Profile

Cover photo
Janet Neice
Worked at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Attended University of Michigan
Lives in Ann Arbor, MI
137 followers|32,901 views
AboutPostsPhotosYouTube

Stream

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Spot on, thoughtful, introspective, logical and intelligent points. Climate change, undoubtedly, is the greatest challenge to our survival on this planet, whether ISIS exists or not.  However, it is clear that such terror and unmitigated mass murder is sparking calls for band-aid solutions. Meanwhile, amidst all the band-aids, the root causes will only continue to grow. When you give marginalized, disenfranchised communities food and water, peace and stability, and economic growth, the power dynamic will shift dramatically. The youth will be far less willing to give up their lives if they have a future. Right now, what they see is a world not worth living in as a result of a multitude of internal and external circumstances. Thus, bombing away, while it sounds quick and easy, will only continue furthering the endless cycle of violence and suffering. Global cooperation is required if we, globally want to continue human existence. 
 
Twenty-four hours after an attack by Da'esh (the organization formerly known as ISIS [1]) on Paris left 129 dead and 352 wounded, the Internet and the airwaves alike have been filled with profound waves of self-serving nonsense and stupidity from left and right alike. Everyone seems to have found a way in which this situation justifies their position – protect the refugees! Exile the refugees! Bomb someone! Stop all bombing of anyone! – and magically, it seems that one of the most complex political situations of our time can be reduced to simple slogans.

Well, I've run out of patience with this, so let me seriously discuss what just happened here, and what it tells us. I'm going to talk about three things which have combined to lead to yesterday's massacre: the refugee crisis, Europe's Muslim population, and Da'esh. I'll then talk about a few things which I think have little or nothing to do with what we're seeing – most importantly, religion and oil – and a few things which do – such as food and water. And finally, we'll talk about what it's going to take to fix this, both in the short term and the long term.

Being entirely out of patience right now, forgive me for being particularly blunt. I suspect that, by the end of this, you will be thoroughly offended by my opinions, whether you are American, European, or Middle Eastern, left or right: nobody has behaved well in the lead-up to this.


The first thing to realize about the refugees streaming into Europe from Syria and its environs is that not only are they not, by and large, terrorists – they're people fleeing these exact terrorists. France was just hit by Da'esh, with over five hundred casualties; in Syria, people are surrounded by Da'esh on one side, and a bloodthirsty army on the other side, and have been seeing death on the scale of yesterday's attack every single day for the past four and a half years. [2] If you were living there, you would very likely be fleeing, too.

But the second thing to realize about the refugees is that there are, in fact, Da'esh members among them. It's clear that at least one of the attackers came in from Syria as part of October's refugee flood, and there's no reason at all not to believe that quite a few more are among them, working both at short- and long-term goals. (More on which in a moment)

Everyone seems to have simplistic solutions, here: kick out all the Muslims (as America's Ann Coulter and Donald Trump suggest), settle the refugees more permanently, build giant prison camps. These solutions tend to miss a few very basic points:

(1) When you have hundreds of thousands of people who are quite literally willing to risk not only their deaths, but the deaths of their families, in order to escape, your odds of being able to keep them out aren't actually great, unless your plan is to mobilize a giant army and start attacking inward until they're fleeing in the opposite direction.

(2) You do not have enough prison camp capacity to handle this many people, nor could you build it. Nor do you have enough housing and residential infrastructure capacity to easily settle this many people, because the flux you're seeing out of Syria is very far from the end of it. 

This is why large regional disasters quickly tend to spread into adjacent regions. This is why it's important not to let regional disasters get out of hand, no matter how politically appealing isolationism may appear.


The second thing to be aware of is that this didn't happen in a vacuum: Europe has a very large Muslim population, and it seems that most of the attackers were French or Belgian citizens. This started out with Europe's colonial ambitions, back in the day: France, for example, ruled over Algeria with a mind-bogglingly bloodthirsty approach [3] for decades, but now has a large population of people with a right to French residence who have been moving in to the country in search of a better economic situation. (Hardly surprising, when you leave behind a colony wracked by a horrifying civil war for decades) And France is far from alone in this.

