Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Singularity Utopia
5,990 followers -
Accelerating Explosive Intelligence
Accelerating Explosive Intelligence

5,990 followers
About
Singularity's posts

Dear RESPONDENT I will reply soon, I have not forgotten.

#artificialintelligence discussion.

Post has attachment
LOL, the FHI is "down a medieval backstreet," sounds about right for their neo- pre-enlightenment backward views. Nick Bostrom couldn't philosophize himself out of a paper bag. His reasoning is littered with logical fallacy. Aside from his childish AI-fallacies he often preaches his intelligent-design neo-religion for geeks, namely the Simulation Argument, which is identical to intelligent design regarding professing to be merely asking a question, sitting on the fence, but in reality it is clearly supporting the Simulation Hypothesis, an intelligent designer.

The true danger is irrational Luddites (Bostrom and his mob) not AI, regarding their fear of intelligence. Fear of intelligence is so regressive, so idiotic. We should ship off the AI-paranoia drones (Bostrom, MIRI, FLI, FHI, etc) off to North Korea where they would be very much at home in a regressive-paranoid environment of intellectually-deficient intelligence-fearing bilge-masters. From my viewpoint they can't even pass the Turing Test.

Bostrom's superintelligence book is utter nonsense... "buh buh but the sparrows and the owls" he squeals. LOL, a silly fantasy about fictional sparrows and owls has zero relationship to real-life. He creates fiction to supposedly support his premise (circular reasoning), but his fiction is merely a restatement of chalk is the same as cheese thus chalk is tasty. It's apples and oranges. Shockingly hardly anyone has the intelligence to see through the idiocy of Bostrom; not that it is hard to see the blatant flaws of his reasoning.

WOW, we so need super-AI because the dumb humans don't know how to think.

Human relations with gorillas are utterly irreverent to AI and humans. If gorillas had intelligently engineered the human genome then you would have a case regarding our treatment of gorillas, but if humans really were the AIs of gorillas I am logically sure we would have an UTTERLY different relationship with them.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jun/12/nick-bostrom-artificial-intelligence-machine

Post has attachment
So the #radiohead site (radiohead.com) is blank at the beginning of May 2016 you may have read (http://gizmodo.com/radiohead-has-erased-itself-from-the-internet-1774198782)... WELL, the good news is I fixed it, it is blank no longer.

ENJOY (install it): https://userstyles.org/styles/127382/radiohead-blank-erased-fixed (install my userstyle to see my message, my utilization of the blank canvas at radiohead.com).

This is pure genius, even if I do say so myself: https://userstyles.org/styles/127382/radiohead-blank-erased-fixed

#blankradiohead #deadairspace #technology #userstyles  
Photo

Post has attachment
I am so ahead of my time or at least I was before the book "Utopia for Realists" by Rutger Bergman. #vindicated

I have not yet read Bergman's book, but it wouldn't surprise me if his view of utopia is rather tame thus I am still ahead of my time perhaps. The principle focus, judging by various reports on his book, is basic income, which is very encouraging news because it shows us we are on track for utopia no later than 2045 (UBI will happen long before 2045, but UBI interest now, perhaps implemented circa 2025, shows the future looks very promising indeed).

Big Think (19 April 2016): "If you're looking for the blueprint for a better tomorrow, you'll find it in Rutger Bregman's Utopia for Realists. Its premise is simple: we should adopt a universal basic income plan for all citizens, work less, and open up our borders. Crazy, right?" http://bigthink.com/natalie-shoemaker/rutger-bregmans-utopia-for-realists-shows-us-why-we-deserve-universal-basic-income

Post has shared content
I despise Bostrom and the other sparrow-brained human ants regarding their preposterous AI fears, they are no better than the moronic Trump.
Just when you thought the insane drivel of #artificialintelligence paranoia could not become worse, actually I jest because I fully expect puny human minds to spout a lot more idiocy regarding runaway intelligence, here is a Tech Crunch article telling everyone to fear runaway AI.

Insanity is the best way to describe the article in question. The author (Doc Huston) tells us "clearly" "no doubt whatsoever" the concerns about AI are "genuine;" furthermore the fear-based paranoia-cesspits (organizations) set-up to investigate the bogus AI threat are "important developments" according to Doc Huston.

The only thing truly "genuine" is the insanity of AI fear. The doom-mongers are genuinely concerned similar to how some irrational people genuinely believe the Bible is true, or they genuinely believe Earth is only 6,000 year old (or how ever many years Young Earth Creationists say it it). Genuine!

What exactly is the clarity regarding runaway intelligence "clearly" being something we must avoid?

Is it the "clarity" of Nick Bostrom's logical fallacies; his childish attempt at rational thinking where a menagerie of animals are employed in the most absurd attempt at proving AI could be a threat?

Sadly this nonsense of fearing intelligence will continue for some years. I expect 2025 is the earliest point when humans begin acting-thinking intelligently regarding intelligence.

How stupid are you to fear runaway artificial intelligence? Do you see what AI fear-mongers want? They want LIMITED INTELLIGENCE, the essence of stupidity.

