if you're reasonable I think I can do my best to be the same.
Not that I think we do disagree THAT much - I mostly brought up the post of Glenn to point out there's a bit of hypocrisy in our thinking around these subjects. I'm a big fan of free speech and am quite upset with things that happened at Charlie Hebro, and I think it's good that Anonymous takes action. I'd also appreciate it if there were less hate sites promoting Jihad and all that. But then, when you think about it - if you decide to shut down Jihad sites, are you really better than the Jihad people who 'just' want to shut down what they perceive as anti-islam hate channels?
Freedom goes both ways - if you want to defend the freedom to say anti-islam things, it's unfair to do that by taking down pro-islam sites. That's not fair freedom of speech, is it?
Of course you can argue the only thing we should be intolerant towards is intolerance - and that would indeed take out the Jihad sites, but it's a massive grey area - you can call much of what Charly did rather intolerant towards islam, after all.
It isn't an easy subject, that freedom-of-speech thing.
Add a comment...