Europe's Muslim population is both profoundly European and profoundly not European. They are European in that they have been living there, often for more than a generation; they work there, they pay taxes, they have become as assimilated as they can. They are not European in that Europe has been profoundly unwilling to allow them to assimilate. This is far from a historical anomaly: Europe has historically defined itself in terms of villages or cities and their local populations, which one can't really join very easily. Groups marked as outsiders – be they Jews, Romany, or Muslims – have been considered only marginally European. At times, there has been a high degree of apparent assimilation: for example, Jews were thoroughly integrated into European culture in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, intermarrying, forming friendships and professional associations across the board. As you may notice, "thorough integration" can be an awfully chancy business. 

Muslims in today's Europe, on the other hand, don't have anything close to this superficial level of integration; France has been routinely passing laws banning Muslims from dressing the way they did in their home countries in the past few years, which should tell you a great deal about local opinions of that population.

So you have a large population who finds it systematically hard to find work, impossible to be accepted, the regular target of police, and told every day that they should probably be kicked out of the country. I'm sure you will find it shocking that, if you do this to a few tens of millions of people for a few decades at a stretch, you will end up with a disillusioned and disenfranchised youth, some of which will combine this with the general hot-headedness and stupidity of being a young adult to become easy fodder for people who have shown up to recruit.

Lots of people seem to have half-assed solutions here, and they tend to be even more foolish than the solutions to the refugee crisis. "Send them back," the European right frequently cries: back to where? Most of the Muslim population is no longer fresh immigrants; they are second and third generation Europeans. They don't have homes anywhere else. The European left, on the other hand, preaches a mealymouthed combination of urging assimilation and unmistakeable racism. 

For some context, go back to the Charlie Hebdo attacks several months ago. There was a large outcry, saying that what the magazine (a notable left-wing satirical organ) had been doing was entirely in the bounds of proper satire, that the satire of religion was a hallowed European tradition. What this explanation glosses over is that nobody on the receiving end of the satire saw it as satire of religion, for the simple reason that religious affiliation, in Europe as in the Middle East, has little to do with what you believe and much to do with who you are. Charlie Hebdo's targets weren't simply religious extremists preaching from Saudi mosques; they were a portrayal of the French Muslim population as violent extremists, the dangerous other. And that's precisely the European left-wing line: Muslims are fine, so long as they become completely European, to the extent that we can forget that they were ever from someone else. Which, realistically, might mean they have to intermarry for a few generations and acquire blue eyes and blond hair, but that's OK, we welcome them!

The honest fact is this: neither the European left nor the right have ever made the large Muslim community into a full part of society. One side has covered it in nice words, while the other side has blared its xenophobia from the rooftops, but nobody on the receiving end of either of these has been fooled.

You sow the wind, you reap the whirlwind. What did you expect was going to happen?


And then we come over to our friends in the Middle East, the psychotically bloodthirsty bastards of Da'esh itself. It's a bit off to even refer to them as Islamist extremists in the mold of al-Qaeda; they've gone so far off the rails of Islam that the only clear ideology that often seems left is power and murder. Exhortations from theologians of any stripe aren't really going to have an effect on them.

But they seem to have realized that they are on an upswing of power, nobody having the resources or will to stop them, and have come up with the idea of spreading this worldwide, with attacks spreading to places like Russia and France – and, as soon as they can, everywhere else. Because as far as anyone can tell, they want to take over the world.

(Yes, this is a kind of screwy plan, and they barely even control chunks of land in the ass end of Syria and Iraq. But they've had enough luck with killing people that they seem to have convinced themselves that if they engage in even more killing people, it'll continue to work just as well. [4])

They seem to have one fairly simple strategic objective with these new attacks: drive a hard wedge between Muslim and infidel populations around the world, so that the Muslims will have no choice but to join them and become their army, overthrowing the local governments and establishing a world-wide Caliphate.

Unfortunately, political stupidity seems likely to help them. If the response to these attacks is to further isolate Muslim populations – both settled and refugee – then they will certainly have a far easier time recruiting among them. It's not actually going to lead to them taking over the world, but it will lead to bloodshed.

This recruitment tends to take a few forms. One is to recruit fighters to come and help in the bloodshed in existing battlefields; the second is to recruit suicide bombers and the like in other countries. These are somewhat disjoint processes, since the process of recruiting someone to commit suicide is rather different and targets different sorts of people, but there is also overlap: one strategy which al-Qaeda long favored was to recruit people to come to places like Iraq, Afghanistan, or Chechnya to fight, and later export trained fighters elsewhere.

One important thing about these tactics is that they seem to be realizing that surprisingly little training and planning is required. Yesterday's attack required some coordination among teams, but nothing spectacular; it did require practice in gunplay. But even this was fairly complex compared to the bare minimum required; consider the amount of chaos caused by the D.C. Sniper back in 2002.


Da'esh poses a particular danger because they seem to have latched onto the idea of exporting their violence to the rest of the world, but they're hardly the first or the last group to do this. If they were to be wiped out, I wouldn't bet any money that someone else wouldn't get the same idea soon after, much like al-Qaeda did before them. It's not even a particularly regional idea; the notion that if we kill enough people we can restructure the world to be perfectly {Aryan, Muslim, Democratic, Christian, Communist, etc.}, or to be the economic vassal states of the {X} empire, is frankly a cliché by now on pretty much every square kilometer of the planet.


So let's review where we are, for a moment. There's a large European Muslim population which is disillusioned, disenfranchised, underemployed, and generally treated as outsiders and fair political punching bags by the society as a whole. There's a giant stream of refugees pouring in to Europe, combining huge numbers of people running for their lives from bloodthirsty maniacs with small numbers of bloodthirsty maniacs looking to recruit. There's a factory of particularly bloodthirsty maniacs with a vision of taking over the world through (a) killing people and (b) convincing the rest of the world to treat Muslims even more like outsiders, who are actively trying to both create refugee streams and send out recruiters, to this end.


At this point, I expect to hear a chorus of voices blaming two things for this: religion (specifically, Islam), and oil (specifically, the West's insatiable need for it). To which my main response to both is "hogwash."

The reason I reject Islam as an explanation for this is that there's nothing particularly Muslim about any of it. The European Muslims which are being treated as second-class citizens aren't being treated that way because they pray on rugs facing Mecca, rather than in pews facing an altar; they're being treated this way because they're "dirty foreigners." (I'll spare you the actual terms used to describe them) Da'esh's plan to take over the world isn't rooted in a theological destiny of Muslims; it's rooted in an explicitly political vision of conquest. And quite frankly, the people being shot at the most are Muslims, too; remember who the refugees were running from?

More profoundly, people in the Middle East aren't systematically any more religious than people are in America. You have the same spectrum from the wholly secular to the crazed fundamentalist, with the former predominating in cities and the latter in the countryside. There's a tendency to assume (for example) that any woman wearing a headscarf must be extremely devout, or subject to domination and terror by some devout man; you have to back away and look at it in its local context, where sometimes it's a sign of devotion or a political statement, but it's also just what people wear; for many people, walking around with one's hair exposed is not done in much the same way people don't walk around in most of the US or Europe with their asses hanging out.

Oil is generally used as a proxy for "if only the Americans|Europeans never intervened in the Middle East, it would be peaceful there!" This bespeaks a rather curious innocence as to the history of the Middle East, combined with a reversed vision of (generally American) exceptionalism, that somehow our surpassing evil can corrupt otherwise noble savages. It's certainly true that without oil, most of the Middle East would be desperately poor – but as it happens, most of it is desperately poor anyway. Oil is not uniformly distributed, and Syria doesn't have that much of it to begin with.

There is one sense in which this is true, which is that the 2003 invasion of Iraq created a spectacular disaster. George W. Bush's belief that if we just created enough of a power vacuum, democracy would magically rush in to fill the void – the precise belief which his father didn't have, mind you, which is why GHWB made the explicit and deliberate decision to leave Saddam Hussein in power – proved to be exactly as unwise as it sounds when written so plainly. The result was a giant area of anarchy and civil war smack in the center of the Middle East, into which would-be fighters from all over the region (as well as other regions) swarmed: veterans of Chechnya and Bosnia found new employment in Iraq, as Sunnis and Shi'ites alike slaughtered one another. This anarchy, never resolved, has been the perfect factory of chaos which quite easily spilled over elsewhere.


But there's one profound factor which has driven the violence in the Middle East far more than oil ever could: water.

The entire Middle East has been in a water, and thus food, crisis for decades. In Egypt, for example, the Nile Valley has been drying out ever since the Aswan Dam was completed in 1970; as this once-fertile soil turned to desert, people have streamed into Cairo, doubling and tripling its population by forming tremendous shantytowns. Unemployment was extreme, as it's not like the cities suddenly had tens of millions of new jobs in them; the government kept order as well as it could by importing grain in tremendous quantities (the government's by-far largest annual expense) and selling bread cheaply. Unfortunately, a drought in Russia and Ukraine, Egypt's primary suppliers, caused those countries to cut off wheat exports in 2011 – and the government collapsed soon after.

Syria is a similar story: the lead-in to the collapse of Bashar al-Assad's dictatorship was steady droughts in the Syrian countryside driving people into the cities by the hundreds of thousands, leading to mass unemployment and unrest. People's livelihoods had simply disappeared. Stories like this repeat across the entire Middle East.


When we talk about the ultimate causes of the situation, this is the fact we tend to ignore: at the root of it, there isn't enough water, and there isn't enough food, and droughts have been hitting the area harder and harder for a decade. When there isn't enough food, people move from the countryside to the cities; and now you have giant groups of people who still don't have jobs or food, and that's a recipe for the collapse of governments as surely today as it was in Europe in the 1840's.

If you've ever wondered why I have often said that we need to be very actively worried about climate change, this is it. Changing climate breaks agriculture in various areas; the people who were farming there don't magically turn into factory workers or teleport to places which are (slowly) becoming more fertile; they become desperate former farmers, generally flooding into cities. 


So given all of this, what can we actually conclude? I think the most important thing is that you can't bury your head in the sand, and assume that problems in some other part of the world aren't your own. A drought or a civil war somewhere else can easily start to spill over in unexpected ways.

If you want to avoid terrible consequences, what you have to do is plan, and in particular never let kindling build up. For example:

(1) If you have a large, disenfranchised, population, this is trouble waiting to start. The only way to fix this problem is to enfranchise them: give them a full stake in your society. Yes, that means treating people who are very different from you like full equals. Yes, it also means that your society – that is, the set of people that you're responsible for – now includes a bunch of people who are a lot poorer than you are, and this is going to be expensive to fix. You're not going to like it. But you're going to like the alternative a whole lot less.

(2) If there's political instability, or worst of all, food supply instability somewhere else in the world, it doesn't matter how far away it seems: you need to get together with everyone else and have a serious plan to deal with it. Once masses of hundreds of thousands of people start streaming across the countryside, chaos will follow in their wake. 

(3) Climate change isn't an abstract fear for the future; it's a major political problem right now. You can't punt it away and talk about what to do about carbon emissions or its effect on the economy; you have to sit down and come up with serious strategic plans for what to do when agricultural productivity in critical breadbaskets drops sharply, or watersheds dry up. Contingency planning for any government needs to include anything from hurricanes to long-term droughts, and not just as one-offs, but what to do if these start happening a lot. The reason you need to plan for this is that it's not a goddamned hypothetical, you idiot.


What do we do in the short term? This is harder, because right now Da'esh has been sending agents across the planet to cause as much trouble as they can. One obvious prong of the solution is ordinary police work; that's proven far more effective than complex intelligence solutions at catching terrorists. Another prong is stopping their support system at the root. Because Da'esh's plans are so focused on actual conquest, a collapse of their regime back home is likely to have more of an effect on their satellite agents than the collapse of a more ideologically-oriented organization like al-Qaeda.

A third prong is to stabilize the situation in Syria: here the key isn't so much blowing anyone up as giving people a way to stop fighting. There are three key obstacles to this. One is Da'esh, which seems to be pretty committed to fighting for its own sake; this is unlikely fixable by any means short of straightforward military defeat. One is the underlying lack of food availability. The third is that quite a lot of people have reason to believe that they will be killed either if al-Assad regains power, or if he loses power. They need a serious guarantee of personal safety in any peace.

What this probably means is that a peace agreement will require very heavy international support: aid to rebuild the country, neutral military forces to guarantee cease-fires, and some way to deal with the underlying economic issues. That's going to require heavy international coordination of the profoundly unsexy sort: not deploying giant militaries to bomb targets and wave banners, or propping up regimes and helping them "suppress insurgencies," but working on the long-term realities of helping locals build a government that they're invested in – even when said government is unlikely to be either similar to Western norms, or friendly to Western aims. Military force to crush Da'esh is almost certainly needed as a precondition to this, but it's by far the smaller part of the game.


The short version is: if you want to fix problems, you're going to have to deal with some very serious, expensive, and unsexy solutions. Because life isn't simple, and you can't just bomb your way out of trouble.

[1] See this recent editorial for the argument for switching to the term Da'esh more broadly: https://www.freewordcentre.com/blog/2015/02/daesh-isis-media-alice-guthrie/ [Thanks to +Lisa Straanger for finding this more in-depth discussion than the Boston Globe op-ed which I had earlier cited]

[2] cf, for example, this infographic: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/14/world/middleeast/syria-war-deaths.html

[3] cf, for example, this obituary of a proud French torturer: https://plus.google.com/+YonatanZunger/posts/1PQQQ3XfnYA

[4] cf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B3slX6-_20
498 comments on original post
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
#WhyIStayed
I don't use Twitter, so this is my way of adding in my experience. I'm working on another post, dealing with mental health and how it is so prevalent in society, yet so poorly treated. Treatments exist, but affordability and accessibility are still very cha...
I don't use Twitter, so this is my way of adding in my experience. I'm working on another post, dealing with mental health and how it is so prevalent in society, yet so poorly treated. Treatments exist, but affordability and ...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Heed the Message, World!
Like a mantra, it's something that I can't stop repeating:   An i nvestment in women is an investment for everyone. If you don't believe in gender equity, then you don't believe in progress or prosperity. Perpetuating a model that suits the 1% is not a sust...
Like a mantra, it's something that I can't stop repeating:  An investment in women is an investment for everyone. If you don't believe in gender equity, then you don't believe in progress or prosperity. Perpetuating a model t...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Hey Ladies!
I am such a sucker for these things. This video, sharing stories and depictions of women throughout 2013, has all the messages I aspire to support and promote--women who are powerful, provocative, courageous, bold. Then it projects everything that destabili...
I am such a sucker for these things. This video, sharing stories and depictions of women throughout 2013, has all the messages I aspire to support and promote--women who are powerful, provocative, courageous, bold. Then it pr...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Snapshots of 2013
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
1
Janet Neice's profile photo
 
Fall 2013. Pics by Jan Fox
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Mija
I am constantly looking for sources of inspiration or for motivation. Sometimes, it's a book or an article. In many cases, it's a movie or a song. Or even the fall colors and the smell of fall. And then there is--people. I have a wonderful ability to bring ...
I am constantly looking for sources of inspiration or for motivation. Sometimes, it's a book or an article. In many cases, it's a movie or a song. Or even the fall colors and the smell of fall. And then there is--people. I ha...
2
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Addendum to #WhyIStayed
Today, a friend shared a link of Facebook of actual quotes victims of abuse heard from their abusers.The more I read these stories, the harder it is to accept that this is a never ending cycle of abuse towards women. It's no exaggeration. So many, many exam...
Today, a friend shared a link of Facebook of actual quotes victims of abuse heard from their abusers.The more I read these stories, the harder it is to accept that this is a never ending cycle of abuse towards women. It's no ...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
WILL they ever get a clue and shut the f*ck up?!
Conservatives really know how to top each other when it comes to complete ignorance about women and sex. This time the gender expert is George Will and his Opinion column of WaPo, titled:  Colleges become the victims of progressivism First, this title is ju...
Conservatives really know how to top each other when it comes to complete ignorance about women and sex. This time the gender expert is George Will and his Opinion column of WaPo, titled:  Colleges become the victims of prog...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Sometimes It's Best to Say Nothing at All
Wow, it's been awhile. Too long for my preference, but occasionally life and work intervene and swallow me whole. It's not a complaint. It's just kept me from writing about all these observations I've made and stories I've seen over the past few months, cul...
Wow, it's been awhile. Too long for my preference, but occasionally life and work intervene and swallow me whole. It's not a complaint. It's just kept me from writing about all these observations I've made and stories I've se...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Hey Ladies!
I am such a sucker for these things. This video, sharing stories and depictions of women throughout 2013, has all the messages I aspire to support and promote--women who are powerful, provocative, courageous, bold. Then it projects everything that destabili...
I am such a sucker for these things. This video, sharing stories and depictions of women throughout 2013, has all the messages I aspire to support and promote--women who are powerful, provocative, courageous, bold. Then it pr...
1
Add a comment...

Janet Neice

Shared publicly  - 
 
Girls
My friend Erica sent me an amazing video that was creatively produced to empower girls. Most of my focus on empowerment has been centered on women, so I think it's necessary to include messages that will appeal to girls at a young age. It's also a topic tha...
My friend Erica sent me an amazing video that was creatively produced to empower girls. Most of my focus on empowerment has been centered on women, so I think it's necessary to include messages that will appeal to girls at a ...
1
Add a comment...
Story
Tagline
What is my impact on this world?
Introduction
I've always been interested in working internationally, and so I did. I've spent the last 14 years working on international development programs throughout Eastern and Central Europe and the Middle East. When I joined the University of Michigan's School of Public Health at the Global Public Initiative, it gave me the inspiration that I've been looking for in my career. Global work is not only across the U.S. borders. It includes all or in other words, knows no boundaries. I've been searching to combine all my areas of interest--political, economic, social, cultural, health--into a specific goal. And now that goal is to empower women across the globe.
Bragging rights
I've traveled and worked in over 30 countries, and I only strive to increase that number. I hope to be able to do so not just professionally, but with my husband Ryan and my two little blondinis--Naomi and Gabe.
Education
  • University of Michigan
    Political Science, 1997 - 2001
  • George Washington University
    International Affairs, 2001 - 2003
Basic Information
Gender
Female
Work
Occupation
I set out to build a career in international affairs and I found a place in international development. My winding road became a career as an experience project management professional with a consistent history of successfully delivering complex, multi-faceted projects. I've primarily managed and implemented strategic international projects in challenging operating environments to create and facilitate economic reform and growth in developing countries’ markets. From 2012-2015, I became vested in programmatic opportunities focused on global health challenges. And now, no matter where I end up, my personal and professional mission is to be a practitioner, an educator, a listener, a partner, a global citizen to address critical issues that tie us all together, politically, socially, economically, environmentally, and require collective strength and effort.
Skills
Project management, international development, capacity building, management consulting, training, Russian language fluency, Spanish language proficiency, economic growth, global health, new business development, proposal writing, governance, USG-funded program consulting, Project Management Professional (PMP) certification
Employment
  • Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
    PROJECT MANAGER, WELLNESS and CARE MANAGEMENT (WCM), 2015 - 2015
    Provide overall project management and analytical support for BCBSM members participating in Wellness Care and Case Management (WCM) programs. More specific responsibilities included: • Collaborate on a team focused on defining business requirements and testing programs/initiatives for business applications, infrastructure and technology related activities. • Provide guidance, assistance, coordination and follow-up to facilitate support for the Registered Nurse (RN) staff throughout the WCM programs and to ensure licensure compliance for state-to-state case management. • Assist WCM personnel on the migration to new technical support systems, procedures, applications and platforms. • Work with application developers and operations personnel to support production applications and member-specific operations.
  • University of Michigan School of Public Health
    Director of Awards and Grants, Office of Global Public Health, 2012 - 2015
    Provided leadership to identify new funding and partnership opportunities in global health. Collaborated with faculty and students across SPH departments and other schools at the University of Michigan engaged in global health. Areas of focus included—multi-disciplinary curriculum development, research, practice, knowledge exchange, and program delivery. Detailed responsibilities included: • Identifying primarily external, non-traditional global health funding for SPH faculty to compete for inter-disciplinary grants, agreements, and contracts. • Creating new processes and systems for proposal submissions and for management of projects outside of the traditional research donor space. Developing solutions that would complement the university-wide systems in place. • Lead the development of SPH’s strategy for raising our visibility in the global health arena; building global platforms and in-country partnerships; and applying SPH’s faculty innovative research and solutions to • create sustainable impact in the most vulnerable, lower resource populations of Low-and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs). • Communicate and coordinate with faculty and staff across UM’s professional schools to bring multiple disciplines together in a decentralized environment in order to form a more united, cohesive and collaborative approach for global health engagement. • Provide training for SPH faculty on the proposal development process for non-research global health opportunities and professional development consultations for SPH students engaged in global health.
  • TD Auto Finance
    PROJECT CONTROL OFFICER/MANAGER, 2011 - 2012
    Responsible for the coordination and support of initiatives for three lines of business (LOB) and workstreams under the U.S. Business Launch program in Technology Solutions. Provide IT project management report in the synthesis of IT data for critical meetings related to the US integration of TD Bank Group (TDBG)’s subsidiaries. Primary project/program support includes: • Organize meetings, agendas, and meeting minutes; • Compile and develop project status reports; • Coordinate project schedules; • Track scope and budget of initiatives and workstreams; • Review applications’ process to ensure audit compliance; • Develop presentations and reports; • Facilitate meetings, assist in documenting new processes
  • The William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan
    Projects Administrator, 2010 - 2011
    Led project management for WDI’s scope of work under a $36 million dollar, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)-funded Expanded and Sustainable Access to Financial Services (ESAF) Program in the West Bank. Responsible for: • Financial management of $5M dollar scope of work of 4-subcontractor-led programs, including budget development; expenditure monitoring; and, review of expense reports and invoices to the Prime Contractor for incurred costs consistent with consultant’s travel, scope of work, deliverables, and compliance with U.S Federal Government and USAID regulations; • Work plan development and contractual oversight, including any modifications made to the original agreement; designation of consultants’ scope of work and deliverables; clearances and approvals from USAID’s contracting officer as required per master contract; and compliance with U.S Federal Government and USAID regulations; • Administration and execution of work plan activities; including, but not limited to, weekly status reports; quarterly and annual program reports; consultant on-boarding, deployment and repatriation; organization of programmatic and financial documentation required for audit reviews from WDI’s auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, and from USAID; procurement of equipment in compliance with U.S Federal Government and USAID regulations; recruitment of technical consultants; and logistical coordination for consultants’ travel and for trainings, workshops, and conferences held in the field.
  • Deloitte
    Consultant, 2009 - 2010
    Managed an $18 million USAID-funded Economic Reforms to Enhance Competitiveness (EREC) Project in Central Asia designed to strengthen sustainable institutional capacity for fiscal management. • Managed financial, administrative, and compliance oversight of project engagement team working across 4 countries and including 6 Resident Country Advisors, 17 Short-Term Technical Deloitte advisors, and over 35 local technical and administrative staff, and independent consultants. Concurrently, actively engaged in new business development efforts for donor-funded programs, including: • Managed multi-million dollar proposal development efforts ranging from $15M-$200M; • Led the development of proposals’ sections pertaining to project management systems and support, overview of proposed personnel’s qualifications and resumes, corporate capabilities, and project performance reports; • Developed cost proposals for different contracting vehicles, predominantly Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) and Time and Materials (T&M). Cost proposal content included, but not limited to program budget; budget narrative; daily rate confirmation for all contracted staff, Indirect Cost Rate Agreements, Certifications and Representations, Marking and Branding plans, and any other financial documentation required by the response for proposal (RFPs) for multi-million dollar USAID-funded programs.
  • BearingPoint
    Business Consultant, 2005 - 2009
    Managed a $14.5 million USAID-funded Economic Policy Reform (ERP) Project in Central Asia designed to support the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises. Central point of contact for home office backstopping of overall project management in collaboration with Finance and Accounting; Contracting Office; Human Resources; Internal Auditors; Country Directors, consultants, and project teams in the field; and, Emerging Market leadership. • Led development of an Emerging Markets’ Project Management Office (PMO) designed to provide a standardized and consistent project management approach on all Emerging Markets engagements. Activities included the creation of an internal portal that included templates; work plans; guides and reference material for a range of internal systems and processes (such as consultant on-boarding and deployment; logistical planning; monitoring and reconciling labor and expenses in BearingPoint’s OneGlobal financial system; client invoice development; training manuals on Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and AIDAR: USAID Acquisition Regulation; programmatic and financial management of different contracting vehicles); personnel documentation repository; sample deliverables, budgets, workplans, proposal documentation; resumes; lessons learned on projects and proposals; and knowledge management across Emerging Markets’ engagements. • Administration and execution of work plan activities; including, but not limited to, program activities, deliverables, and measurable impact reports; consultant on-boarding; logistical management, deployment and repatriation of expatriate advisors; organization of programmatic and financial documentation required for audit reviews from BearingPoint’s internal auditors, and from USAID. • Financial management of project budgets; pipeline projections, review of field offices’ monthly accounting reports; process expense reports from employee and consultants; development of monthly invoices to USAID, quarterly financial reporting; audit compliance; development of monthly Estimate-to-Complete (ETC) Submissions; project team utilization; and reconciliations and expense adjustments. • Development of monthly and quarterly audit reports compliant with FAR, AIDAR, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and regulations. Primary point of contact for internal auditors, requiring immediate and expedited responses for any audit request. Provided audit status reports, including any issues, questions or approvals required from senior leadership. • Contractual oversight of approved work plans; modifications to original contract terms either programmatic or financial; required country clearance, technical, and rate approvals for deployed consultants in collaboration with the Managing Director of Business Operations in Emerging Markets. • Management and trouble-shooting of project and personnel issues and risks; • Engaged in business development process management and provided contributions to proposals’ technical approach in regards to the proposed personnel sections, corporate capabilities, and Emerging Markets’ management systems to deliver proposed program.
  • Social Impact
    Program Officer, 2004 - 2005
    Provided management support on USAID/Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI) task orders and various Subcontractor Agreements, including financial report verification, report development, and administrative support in line with SI policy and procedures. Responsibilities included: • New business development; • Recruitment and Consultant Deployment/Mobilization; • Compliance of Contract and Subcontract actions; • Financial Management; • Logistical support for workshops, conferences and other events with clients and partners
  • ACDI/VOCA
    Project Coordinator, 2003 - 2004
    Managed a USAID-funded Cooperative Development Program in Ukraine and a $10 million USAID-funded Farmer to Farmer Project in Russia. Project support included: • Provided support for 2 field offices in Russia and 1 field office in Ukraine, including Chief of Party and Country Representative, 6 Local Technical Advisors, 10 Local Support Staff, and an average of 1-2 U.S. agribusiness specialists deployed to the field per month. • Delivered logistical support for volunteers and consultants; • Maintained communication with stakeholders for all international activities; • Procurement and Contracts/Subcontracts management; • Drafted project and proposal budgets; • Developed semi- and annual work plans, closeout plans, and other project-related documentation.
Places
Map of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has livedMap of the places this user has lived
Currently
Ann Arbor, MI
Previously
Toledo, Ohio - Columbus, Ohio - St. Louis, MO - Washington, D.C. - McLean, VA - Fairfax, VA - Tel Aviv, Israel
Links