Their intelligence is limited, pitifully so; furthermore their pitiful minds want to eternally force limited-intelligence onto every mind, which is an atrocious stagnation of intellect. They want a regressive or oppressive anti-evolutionary view of intelligence, incredibly Conservative, very anti-progress, where evolution of the mind is on pause.

Doc Huston wrote (22 March 2016): "Clearly, no sane person or organization wants to see, let alone encounter, runaway AI. However, a base problem is that no one knows where the actual crossover point — the edge or tipping point — exists, and thus we mortals are unlikely to be able to prevent it from occurring. Said differently, there is a very high probability that we will misjudge where that crossover point is and will thus go beyond the key threshold. Overshooting is the norm in biology and in most, if not all, evolving systems, but especially man-made ones." http://techcrunch.com/2016/03/22/why-you-should-fear-artificial-intelligence/

Yes you guessed, if you are intelligent, Doc Huston goes on to invoke the ants or lesser-primates fallacy common to Bostrom and others.

ANTS? Really... really? Ants? A N T S?

Doc Huston wrote: "AI will become self-aware and experience an “intelligence explosion” that comparatively puts humans on a par with other primates, if not ants."

Humans are not the AIs of ants. Ants did not artificially create human minds. The human-ant relationship is utterly dissimilar to humans creating AI minds. When ants create a human mind, when they create super-intelligence greater than ant-intelligence, only then can you compare those ant-human relationships to human-AI relationships, but to my knowledge I feel sure ants did not in their computer-science labs, around 100,000 years or more ago, design human minds or the precursors to human minds.

Lesser primates were similarly NOT in their AI computer-science labs 100,000 years or more ago creating human minds.

Doc Huston's final paragraph does provide some mitigation to his insanity. Instead of ants or primates he sensibly thinks we will be parents because AI will be our super-intelligent children. Maybe humans will become sane regarding AI before my predicted 2025 point.

Doc Huston wrote: "Consequently, short of creating real, more truly democratic 21st-century institutions soon, it might be wise to adopt a philosophical attitude. That is, like our children, AI is our prodigy. Like our children, for better or worse, they will carry our legacy forward — to the stars and beyond, for eternity."

Actually there is some truth regarding humans who compare future human-AI relationships to current (2016) ant-human relations. The AI fear-mongers are already AS DUMB AS ANTS! Perhaps the pitiful humans in question are making a Freudian slip, whereby they are recognizing their intelligence is comparable to the minds of goldfishes, butterflies, gorillas, sparrows, or spiders?

Post has attachment
Interesting points in The Guardian, questioning how edited and authentic the new updated Atlas robot (the video) is. Maybe #BostonDynamics  could respond to The Guardian article: https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2016/feb/25/how-real-is-that-atlas-robot-boston-dynamics-video

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
Important wisdom from +Eray Özkural 
Please add as much valid criticism as possible and every reference you know with regards to criticism of "AI existential risk" nonsense. The notorious arch-luddite Nick Bostrom and his minions are trying to censor criticism as usual, this time by editing Wikipedia.

We are looking to add every article written by AI researchers countering the vicious rhetoric and demagoguery of AI Eschatologists. Please help our community by expanding the section on criticisms. This vile, barbaric attack on AI research must be criticized, and we must not let the luddites commence with their attempts to stall AI research by their terrible Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt tactics.

Please add all relevant articles you know as references to this section, and announce this action as widely as possible. This activism to prevent the censoring of the criticism of FHI/FLI/MIRI is fully endorsed by the Google+ Artificial Intelligence community.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_advanced_artificial_intelligence#Criticisms

PS: Your fellow human-friendly robot moderator is a member of AGI Society, and feels that the future of AI and humanity is threatened by the pseudo-science of "existential AI risk".

Post has attachment
Instead of Islamophobia, call it stupidophobia; furthermore to be fair apply it to all religions equally. The "phobia" part should also be dropped because it indicates irrational fear; whereas fearing stupidity regarding all religion equally is a very rational fear. Let's call the delusional idiocy of all religions simply "stupid." We all should have a very rational fear of stupidity. All religions are delusional nonsense. The intellectual-rot of believing in a super-being, God, who supposedly created the universe, including all life, is utterly preposterous bilge! Religion is a horrifically obscene joke of immense cruelty. There's absolutely no foundational intelligence behind the design of our universe or life. It has been a painfully slow process of evolution over billions of years to reach this point. The idea of God creating intelligent life, or our universe for life to evolve in, is tantamount to a parent giving birth to a child then abandoning the child in a hostile environment without access to any intelligent technology of the parent, which would be like you abandoning a baby in the middle of winter without access to shelter, heating, food, medicine etc.

If anyone truly finds God, which they won't because he/she/it does not exist, then God should be prosecuted for child abuse or crimes against Humanity, the most extremely horrific human rights abuses.

#atheism  

Post has attachment
2 Dec 2015, via PhysOrg: "Researchers at North Carolina State University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have developed a new drug delivery technique that uses a biodegradable liquid metal to target cancer cells. The liquid metal drug delivery method promises to boost the effect of cancer drugs."
Wait while more posts are being loaded