Profile cover photo
Profile photo
This is the best description EVAR!
This is the best description EVAR!
Marty's posts

Post has shared content
Reddit just continues to get more freaking amazing. Since our internet freedoms are beginning to erode, Redditors are crafting their own Internet Freedom Act.
+reddit users want your help to write the "Internet Freedom Act"

reddit users, the same that started the #SOPAStrike movement that ended up having +Wikipedia joining it, are now trying to come up with a piece of legislation/treaty.

+Michael Masnick, at +Techdirt, writes about this initiative:

"Again, there's a big hill to climb here to make this into any sort of reality, but there's something really amazing and compelling about this self-forming group taking the initiative to try to not just drive the debate, but to actually craft legislation that would protect internet freedom." []

What do you think? Can a true open-sourced bill be crafted and presented? Or will this be the first step to get others to join?

Read + Share + Spread + Participate

Post has shared content
Glad to know that our sensationalist media have branched out beyond politics and are hard at work obfuscating news to increase advertising revenue on technology stories. Your capitalism at work.
Google+ traffic grew by 480% in one month, so press reports a 60% decline. Wait, what?!

Have you seen the stories lately that Google+ traffic dropped by 60%?

This figure represents not the decline of Google+, but the decline of newspaper trustworthiness. Here's what happened.

Google+ was invite only. On the day they opened the floodgates to the public, traffic immediately spiked by 1,200%. These new people were mostly enthusiastic new users. But a minority was tire-kickers who didn't stick around.

When the dust cleared, total traffic was nearly five times higher than before the doors opened. But the Sunday Mail reported it as a 60% drop from the peak on day one of public beta.

Their idiotic, misleading headline: "Traffic plunges for Google+ as 60% of users log off"

The accurate headline they should have used: "Traffic increases fivefold as Google+ opens to public"

Steve Jobs is not dead, just permanently outsourced.

Post has attachment
Updates for Steve Jobs have stopped, the product has reached end-of-life status.

Post has shared content
Google+ experienced explosive growth in the last few days, and is now estimated as having over 43 million users after going public. +Matthew Snyder, +Joey-Elijah Sneddon and any other Google+ evangelicals, please spread the word, for the word is good.
Google+ is Really Taking Off! Millions Joining Daily. 30% Increase in Users in last 2 days.

My team just completed a new round of counting Google+ users by surname. And I have updated my model. Our sampling of 400 uncommon surnames in the U.S. also reflects usage in many other countries, since the list of 400 includes names that are popular in India, Germany, Italy, France, Japan, and many other countries.

In the past couple of days, since Google opened its doors to the general public over age 18, the growth rate has skyrocketed to rates we only saw during the first week of its "field test" -- back when it had a small number of users to begin with, the growth rates were of course much higher.

But when I checked the data this morning, it is clear that Google+ is absolutely exploding -- 30% growth in just 2 days and with a base of nearly 30 million members already.

Here are my latest estimates:

On September 9, our model showed 28.7 million users
This morning, our model shows 37.8 million users, with most of the growth coming in the last 2 days
By adding a fudge factor (see below) to account for private user profiles and for non-Roman surnames (both of which are totally overlooked by our surname counting model), my current estimate is 43.4 million users

The timing on Google+ opening up to the public is interesting. Facebook has made a ton of UI changes this week and is holding it's F8 Developers Conference today - in fact it is just staring now. According to a survey this week by Mashable, 72.2% of Facebook users hate the recent UI changes, including the News Feed redesign. Twitter's stream was filled with complaints yesterday about Facebook under the hashtag #newfacebook.

Google is a company that has had the incredible discipline for more than a decade to use a very simple, minimalist design on its home page along with a long search box to encourage longer queries. Changes to home page links are very infrequent. The popularity of its home page never led Google to turn itself into a portal, with hundreds of links and a few lucrative ads. Given that discipline, I think the tens of millions of people who will be signing up for and using Google+ will find that changes here will be very well thought out, very iterative, very carefully tested, and won't be nearly as jarring as the changes that have been made at other social networks. Google is not in a rush to change the world. They are on a steady course to do so.

Notes about My "Fudge Factor":

My earlier model (see links below) which proved to be very accurate in the first 2-3 weeks, did not address either private profiles or non-Roman alphabet. According to, there are substantial numbers of users from countries like Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Japan, Thailand, and many other countries, which my surname counting approach does not include. So I have decided to add a 5% privacy fudge factor and a 10% non-Roman alphabet fudge factor in my Google+ model. I'll need to develop a way to actually calculate those percentages somehow, rather than just guess on them.

For reference, here are my earlier posts on this subject:

Google+ passes 10 million users on 7/12: .

4.5 million estimate on 7/9 (actually 12:15ish on 7/10): .

1.7 million estimate on 7/4: .

Post has attachment
This is the difference between men and women.
Wait while more posts are being loaded