Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Bill Davis
72 followers -
Retired electronics design engineer
Retired electronics design engineer

72 followers
About
Communities and Collections
View all
Posts

Post has attachment
Statins in the Drinking Water? - Packer
Statins in the Drinking Water? by  Milton Packer,  MedPage Today "Universal treatment for people at minimal risk means that a physician would need to treat more than 100 patients for 10 years to obtain an extra year of good health in one person. This margin...

Steve Goddard‏

Today's Top Climate Fraud : Fake News About The Northwest Passage: http://youtu.be/7uHWU8-f258?a

Post has attachment
If their little system is dismantled, the elite will be forever disabled. It has taken the imperialists decades to build their pay-to-play scheme on the backs of middle Americans. They will do anything to save the Titanic now. So creating yet another film of pure lies and scare tactics about a Chicken Little “sky is falling” falsehood is right in keeping.

The lies are so thinly veiled these days that even the sheeple are waking up.

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Enforcing The 97% Consensus Has ‘Generated Further Doubt’ About Global Warming climatechangedispatch.com/enforcing-the-

Post has attachment
"According to NASA, glaciers retreat when it is cold, and advance when it is warm."

"NASA accomplished this magical defiance of the laws of thermodynamics, via good old fashioned data tampering."

Post has attachment
Twenty-Five Years Since The Ozone Hole Killed Us All. https://tiny.iavian.net/hzzg

Post has attachment
"Our results permit to conclude that CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas and cannot be accepted as the main driver of climate change. The observed temperature increase since pre-industrial times is close to an order of magnitude higher than that attributable to CO2. We find that the increase of CO2 only might become dangerous if the concentrations are considerably greater than 4000 ppm. At present rates of increase, this would take more than 200 years. Therefore, demands for sequestering CO2 are unjustified and trading of CO2 certificates is an economic absurdity. The climate change must have a very different origin and the scientific community must look for causes of climate change that can be solidly based on physics and chemistry."

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
‘The current focus on CO2 emissions reductions risks having a massively expensive global solution that is more damaging to societies than the problem of climate change,’

She argues that the IPCC ‘oversimplifies the characterisation of uncertainty by substituting “expert judgment” for a thorough understanding of uncertainty. They look at “evidence for” and “evidence against” (but somehow neglect a lot of the “evidence against”), and completely neglect to acknowledge ignorance. The bottom line is that the climate system is too complex with myriad uncertainties for simple reductionist approaches to understanding and managing uncertainty to be useful.’

The challenge, she says with unflinching optimism, is ‘to open the scientific debate to a broader range of issues and a plurality of viewpoints and for politicians to justify policy choices in a context of an inherently uncertain knowledge base.’
Wait while more posts are being loaded