It's about time someone did.
The US seem quite eager to be involved in conflict, any type as long as they can get involved. Iraq, Libya, Syria (almost), Afghanistan, and the others but the most recent what I seem to think as Crimea but Putin put all hope of any outside involvement to an end when he mobilised his troops and put them in Crimea. By doing this he avoided what has happened through the other nations.
Forgive me if I am wrong here because we have two sides to this possibly even three.
The first side is what we are told and shown to believe via media. Most of what you know is third hand. ( bible, you will see and hear of many. ....? Did it say with your own eyes witnessed first hand or does it mean via media news outlets?)
If Putin was a war monger and wanted to cause crap then he would have just waltzed in and took Crimea. It's as simple as that, but the fact that he didn't says so much.
By Putin doing what he did he stopped any looting, rioting and anything else starting.
There are some who were hoping that it would all escalate and get involved. If that was to follow the path of the others also Egypt. Seems they are the aame people who want it all started so the money can start rolling in.
The US seems to be in my opinion the one that is the common denominator in all of these conflicts.
Hasty to get involved. It wouldn't suprise me in the slightest if there is a create a spark or plant a seed type plan, to create what is necessary to destabilise a country in any way possible, either through politics, colour, class, religion, gender, or what ever other method they use to create divisions.
I would also like to point out while I am at it to Mr David Cameron that our Military is not his personal Army.
They serve Queen and Country. The country just not only applies to the land but they are effectively our protectors.
Protectors from the enemies that I actually feel like our leaders are creating.
Mr Cameron the Prime Minister the leader that stands for the minutes silence in rememberance for those who sacrificed their lives for us. Us all. This wasn't serving solely for the benefit of a specific colour or religious group. It was for all of us.
Yet while remembering the fallen how many actually stand in that longest minute imagining their loved ones, telling parebts their child or children waere dead, they had been killed in action. The loss,......lives on all sides destroyed entire families and communities too.
Yet today we have moved on.
We have new enemies and new technology. Technology obtained and created through the spending of massive amounts of money, money which would be interesting to try and fathom where all the money has come from though that has funded this but. .........
All of this focus on conflict, wars and destruction?
Wtf you on Cameron?
It's no wonder Putin is saying take up yoga and chill out.
We are not the US' s lapdog. Don't do another Tony Blair where Bush says jump and Blair says how high.
These men and women ye send to wars are the loved ones of families and communities back here.
The reason that I bring this up is because the wars and conflicts you send our military to, that would be the men and women of those serving Queen and Country sacrificing their lives on a war that I believe is dressed up as a war against terror.
This war against terrorism? .......do you not mean a war dressed up as anti terrorism when really it's not only about oil and energy but a means to generate a recovery in a slumping industry and to also manipulate stock market prices and also alter the entire financial system.
There are those who profit from these wars even as they continue. Contracts and trade continue and money still generated.
The thing that gets me narky is this,
Those that continue to send, don't ever sacrifice anything apart drom the lives of others.
Does Mr Cameron look to be devastated at the news of a single loss of life from these conflicts? No. They're all just a number to him and the rest sending.
It doesn't matter which side you're on. Theyre all doing it.
Those sending do not actively participate.
These leaders who are so eager for it?...........how about you go first.
The British Army isn't your personal Army Mr Cameron you really need to understand that.
I think many would agree with me when I say the British Armed Forced don't always have to use weapons to win a war.
The battle we should be fighting isn't with each other.
The war is of a global recovery effort. The military are skilled enough to put their skills together to good use.
I personally want them all home, or even let them have a choice.
As for Defence spending Mr Cameron, I'd like to ask if Manchester United was to buy a defender they wouldn't play him in a strikers position really, nor would thwy train the opposing team and let them know tactics so to speak would they?
Personally I dont trust those that are sending as I feel they don't give a shit about those they send.
I say this with proof and when I say proof I meam proof.
Soldiers should be paid their worth. Risking their lives when footballers get what they do is an absolute piss take. Our soldiers are paid a pitence considering that in a split second they may be gone. Gone. That thump in your chest is the moment you realise the ripple that it just created. The loss. That might be someone's mam or dad, brother, sister, son or daughter and you Mr Cameron and those prior to you don't give a shit. Nothing to you.
A quick 2minute mention on the news. Family left ruined. Money can't replace what thry have lost but if I were you Mr Cameron I would show my gratitude by making sure they all want for nothing.
I'm not saying porches and lambourghi s I'm saying their mortgages paid off, cars, education, counselling and support.
Those who have lost limbs, or have been left severely injured and disabled show them the support by supplying what they need freely. I dont know how the governmemt dares.
I would like all military service personel to have councillors that will support them.
When these men and women joined the armed forces they attend basic training. The army changes them from a civilian to a soldier.
You must remember to help them back when they leave.
Pays and pensions should reflect what they do and what they sacrifice for us all, it doesnt really matter which military you serve.
For those of you who are sending these men and women basing this all on a war against terror and if it really is about gold, financial system, stock markets or generating a revenue while deceiving those that you send, sending under false pretences, you will be rumbled.
I'm still waiting for these wmd's Tony Blair declared were there but never showed up.
Many lives lost Mr Blair.......
If the wars really are for the benefit of us all then hey its up to the Supreme Being aka God to decide what the score is there.
Just thought I'd point that out.
(At mo point in the above I to seem ungrateful for those who are serving, have served or lost. It's actually because I care)
It bothers me that our military also have to pay their own life insurance and also buy their own kit.
Defence spending spent on what??????
What's more valuable the person serving or the vehicle they use?