Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Will Hill
1,838 followers -
Yes, this is me.
Yes, this is me.

1,838 followers
About
Will's posts

Post has shared content
Quick post about why Bing sucks.
The top sponsored ad on the Microsoft search engine for the biggest company in the nation (Walmart) should not be sending people to a phishing server.

Post has shared content
Congratulations!
I'm happy to announce that DASH (the Harvard open-access repository) just passed the milestone of 10 million downloads.

The business-as-usual DASH home page.
https://dash.harvard.edu/

The real-time download counter with confetti.
https://dash.harvard.edu/downloads.html

#oa #openaccess 

Post has shared content

Post has attachment
Techrights Covers Microsoft's Shameful Patent Threat Microsoft PR tries to pass the usual software patents threats as "defense" for free software.

This may seem petty in a world dominated by Trump, but extortion and rent seeking are the end goal. You are stripped of your rights so that people can eliminate competition and rob you. Non free software is a significant component of the autocratic states being built around the world and Microsoft is a dangerous flunky for them. 

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
How Loony Trump Administration Climate Denial Really Is A Trump spokesperson gave the keynote speech at some kind of phony climate conference and spouted a crazy combination of insult, conspiracy theory, and misleading bullshit. The Trump administration proudly stands behind what most people probably hoped was just "campaign talk." I'm shocked.

Did you know that climate science was a big conspiracy by know nothing people who just want to get rich?

Power and money and influence is on the side of the environmental movement. ... We face today a very interesting conglomeration of intentions and motives – between those who believe global climate change crisis and those who have figured out how to get rich on basis of promoting those ideas. This challenge claims to be moral and has at its heart …. the push behind it is a special interest that figured out lot of money to be made by keeping poor people in poor countries poor perpetually. ... Time and time again ‘experts’ have theoretical, but no practical knowledge.

He later inverts the concept of a tragedy of the commons to recommend privatizing all land. Because the former Soviet Union was a mess, all commonly held land must be a tragedy.

ranchers, farmers, timber-owners. If they don’t take care, they lose (the) value of that resource. Having things in common means we each have an incentive to grab something before someone else grabs it – [this is the] story of the modern environmental movement. It’s completely wrong – human history for thousands of years contradicts what environmental movement is selling and has been successfully selling. Urban people have lost connection with stewardship.

Really, this is embarrassing. Do people really believe this bullshit?

Post has shared content
this is being called a constitutional crisis. 
Cracks in the rule of law

+Yonatan Zunger put his finger on what's really disturbing about today's news: the breakdown of the rule of law as the Department of Homeland Security flagrantly violates the orders of Federal judges... and somewhat hidden by the chaos, the elevation of Steve Bannon to the Principals Committee of the National Security Council. Yes, Bannon - the guy who said this:

“Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”

You should always try to look behind the crazy new stories that Trump creates, to see what's going on more quietly. Trump is not dumb. He may seem dumb, but he would not be bossing all of us around if he were dumb. When we make fun of him we may temporarily feel we're winning... but so far, we're losing.

We need to get serious. If we let him get away with violating the orders of Federal judges, there's no telling what he'll do. Phone your senators and representatives - it's more of a pain than sending emails or playing around on social media, but that's exactly why it works. This website makes it easy:

https://www.5calls.org/

Next I'll quote Yonatan - if you didn't read his whole post, please read this!

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Some updates on the political situation. Everything is very preliminary right now, because it's (apparently deliberately) unclear.

Several Federal judges have issued stays against the "Muslim ban" order. However, there are confirmed reports from multiple sources that Customs & Border Patrol (CBP, part of the DHS) is willfully disregarding those stays, denying access to counsel, moving the people they're holding to undisclosed locations so that nobody can get habeas corpus, and deporting people. This is very certainly not a local commander's decision; it goes up to the Sec'y of HS at least, and directly to Trump at most.

But – and here's the kicker – it's incredibly unclear what the scope of this refusal is. There's no clear news coming out, and we're getting more useful reports from the Twitter feeds of top attorneys in the field (both from groups like the ACLU, who have done heroic work tonight, and from attorneys at top firms, who have been joining this pro bono) than we are from anywhere else.

If this is a refusal of unambiguous Federal court orders, then this is serious, serious beyond the scale of anything we've seen in our lifetimes: it's DHS saying that if Trump tells them to do one thing and the courts another, they will do what Trump says and best of luck to the courts trying to enforce that. Which is to say, they're establishing a precedent that DHS actions are not subject to any sort of court review, or to anything other than the personal fiat of Trump – including their right to detain people, deport them, or hold them incommunicado.

Alternatively, this might be something else, a decision by CBP counsel that certain court orders don't apply to certain cases; this is serious too, since they're trying to create "facts on the ground" faster than the courts can react, but it doesn't mean a wholesale rejection of the system of law. I simply don't have enough information yet, and hope to update as we know more.

Separately, there was another story today: Trump reorganized the National Security Counsel. The two most prominent changes are this: Steve Bannon now has a seat on it, and the Director of National Intelligence and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff were both demoted: they only attend meetings of the Principals Committee which "[pertain] to their responsibilities and expertise."

