Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Piety Piet duh Pious Poet
379 followers -
i am the alteregoogeretla of RockSoiler ... he's got a few vids up ...
i am the alteregoogeretla of RockSoiler ... he's got a few vids up ...

379 followers
About
Posts

Post has attachment
a male singer this time.. walking yak tempo
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
+Joris Luyendijk i made a feeble attempt but failed to easily find Joris Luyendijk remark upon c.a.p. = Common Agricultural Policy - an EU rule that fleeces the poor in favor of large landtract holders disproportionately, failing it's stated goal, protecting prices a small producer can fetch by way of tariff barriers. James Armstrong proposes to 'cap' it at minimum wagers, this eligibility cut of points must replace the 'great and small' clause to cut the 4billion per annum costs in half)

https://www.theguardian.com/business/joris-luyendijk-banking-blog/2013/mar/10/what-london-bankers-think-bonus-cap 300plus comments .. but no G+ sharing option

... i'll not bother with the comments on this next one then, .. nearly 1400 of them though:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/dec/08/suck-it-up-britain-negotiate-brussels-eu-brexit

a snip of content instead:
http://tlio.org.uk/cap-welfare-for-the-rich-landownerscorporations/
Welfare for the Rich: how large landowners & corporations get lion’s-share of UK’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) annual windfall
23/09/2014 Tony Gosling w 1 Comment

Written in 2010, by James Armstrong, Dorchster
Contact: james36armstrong@hotmail.com

reC.A.P., – TO CAP IT OR SCRAP IT?

The Common Agricultural Policy costs U.K. taxpayers some £3.8bn per annum.
It does not benefit ‘small’ farmers nor agricultural workers
It is a serious threat to democracy and welfare. It should be scrapped . The least we can do is to cap the expenditure at a means tested amount equivalent to claimants receiving £12,344 per annum – the minimum wage.

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/Diggers350/conversations/topics/2860
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
+Alt-Right Tankie-- Brendan, if you keep dismissing points like the ones Andre makes in the 2h16th m ([{:: about the dffrnt flavors of antiphantilizzumz, which includes manly anti-occupation sentiment and practice, a rural variety as it were, from regions resisting 'FarMafficopiae' rather than the result of it .. sjw gender 'chopshoppeurs'::}]) -- you're gone keep on scoring duh fake vapid void 'gotsjas' bro ...
let me apply a very similar magnifying 'class'glass to the gender warz and talk about another, however invisible .. HUUUUUUUUUUGE wall,

the protransrites crowderies break down in basically 2 camps:
those who have internalized the effects of plastics, etc preemptively, anticipatingly, unresistingly (.. dare i?, yes i dare say 'expectantly') ... and those who have done so literally (in large part unwittingly, too late to duck and now celebrating dunk symptoms stockholm style).
posted here the other day btw:
Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Posie Parker - January 13, 2019
804 views
81
2
Share
Save
Deep Green Resistance
Published on Jan 13, 2019
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
the chinese working for the army ... who would have guessed it? .... brave farmers though ...share far and wide ... be sure to get up on what i've called my final period.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
SONAM LHATSO
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
if this doesn't make viewers skeptical of literacy .. nothing will .. and the inquisition will resurge, beginning from the bible belts of the world
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

I'VE NEVER CAUGHT RUSS PLAYING ON ANY FIBRE OF BEING THAT COULD CLASSIFY AS GREEN, EVEN BY THE REMOTEST OF STANDARDS .. PERHAPS HE REALLY HAS NONE. BUT ALL DOWNSIDES HAVE THEIR UPSIDES
Feminism is pure genius: Angelic pawn demonstrates the societal benefit of feminism (SFTU 2530)
Ahead of two fugly, man-faced nothings: a poised, seemingly thoughtful, stunningly angelic feminist pawn proudly parades her inner ugliness — revealing herself as a socially-engineered siren primed to crash morally sleepy men against the shoreline of their libido’s indiscretion. In USA’s modern death-cult, each and every feckless feminist foot-soldier has a kind of people upon whom they wish death. For murder slanger Margaret Sanger (the white devil cave beast who birthed the modern infanticide-movement), the death-worthy foes were “undesirables,” especially niggers; for Hillary Clinton (some ugly child-rape apologist trash), the death-worthy foes were first “super-predators” (i.e. niggers), then “deplorables.” In any case, for the modern death-cult, feminism has been an indispensable tool for murder and life-prevention. Moreover, a little-known secret is that feminism provides an immensely powerful benefit to society, and its creation was pure Darwinian genius: feminism serves to bait, and to lure away into misandry and celibacy, hags who are too weak to be real women focused on sustaining, by good character, the appreciation of a man. Feminism is simply a giant pink political-roach-motel, promising trashy political-retardettes all the murdered babies and “cis-gendered” man-tears they could ever want. And that is the beauty of feminism: women susceptible to such bait would make terrible wives, and even worse mothers. Feminism is pure genius. Before feminism, worthless women were, as women, too docile and taciturn to demonstrate openly their shitty personalities and even shittier priorities. Eventually however, wise patriarchs created feminism, and in doing so created a sociological honeypot, which alerts manly men worth preserving to the threat of disguised bitches–masked by beauty–who are worth only abandonment and oblivion. Feminism solved a significant social problem. After all, it takes nothing for a man to avoid a variously fat, fugly, self-worshiping, man-faced nothing; but it takes feminism–or an equivalent erudition–to expose a bitch in beauty’s clothes, and to thereby gradually prevent the procreation of such bitches by, at once, raising their self-esteem, while lowering their social-value.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded