ZIONAZI MYTHOLOGY OF APARTHEID HOLOCAUST TO PALESTINE
gccoopuk cr tmApril 2016#bds #drrgyagnik SAVE HUMANITY
LET MY PEOPLE GO
LET MY PEOPLE GO
LET MY PEOPLE GO
You said “the Jews”(presumably meaning any Jew and/or all the Jews of the world) have a right to a homeland in Israel and a right to “their country.”
Let’s take first of all the notion of “their country”.
It is a fact that many if not most of the Jews who went to Palestine in answer to Zionism’s call hadno biological connection to the ancient Hebrews. The incoming Zionist Jews were mainly foreign nationals of many lands, descended from those who became Jewish byconversion to Judaism centuries after the fall of the ancient Jewish kingdomof Israeland what is called the “dispersal” into “oblivion” of its people. The notion that there aretwo entire peoples with an equally valid claim to the same land is an historical nonsense. The relatively few Jewswitha valid claim were, are, the descendants of thosewho stayed IN Palestinethrough everything. They numbered only a few thousand at the time of Zionism’s birth; they regarded themselves as Palestinians; and they were fiercely opposed to Zionism’s colonial enterprise? because they rightly feared that it would makethemas well as the incoming, alien Zionist Jews enemies of the Arabs among whom they had lived in peace and security.
Now let’s come to grips (all too briefly and therefore inadequately) with the matter of Israel‘s right or not to exist.
According to first and still existing draft of Judeo-Christian history which is constructed on Zionist mythology (more on this in a moment), Israel was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the UN Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. This is nonsense.
In the first place the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestinedid not have the rightto decide to partition Palestineor assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.
Despite that, by the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly didpass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal? meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.
The truth is that the General Assembly’s partition proposal never went to the Security Council for a policy decision. Why not? Because the US knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.
So the partition plan was vitiated (becameinvalid)and the question of what the hell to do about Palestinewas taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the US was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence ? actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.
The truth of the time was that the Zionist state, which came into being as a consequence of Zionism terrorism and ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist unless?.. Unless it was recognised and legitimizedby those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state.In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved. And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not and cannot take from the Palestinians by force.
The question which should be put to all who are demanding that Hamas recognise Israel is this: WHICH ISRAELis to be recognised?. Israel inside its borders as they were on the eve of the 1967 war and thus in accordance with Security Council Resolution 242; the Greater Israel of today, which, on a daily basis, is expanding its illegal settlements on the occupied West Bank; or (possibly) a slightly reduced Greater Israel of tomorrow ? i.e. an Israel inoccupation for ever of some of the land and water resources it grabbed in 1967?
What, Mr. Cameron, is your answer to that question?
gccoopuk cr tm April 2016 LET MY PEOPLE GO FREEhttp://www.alanhart.net/zionism-open-letter-to-british-conservative-party-leader-david-cameron/