Profile

Cover photo
Steven Lomas
7 followers|30,816 views
AboutPostsPhotosVideos

Stream

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
All pre-trib rapture theories sound like a great idea to those who fear death in the flesh, but no matter what anyone says or thinks about the timing of the rapture, we must be very careful not to contradict the Word of God.

John 6:44 NO ONE CAN COME TO ME, unless the father draws them, and I WILL RAISE THEM UP AT THE LAST DAY.

So can anyone go to Jesus before the LAST DAY ON EARTH? Not according to Jesus. Maybe Jesus was only talking to the jews, and He didn't mean that Christians would be raised at the LAST DAY? John 6:54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I WILL RAISE THEM UP AT THE LAST DAY.

Ooops! Sounds as though He was talking about Christians, doesn't it? I mean to say, what self respecting jew would think that Jesus was talking to them - after all, they don't eat human flesh or blood, do they?

Well we know that He is coming like a thief, so when precisely in scripture does Jesus declare that He will come like a thief? Revelation 16:15 BEHOLD, I COME AS A THIEF. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.


Notice how He is no longer coming, but He comes? So when exactly is this? Well its after the 6th bowl of 'thymou' wrath has been poured out upon the world, and immediately before the 7th bowl of 'orges' wrath is poured out upon the wicked - because scripture says in 1Thess 5:9 For God did not appoint us to suffer 'orges' wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.

So we shall endure patiently until He comes, just before the last (7th) bowl of 'orges' wrath is about to be poured out upon the wicked - and not a moment sooner? Why can't He come before this time? Acts 3:21 (NLT) For He MUST REMAIN IN HEAVEN, until the time for the final restoration of all things, as God promised long ago through his holy prophets.

Well maybe He will come back a 3rd or 4th time to do this? Hebrews 9:28 so Christ was sacrificed once to take away the sins of many; and He will appear a SECOND TIME, not to bear sin, but TO BRING SALVATION to those who are waiting for Him.

Sorry, but anyone who believes that Jesus is coming before then, or believes that they are going to Jesus before the Last Day, obviously haven't studied their bible very well. In fact paul tells us clearly in 2 Thess 2 that anyone who believes a lie regarding the Lords return are choosing to ignore the truth and are given a spirit of delusion that they will love the lie, which is regarded as delighting in wickedness.

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
It should have been 6 scientific misconceptions.....

6 Safe Nuclear Fission Power - IT CLEARLY IS NOT SAFE, NOR A MANAGEABLE RISK - unless you enjoy Fission Chips instead of fish 'n' chips:)
http://www.naturalnews.com/048634_Fukushima_radioactive_waste_worker_death.html

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
@00:51 your video says "Temperatures are not the only thing on the rise".

We know that global temperatures are not rising any higher than they have been historically, whilst simultaneously many minimum temperature records are being set globally, but not as low as historical indications. So what temperature are you talking about - the strong kitchen?

Areas of the planet experience climate change ALL THE TIME - with or without the barely significant amounts of man generated CO2, so I fail to be impressed by all the cries of climate crisis caused by fossil fuels, as there is no correlation whatsoever between CO2 and temperature - anywhere on earth.

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
I really loved the "Cannot bankrupt us' part of the presentation. The whole world is already bankrupt. All fiat currencies only work whilst ever there is debt ie. no debt = no money supply. Being bankrupt implies a level of debt which is unserviceable. The debt in the world is entirely unserviceable, which is why debt levels continue to rise despite frantic accounting ploys to make it seem otherwise, whilst real productivity continues to decline. Removing spent borrowings from the GDP, and adding the underwritten liabilities, would show that most countries have been in sharp growth decline for a very long time.

What you call a subsidy, is in reality, an attempt to reduce the level of taxation already imposed on the poorest people who rely upon fossil fuels to survive every day of their lives. eg Where I live the current price for diesel is $1.30 AUD per litre, which includes taxation of $0.45 per litre. So if the government drops the taxation to $0.40 per litre to help people in poor & remote areas, the $0.05 reduction is regarded as a subsidy. So your $720 billion subsidy actually goes to reduce the inflation of all goods which rely upon fossil fuels for any part of their 'manufacturing to market' process.

149M km2 is the land surface area of the planet and with 7 billion people equates to 20,000m2 per person. Now I live on 1335m2 of land which currently easily supports 5 humans. So I'm not competing with anyone for resources keith, when in fact I could easily support more.

Four major problems facing earth are stupidity of assumptive/presumptive scientists, stupidity of politicians who believe them, the stupidity of the population who believe the politicians, and the millions of years of future pollution from using nuclear fission energy.

Your suggested population controls are all backwards keith - killing children in the womb might have been OK for your mum, because then we wouldn't have to wade through all your bullshit, but there is no point killing people in order to stop them from dying in the future keith. Also, larger families means less dwellings and better resource efficiency.

Now I know that you aren't a big fan of reality keith, but your policies appear somewhat undercooked thus far, and might require some significant fine tuning before they have any hope of ever being considered, not to mention being practically implemented.

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Getting down to the core issues, this is what the IPCC are really promoting as the ONLY viable alternative to meet the worlds ever expanding energy needs. It has nothign to do with CO2 which comes from fossil fuels, because that Carbon came from the atmosphere. Its all about making carbon fuels appear to be destructive to tne environment, when the truth is that its really Nuclear Fission Technology that is the most destructive energy source known, in the history of humanity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCLdQOOvrww

Steven Lomas

Shared publicly  - 
1
Faith Baillie's profile photo
 
so they should be

Add a comment...

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
That's covering your tracks:)
Yawwwwwn....

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
I loved the part @ 7:30 about most theologians insisting that the earth was flat because of their interpretation of some bible passages. I don't suppose that you would know what these bible passages are, that you refer to?

Interestingly enough another Christian Scientist actually challenged the Roman Church authority regarding his theory of heliocentrism. So you might say that a real christian believer took on an established cult like religion (catholicism) because of its stance against heliocentrism because it actually taught against what the ancient scriptures had clearly declared about planetary shape & movements.

Galileo is regarded today, as the father of modern science, which is a fitting title bestowed upon a humble christian scientist who pursued truth, despite the ignorance of the established scientific opinion of the day, and the corrupt roman theologian authority at the time. He was a real scientist who studied physics, astronomy, mathematics, engineering and philosophy, so you might say that he was a well rounded christian.

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Audio volume recorded is far too low!

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
There is no energy crisis, only a technology crisis brought about by capitalist extremists working with corrupt humans like scientists and politicians.

Steven Lomas

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Is warming an opinionated conclusion based upon comparing 'temperature anomolies'? Are 'temperature anomolies' based upon comparing against an average? Is the average being used, based upon the 20th century results? Is there specific evidence which suggests that the 20th century was warmer than any other century in the past 3 billion years? If the whole globe is not experiencing higher temperature anomolies, then is 'global warming' the correct term to use? If the temperature anomolies are not consistent with the CO2 anomolies vs 20th century average CO2, then is it scientific to assume that CO2 is the cause of the apparent temperature anomolies?
Basic Information
Gender
Male
Links