Profile

Cover photo
Yoz Grahame
Works at 18F
4,009 followers|29,216 views
AboutPostsPhotosYouTube

Stream

Yoz Grahame

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Thank you so much, +Stumptown Syndicate, for getting this talk online!

If you want the slide deck, it's here: https://speakerdeck.com/yozlet/programming-is-debugging-so-debug-better

The other OSBridge 2013 talks I reference are:
Chris McCraw - Debugging Without Borders
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hmXZuFwke8&index=58&list=PLfwE4lxvXUNkTYetcZkAE2dyUewIs9Ya5

Justin Hileman - PHP for Pirates: pillaging interactive debugging from Ruby and JavaScript
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMoTNBkOhk8&index=14&list=PLfwE4lxvXUNkTYetcZkAE2dyUewIs9Ya5

Greg Price - What is that Process Doing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYIDMIekgyU&index=55&list=PLfwE4lxvXUNkTYetcZkAE2dyUewIs9Ya5
1
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
DAMMIT. I was trying to not get my hopes up! Now my hopes are standing on the roof, yelling about growing new limbs!
11
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
After 2 years of iOS, I'm getting quite tempted to switch to Android, but not certain yet. Is it possible that anyone reading this (hello, Google chums) might have a fairly recent (like, year old or less) Android phone I can borrow for a month? Will happily repay in food, booze, chocolate and singing. Okay, you probably don't want the singing.
2
Paul Wayper's profile photoSarah Dilling's profile photoDan Shick's profile photoObi Nwosu's profile photo
5 comments
 
Eze’s borrowing my old Android device ... and there's the small matter of us both being in London. 
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
Happy 10th birthday, Second Life. Ignore the haters; you're still really actually one of the most interesting things on the internet.
6
Margaret Leber's profile photo
 
Despite all the things that are crappy, wrong or bad about SL or LL...you're absolutely right. 
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
Mainly for +Todd Gage and +Carol Smith.
yozlet's photo on Instagram
1
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
My chum +Shimon Young wrote this fabulous kids' app for iPad (and there's an iPhone version) and my kid loves it too and so do the kids of the bloke who wrote "The IT Crowd" so you should buy it even if you don't have kids just because you might need to keep one entertained occasionally. There's even a free version. So there.
Graham Linehan originally shared:
 
My kids adore this app. Essential, along with the Toca Boca series. The makers tried to get a free copy to me but it never worked, so I had to buy it. Glad I did.
Learn more, read reviews, and download My PlayHome by Shimon Young on the iTunes App Store.
26 comments on original post
5
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
I've been getting gradually more annoyed all day, and in the shared post below, Dan absolutely nails the reason why. As he says, there are serious issues coming up with Google's handling of accounts it doesn't like (or algorithmically thinks it might not like), but much of the snarking is at best unhelpful, at worst counter-productive. It shows Google that some of the customers left in the cold by their policies aren't worth having anyway.

I should be clear about what I mean by snarking: Just an hour ago, I saw a post (thankfully, since deleted) from someone using an image to compare Google+ with the SS. Way to make a privilege argument backfire!

Google+ clearly still has some problems, but if it wasn't such an interesting and promising service, nobody would care. It's also still a beta service, it's still changing substantially, and it's gone from zero to 20 million users in a month. There are real people behind it doing an amazing job; they're also making some mistakes, because this is really hard and they're only human. If you treat them that way, you'll get a lot further.
Dan Shick originally shared:
 
People who like it here and have even the faintest notion of how software and websites are tested and made better should have more patience for Google to achieve the right balance of the principles mentioned in the below-linked artlcle.

I'm not saying that it's acceptable to have people's entire suite of Google services disabled due to perceived or actual profile TOS violations. I'm not saying that the concerns of community members like +Liz Henry , +Autumn Tyr-Salvia and +Doctor Popular are unworthy of note. I'm not saying that Google shouldn't more quickly address the concerns that our peers are raising.

But for pete's sake, can we please keep it constructive? Doom-and-glooming articles like +Violet Blue 's on ZDNet today, to which I will not link, are not constructive, even though they do raise awareness of the issue. Projects like +Skud's Google doc ( http://is.gd/nonplussed ) that gathers information on suspended accounts are.

Polite comments and feedback to the people who have created the awesome framework of a potentially awesome social network will help us all realize that potential. Remember how the gender anonymization issue was addressed?

It's Saturday, for pete's sake!
View original post
9
1
Ian Betteridge's profile photoMargaret Leber's profile photoNick Sweeney's profile photoAngela Relle's profile photo
13 comments
 
That's some tremendously bad logic on display from +Robert Scoble. MetaFilter gets social. It operates on consistent pseudonymity and charges $5 for entry. Therefore Facebook doesn't get social. Or something. Laughable.

For the record, Facebook's real-name policy embarrassed itself in its handling of Native American names, which sets a precedent that G+ ought to have noted and sought to avoid. That's hardly an edge case, either: it's a demonstration that a smell-test known-names approach is neither respectful of users nor sustainable.

To +Margaret Leber : I've thought a lot about the ownership of identity over the past few years:

http://nicksweeney.com/2008/03/12/show-me-who-you-are/

My basic sense is that it's a trust-plus-tokens model: trust comes first, and tokens fill gaps in the absence of trust, but tokens aren't sufficient, because it's very easy not to trust them. I think there's room for a kind of 'vouching' model for online identity, but I've yet to see a good implementation.
Add a comment...
Have him in circles
4,009 people
Howl at the Moon Louisville's profile photo
Leonid Kogan's profile photo
Dan Burzynski's profile photo
Jason Scotts's profile photo
ragab hassen's profile photo
maria handry's profile photo
Truong Vo Quang's profile photo
Diana Iordache's profile photo
Simon “H Pisces” Weiss's profile photo

Yoz Grahame

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
Under UKIP, all architecture courses will be discouraged from teaching 20th century architecture; if taught, the lecturer must make disapproving faces and regularly spit. Any student exhibiting the dangerous signs of original thought will be spanked and, if necessary, have their fingers demolished.

I can't wait to see the other arts courses based on UKIP-regulated aesthetics! Music? Elgar and Elaine Page for everyone!
2
WankersCramp69's profile photo
 
No, I imagine the teacher would see something that is shit and point out that it is shit.
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

commented on a video on YouTube.
Shared publicly  - 
 
"I hope people like it and I'm... I wake up in the middle of the night with nightmares about what's going to happen, if people laugh and it's not a comedy, or things like that. I'm just hoping none of that happens, which it almost certainly will."

What actually happened:
http://www.today.com/id/4063055/
1
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
 
(Cross-posted from Metafilter)

I've played a hell of a lot of social games. I started with Farmville and managed to achieve my goal of beating 90% of my friends through sheer bloody-minded stamina and min/maxing, at no small annoyance to my girlfriend who had to put up with me returning to the computer every few hours.

Then I moved onto Frontierville because it was supposedly 'better' and likewise got pretty far in it, to the point where I succeeded in my personal goal of getting rid of all the trees and weeds (which is kind of a clever if evil tactic on the designers' part to keep people like me playing). But I recall thinking that Frontierville, despite its incredible shininess and points and such flying everything, was oddly unsatisfying and bizarrely complicated. So off I went to...

Cityville. Perhaps one of the more interesting Zynga games (relatively speaking), since it had a bit of genuine strategy baked into it in terms of how you laid out your city to maximise the benefits of things like parks and other city improvements, plus it had one of the better difficulty curves that hey've made. I made a pretty damn big city and of course did optimal packing, and I have to admit that it was fun to see how my friends had laid out their cities. Indeed, one of the attractions of Farmville was how it allowed people to be surprisingly creative with their farm layout, even though - or perhaps despite - layout had no gameplay meaning in the game.

Around the time I was hitting the wall with Cityville (i.e. it was taking more than a 3-4 days to level up), Empires and Allies came out. This was touted as being Zynga's first 'proper game' and I think Brian Reynolds had also joined Zynga around then - Brian being the designer of Civ 2 and SMAC, two of my favorite games of all time. So I thought, hey, maybe they've cracked it - a Zynga game with real gameplay.

Two minutes after I started playing, Empires and Allies told me to place a barracks here and hit it five times with my hammer to construct it. Then I would have to wait until my action points replenished. It was exactly like Cityville, and at that moment, if I had more money and someone from Zynga was watching, I would have hurled my computer out of my window. As it was, I just vowed never to play a Zynga game again because I was sick of their bullshit 'gameplay' and sick of their manipulation.

More importantly, I was disgusted that I had wasted so much time - dozens if not hundreds of hours - on an experience that was almost entirely worthless. Worthless from an artistic perspective, worthless from an educational perspective, and worthless from a social perspective. I would never recommend to anyone to play a Zynga game because I don't want them to hate themselves like I did after playing one.

A while ago, I read an essay by Ronald Dworkin about what makes for a good life. He said something that I found very affecting:

"We value great art most fundamentally not because the art as product enhances our lives but because it embodies a performance, a rising to artistic challenge. We value human lives well lived not for the completed narrative, as if fiction would do as well, but because they too embody a performance: a rising to the challenge of having a life to lead."

It reminded me of another view from people like Philip Pullman, that a good life is being able to tell a good story of your life afterwards. Now, social games are thankfully only a comparatively small part of people's lives right now, certainly compared to TV. But they are a small part of a hell of a lot of people's lives, and I submit that they do not rise to any performance. They are not part of a good life.

Most business people don't give a shit about a good life. They just want to make money. Maybe you didn't start out like that but that's how you end up, especially if you take VC money or go public. So I don't expect them to be swayed by this argument.

However, I do expect that game designers would listen, because crucially, the creation of most social games is also not a performance. It is not daring, it is not rising to any challenge. It's dull. Anyone playing a Zynga game or the hundreds of copycats could tell that. And I think game designers really do care about this. We want to make art. 

I can't come up with a definitive list of what makes a game 'good'. Just as it's foolish to fill out a list of 'graphics', 'sound', 'story', and 'gameplay' and then average the numbers to come out with some definitive judgement of how good it is, I can't do that on a more abstract level. Only an individual can. So here are some questions you might want to ask yourself about the games you make:

- Would you play it? And would you buy it?
- Would you be proud to tell your (hypothetical) grandchildren about it?
- Will its players feel that playing it was a worthwhile use of their time?
- Will its players remember it in a month? A year? Ten years? And what will they think about it?

Not all of my games pass this test. In fact, very, very few do. But I'm trying.
Both inside and outside the walls of Facebook, the story of social games has become one of dead geese and golden eggs, flatlined growth, formulaic games and shady practises. Many warned that the secto...
2 comments on original post
1
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
Now you can look me up with my AOL Google keyword: yoz
yoz grahame yozlet cake
3
Dena Grabinar's profile photoYoz Grahame's profile photo
3 comments
 
Thank you, Dena! I hope my pixellated guts do not end up scattered all over the memeway.
Add a comment...

Yoz Grahame

Shared publicly  - 
 
I've been using the term "privilege" a lot lately, and constantly referring to my own. I'm not going to stop doing that (at least, until someone says "Yoz, shut up about the kyriarchy and order something, will you?") but this is a thought-provoking piece about how to have these discussions more effectively.
Bryan O'Sullivan originally shared:
 
Interesting read, especially given all the kerfuffle around name-related problems with G+.
8 comments on original post
3
1
Antony Jackson's profile photoYoz Grahame's profile photoMargaret Leber's profile photoJeffrey Faden's profile photo
27 comments
 
shrug

Sounded more to me like he was pointing out some of the contradictions and weaknesses behind the whole identity politics game.

"Trying to improve the overall situation" has a nice ring to it but overlooks that not everyone agrees what state of affairs "improving" the "overall situation" would be. Like the term "progressive"...not everyone agrees that the directions "Progressives" want to move would represent actual progress.

(I really do wish we could rescue the idiom "begging the question" from the ignorant who by repeated abuse have turned it into meaning what they thought it meant rather than what it actually meant.)
Add a comment...
People
Have him in circles
4,009 people
Howl at the Moon Louisville's profile photo
Leonid Kogan's profile photo
Dan Burzynski's profile photo
Jason Scotts's profile photo
ragab hassen's profile photo
maria handry's profile photo
Truong Vo Quang's profile photo
Diana Iordache's profile photo
Simon “H Pisces” Weiss's profile photo
Work
Occupation
Technical Troubleshooter & Engineer
Employment
  • 18F
    Innovation Specialist, 2014 - present
  • Neo Innovation
    Engineer, 2013 - 2013
  • Ning
    Developer Advocate, 2005 - 2006
  • Business Data Quality
    Architect/Developer, 2003 - 2005
  • Sparza
    Research Manager, 2000 - 2001
  • The Digital Village
    Field Researcher for The Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy, 1997 - 2000
  • Delphi Internet/Delphi Creative
    1994 - 1996
  • Linden Lab
    Special Circumstances, 2007 - 2012
Links
Contributor to
Story
Tagline
Only eats kosher planets
Bragging rights
i know skud!
Basic Information
Gender
Male