Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Howard Ullman
Attorney, distribution, antitrust, IP, and competition law blogger, computer tech enthusiast
Attorney, distribution, antitrust, IP, and competition law blogger, computer tech enthusiast
About
Posts

Post has attachment
Embed from Getty Images In SOLIDFX, LLC v. Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc., Case Nos. 15-1079 and 15-1097 (opinion available here), the Tenth Circuit aligned itself with the First and Federal Circuits to hold that the invocation of intellectual property rights…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Getty Images and a group of professional photographers sent a letter this week to the Senate Judiciary’s antitrust subcommittee complaining about Google’s image “scraping.”  In a nutshell, Getty alleges that high-resolution images in Google’s image search…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
In a recent decision, the Northern District of California denied Chrysler’s motion for summary judgment to defeat a Robinson-Patman Act price discrimination claim.  Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108693 (N.D. Cal.…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
You Can't Use the Sherman Act to Wrangle an Invitation to a Political Debate

So held the District Court for the District of Columbia in Johnson v. Commission on Presidential Debates, No. 15-1580 (RMC) (D.D.C. August 5, 2016).  There, the Libertarian and Green Parties challenged decisions of the Commission on Presidential Debates…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Researchers at my alma mater (including Steven Levitt of Freakonomics fame) recently reported the results of an interesting study: discounts offered on virtual goods (i.e., in-app purchases in connection with online video games) did not stimulate…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the Fourth Circuit’s decision in SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., et al., 801 F.3d 412 (4th Cir. 2015), allowing the decision – and, arguably, a circuit split on the pleading standard for Sherman…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Third Circuit Rejects Single-Product Bundling Claim – But Holds Its Fire on What Test to Apply

In Eisai, Inc. v. Sanofi Aventis U.S., LLC, No. 14-2017 (3d Cir. May 4, 2016), the Third Circuit addressed a mix of allegedly exclusionary conduct, including the defendant’s discounting of its anti-coagulant drug Lovenox, and held that the discounting was…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
I’m happy to be speaking on “Discounted Pricing Clauses: Drafting Enforceable and Compliant Provisions After Collins.”  We’ll be addressing potential pitfalls in drafting discounted pricing clauses in commercial contracts, particularly in light of the…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Say you’re a group of hospitals that get together under a Joint Operating Agreement.   You agree to form an integrated health system. You agree to total your net incomes into a single “network net income” that is allocated to the parties based on…
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
On March 4, 2016, the Maryland Attorney General announced a civil suit for alleged unlawful resale price maintenance against Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (“J&J”) in connection with its sale of contact lenses. The Maryland AG alleges that J&J’s…
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded