This is a rather uncharted and controversial subject so feel free to offer lots of insights that aren't documented by "reputable scientist #45."
There are many people who grow up being sane and sensible. They live free of mental illness. They begin studying religion, meditation, self cultivation, the occult, various subjects otherwise, and become highly intelligent. They develop a form of what most would describe as schizophrenia in which they perceive religious and spiritual happenings. Ironically if you encourage them to try other religions out they often will still experience religion and spirituality except they will experience different kinds.
It leads a lot of people to wonder what is spirituality in reference to the mind? Is it brought on illness by misdirected knowledge? Or is it just a natural part of human development when they investigate things that are greater than themselves to develop a "spiritual" aspects of themselves.
My personal thought is that spirituality is a natural development however needs to be dealt with carefully as it is neurochemical in nature. It is possible to get too much of a good thing. I consider myself an Atheist as I have experienced many religious perspectives and learned that these are just passing perspectives of the mind. I continue to experience spirituality regardless of belief. I've learned to use it for a soothing effect rather than to get upset about it normally.
There are many people who grow up being sane and sensible. They live free of mental illness. They begin studying religion, meditation, self cultivation, the occult, various subjects otherwise, and become highly intelligent. They develop a form of what most would describe as schizophrenia in which they perceive religious and spiritual happenings. Ironically if you encourage them to try other religions out they often will still experience religion and spirituality except they will experience different kinds.
It leads a lot of people to wonder what is spirituality in reference to the mind? Is it brought on illness by misdirected knowledge? Or is it just a natural part of human development when they investigate things that are greater than themselves to develop a "spiritual" aspects of themselves.
My personal thought is that spirituality is a natural development however needs to be dealt with carefully as it is neurochemical in nature. It is possible to get too much of a good thing. I consider myself an Atheist as I have experienced many religious perspectives and learned that these are just passing perspectives of the mind. I continue to experience spirituality regardless of belief. I've learned to use it for a soothing effect rather than to get upset about it normally.
View 28 previous comments
+Jason Miller Are you asking me?2w
+Zach Decker I was but I think I pretty much just restated your original question. Thanks for responding.2w
In philosophy the question of God have a incredible strong tradition and meaning
Who think is a silly thing, it mean think was silly Spinoza, Hegel, Aristotle, Heidegger or whatelse, you need to justificate, it's something you need to argue deeply
The most of atheists they know nothing of this level of discussion or act like they think God is simple theirselves (or whatelse Prometheus sublimination in the mirror of the mindkind's factory ) that is simple gnosticism without know is gnosticism most of the time.
I didn't go deeply in the philosphycal question, because it's not simple, philosphy is not something really simple to get and study, this is reason you need to respect lot of great thinkers have handle the concept of God and the meaning in human life.
I tell you what is all the matter.
These post-modernists and post-nihilists are the garbage of history where ended all the marxist disillused and delusional
Listen well now
Since everything collapsed in their utopies and they weren't able anymore to find a new meaning after the death ot their main root obsession, they cant't stand to die without destroy the meaning of life for every one in this earth
did i make myself clear?
Now, I'm atheist for example, I not experimented the faith, even though in some moments of my life i try to listen, try to search in me something, in any case the reason is very simpe why i'm atheist: i breath this time that is atheist and i was convinced to be atheist by the system (family,. school, television, etc..)
This is not a deeply reason, you see
I'm the only don't' have a deeply reason, plenty of expanations and demostrations and lectures to other for being an atheist? i'm the only simple was learned to be atheist?
How many of us?2w- +ANDY LOL violently exterminate the Christian government2w
+Richard Lucas Surely thats the other way round. I get confused also...can someone please give me a clear definitive difference between deductive and inductive. Is inductive reasoning based around empirical premises and deductive logical? Just because empirical data leads to a certain conclusion this doesn't necessarily mean that conclusion is correct...6h
+Symon No, and there is no way to be sure up front. Deduction is like propositional and digital logic in that they are tools that can retroactively put together a more sure structure post hoc, but it is the intuition, and leaps across inferential gaps that open up knowledge. The captain sails by feel, and then charts the newfound seas.5h