(The other full members of the PC, incidentally, are the secretaries of State (Tillerson), Treasury (Szubin), Defense (Mattis), and Homeland Security (Kelly), the AG (Sessions), the President's Chief of Staff (Priebus), the National Security Advisor (Flynn), and the Homeland Security Advisor (Bossert). You can read the full order here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/28/presidential-memorandum-organization-national-security-council-and)

The demotion of the DNI and CJCS is surprising and I don't yet know what it means. There currently is no DNI – Coats' nomination is yet to be confirmed. It's hard to imagine what meetings wouldn't pertain to their "responsibilities and expertise," especially given that secretaries with much more specific responsibilities (like Treasury) weren't demoted. Bannon's promotion, however, is more significant: Trump is known for not attending many meetings, and delegating those, and Bannon is likely to be his principal representative in the NSC.

My gut read is that this is something which will prove very important in the long run. Trump's rift with the existing military and intelligence establishments is well-known, and he's made numerous statements, directly and through surrogates, about his interest in constructing alternative establishments reporting directly to him. Bannon would be a logical person to manage that subchain, as his "Chief Strategist" role doesn't come with a large org to manage already, or with Congressionally mandated restrictions. That would be the skeleton of a new internal security system, with the DHS and FBI (both very loyal to Trump) in the loop, together with a new private "security force" rolling up to Keith Schiller that takes over a lot of Secret Service roles, and a hypothetical new intelligence force, with Bannon being either de facto or de jure in charge of all the new organizations, and little to no legal supervision over them.

It's not clear, again, that this is where it's going, but it's definitely the configuration I would keep my eyes open for. It would promote Bannon from a Goebbels to a Himmler, which I suspect he would be just fine with.

So: Many signs out there, but nothing clear yet. These could range from incredibly serious to passing things, depending on how the next week or so plays out.

Update (00:51 PST): The DHS has put out an official statement, and I'll be damned if I can figure out what it means. It starts out by saying that they will continue to enforce all of Trump's orders, and that the orders remain in place, but it does offer a nod (later on) to complying with judicial orders.

Text here: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/29/department-homeland-security-response-recent-litigation

Update (02:06 PST): The Washington Post's story pulls together a range of official statements, which make it clear that this is deliberate and central policy, ordered personally by Trump. The exact meaning of the DHS statement remains unclear, but most people are reading it as an intent to continue to do whatever they want; it may involve a suggestion that if they don't want to grant a waiver to someone with a green card, they may do it by simply revoking the green card on the spot.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/refugees-detained-at-us-airports-challenge-trumps-executive-order/2017/01/28/e69501a2-e562-11e6-a547-5fb9411d332c_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_airports-1046am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.560b5a336b45

Update (07:55 PST): Sources confirming that DHS lawyers had flagged the banning of legal permanent residents as illegal ahead of time, but were specifically overruled by Bannon. Note the implications both for the deliberacy of the act and for the extent of Bannon's power. Also, Priebus confirmed on "Meet the Press" that the omission of Jews from the Holocaust Remembrance Day statement was deliberate and is not regretted.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/steve-bannon-personally-overruled-dhs-decision-not-to-include-green-card-holders-in-travel-ban-cnn/


Photo

Post has attachment
Crackdown on Social Media Roy Schestowitz and JoinDiaspora are being sued by that jerk who claims to have invented email, Shiva Ayyadurai. The same man who sued Gawker into bankruptcy and is also suing Techdirt.

See also, https://joindiaspora.com/posts/1a32d1d0c6580134062f0242ac110007

This is bad news, folks. 

G+ no longer working with older browsers for me, particularly the version of Iceweasel and Midori that came with Debian Wheezy, and the one that's still used by GNewSense, Iceweasel 31.5. I get an error after signing in. Other Google services all work, and obnoxiously enough, notifications continue to come through them.

Iceweasel was changed out for Firefox LTS version 45, which has behaves like spyware - it said it sent data back though the checkbox said NO - and is one of the reasons I am moving away from Debian. I have not read the security notice yet, but think Debian should move to IceCat instead of a browser from a company that embraced EME.

G+ does still work with Abrowser 50.1 as found in Trisquel. I have not tried with IceCat yet. I imagine G+ also works with versions of Internet Explorer and other PRISM platforms.

The net result of all of this is that you won't see me as much here. I'm over on Diaspora. 

Post has attachment
More Evidence Glyophosphate (Roundup) Damages Your Liver Remember that guy Monsanto tried to wreck by having his paper yanked?  Here he is again, showing that glyophospates at levels well below current limits can cause liver damage.  See also,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles-%C3%89ric_S%C3%A9ralini

The Wikipedia article, sadly, contains a lot of smear material and does not contain recently FOI request documents about the 2012 retraction.  A French newspaper got all correspondence about the retraction and found the panel was stacked by people on Monsanto's payroll, and were recruited for the express purpose of defending GMOs and glyophospate. 

http://www.gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/17121-emails-reveal-role-of-monsanto-in-seralini-study-retraction
Wait while more posts are being loaded