shit about life on this planet, and we will gladly accept a certain amount of degeneration if it only satisfies our desire for the warmth of a society of equals, where nobody is challenge and everything remains the same.

Soon, we will have a homogenous, mixed human population without qualities or differences, which, to confuse the very dumb, we call 'diversity', and the world will be  a better place with more rather torpid humans who all get a Barbie education, and less of anything else. Who could say no ? Let's roll and get this done now, as long as people actually believe that we're doing The Lord's Work. And remember : You have no right to prefer or like better, one human of your choice above another ! That sort of fascism will be a thing of the past...

Post has shared content
Find Your Place in the New World Order
Leaked excerpt from an introductory speech draft for the Bilderberg Conference, which will take place in June this year, in Dresden, Germany.

The world we live in has to change fast, if mankind is to avoid great danger like world hunger and destructive wars - these problems cannot be solved by mutual consent, so progressive forces of Good have been contemplating solutions for all, and come up  with the most practicable ones. As Climate Change, Animal Extinction and Global Pollution  are given things that would cost too much money to correct, we need to pacify humanity and adapt it to the challenges of an inglorious, tough and dreary future where it will no longer possible that  enterprising individuals or nations gain an unfair advantage over their contemporaries.

First, it must be assured that the political powers of Good whom we can trust and who stand for humanism and philanthropy, will prevail and determine the fate of mankind, rather than evil and destructive ones. These powers can obviously only be free democratic ones - no formal dictatorships are allowed, though some monarchies will have to be tolerated. We must all work together to ensure that the democratic powers and their allies will be able and determine humanity's destiny, through Full Spectrum Dominance over destructive forces (namely Russia) who desire to keep the world  irrationally multipolar.

Equality for all is the noble goal, are not all humans created equal ? Is not everything about them the same except for their wealth and skin color ?  Different skin colors will diappear through healthy, induced migration, and at the same time, wealth will be effectively equalized. As it is obviously impossible to make everybody rich - we have for decades tried to give money to the poor, but it always lands in the hands of some elites - we finally decided to bring the poor to where the rich live, and have them fight it out. What may at first sight sound cruel, is now in fact working perfectly. We call it Replacement Migration, and it was discussed and agreed upon in the UN more than twenty years ago.

It must be understood that human society is based on an economy that consists of four branches, one being the food industry that caters to basic needs, and the economy supplying the food industry (tractor makers etc.), further the entertainment industry which creates fun gadgets and illusions - so humans don't get bored. Much of what the food industry produces is actually also just fun produce, as we do not NEED to eat these foods and would be wise to avoid them. But we like to consume them, and so we turn nature into products, which we then throw away, creating mountains of waste. There is the banking industry, which regulates the money flow, money being like the oil that keeps a motor from breaking down, and indeed makes it run faster. Finally, there is the war industry. You have to understand that these four industries by principle make up most of what we call the economy. All human culture is built upon this economic principle - that we turn nature into rubbish to survive, while being fed well and having what we like to see as fun and entertainment. 

We're also like squirrels, we like to collect, and we always want more. We can't stop. We want more than our neighbor has. That's the way we are. If a human sees another have or own something he himself  doesn't have, he gets jealous. It makes people aggressive, and there are wars. We also like to cheat and even kill each other, so as to gain a lead over the other party - humans are by nature competitive, and this is the world's main problem. Leo Strauss observed that the human being is inherently evil. Humanity must be equalized by force - it is our duty to  make sure that everybody is equal. Everybody must have the same amount of wealth, no matter if that means very much or very little. As very much is hardly possible with ever more people, it'll very likely be very little. But that doesn't matter - equality matters. Equality means peace and control. 

