It doesn't have a name. Doc Mike even linked a convenient version of the patent with the important bits highlighted. Why would you read that patent about the vaccine and then think the vaccine doesn't exist just because it doesn't have a name?
That patent is dated at around the same time as he would have been conducting the research that was designed to make the MMR vaccine seem unsafe. Wakefield was paid obscene amounts by a lawyer to investigate MMR with a plan to start a class action against the manufacturers. He knew the outcome of the research before he started it. http://briandeer.com/mmr/lancet-summary.htm
How can you see all this unethical behaviour (including being paid from the UK Legal Aid Fund which is designed to help poor people) and conflicts of interest and still think that his research is sound?