Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Apurva Pande
here there and everywhere
here there and everywhere
About
Apurva's posts

Post has attachment
trying out the new google+ brand page

before the fix sets in. spotify, you've set me loose inside an endless record store and told me to take as much as i like...you should know people with organized playlists should not step foot inside this place

Post has attachment
Google, I know you're trying hard, but why do I keep imagining a suited john hodgman character doing this ?

working off another thread and genuinely seeking answers. A has B under "friend" and C under "acquaintance". B has A under "acquaintance" and C under "friend". C has A under "friend" and B under "acquaintance". Assume an "acquaintance" cannot see what is posted in "friend". A then, posts something in "friend", critical about C, but readable by B. B is a "friend" of A and can read it, C cannot. So far so good. Then, B comments on A's first post and also says something critical of C. However, C is under "friend" for B. B is likely in trouble with C. But can B get A in trouble just by the act of responding to A's post ? ....This is like a bad mensa/ gre question, but I'm really trying to figure this out. Anyone? Chris Nolan can you help ?

"It’s like peeking into a party and realizing that the people who are inside are nothing like you." on the silicon valley inundation on g+ (techcrunch)

Post has attachment
saw a middle-aged guy walk inside an art supply store and ask for greeting cards. he got a polite response, but it reminded me so much of this scene

apologies for anyone who sees repeat posts from fb, but i'm trying to get comfortable on g+ using the lazy option by mirroring stuff

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Photo
Wait while more posts are being loaded