Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Ian Gentles
Is that it?
Is that it?

Communities and Collections
View all

Post has shared content
Where old meets new

Tooley's Boatyard situated in the heart of Banbury on the South Oxford Canal, is the oldest working dry dock on the Inland Waterways.

The bridge leads from Castle quay shopping centre to Banbury Museum. Both relatively modern structures.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
A street filled with history.

Quirky, colourful, and often described as the street of flavours.

Parsons street in Banbury Oxfordshire - on 1st June 2018
A view from behind the A Board

Parsons Street in Banbury

Pictured: 1st June 2018
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
I guess you'll have this by now.

If not. It's rather good.

Privacy Badger blocks spying ads and invisible trackers.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content

In Banbury Oxfordshire
Parsons Street Banbury - 1961 Triumph Herald coupe`

Stage of the #RallyeMonteCarloHistorique

Picture taken 1st February 2018
Add a comment...

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
This has to happen
First Nation To Switch UBI On?

The arguments against Universal Basic Income have made sense only to those who use ideology instead of economic theory to describe how society works. The reality of UBI is full of such positivity in its effects that really we cannot have it fast enough.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
Simply. Yes
Why Google+ is the worst social site, with the exception of all the others

Social networks are great in theory, but annoying in practice.

For several years, Google+ was the greatest social anything ever. Then Vic Gundotra left Google, and the company pivoted G+ into a visual Reddit, with the focus on topics, rather than people.

Now engagement is a fraction of what it used to be. Google+ is still slow and bloated and has a few other problems.

So I stopped being exclusive to Google+, and started up an external blog, resurrected my newsletter and started posting again on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Reddit and others — as well as on Google+.

All these social networks and alternative media suck in one way or another. Blogs don't get any traffic or engagement. Newsletters are one-to-many media that tend to have small followerships.

Twitter is a hotbed of bots, hostility, propaganda, trolling and harassment. And has ads.

Instagram is like high school, with the jocks and the cheerleaders getting all the popularity while everybody else just wants to be their friends. And has ads.

Facebook is hell, with that company manipulating everything and choosing what your relationships are. And has ads.

Reddit is a great source of content, but it's not great for blogging, driving traffic or engaging with a community. And has ads.

They all suck in some way or another.

At some point it becomes clear that, despite its flaw, Google+ is still the best social anything out there. And in the most important ways.

The Google+ community is better. Specifically, while you get "rewarded" on other social networks for being political or hostile or snarky or formulaic or for some other bad reason, Google+ community members are generally rewarded (with engagement and esteem) for being smart and contributing something of value. And no ads.

I don't know. This is how I'm feeling right now.

What do YOU think?
Add a comment...

Post has shared content

Thanks to +Gideon Rosenblatt
Relationships on Shared Knowledge Graphs - and on Google+ in Particular

G+ is on my mind these days, and so I hope you don't mind me spewing out a bit more riffs on this front over the next few days. Like many of you here, I have a substantial investment in this platform and would like it to succeed.

In short, it's not enough to enshrine Collections and Communities. Circles matter too.

Relationships in a Knowledge Network
I've been stewing on a core idea, which is that Google+ needs to invest more into building back relationships between human beings. I'm not saying this to detract from the important strategic turn this network made in focusing on topics. I'm saying this to support the focus on shared interests.

For there is no shared interest without someone to share them with.

A pure topic network already exists: it's called Google Search (and the Knowledge Graph behind it). What Google+ really is is a Shared Interest Network, designed to augment its Interest Graph. The Interest Graph is the point of intersection between the Social Graph (which Facebook already dominates with its social network) and the Knowledge Graph (which Google largely controls).

The Interest Graph is what ties me to a network of particular topics. It’s what ties me into the Knowledge Graph.

For what constitutes knowledge is a true matter of perspective. I may want to know about the human soul, about artificial intelligence, and about mission-driven businesses. You may want to know about marketing, biology, and theology. The value that certain knowledge has for me is not the same as what it has for you.

The Mission of Shared Interest
Understanding this relative value that each of us hold for various topics is essential, not just for advertising, but for the bigger project of organizing the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful, which is, after all, Google's mission.

One could argue that Google already has a very good model of this intersection between people and knowledge thanks to the massive amounts of data it collects from our interactions with its Search Engine. But those relationships to knowledge — that search history — is a mixture of our subconscious and conscious minds that we don't always want exposed to everyone else.

The Shared Interest Graph is a representation of our outward-facing expressions of our interests. It is what we consciously express to one another, what we willingly share with one another.

The primary purpose of a Shared Interest Graph is to express ourselves to one another.

Shared Interest Graph Competition
Interest-sharing networks like Google+ that are built for the express purpose of generating an Interest Graph. The Interest Graph is the new frontline in the battle for commerce.

From a commercial perspective, I'm talking about the detailed understanding of how each individual conducts her or himself when we know our expressions are visible to the public.

If you don't quite see how important something like this is, I recommend you dig into what Facebook is doing with its Graph API. You see Google is cooperating with search competitors like Microsoft and Yandex on, which suggests to me they are not anticipating a future where any one company has a lock on the knowledge graph and its connections to our various social graphs through things like social networks, email, messaging, and more critically in the future, the Internet of Things.

Facebook, however, does seem to believe that they can own the whole thing. They are betting they will be big enough to control this interface between people and knowledge. They know there's advertising money there, and know, rightly, that it is this juncture between people and things is where all business-to-consumer commerce originates in the field of marketing and operates in the coming Internet of Things. Facebook is betting its future on owning the interface between people and things.

This, you see, is part of why I invest my time on Google+ and Twitter (and now Mastodon), with only a minimal presence on Facebook.

Relationships Lost on Google+
Google is betting its financial future on this interface too. What Google doesn't seem to realize is just how important its bet on the Shared Interest Graph — its bet on Google+ — actually is.

The good news is that the Google+ team is really focused on the idea of shared interests. That’s been the fuel behind the resharpened focus on Collections and Communities in the new UI.

The bad news is that other topical navigation solutions such as hashtags and search have been badly degraded in the redesign. These need to be fixed.

The further bad news is that the redesign badly crippled Circles, which is really the heart and soul of human relationships on Google+.

But the squelching of Circles is only one example of the way that relationships have been demoted in importance on Google+ over recent years. Another example is the fact that, without tools like +CircleCount and +Circloscope, we are unable to know whether or not someone has circled or followed us back. Reciprocality is social networking 101. This omission would almost be funny if it weren’t so damned egregious and telling of the lack of focus on relationships.

Why did the design team take away the simple icon that shows someone else feels that they too are in relationship with you? Was it somehow running out of pixels? No, my gut tells me its because it is now unclear what exactly constitutes that reciprocality. Should it show as reciprocal simply from someone follow one of my Collections or does it have to retain its original meaning, which was that that person had circled you? It’s a good question right? But rather than resolving this, the design team just punted on it, remaining silent to ongoing user questions about the rationale behind its removal.

Or what about the fact that it take a good 30-40 seconds between the time I hit the “Done” button and the time I’ve successfully added someone to a circle using my Android phone? Adding someone to a circle should take no more than a second or two. It’s ridiculous that it takes that long, and more evidence of the lack of focus on relationships in the redesign.

Let’s Go!
If all this sounds a bit harsh, it is only from a place of the tough love that I hope can act as a catalyst for change. Google+ team, we are here to help you, just as much as you are here to help us. People want to be co-creators, not cattle.

We are telling you, in various ways, that there needs to be a renewed focus on relationships. And here’s the good news, it’s not at the expense of the new strategy, but in full support of it. For a Shared Interest Graph is nothing without people with which to share it.

(Please excuse any typos; I don't consider this my blog, where I edit things more carefully before publishing. If there's something that just plain doesn't make sense, let me know in the comments and I may re-edit the post to address it.)
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
A collection for those who enjoy all things Weddings

Some excellent articles in here
Add a comment...
Wait while more posts are being loaded