, the point you're missing is that the law should be written FAIRLY. That's why we VOTE governments. As such, the lawmakers should listen to the people (and do, via petition) when we are telling them they are wrong.
The internet is a global phenomenon, transcending all normal borders and boundaries - and as such, is very hard to adjudicate. What the governments are proposing is too harsh and risks the free environment to be found in this "alternative world". What IFM are after is something that allows the majority of the countries to be comfortable, and law abiding.