Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Oakley Cell Tower
80 followers -
7 dead in 7 months 2016 ☆ Non ionizing radiation has been proven to cause many health effects. Listen and learn, teach others
7 dead in 7 months 2016 ☆ Non ionizing radiation has been proven to cause many health effects. Listen and learn, teach others

80 followers
About
Oakley Cell Tower's posts

Post is pinned.Post has attachment
A letter I submitted today for California's Public Record for SB.649

I feel as though our Government considers us as "Not Human", "Disposable", that we are just a bunch of "Lab Rats", waiting to be the next in line to fall victim to the health effects from Wireless Telecom Antennas, Mobile Phones and of course, Smart Meters.

Elderly people are already an at-risk population. (and children). Their bodies are unable to heal (as fast, if at all), may have immune deficiencies, are weak, frail and unable to protect themselves from the onslaught of EMF.
Since my husband and I moved here, my husband has been diagnosed with hypertension and then with diabetes. He was in great health before our move in 2014.

I am sick just about everyday. My eyesight has rapidly deteriorated, sleep disturbances, nausea, stomach pain, loss of appitite, memory problems, dizziness, brain fog, absolutely no energy, tinnitus, and rapid heart beat (my pulse here does not go below 112 bmp) are some of the health effects I personally feel everyday. The RFs, EMFs and microwaves damage the eyes, brain, balls and breasts, first.

I am so discouraged by the way we are ignored and swept to the side while the FCC continues to claim that non-ionizing radiation is safe. (The FCC is not a health agency and they are at least 20 years behind in updating their standards for protecting public health.
Why is this being allowed to continue?

The International Scientists Appeal says, "Due to the concern that the FCC’s new rules will result in increased exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF), the Appeal’s advisors oppose the new rules and call for a “public health review of the growing body of scientific evidence that includes reports of increasing rates of cancer and neurological diseases that may be caused by exposure to EMF from wireless sources.”
The letter (dated June 9, 2017) is signed by the five advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal: Drs. Martin Blank, Magda Havas, Henry Lai, and Joel Moskowitz, and Elizabeth Kelley.

I'm just wondering why the FCC does not consider these expert's opinions, fact based, peer reviewed studies or findings. I know the answer to this one, also. It's called corruption and greed. Why else would they blatantly ignore the public's cry for help when it comes down to concerns about health effects?

I am not against Government. My father worked for the Federal Government. I am just against things that harm living things and our children's children. It so disparing knowing that we are unable to protect ourselves from wireless, pulsating, non-ionizing radiation


http://scientists4wiredtech.com/action/?contact-form-id=9&contact-form-sent=1888&_wpnonce=9722feb873#contact-form-9
PhotoPhotoPhotoPhotoPhoto
California SB649 Small Cell
5 Photos - View album

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
"CONCLUSIONS:"
"EMPulse exposure significantly decreased associative learning in mice and TMG acted as an effective protective agent from EMPulse exposure."
"This mechanism could involve an increase of oxidative stress in brain by EMPulse exposure."


#SmartMeter #SmartCities #SmartGrid #future #epidemic #EMF #EMFkids #nonionizing #radiation #pulse #dumb #risk #chance #true #proof #yourownkids

Post has attachment
Coincidentally, my husband (55yo) was diagnosed with Diabetes Type2, a couple of months ago.
Living here base of Oakley, Ca Cell Tower for 3 years 2 months.

"RESULTS:"
"(i) After EMPulse exposure, compared with sham-exposed insulin, the bioactivity of insulin in decreasing fasting blood glucose levels in type I diabetes model mice was reduced significantly (p = 0.023). "
"(ii) Compared with sham-exposed insulin group, the percentage fluorescein isothiocyannate (FITC) labelling of HL-7702 cells was significantly reduced in the EMPulse-exposed insulin group (22.7-13.8%, respectively)."
"(iii) Compared with sham-exposed insulin, the fluorescence intensity was significantly reduced in EMPulse-exposed insulin (p < 0.001)."

"CONCLUSIONS:"
"EMPulse exposure significantly decreased the bioactivity of insulin to reduce the blood glucose levels in type I diabetic mice."
"This could be due to a decreased binding affinity between insulin and its receptor."
"This mechanism could involve an alteration of insulin's' conformation caused by EMPulse exposure."


Post has attachment
..."the present results suggest that long-term EMPulse exposure is harmful to cognitive ability in rats and could induce Alzheimer’s Disease -like pathological manifestation."

EMF Non-ionizing radiation
2016

Post has attachment
"Overall, this study suggested that EMP exposure may lead to the disturbance of reproductive hormone levels and affect the offspring sex ratio."

Post has attachment
"Radiation protection during power grid expansion
Kick-off event together with the BMUB on the BfS research program"

"Beginning 11.07.2017 10:30
End 11.07.2017
Venue Berlin (Tagungswerk Jerusalemkirche)"
"The expansion of the power grid is necessary to implement the energy conversion."
"However, there are scientific uncertainties about the possible long-term effects of static and low-frequency fields, such as occur in the vicinity of the planned lines."
"The Federal Office for Radiation Protection ( BfS ) is therefore intensifying its research on the topic of power grid expansion"
"At the kick-off event, BfS informs about its research initiative."
"Title of the invitation to the kick-off event on the BfS research program Radiation protection during the power grid expansion"

"In order to implement the energy demand in Germany, it is sometimes necessary to expand and strengthen existing electricity networks. At the same time, questions of radiation protection must be taken into account from the outset:"

"What is known about the health effects of low-frequency electrical and magnetic fields?"
"What are the protective measures?"
"What are the potential loads caused by high-voltage cables?
In view of the still existing scientific uncertainties regarding the possible risks of static and low-frequency fields, precautionary measures are important. The BfS is therefore intensifying its research on the topic of radiation protection during the development of electricity networks. There are 33 studies in the fields of epidemiology and biology, exposure and dosimetry and risk communication ."

Post has attachment
7/18/17
"BfS online consultation on radiation protection research
To facilitate a broad discussion, the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) is now offering the possibility to participate in the recently launched research program radiation protection in power grid expansion (see EMF-Portal news from July 4).

"Until mid-September, interested persons can review the individual projects of the program and submit their comments online. These are evaluated in the BfS and considered during the further planning of the research program."

"The aim of the online consultation is to discuss all aspects of health and radiation protection from the beginning. Further information are available on the BfS homepage (in German)."

Post has attachment
“Some consumers may use mobile phones against the body, which the FCC does not currently test, and could result in RF energy exposure higher than the FCC limit.”"

"Most likely, consumers remain woefully unaware of the fact that they should not put their phones in their pockets. Studies have linked cell phone emissions to a variety of potentially harmful conditions which range from tumors (both benign and cancerous) to low sperm count."

"Cellular phone manufacturers do include information about keeping the phone away from the body but their messaging remains largely hidden from plain view. Consider two examples which should encourage consumers to carry their phones more safely:"

"The BlackBerry cell phone’s user manual has the following separation distance warning hidden in the fine print:"

“….keep the BlackBerry device at least 0.59 in (15mm) from your body (including the abdomen of pregnant women and the lower abdomen of teenagers) when the BlackBerry device is turned on and connected to a wireless network.”

"The Apple iPhone 5 buries the following language on its website and in the phone’s data under “legal”:

“To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, the supplied headphones or other similar accessories. Carry iPhone at least 10mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels. “

Post has attachment
"Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation"

"In 2015, the Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law three bills (Assembly Bills 243 and 266, and Senate Bill 643) that create a licensing and regulatory framework for medical cannabis through the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act. This legislation created the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation within the Department of Consumer Affairs. It also divided the responsibility for state licensing between three state entities – the CA Department of Food and Agriculture, the CA Department of Public Health and the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation, with the Bureau designated as the lead agency in regulating the cannabis industry in California."

"The Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation is not issuing licenses at this time. DCA recommends interested parties continue to work with their city or county governments to procure the local licenses and permits required to establish a medical cannabis business"
Wait while more posts are being loaded