‘Overpronation’ … the quack is strong in this one …http://www.runresearchjunkie.com/overpronation-the-quack-is-strong-in-this-one/
"Why did they not cite the evidence around this?
1. They did not know about the studies; in which case they should not be publishing on a topic in which they are not familiar with the body of literature that underpins it; or
2. They did know about them but did some serious cherry picking or intellectual dishonesty to not cite them as they debunk their own theory
Either way where was the adequacy of the peer review and editorial processes in not pointing this out and dealing with it?"