There must be equality in everything, but most importantly wealth and skin color. Skin color is important because it's so obvious. Our science so far says that humans are racially very homogenous, or in other words that there is no other difference than skin color. There is also disputed scientific proof that IQ differences exist, but if those exist they must go as well. The percentages of human races now and in twenty years are about this: whites 1.6 > 1.5 | indian 1.2 > 1.5 | asians 2.1 > 2.5 | black   1.1 > 1.7 | arabs 0.5 > 0.7 | other  1.1 > 1.8  

As in reality, the Whites and the Asians have created the most wealth for themselves, and are also of lighter color and higher intelligence than the others (there is one exception - the Indians, who are basically Caucasians of darker skin color), Whites and Asians must be made darker, mixed. In practice, this is not possible with Asians right now, but real existing global migration flows makes it possible to exchange the Whites of Europe and North America insofar that they will be brown by getting mixed mainly with Negroids and Arabs,  thus disappearing or rather, becoming an indistinct blend that does not raise aggression - neither will it have more wealth. It will have much less wealth, but that cant be helped. It's beneficial.

In essence, it means there must be a disappearance of what is now  being called "white privilege", by importation and flooding Europe and North America with poor people from other, poorer continents and countries, preferably young males, as these will guarantee the desired changes to happen quickly for simple sexual breeding reasons. North America and Europe will be of mixed or rather blended race within 30 years. It is important that the races mix well, and have one homogenous skin color, in effect this is the most important factor - all would be in vain if  people simple immigrate and stay apart. If that were to happen, there would be real diversity - however, homogeneity is desired - never mind the propaganda, we only use that to steer people along while they still have individualistic ideals.

Diversity should ideally also disappear among cultures - as we managed to create a homogenous western media culture, we could basically use this but as this culture is a hedonist one, it created individualistic egotists, when a more community-minded people would be desired. Taking religions into account is believed to be the most practical solution here, as the human animal naturally craves such beliefs, they mentally stabilize him and make him more pliable and allover altruistic.  Comparison between the effectiveness of religious beliefs made us choose Islam - we expect it to be the one world religion of the future, mainly because of it's self-sustaining features. It doesn't need servicing.

Conclusion : for practical reasons, the white populations of Europe and North America have to make room for a large number of immigrants from highly dissimilar racial and cultural origins, who should interbreed with them as fast as possible. This will equalize property levels and make the much envied white race go away, thus assuring the disappearance of the envy factor, as both Europe and North America will at the same time automatically see their wealth dramatically reduced, thus becoming more equal to Africa, the Semitic belt and Latin America. The Asian problem, that is that the Mongoloid people because of their higher  IQ levels becoming superior, as the whites formerly were, can unfortunately not be tackled at this time, as they are not quite rich enough and mentally/culturally not adapted enough to enable social engineering on a scale similar to Europe and North America, where the necessary psychology of acceptance has been created over many decades of hard work by socialist teachers and the spread of positive thinking by our media.

Unfortunately, the insertion of aggressive, testosterone-rich young males from several continents into formerly white countries will not happen without violence and much bloodshed once the native population awaken to the realities of the process, but the result will be worth the ordeal. There will be wealth-creating benefits - with more inhabitants, real estate prices will be going up again, there will be a general economic upward trend - healthy growth will be reestablished for many years, till Climate Change hits in earnest.

The New World Order/Peace on Earth calls for the inhabitants of Europe and North America to sacrifice their visual peculiarities and real privileges, liberties and wealth for the higher ends of humanity. So far, psychological problems resulting from this epochal task could be avoided because of the special nature of Western culture, which has progressed to a stage where it's members feel guilty about their privilege and thus accept an obligation to give them and themselves up, after gentle nudging by our media. We are not concerned about this, as on the whole, Europe and North America will increase in wealth - it will just be in the hands of different people, and in the end, 
it will be in the philanthropic hands of the banks.


The inhabitants of Asia will share their white brethren's fate at a later date, whenever this becomes practical, and after a lengthy re-educational preparation process. This will likely be the case in another 20-30 years, when China is a rich country comparable to the now West (the "First World" of the past), and through insertion of Islamic boots into China's soft underbelly, also from Indonesia which already is a Muslim nation. However, this is a problem our successors will have to tackle. We're optimistic, and so are the Middle Eastern Sunni Muslim powers we consider our closest allies in this win-win scenario. After Europe and North America, Russia will fall - and the Asians will be confronted by a ring of an entirely homogenous federated nations under one government, it's inhabitants being ideal humans - an Islamic consumerist culture that has the potential for easy assimilation of the entire Eurasian land mass.

#nwo   #migration  #bilderberg
Photo

Post has attachment
DID you know ? IQ stands for Intelligence Quantifier.
"Violent crime decreases as modal I.Q. moves upward of 85" and virtually stops at or above I.Q. 115

Paul Cooijmans is a very clever individual who is unsurprisingly right about many things - but as prone to ridiculous prejudice as any human I ever met, including myself. Under circumstances, any human brain is incapable of seeing naked reality staring into it's mental eye.  
And not refusing it at first glance, automatically. 
So that in this sense, most of what follows is actually true :

This is what he has to say on the heritability of #homosexuality
http://paulcooijmans.com/evolution/homosexuality.html

On human #degeneration
http://paulcooijmans.com/evolution/human_degeneration.html

And as a practical guide, on societal decline (also see #survivalism and/or #offgrid , and #preppinghttp://paulcooijmans.com/evolution/decline.html

Post has attachment
The Bell Curve is not politically correct, but neither is evolution -  it's science. There is no way around it because of the 19th century assumption that all men are equal and some are just hindered from brilliance by bad social origins, or because they live in Africa, though such things of course happen. 

This is about scientific statistics, which show what MOSTLY happens. They have been repeated since the "Bell Curve" was written, with more or less the same results. Social circumstances were taken into account, and everything points to the fact that there are genetic differences.
If we assume that all human races have the exact same intellectual properties when levelled out, we might as well assume that all humans have the same basic potential, which is clearly not the case - or have you never run into an idiot ? 

A cultural marxist however, force-powered by multiculturalist pressure, will argue that human intellectual capacity is quite different in individuals and families, that it's different everywhere but please no ! NOT at all between races, when all evidence points to the opposite.
H will then tell you to definitely interbreed with Pygmies, as this will undoubtedly further the ends of the human race, in a philosophical sense - and what else is there but philosophy ? Way to go.

This is a brief wikipedia description, leading to the book. It is however available as a free pdf for those who know their ways.

This is an interesting post with an opinion about The Bell Curve
https://plus.google.com/+AbelDean/posts/Nbj46FZJ7uu

Post has shared content
Watch it, read it - this is a Cultural Marxist at work, a true believer. 
He looks like a peasant because that's what he was born to. His thinking is simplistic...how cannot everybody believe what he believes in ?
THE FUTURE WILL NEVER BE ©TimmerMans || I wonder if he's even able to define "diversity" in any sensible way. He's contradicting himself several times in his little speech, and he never makes much sense with any one of his statements :

"Diversity is now in some parts of Europe seen as a threat. Diversity comes with challenges. But diversity is humanity's destiny. There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see diversity in it's future - that's where humanity is heading, and those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture are trying to portray a future based on a past that never existed. 
Therefore, that future will never be. Europe will be diverse, like all other parts of the world will be diverse, the only question is "how do we deal with that diversity". And my answer to that is : by ensuring that our values determine how we deal with diversity, and not giving up our values to refuse diversity - that will bring us down as a society. If we  don't get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe we built, Europe will not remain the place of peace and freedom for very long."

He has considerable linguistic intelligence, given that he makes up his phrasing from just some notes - he barely messes with grammar, and his accent is without Dutch gutturals - the problem is that he really and obviously doesn't have an idea what the fuck he is talking about. This is a mantra not an argumentation. This guy is Vice President of the EU Commission. He talks like a priest.
My impression is that a group of politicos of limited wits have just agreed on a general philosophy which they now religiously believe  in, that would be the Kalergi-originated one, and that  they are now following up, do or die. If they only manage to fill Europe up with brownies before it can gather its wits and vote them out of office, all will be well and the world will be a better place. They really believe this, but there is not a shred of scientific evidence for what they say.

