Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Tomer “Tom” Tamarkin
Connecting the “cloud,” IoT home automation, fusion energy video games & utility smart meters to save consumers money
Connecting the “cloud,” IoT home automation, fusion energy video games & utility smart meters to save consumers money

Tomer “Tom” Tamarkin's posts

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Fusion Energy; Too Important To Fail – Too Big To Hoard

A proposal for privately funded fusion energy experimental science, R&D leading to commercialization

By: Tom D Tamarkin

Post has attachment
Where Tom Tamarkin & his companies stand on the issues of energy, climate change and current generation “renewables”

• We neither endorse nor reject the notion of Anthropogenic Global Warming. See our statement on AGW at:

• We have written a science based article for utility managers, regulators, politicians and citizens at large titled: “Energy Basics – Where Does Energy Come From On Our Planet?” See at:

• We commissioned an extremely thorough study and analysis of the feasibility of solar power to provide baseload power titled: “An examination of the economics and practicality of grid scale solar power” See at:

• We provide a detailed look at the science and practicality of wind power titled: “Wind Power (Technology and Economics)” See at:

• We provide a detailed analysis of Energy Storage titled: “Grid Scale Energy Storage Systems” See at:

• We provide a detailed look at the practicality of Bio-fuels based on the thermodynamics titled: “Thermodynamics of the Corn-Ethanol Bio-fuel Cycle” See at:

• We have prepared a detailed presentation on the costs of alternative energy titled: “Resource-Based Energy Simulation and Modeling Game Proposal” See at:

• We believe that our country’s national security and the wellbeing of its citizens is 100% predicated on inexpensive abundant energy across all energy consuming sectors.

In 2013 the United States consumed 97.4 Quads of raw energy to produce 38.4 Quads of energy used by consumers and industry. The remaining 60% was lost as heat or thermal rejected energy. That is 1.028 X 10^20 Joules or 9.74 X 10^17 BTU of expended raw energy. To put that in perspective this equates to the amount of energy produced by 16.793 billion barrels of crude oil burned in one year. Today most of this energy consumed in the U.S. comes from fossil fuels.

Follow link to LLNL energy generation &flow chart:

Hydrocarbon fuels have an exceedingly high energy flux density meaning a small unit volume produces a large amount of energy. Nuclear is the only energy source of higher energy flux density than hydrocarbons but today’s nuclear fission processes may only be used for a few more decades because of nuclear waste issues coupled with public perception & policy. The energy flux density of solar, wind, geo-thermal, tidal, and the like is thousands of times lower per unit volume of collection apparatus than hydrocarbon fuels.

Fossil fuels are finite. The speed at which they are consumed is a factor of worldwide per capita energy use. Now, developed countries like the U.S., Canada, Europe, China, Russia, South Korea, Israel, and Australia are using 80% of world energy capacity. Demand is accelerating and can only continue to accelerate as the Internet and travel teaches people and countries of less developed means that they should aspire to greater means which takes more energy. Few professionals in the energy forecasting business have taken this into consideration but there is no denying this and no turning back.
We must either increase energy levels for less developed countries and people or decrease it for developed societies to achieve a perceived “social equilibrium.” Needless to say, citizens of developed countries will not allow regression.

By mid-century fossil fuel reserves will no longer be economically viable due the vast increase in international energy demand and the associated increases in extraction/production costs as more unconventional fossil fuel reserves must be taped coupled with environmental constraints and regulations.

Thus, an entirely new source of energy must be proven, demonstrated and commercialized over the next 3 decades or we risk destabilizing the security of all nations in the world and the health of their citizens. This energy must be extremely powerful in terms of energy flux density, abundant, clean, safe, and leave no long term waste products. Our article titled “Climate Change Won’t Kill The Grandchildren – Having No Energy Will” provides our view of the future and proposed goals for the next several decades. See at:

And we must begin now because in 3 to 4 decades two significant events converge. As described above we deplete “economically viable fossil fuels” which drives the cost of energy up enormously. And in the United States this is coincident with the retirement of the vast majority of our generation capacity due to their life cycle maturity or age.

We believe the public has a vested interest in the facts and that science based energy education is crucial for our citizenry.

Climate Change Won’t Kill The Grandkids – Having No Energy Will
A case for the acceleration of fusion energy scientific research and development

By: Tom D. Tamarkin

Energy Basics; Where Does Energy on Our Planet Come From?

By: Tom D. Tamarkin

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded