Having said that, I completely agree with this article. I see no reason that we continue to demonize a substance that's less addictive and less harmful than tobacco, and that has numerous medical uses. Why not legalize weed? If we still feel it necessary, we can show ads about its "negative" effects, just as we do for tobacco.
Personally I have never found pleasure with the stuff when I have had the misfortune to walk in to its smoke. Headaches that knock me out for the rest of the day are no fun.
The next 7 (!) alerts came during the day, all accompanied by the same tones, and all with the same description and license plate number as the first. No new information, just a jarring sound that caused me to jerk the steering wheel during the alert that came when I was in the car. Fortunately, I was in the Baskin parking lot when that happened, so I wasn't going fast and didn't hit anything.
I have no objection to AMBER alerts being sent to many people, including me. But the "emergency" sound is unnecessary, and the alerts should respect the "do not disturb" setting on the phone. If I'm asleep or giving a talk, I won't be looking for that car. If I'm driving, do you really want me looking at the phone for the description? If this were an imminent threat to everyone (severe weather warning, earthquake, etc.), that'd be different (you might want people to pull over and seek shelter), but a message about which license plate to look out for isn't so high priority that I need to look at it RIGHT NOW. This is doubly true when it's been 15+ hours since the first alert and the driver could be anywhere in a 900 mile radius. Besides, the description and license plate number were on every highway sign in the Bay Area, and those I could read while driving.
Sadly, all this will do is encourage a lot of people to completely disable AMBER alerts when all they want to do is stop them from making so much (uncontrollable) loud noise.
I have one important question, though: the article mentions a "15-year old student in Mongolia" who "received a perfect score on the final exam" and is now applying to MIT and UC Berkeley. Why? If a MOOC is as good as the "real thing", why bother going halfway around the world and paying a lot of money (or, more likely, in this case, getting a lot of scholarships) for the "same thing"? Either this student is a fool (which I doubt) or a MOOC from Berkeley isn't as good, for some reason, as being there in person.
"At times, human rights activists seem to have no problem with anti-Semitism -- even of the genocidal variety -- condemning it forcefully only if it is accompanied by anti-immigrant or anti-Muslim sentiment."
For example, faculty are normally judged and rewarded based on grants, publications, student production, etc. If you have an "off year", your unit doesn't cut your salary and hand it to the young hot-shot who had a better production record for that year than you did. You're not doing piece work. Is that for "experience"? What if that "experience" doesn't translate into production quickly? A pure libertarian would say to reward the young person instead. That may happen over the long term through lay-offs, but if skills are the only thing of value (as opposed to skills+experience), the cycle for adjusting pay for output would be much shorter (e.g. more like piece-work).
If that's the new contract, then tech piece-work should be priced higher, to allow offsetting future down-times when you can't work at the pace or level of your late 20's.
To state that young people are "smarter" because they eschew families, cars or anything other than work is getting it precisely backwards or incredibly naive.
Duct tape is known for being strong enough to restrain people (think of all the "duct tape someone to a goalpost" pranks), and it's cheap. Plus, you can't actually damage an airplane with it, other than the adhesive not coming off easily. Of course, there's the chance that a restrained individual might have a potty accident if it's a long flight, but, hey, you shouldn't have acted up in the first place.
If we do this, perhaps we can be allowed to carry itty-bitty (2") pocketknives again. Please?
In May 2009, H. Peter Anvin published a white paper on RAID6 (http://web.archive.org/web/20090807060018/http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/raid6.pdf) that describes how to do 8-bit GF multiplies using PSHUFB (see page 8). Our FAST paper cited Anvin's pioneering work, since it inspired some of the material in our FAST13 paper (and I have proof that I had a working version implemented in Sept 2010).
For those who are looking for our FAST13 paper, you can still download it from the SSRC web page (http://www.ssrc.ucsc.edu/Papers/plank-fast13.pdf). Source code is still available from https://bitbucket.org/ethanmiller/gf-complete. Feel free to use either the paper or the library with no fear of infringing StreamScale's IP with respect to the use of SSE instructions for Galois field arithmetic (the only thing the press release claims we "stole"). Anvin's paper publicly disclosed the basic technique of using PSHUFB (the only relevant technique in our gf-complete library) more than two years before StreamScale disclosed their approach to anyone. If you're still worried, simply copy the inner loop code for GF multiply from Anvin's 2009 paper—it's nearly identical to what's in gf-complete.
StreamScale should be ashamed of themselves. Companies that use unsubstantiated claims to coerce publishers to remove academic papers should be soundly punished when their claims are shown to be false.
Benjamin Netanyahu was unable to speak in Berkeley on November 28th (see http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2000/11/29/MN44311.DTL). Hundreds of protesters blocked the entrance to where he was to speak, forcing the cancellation of his lecture. One said "I don't believe in free speech for war criminals."
It seems that the folks in Berkeley believe in free speech for virulent racists and anti-Semites, but not for the former leader of a democratic nation with whose policies they disagree. For all their bluster about freedom and rights, "liberals" (at least in Berkeley) are only willing to give those rights to people with whom they agree. Shame on them.
- Pure StorageResearch Scientist, 2009 - present
- University of California, Santa CruzProfessor, 2000 - present
- University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyAsst. Professor, 1994 - 2000
- University of California, Berkeleycomputer science, 1988 - 1995
- Brown Universitycomputer science, 1983 - 1987
Santa Cruz to be split into congressional districts; Dividing line weave...
The line ambles through downtown Santa Cruz like a drunken party guest, sort of following the river, stumbling between familiar friends and
Transactional memory going mainstream with Intel Haswell
Transactional memory is a promising technique for making the development of high-performance parallel programs easier and safer. It has larg
U.S. trade policy: America's unequal trade relationship with China - Los...
The American economy has been in trouble for more than a decade, and no amount of right-wing tax cuts or left-wing fiscal stimuli will solve
How Much Data Will Humans Create & Store This Year? [INFOGRAPHIC]
How much is 1.8 zettabytes? We all know it's a big number, but just how big? The mind-blowing comparisons in this infographic will put it
Letter to UC President Mark Yudof from the Jewish Community Survey
1. Dear President Yudof, We are Jewish community members of California – rabbis, principals, teachers, alumni, parents, grandparents, family