The counter-arguments are the better arguments. Why are they not being used efficiently ?  Because there's a Politically Correct mass psychosis in place.

Here's a first draft of my spontaneous answers to all the wise things Frans says in his little speech above, please feel free to suggest corrections.
a -"But diversity is humanity's destiny" - diversity is what we have now. There's lots of different people with different cultures, different languages and different faces, So if you want diversity, don't force them to mix - let them do what they like. Diversity goes with Freedom, not Social-Genetic Breed Engineering (SGBE). TimmerMan, when he says "diversity" really means Homogeneity - everybody must look alike and have the same culture. And as genes and cultures go, the smallest common denominator will prevail. That sounds like genius level to me.
b - "There is not going to be, even in the remotest places of this planet, a nation that will not see diversity in it's future..." - I don't think so ? I see people migrating/immigrating from certain places to certain other places and not vice versa. For example, Europeans emigrated to America when Europe was poor, hoping for riches. Now Africans emigrate to Europe, hoping for riches. There are other reasons, but those are negligible if you check. There are other people, but in our age it's more or less poor Third Worlders on their way into the First World, because the quality of life is better there. For how long ? While I see no Europeans travelling to "the remotest parts of the planet" to stay and claim it as their own, Mr Timmermans. Some did that in the Colonial Era which we so despise, and which we are now repeating in a reverse manner ?
c - "those politicians trying to sell to their electorates a society that is exclusively composed of people from one culture " - Timmermans is an authoritative thinker, not a democrat at all. He assumes the man on the street is unable to think on his own, therefore "politicians" must have stirred him into refusing to accept a steady influx of brazen strangers to bring a momentary "diversity", bring the overpopulation problem right to his doorstep from the Third World and entirely incompatible cultures. Couldn't be that they dislike this on their own. The man on the street will be forced to accept a change of culture ! His traditions are moot.
d - "politicians trying to... portray a future based on a past that never existed."  He iss saying that liars are telling us, the European public, that we had a consistent culture. This is not true, we never had a culture. Are we not watching Hollywood movies that are also shown in Uganda, in Japan and Chile ? So there. We have no culture - they do. Thus spoke Frans Timmermans, decide for yourself if you want to agree with him, decide for Islam if you dare.
e -"Europe will be diverse, like all other parts of the world will be diverse," - No Sir. Africa will stay African, Asia Asian, Arabia Arabic and Latin American Latin. This is about Europe and maybe the US, Australia etc. - but nothing else. And not just because freaks like you cannot command elsewhere, Mr Timmermans.
f - "how do we deal with that diversity... my answer... is : by ensuring that our values determine how we deal with diversity, and not giving up our values to refuse diversity - that will bring us down as a society."  - Let me briefly remind the reader that he isn't really talking about diversity, he's talking about a "mixed race much like the ancient Egyptians", of whom we really don't know what sort of a mix they were, if any. This is what the Kalergi Plan describes, which the EU is fanatically following, and with it Frans Timmermans. Dealing with diversity mean mixing it into homogeneity of a different kind than before, nothing else. But that makes not for pretty prose, so Frans prefers upholding "our values" - in a word the result of that European culture he just told us doesn't even exist.
g - "If we don't get this right, I truly believe Europe will not remain the Europe we built, Europe will not remain the place of peace and freedom for very long."  Are you serious, Frans ? The Europe that YOU guys BUILT ?  A few more prominent names come to mind immediately... but that's probably just me again. Well Europe is indeed changing rapidly BECAUSE of your strange values, BECAUSE of the ridiculously childish Kalergi Plan, dreamed up by a romantic nobleman in the 1920s, about a hundred years ago. 
Our Europe has already stopped being a peaceful place since you insisted on bringing a mass of underqualified Muslims here who never managed to integrate well (aha!) and because you messed around invading and bombing Muslim countries, actively furthering terrorist movements there, which now have spread to Europe. What - wasn't you, Frans ? I agree, first time you win the argument ! It was the EU's parallel institution, that infamous NATO. How could I confuse that... I must have had the impression it was one and the same. You built SOME Europe, Frans. 
NOW LEAVE US THE FUCK ALONE. Just go away, we hate you. If we were Muslims, you might be eligible for a free rock shower.

