Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Madhusudan C.S

Post has shared content
Hi, I'm Nathaniel, your friend who loves movies, and who also loves, most of the time, watching the Academy Awards ("the Oscars").

(Let's pause for a moment and reflect on the fact the lay people watch the Oscars in the first place. It's a trade show. Much like are held for people in every other profession. The statues presented at the show are awarded by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, a trade association. Why should anyone else care? Did you know that there's an award given by computer scientists' trade association every year for Lifetime Achievement In Computer Science ( But millions of people don't watch that as entertainment. They do watch the Oscars, though.)

Thursday morning I was shocked to learn of the Academy's making a worse mistake than having Seth MacFarlane host the show (two years ago; it was excruciating - and I had been a fan of his up until that point!): this year's nominees are Oscar Mayer-Jimmy Dean kinds of sausage festive and blindingly, dazzingly, klan-rally white. In 2015.

There's some good coverage at,, and

The exclusion of David Oyelowo, whose portrayal of Martin Luther King, Jr. in Selma is haunting and astonishing and just so damn good, is a mind-boggling choice. And what about Chris Rock’s fantastic Top Five? Maybe it would have been too much to hope a comedian who appeared to be playing a role so natural it didn’t feel like acting [...]

Part of loving movies is being willing to believe in the world maybe being better than it actually is, so let's take that ride and fantasize a bit and see if we can't come up with a better slate. A few principles: (1) a film should be an overall cinematic success to be nominated in any category, so I'll be perfectly happy to bump people nominated for good work in otherwise lacking films and (2) I'll be reluctant to bump anything I haven't yet seen.

Best Picture:
American Sniper: I probably would have seen this had its producers had the decency to show it in San Francisco before yesterday and I'm not willing to play the "this movie is so good we can't even let you see it" game. Bumped.
Birdman: I had good fun with this, and am still thinking about it weeks later. It can stay.
Boyhood: Looking forward to seeing this at a friend's house in two weeks.
The Grand Budapest Hotel: I think I'll really like this when I get around to seeing it. It can stay for now.
The Imitation Game: A very well-produced movie that takes way too many liberties with its historical subject. The history of my craft is important and it didn't happen that way. Bumped.
Selma: I came out of the theater last week and told the friend with whom I saw this "I've seen a lot of good movies this season but this felt like the only really great one; this would be the first film this year that I'd actually be happy to win Best Picture". During the film I actually remembered my schooling and thought "Kids these days are going to have it so much better than I did - when I was learning about the Civil Rights era we only had Mississippi Burning to watch in class, but these young'ins are going to have this, the lucky bastards!".
The Theory Of Everything: I liked this and felt that the science was quite decently represented. It should remain nominated, and it's one of the better nominees, but I don't think it should win.
Whiplash: I should probably take some time to see this.

Having bumped two, what have I seen this year that I would put in their place? Fury and Dear White People. I've been fascinated with the history of armored warfare since I studied it in university and I loved seeing an actual tank movie - the first major picture depicting the subject of which I'm aware (which is not to say that I won't always have a special place in my heart for Tank Girl). And Dear White People, despite a few rough edges, both split my sides with laughter when I watched it and has improved me as a person (as all great art should) as I've reflected on it in the weeks since.

Best Director:
Wes Anderson: I'm still looking forward to The Grand Budapest Hotel.
Alejandro González Iñárritu: Birdman's direction is the kind of flawless technical and artistic accomplishment that fascinated me back in my student film days.
Richard Linklater: I'm still looking forward to Boyhood.
Bennett Miller: I haven't yet seen it but Foxcatcher just didn't preview to me as a story told in any way other than the way I expected it to be told. Bumped.
Morten Tyldum: No matter how entertaining The Imitation Game was, it was only a good film, not a really great film, and it just makes crap up about an important part of history and I have to hold its director responsible for that. Bumped.

Ava DuVernay clearly gets one of the two opened spots - direction is at the center of Selma's phenomenal artistic success. For the other: Chris Rock. I saw Top Five; it was interesting! And I think it's noteworthy for nominally being a comedy that makes the viewer think more than laugh and still be overall a successful film.

Best Actor:
Steve Carell: Mr. Carell does look great in the role, but Foxcatcher doesn't look like that great a movie. Bumped.
Bradley Cooper: Since American Sniper only started showing in San Francisco yesterday I'll happily consider Mr. Cooper's performance for the 2015 awards. Bumped.
Benedict Cumberbatch: He's fantastic, but The Imitation Game was much less than what I wanted from it. Bumped.
Michael Keaton: Mr. Keaton is perfect and Birdman is great.
Eddie Redmayne: Mr. Redmayne is perfect and The Theory Of Everything is great.

Three slots! That's a lot with which to work. First is David Oyelowo for Selma. He's great in the role, the film is perfect, and the only real objection I can find is that since Dr. King really only raised his voice when preaching or giving a speech it might be reasonable to think "a calm, quiet dignity, occasionally broken by profound words slowly spoken" might not be all that much of a challenge as far as the craft of acting is concerned. But Oyelowo is of every scene, present and leading. For the second slot: Brandon P. Bell in Dear White People. While the point of the movie is the understanding of one's blackness at a university in particular and America in general and all four characters deal with it in their own ways, Bell's character Troy's challenges found the most sympathy with me. Troy is stretched in wide directions throughout the film and Bell is genuine in every appearance. For the last slot: Jake Gyllenhaal for Nightcrawler. I think it won't be long before we see Gyllenhaal's Lou Bloom appear on "Twenty-Five Best Movie Villains Of All Time" lists; I found him compelling and deeply disturbing.

