Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Casey Artner
936 followers
936 followers
About
Casey's interests
View all
Casey's posts

Post has shared content
More data about the expense of poverty.

" When Orhun and Palazzolo compared households with similar consumption rates shopping at comparable stores — and controlling for two-ply TP — they found that the poor were less likely than wealthier households to buy bigger packages, or to time their purchases to take advantage of sales. By failing to do so, they paid about 5.9 percent more per sheet of toilet paper — a little less than what they saved by buying cheaper brands in the first place (8.8 percent).

Perhaps this sounds like a subtle discovery about minor household goods. But it supports a larger point about poverty: It's expensive to be poor. Or, to state the same from another angle: Having more money gives people the luxury of paying less for things. "

Post has shared content
There are a lot of things you don't realize are unusual until you step outside of them for a while.

The article below is by +Brad Templeton, and his experience of being questioned by the FBI for taking a photo of the Sun. (His camera was apparently pointed in a direction which could have also caught a Federal building, although the building wasn't marked as such) If you live in the US, you're probably nodding your head and thinking that "yes, that's about what you should expect" – whether your second thought is "and that's horrifying" or "the government has to protect its buildings."

A few years ago, I was in Tel Aviv, and was carrying my camera, having spent some time photographing the city. My cousin (a professor of political science) and I were talking as we went to a meeting she had with some government official she was interviewing at a Ministry of Defense building. When I realized that we were right next to the building, I said "Oh, shit!" and hurriedly put my camera away. She was completely confused; why was I doing this?

It was only when she didn't understand at all that I realized how the behavior that I'm completely used to – that having a camera out in the vicinity of a government building (a military one, at that!) would be taken as such an open provocation that I would be almost certainly detained and the camera seized, if I was lucky – is neither historically normal in the US, nor is it common in the rest of the world. Even in Israel, a country that has good reason to have an extremely alert security posture, it had never occurred to anyone that possession of a camera in the vicinity of a government building should draw an immediate armed response.

The rest of that trip was a similar exercise in noticing small differences. Re-entering the United States was another one; surrounded by signs warning you not to attempt to use a phone or photograph anything, you are moved through passport control, screens playing videos about the various crimes you are warned not to commit. At the end you show papers, and are fingerprinted, photographed, and interrogated. (This is what they did for citizens; I can't imagine what the non-citizens line was like) All the officials present, from the people inspecting papers to the people moving people about through the line, were overtly hostile; after the INS/DHS merger, USCIS clearly viewed its primary mission as preventing people from entering the country.

Not all of it has to do with "national security;" consider how children are allowed to play. In the US, they need to be monitored 24/7; playing in the front yard, much less going to the park on their own, is a sign of possibly criminal neglect. As a child in the US, I would go all over the neighborhood when playing; in Israel, my friends and I would roam over a good mile's radius, and my mother would routinely send seven-year-old me to the grocery store to pick things up.

When in the US for any length of time, this entire situation seems perfectly normal, and people wonder what I'm complaining about. And that's the thing: it had been feeling perfectly normal to me as well, until being out of the country for a few weeks reminded me that not only do other places not do this, but until recently, the US didn't, either.

Brad Templeton now has a police record, and any future investigations that touch on him will turn up that he was questioned for suspicious photography (and maybe more) of a government building. The fact that he has only this, and wasn't arrested or imprisoned, is largely because he looks like a respectable, white, professor.

I would ask when we started considering this "normal," but we all know the answer to that: after 9/11, when "security" became the watchword which would trump any question of legality or constitutionality. What worries me is that, fifteen years later, we are entering a world where there are adults with no memory of any other world. How do you move a world towards freedoms that nobody remembers, or argue against safety measures that "everybody knows" are required, since they've always been there?

Post has shared content
A day in the life of a programmer.
Photo

Post has shared content
The missing manual for SQL programmers
Photo

Post has shared content
The Tree That Owns Itself

In case you are of the opinion the law prevents this from happening:

"it is the stated position of the Athens-Clarke County unified government that the tree, in spite of the law, does indeed own itself."[1]

And because the original white oak tree fell, a new one was planted from one of its acorn - so the current tree is the son of the original oak tree.

So, like +Rogue Black says, in United States of America, a white oak tree was given rights over itself before black people, and even had property rights before women...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_That_Owns_Itself

[1]  Roger Cauthen, Athens-Clarke County Landscape Administrator (October 27, 2006)

>>>otteroftheworld wrote:
>>>My parents live in this town and the city legally can't
>>>tear the tree down to build or anything because the
>>>tree has its own legal rights and they can't do anything
>>>about it
>>
>>vnicent wrote:
>>how does.  how does this happen.  how DID this happen
>
>giraffepoliceforce wrote:
>I love this story because this guy in the early 1800's had so
>many create childhood memories of this tree and wanted
>to make sure it was protected no matter what.  So he
>deeded the ownership of the tree to itself and everyone
>just went with it.
>
>Then in 1942 this intense windstorm came and knocked
>the tree over. And people were bummed. But someone had
>saved an acorn from the original tree, so they planted that
>and now Son of the Tree That Owns Itself is over 50 feet tall.
>
>And since this new tree is technically the offspring of the
>original tree it's considered to have legally inherited the plot
>of land it's inhabiting.
>
>Two generation of trees owning land is amazing and if you
>don't think this is the coolest thing, get right out of my face.
Photo

Post has shared content
"""
And though it might have appeared to maximize numbingly repetitive factory work, with the rise of technology and increasing number of jobs where you actually have to think, the 9am start time is completely backfiring.

As Kelley told the British Science Festival in Bradford, “We’ve got a sleep deprived society.” His prescription was to move start times forward to 10am and to test his theory he moved the start time of a British school forward from 8:30am to 10:00am. He wasn’t surprised when he saw grades improve by an average 19 per cent.
"""

It doesn't help that expecting people to show up at 9 means creating a rush hour that makes commuting hell.

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
Good lord this is freakin' awesome
I want this in my IDE so it matches the inside of my head when I'm in the zone.

https://github.com/codeinthedark/editor/pull/1
Animated Photo

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
First things first, fix that app tray
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded