Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Hoefer Law
Hoefer's posts

Post has attachment
Our Blog Has Moved
For more recent Veterans' Case Law Blogs, click here.

Post has attachment
Scott v. McDonald
v. McDonald ,
789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2015) ISSUE EXHAUSTION;
PROCEDURAL ISSUES Held: “[T]he Board’s obligation to read
filings in a liberal manner does not require the Board or the Veterans Court to
search the record and address procedural ...

Post has attachment
Delisle v. McDonald
v. McDonald ,
789 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2015) JURISDICTION; RATING
KNEE CONDITIONS Held: The Federal Circuit cannot review the
CAVC’s application of law to fact. In dicta, the Court found that the plain
language of Diagnostic Code 5257 is no...

Post has attachment
Smith v. McDonald
v. McDonald ,
789 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2015) 38 C.F.R. § 3.103,
COURT NOT REQUIRED TO GRANT JMR Held: The Court is not required to
automatically grant a joint motion for remand (JMR) – and its failure to do so
does not conflict with the rulin...

Post has attachment
Froio v. McDonald
Froio v. McDonald , 27 Vet.App. 352 (May
29, 2015) EAJA FEES FOR LAW STUDENTS Held: EAJA fees are allowed for work
performed by law students as part of a legal clinic setting. Click here for complete April  2015 Veterans Law Update.

Post has attachment
Wingard v. McDonald
Wingard v. McDonald , 27 Vet.App. 329
(May 8, 2015) 0% RATING; COURT
Circuit’s determination that the Court is statutorily precluded from
determining whether the inclusion of a ...

Post has attachment
Westfall v. McDonald
Westfall v. McDonald , docket no.
13-0575(E) (Apr. 28, 2015) JUDGMENT, MANDATE, EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) Held: A CAVC order granting “a motion to expedite the
issuance of mandate does not, on its own, operate to shorten the time to appeal
to the F...

Post has attachment
Haynes v. McDonald
Haynes v. McDonald , 785 F.3d 614 (Fed.
Cir. Apr. 29, 2015) DIC, “SURVIVING
SPOUSE” DEFINITION, “ABUSED SPOUSE” EXCEPTION Held: In order to qualify for DIC benefits,
there must be a valid marriage at the time of the veteran’s death and
continuous cohabitati...

Post has attachment
Gray v. McDonald
Gray v. McDonald , 27 Vet.App. 313
(Apr. 23, 2015) AGENT ORANGE, “INLAND
WATERWAY,” DA NANG HARBOR Held: VA’s interpretation of 38 C.F.R. §
3.307(a)(6)(iii), designating Da Nang Harbor as an offshore waterway, is
irrational and inconsistent with the regulat...

Post has attachment
Toomer v. McDonald
Toomer v. McDonald , 783 F.3d 1229 (Fed.
Cir. Apr. 21, 2015) EQUITABLE TOLLING,
PRESUMPTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REGULARITY Held: In order to warrant equitable tolling of the
120-day deadline to file an appeal with the Veterans Court, a claimant must
show (1) ...
Wait while more posts are being loaded