Video thx to +The Winged Messenger 

Post has shared content
Surely this is an exaggeration ? It must be, it must be, it must be... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window #extinction
Photo

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has attachment
The simple facts : it took us a million years to reach 3.5 billion people, that was about 1970. SInce then, it took us 35 years to DOUBLE that.
You didn't know this, huh ?  Hardly anyone does. Too many TV serials to memorize ! TIME TO WAKE UP...

Now with the poorest parts of the world overpopulated, and with the advanced countries stagnating in growth, our genius level politicians, in the face over pollution and climate change, decided that the logical thing must be to flood the advanced areas with poverty migrants, so they can make many little kids with the infertile advanced people who live there, so we can maybe have 15 billion people in 2050. That makes sense - what could go wrong ?

Unfortunately for them, even most Muslim countries are now showing a decrease in population growth... so 15 billion or more may not be likely. But still, while we're at it, let's ruin the cultures and social systems of the developed world anyway, because we feel so revolutionary doing it...
This is the time, and this is the record of the time.

#overpopulation

Post has shared content
Hey Primate ? You insist being made by AllahTM, so why would you give a shit about any other life form in the universe, especially if you evolved from them ? After you the deluge ! Let's have fun and delete 500 million years of evolution - yay !!
The Extinction Crisis
The Extinction Crisis
biologicaldiversity.org

Post has shared content
Well... these days, everybody knows racism is "bad", but hardly anybody ever cares to study what it's actually about. Modern people don't study - they believe ! They're not stoopid, are they ?

Human races evolved after several waves of early humans traveled northwards in Africa (it's uninformed crap to believe that Africans are all the same race), and even more after they dispersed over the plains of Europe and Asia... over tens of thousands of years they adapted to different climates and surroundings, and started to favour different outwardly features, which made some of them, but not all, more easily distinguishable - nowadays, we roughly and simplistically distinguish between five or so such races, mainly due to their different looks. But is that all that distinguishes them ? 

Political Correctness suggests it must be so, in fact racism is defined as the belief that there might be further differences, and proof of such differences are ample but being considered detrimental, science that offers such proof is frowned upon by the high priests of cultural marxism. It may not be, it's taboo. This is understandable as a reaction to racist excesses in the past, but it's scientifically unsound. Why must the human primate always subject reality to his emotional states ? Because he is his own caveat, and free will is an illusion.

As said human  races (keeping it simple) have been living and evolving apart for quite some time, it is not far out to assume that they evolved different qualities, to a degree - we by now know that evolution creates genetic and epigenetic changes to adapt a species to environmental changes within a few years or a decade or two for species with short life spans. Why not humans in several hundred years ? It's illogical to think that this never happened. We are NOT equal. It's a LEGEND.

But nah, that doesn't fit in with our 150-200 year old belief system that obsessively tells us how "all men are created equal". That's what we are expected to believe, true or not, and to hell with the facts - let the sociologists decide where science is allowed to proceed and where it won', so they can construct their ideal New World Order, and shove us all back a few thousand year. It's for a good cause : the smallest common denominator ! 

Political Correctness forbids to openly discuss this, so I will just stop doing it here... let me just say that those who insist that no genetic difference can be allowed to exist between members of the same species except sexual flavours, which MUST be genetic, are prepared to even unbelieve evolution itself on the grounds that it is inherently racist. Which in fact, some of them do.
Wait while more posts are being loaded