Interesting perspective.

I have heard a lot of people present this view as a serious alternative to religion. It isn't an alternative at all, and lacks the strong points of religion while not being any more 'scientific'.

Interesting points.

Good read.

I like the idea of clearly laying out the fundamental hypotheses found in (fundamental) science and religion.

The original blog post. A good read.

This is terrible.

I support this.

I think that this result is one of the most important of the year and Sabine's post (or the Physics Today one) are good introductions to it.