I don't need to provide documentation of things that are already in your face - you need to open your eyes and pay some level of attention.
"You do understand that guns do not actually kill people right? Its the person pulling the trigger, none of my weapons have ever jumped up and killed anyone."
That's just another BS bit of tripe from the right. The person pulling the trigger wouldn't have the trigger without the gun. If guns don't kill people, why don't we send soldiers to war without them. The fact is that guns are THE most often chosen method of killing someone because they do kill people. Anyone saying they don't is simply proving themselves a moron.
I never said ANYTHING about cosmetic modifications, that's just crap you injected into your failed argument as a red herring to puff it up. As far as the law, and the 2nd Amendment, I am very familiar with them, obviously a great deal moreso than you.
Gallows WOULD be cheaper. As I pointed out I was trying to be fair, especially considering that the people on the other side are the ones threatening everyone with guns.
Nobody but you brought up anything about Chicago, which is just another attempt by you to introduce a red herring. It has nothing to do with anything, certainly not the fact that fewer guns will make people safer.
Republicans have fought for years to eliminate taxes and government. It's part of the party platform. If you don't understand that, then you probably shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't even know what your party represents. Ever hear of Grover Norquist? Every elected Republican ( but 4 ) are signed onto his pledge to drown our country in the bathtub. As far as we Americans are concerned that makes them all traitors.
A lawfully armed citizen is NOT a deterrent for crime, nor a huge deterrent for mass shootings. Quit shitting yourself. One gun is dangerous. Multiple guns is a crossfire. You really can't be stupid enough to believe that more gins are the solution to the problem of too many guns. That's like saying the solution to flooding is more water, the solution to fire is more fire, or the solution to debt is to spend faster. Oh, wait, that's exactly what the Republicans claim.
Mass shootings will continue, not because of the existence of 'soft targets', but because of the existence of guns. Soft targets don't shoot themselves, morons who are allowed to have guns shoot them.
Your alleged Liberties do NOT include the right to take away anyone else's safety. Period. Banning guns is NOT giving up a Liberty, because the liberty to endanger others does NOT exist in the first place, except in the minds of delusional people. The removal of guns would bring permanent, not temporary safety, at least from guns. Then you nuts that think you have a right to kill other people would just invent other weapons to do it with.