Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Heath Injury Law
10 followers
10 followers
About
Posts

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
In our new article Charting a Course through the Perils and Pitfalls of 537.065 Litigation, we outline paths for attorneys representing injured victims and the attorneys for insurance companies to navigate the perils and pitfalls of 537.065 agreements.

http://www.boughlawfirm.com/articles/charting-a-course-through-the-perils-and-pitfalls-of-537-065-litigation

Post has attachment
Our firm brought a product liability action against the manufacturer and distributor of the wheel chair. Extensive discovery on the original design drawings, knowledge of Other Similar Incidents (“OSI’s”) and the proper manner to recall a consumer device was commenced. This case settled prior to the depositions of the corporate representatives of the manufacturer.

http://www.boughlawfirm.com/Cases/wheel-chair-patient-v-wheel-chair-manufacturer

Post has attachment
We are again fighting Shelter Mutual Insurance Company over Shelter policies and whether they allow the insured to “stack” coverage.

http://www.boughlawfirm.com/insurance-companies-continue-to-fight-uim-coverage

Post has attachment
The judge determined that the bar was liable for the negligence and ordered it to pay $3,750,000. The insurance company failed to defend this case and the trial proceeded under a Section 537.065 agreement, pursuant to Missouri Statute. The plaintiff agreed to only collect the judgment against the bar's insurance carrier.

http://www.boughlawfirm.com/Cases/plaintiff-v-local-bar-closed-head-injury-negligence-future-medical-care

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded