Profile

Cover photo
William Cho
108 followers|36,285 views
AboutPostsPhotosYouTube

Stream

William Cho

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Haha Maybe too much coffee? lol  I agree media slants stuff to get eyeballs.  Same here as in the US and all over the world.    But one thing to maybe consider is that while the missile was not even close I think maybe what the point was that NK is unreliable and so maybe if they had dialed the missile slightly to another direction (by randomness) that the missile could have hit the airplane.  A possibility?  Could NK be so inept?  Maybe?
1
Add a comment...

William Cho

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Also in the discussion on racism in Korea few things should be clarified.  Having fear or trying to protect (in their mind) from something they don't understand is different from racism based on hatred of a race.  Sure hatred is based on fear but not knowing and refusing is still different from refusing based on hatred and looking down.    And yet the same word is constantly used.  Also there should be some discussion about what people int he world should think about race.  In the western world and America especially believe all races are equal and all should treat each other equally which is what I subscribe to.  However in many parts of the world including Korea they do not believe this in that same way.  Does one nation or culture have the magic answer to all of humanity on Earth?  Every nation believes in showing common courtesy but many have a sense of their race as being special and not equal to others.  Does that mean western or American individuals should deride those people thinking different from them as being ignorant or stupid or racist? 
2
Baek Juho's profile photo
 
출가하세요
 ·  Translate
Add a comment...

William Cho

Shared publicly  - 
1
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
108 people
Aaron DeMichael's profile photo
Annie Fleischack's profile photo

William Cho

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
NK Regime is bad and its people should be freed.  No argument there by anyone. But this UN finding really has no impact on this issue.  

There is too much to lose in a military conflict since a few artillery and a few missiles from NK could wipe out South Korean factories like those of Samsung and LG and Hyundai.  That would cause billions if not trillions of dollars of financial damage to not only Korea but for USA and China and Japan because the economies are so intertwined.  

So military conflict is not an option unless NK was bombing and destroying and killing massive amount of people.  NK are too smart and wont do that.  There really is nothing UN can do.  More sanctions on sanctions that don't work means it still doesn't work.  

China is now pretending to be upset about NK because they want to be the new world super power that gets respect but they have no motivation to have NK regime collapse or change.  The status quo is the best scenario for China.  

We had one chance with the uncle Jang who was killed.  If he could have assassinated Kim Jong Eun and had made a deal to save his skin for a complete overhaul of NK that could have been a chance for real change.  There were discussions with him but Kim found out and decided he had to set an example.  

Kim is fully in charge and unless he is killed on the inside there is really no chance for a change.  Perhaps some kind of commando raid to have him assassinated.  

But then you also have to wonder what does the US military and SK military establishment want.  Do they really want such a change?  Or are they motivated to keep the status quo?  How are they advising the politicians on what the options are?  Is there a commander in chief who understands the details and then has the guts and motivation for a change?  Who?
1
Add a comment...

William Cho

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Are you sure the lady was refused entry into the store because she is black and did not want a black person in her store?  Or did the owner have some other reason in mind?  Also when the person who visited France said foreigner is it because her English skills are not as good?  Would she say she met waygookin in France in Korean to her Korean friends?  Just wondering if some of it is lost in translation.
1
xXsallalXx's profile photoRosen Krantz's profile photoFemmina Rhavyn Kesset's profile photoSteve Miller's profile photo
6 comments
 
+Steve Miller  Hm... their word for "foreigner" seems normal to me, considering the way human cultures, language, vernacular & etymology emerge and evolve overtime: I don't know of ANY culture that has words, that aren't based on 'from their own point of view.'

Gee...often, it's as if the etymology stem from the view that they're the center of the universe! Now how about that? Just ask the Vatican...and Copernicus, and Galileo.

xD

From what I understand, the Chinese character for China, literally means a 'country located at the center of the world:' that, kinda speaks volumes as to how they view themselves, their culture, and the geographical boundary based collective, aka. 'country,' in relation to the rest of the world.

Plus, it's always funny observing people getting lost in translation: in my personal experience, it almost seems as if English were formulated by a bunch of lawyers.

xD

In every non-English (or at least it seems like 'every'...or perhaps 'almost every'), even some of the older Romantic Languages, all seem to be more lyrical, open ended than objective and possession-specific, as are the case in the English language.
Add a comment...

William Cho

Shared publicly  - 
 
test
1
Add a comment...

William Cho

Shared publicly  - 
1
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
108 people
Aaron DeMichael's profile photo
Annie Fleischack's profile photo
Links
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Birthday
April 29