Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Boyd Smith
1,213 followers -
FLOSS advocate, Linux User, and proud Haskell programmer.
FLOSS advocate, Linux User, and proud Haskell programmer.

1,213 followers
About
Posts

Post has shared content
+NASA needs to step up their game. ;) Their team should have debunked this 2 years ago.

Glad science still mostly works the way I learned in college. Disappointed I don't get to have the reactionless drives from my favorite future fantasy novels.
“Tajmar’s results are exactly what you’d expect for the systematic error explanation: with a properly shielded apparatus, with no additional electromagnetic fields induced by the wires, there is no observed thrust at any power. They conclude that these induced fields by the electrical wires, visibly present in the other setups, are the likely culprit for the observed, unexplained thrust:

‘Our results show that the magnetic interaction from not sufficiently shielded cables or thrusters are a major factor that needs to be taken into account for proper µN thrust measurements for these type of devices.’

To the best of our knowledge, then, rockets will still require propellant. The EmDrive isn’t a reactionless drive at all, and all the laws of physics should still work. In short, we fooled ourselves.”

For years, many tinkerers and inventors have been claiming that some sort of electromagnetic cavity, e.g., the EmDrive, can create a reactionless drive. That is, they claim they can change the momentum of a rocket without any sort of change-in-momentum of anything else, violating Newton’s action-reaction law. Needless to say, much like perpetual motion, physicists are largely skeptical. But until now, we hadn’t yet found why they were achieving the results that they did. However, a new source of error was just uncovered: magnetic fields originating from the cables that power the device. Properly set up the device, away from cables and loops of wires, as Martin Tajmar’s team did, and guess what: your ‘anomalous thrust’ disappears.

The EmDrive, billed as NASA’s impossible space engine, really was too good to be true.
Add a comment...

Prismata steam key: DR4ZR-FH5HP-D6T7B

* amazing, 100%-positive reviews!
* single-player story campaign
* no card packs, no pay-to-win, and no BS
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
It gets a little repetitive in the middle, but stay for the punchline at the end.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
+Zac Slade and Valli. ;)
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
It ain't easy bein' cheezy.

How to make Cheetos "at home".
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Listening to...
Add a comment...

Why I demand ECC memory:

Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.245739] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246171] [Hardware Error]: Corrected error, no action required.
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246180] [Hardware Error]: CPU:0 (15:2:0) MC4_STATUS[-|CE|MiscV|-|AddrV|-|-|CECC]: 0x9c44410032080a13
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246188] [Hardware Error]: Error Addr: 0x000000026fd3ebc0
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246192] [Hardware Error]: MC4 Error (node 0): DRAM ECC error detected on the NB.
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246212] EDAC MC0: 1 CE on mc#0csrow#2channel#0 (csrow:2 channel:0 page:0x26fd3e offset:0xbc0 grain:0 syndrome:0x3288)
Mar 20 11:52:31 monster kernel: [1673877.246214] [Hardware Error]: cache level: L3/GEN, mem/io: MEM, mem-tx: RD, part-proc: RES (no timeout)

First time it's happened this year, but not the first time with this memory.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
I watch enough YouTube that Red is worth it just to have the ads removed. But, this show is proof that great series are coming from YT Red. If youdon't love it by the end of the second ep., it's not for you, but TY Red might be.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded