Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Ben Bradley
170 followers -
Human Being.
Human Being.

170 followers
About
Posts

Is this the record for a G+ community? Over 5 years without a post?

Waving a slow bye-bye to G+.

Post has attachment
It's just as well this group hasn't had activity in over a year, as Google has decided to shut down Google Plus.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/10/google-exposed-non-public-data-for-500k-users-then-kept-it-quiet/

Post has attachment
I'm delighted to see yesterday's (April 3) Google's Doodle dedicated to clockmaker John Harrison and his birth 325 years ago. Google finds a collection of popular articles on the Doodle and on Harrison in general:
https://www.google.com/search?q=John+Harrison

These articles are "reasonable" short bios of Harrison, and many mention the Dava Sobel book "Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time." This general-public-oriented science book is a popular seller, but a true nerd or geek like me always wants to know more, much more.

Already in my collection was "The Science of Clocks and Watches," covering mechanical clocks from the earliest pendulum clocks through pendulums in vacuum (the most accurate clocks of their time) and then clocks from electronic quartz oscillators, which are much more accurate than mechanical clocks. This book doesn't have a lot on Harrison in particular, but it does show several of his inventions related to clock design.

What prompted my interest in John Harrison was the recent (2015) and remarkable verification of his claim, in a book he published shortly before his death, that a pendulum clock could be made with accuracy within a second over 100 days. The reaction in Harrison's time was the idea was 'absurd.' Only in recent decades did anyone take seriously the instructions in the book on making such a clock. There were several articles on the advance, such as this one:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/apr/19/clockmaker-john-harrison-vindicated-250-years-absurd-claims

This became the basis (or actually the end point) of a speech I gave to Fellowship of Reason last August. In researching I got both the Sobel book and "The Quest for Longitude: The Proceedings of the Longitude Symposium Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts November 4-6, 1993." This is a beautiful larger-format book with photographs of many of Harrison's clocks (most still running!), as well as technical articles on how he solved many problems of accurate timekeeping. While it features other methods of finding longitude and their inventors, it largely focuses on Harrison's works and efforts to make a chronometer (as an accurate clock/watch came to be called). One of the authors is the person who made the "Clock B" based on Harrison's book that achieved the one-second-in-100-days record.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
Who? I don't get it.
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
I donated to this, only a couple days left - I think it's a message that really needs to get out:
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-13th-step
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
This "Infinity paper airplane" that flies over hot stove burners is Teh Next Big Thing on Youtube (8,800 to 13,000 view the last few minutes). Is it real?
paper airplane awesome trick infinity heating plate thermal how to
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Know your target market.
People ask me periodically what my target market is. My answer is the same as most technical consultants: My target market is people who need my skills.

If you're a piano tuner, your target market is people who need their piano tuned. I'm a mathematician, so my target is companies that need math.

I may specialize in an industry some day, but so far what my clients have had in common is the nature of their problems, not their industry. They've come from legal, medical, manufacturing, etc. But they've all needed help with probability, numerical computing, etc.

Post has attachment
This looks like an Important Announcement in Number Theory: Not proof of the twin prime conjecture, but proof that there are infinitely many pairs of primes that differ by 70,000,000 or less. Only 69,999,998 to go! :D https://plus.google.com/103404025783539237119/posts/T5vXKd1N819

Post has attachment
Here's a Brand New Community (G+ has communities now!)  for NaNoWriMo, started by none other than (no, not me) ...
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded