Profile cover photo
Profile photo
satheesh R
296 followers -
Failure is not an option.. But failure has to be an option...
Failure is not an option.. But failure has to be an option...

296 followers
About
satheesh's posts

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Why Rotoscoping Can Be the Most Helpful and the Most Hated VFX Technique..

Post has attachment
First Hands-On with the new EOS 5D Mk IV: 500Mbit/s 4K recording..

Post has attachment
mocha Pro OFX plug-in for Nuke & Fusion..
Its here! Launch your favorite planar tracker as a node from inside a Nuke or Fusion project. This quicker new workflow is a game changer for professional VFX. Available for

Post has attachment
mocha Pro 5

mocha Pro 5 is a major update including GPU accelerated tracking and new plug-in options to streamline your VFX projects into a time-saving workflow – no longer leave your host timeline! Plus improved licensing system, new export formats, new Python scripting interface, new purchase options and more.

For the first time ever, mocha Pro is being offered as an affordable plug-in to run inside Adobe After Effects CC, Adobe Premiere Pro CC & Avid Media Composer. Support for OFX hosts such as Blackmagic DaVinci Resolve and The Foundry’s NUKE coming soon!



The Math Behind the Apply Modes.
----------------------------------------------
Contents
Normal
Add
Multiply
Screen
------------------------------------------------

Normal
In this mode, the Merge offers an extra Subtractive/Additive control which lets you select between additive and subtractive compositing or even make a mix between these types.
The two formulas of the Normal mode are:
Result Color = Background Color ∗ (1 − Foreground Alpha ∗ Alpha Gain ∗ (1 − Burn In)) + Foreground Color - for additive
Result Color = Background Color ∗ (1 − Foreground Alpha ∗ Alpha Gain ∗ (1 − Burn In)) + Foreground Color ∗ Foreground Alpha ∗ Alpha Gain - for subtractive
As you can see, the difference between the additive and subtractive formulas is that in the additive one, the foreground doesn't get multiplied by its Alpha.
This is because additive compositing implies that your images are already pre-multiplied by Alpha. It normally means that completely transparent areas are black and 0 in Alpha corresponds to 0, 0, 0 in R, G, B.
The additive approach is used in 3D and professional compositing software.
The subtractive approach is mostly used in editing software, Adobe-ware and other programs working in low color depth. It works with "un-premultiplied", or pre-divided by Alpha images (depending on the way the Alpha was created).
In such images the color extends beyond object edges and in semi-transparent areas it has the same values as in completely opaque ones. The multiplication by Alpha is performed on the fly at the time of putting the layers together, as you can see from the subtractive formula.
A benefit of this workflow is that all the color tools operate the values unaffected by transparency (straight colors), so highlights remain highlights and shadows remain shadows regardless of how transparent or blurred the object is.
In software like Fusion, which is capable of processing the images in 32 bit per channel mode, it's easily fixed with pre-dividing by Alpha (sometimes strangely called un-premultiplying), but in 8-bit or 16 bit integer mode you will experience color distortions after performing sequential divisions and multiplications due to rounding losses.
Fusion supports both modes as it's capable of working in multiple color depth.

__________________________________________________

Add
As you can conclude from the Additive formula of the Normal mode, if you set the Alpha Gain = 0 in the Merge and leave the Subtractive/Additive = 1 by default, you will get a pure addition of the Background and Foreground color. The Foreground Alpha is completely ignored in this case.
Here is what happening if we substitute Alpha Gain by 0 in the formula:
Result Color = Background Color ∗ (1 − Foreground Alpha ∗ Alpha Gain ∗ (1 − Burn In)) + Foreground Color


Result Color = Background Color ∗ (1 − Foreground Alpha ∗ 0 ∗ (1 − Burn In)) + Foreground Color

Result Color = Background Color ∗ (1 − 0) + Foreground Color
If you set Burn In = 1, the resulting color will be a pure addition too, but the Foreground Alpha will be also added to the Background Alpha. Most of the time it's undesirable, because adding two images with Alpha together, you will get Alpha > 1 (Alpha = 2 in completely opaque areas).
But there is a case when such handling of the alpha is preferable. Imagine, that you separate your image onto two layers by cutting a part of it with a mask to process it separately. If you merge it back over the original in the Normal mode, you will get a semi-transparent border of the mask in the resulting image. This is because in the default Normal mode you first multiply the Background Color with inverted Foreground Alpha when you cut a part of the image and then do it again while pasting it on top.
Why not to leave the background layer intact while cutting a part of it as a foreground? Good question - simple answer: semi-transparent areas will reduce transparency twice and mix the original color with altered one.

__________________________________________________

Multiply
Result Color = Background Color ∗ Foreground Color
This mode is used to composite shadows, apply lighting maps and masks.
In the areas where the Foreground Color is 1, the Background Color remains unaffected. If the Foreground Color is 0, the result is black.
Screen
Result Color = Foreground Color + Background Color − Foreground Color ∗ Background Color
or
Result Color = 1 − (1 − Background Color) ∗ (1 − Foreground Color) Screen is essentially, inverted Multiply. You can clearly see it from the second version of the formula, where the colors of both layers get inverted and then multiplied together.
This mode is used, for example, to combine reflection and transparency on the glass.
The result is never more than 1.

Post has attachment
Nuke OCIO/ACES tutorials

HI folks. A lot of people seem to be confused about using OCIO/ACES in Nuke. So I'm working on some tutorials to help smooth the transition out. I'm posting my drafts here and will eventually post them on Nukepedia. I just wanted to get some feedback on them first. Can you guys just give me feedback on what information you are interested in learning? Also if any of the steps in the tutorials are confusing?

ACES for Nuke via OCIO: Part 1 Initial Setup
http://deke.clarify-it.com/d/r4gx77

ACES for Nuke via OCIO: Part 2 Default Lut Settings
http://deke.clarify-it.com/d/4feq4g

Post has attachment

NUKE 10 has arrived!

The NUKE 10 release focuses on enhancing performance, increasing stability and delivering new functionality in the areas you told us matter most: paint, playback, export and more. OpenColorIO integration leads the list of updates to keep NUKE in line with industry standards. And NUKEX and NUKE STUDIO get a powerful new Smart Vector toolset for automated clean-up, replacement and augmentation tasks.

- See more at: https://www.thefoundry.co.uk/#sthash.XJZwJpiJ.dpuf

Post has attachment
Foundry announced their set of VR tools sets called CARA VR...

Post has attachment
Foundry launches Nuke family 10 th versions.
Wait while more posts are being loaded