Best Actress:
Marion Cotillard: I intend to see Two Days, One Night.
Felicity Jones: The Theory Of Everything is great but neither Jones' role nor her performance had any effect on me. Bumped.
Julianne Moore: I think I might see Still Alice depending on what I hear about it over the next few weeks.
Rosamund Pike: I didn't think that Gone Girl excelled or the role was realistic but Pike's performance is flawless. It's close, but I'm afraid I have to bump her.
Reese Witherspoon: I've been wanting to see Wild over the last few weeks; I'll probably get to it soon.

Perhaps I'm just a sucker for beautiful young women (aren't the Oscars centrally about that on some fundamental level anyway?) but I'm going to swap in Tessa Thompson for Dear White People and Rosario Dawson for Top Five. Both performances are excellent, both films are great, and both characters are likeable young women showing strength to their challenges.

Best Supporting Actor:
Robert Duvall: The Judge previewed merely okay; I'd probably enjoy it if it fit into my schedule but so far I haven't made any particular effort to see it and unless someone speaks up about it I don't know that I will.
Ethan Hawke: Still looking forward to Boyhood.
Edward Norton: Birdman's a great film and Norton is a fantastic actor (Death To Smoochy forever!) and he's entertaining in this role but this role just wasn't all that noteworthy. Bumped.
Mark Ruffalo: From how blandly it previewed I just can't get my head around all the nominations for Foxcatcher. Perhaps I'll get around to seeing it?
J. K. Simmons: I should probably see Whiplash.

With just one slot I'm going to have to put in Dear White People's Tyler James Williams. Black, gay, and geeky, Lionel Higgins might just have it hardest at Winchester but I felt like I related to him most strongly and I also found him rather sweet. Right up until (spoiler alert!) he cuts his hair at the end of the film; that I just can't abide.

Best Supporting Actress:
Patricia Arquette: Still really looking forward to Boyhood.
Laura Dern: Still thinking I'll probably watch Wild sometime soon; I've been a fan of Ms. Dern since Ladies And Gentlemen, The Fabulous Stains.
Keira Knightley: I've liked Ms. Knightley in many other films but The Imitation Game just didn't ask that much of her; there's just not enough of a role here for me for even a supporting actress nomination. Bumped.
Emma Stone: This role just wasn't large enough to me - we see this character in relation to her father and in relation to Edward Norton's character, but I can't remember her interacting with anyone else? The character's mother is in Birdman; are they ever even together at any point? Ms. Stone's fine; it's this part that's just not working for me. Bumped.
Meryl Streep: Into The Woods previewed terribly for me - what I remember from the play is human frailty and mistakes and transgression and the darkness that follows blended into and hollowing out the characters' other successes; the film looks totally sanitized of all that. Is there any reason I should see it? Bumped.

Into those three slots I'm promoting Mackenzie Foy (Interstellar), Rene Russo (Nightcrawler), and Teyonah Parris (Dear White People). Foy is a revelation; so much so that it's disappointing when her character grows up and Jessica Chastain takes over the portrayal. Russo's Nina, a woman barely getting by, is all too perfect a victim for Lou Bloom. And Parris' Coco walks the tense line between careerism and blackness in modern America.

(We might need to take a moment here. Yes, I've just swapped in all four leads of Dear White People. No, it isn't pandering. To explain why, I'd like to recall to your mind that ad campaign that ran in San Francisco a few years back: "From Folsom Street to Castro Street there's more than one way to be gay", and with the slogan were a set of seven or eight caricatures of different stereotypical appearances of gay men. Analogously, Dear White People has four protagonists whose stories in aggregate tells us that there are at least four different ways to be black, and that makes it a far better and more important film than it would be if it were simply about one character. All four performances carry the film (which means that is the far better poster for the film than, and I feel a little guilty putting two of the four actors in supporting roles and I tell myself that I did it based on screen time.)

Best Original Screenplay:
Alejandro González Iñárritu, Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris, Jr. & Armando Bo: Birdman is, underneath the great direction and great acting, a great story.
Richard Linklater: Still very much looking forward to seeing Boyhood.
E. Max Frye & Dan Futterman: If the script for Foxcatcher were all that great, wouldn't that show in the preview? Bumped.
Wes Anderson & Hugo Guinness: What the heck was I doing in March and April that was so important that I didn't see The Grand Budapest Hotel?
Dan Gilroy: The story is a good one but it's the performances that make Nightcrawler a great film. Bumped.

Into the two gaps I'm putting David Wain & Michael Showalter for They Came Together and Chris Rock for Top Five. When I showed They Came Together at my birthday party my guests were doubled over and cringing from awkwardness and embarrassment while simultaneously laughing to the point of tears. Top Five I found remarkable for the way that even now, weeks after seeing it, I think back to it remembering that it was funny, wishing that it had been funnier, and then remember that the problem of having to be funny all the time was the central theme of the film, at which point I then rebuke myself all over again.

Best Adapted Screenplay:
Jason Hall: I'll happily consider American Sniper for the 2015 awards. Bumped.
Graham Moore: The Imitation Game just made up too much crap to fit the stereotypical one-lone-genius-saves-the-world formula it seemed to want to tell. Bumped.
Paul Thomas Anderson: I saw Inherent Vice, but I think I'm going to have to see it again to work through it all. That's a good sign.
Anthony McCarten: The last scene of The Theory Of Everything was a cinematic misstep and I place the fault with the writer. Bumped.
Damien Chazelle: I really should probably see Whiplash.

Best Animated Film:
Having only seen Big Hero 6, and thinking that it should stay nominated, I'm unclear on what to bump in order to make room for The Book Of Life and The Lego Movie, both of which were excellent, and I would have though would have made the list.

Best Foreign-Language Film:
With embarrassment I confess that I have not yet seen a single non-English-language film released in 2014. I saw non-English-language films in 2014, but they were all from earlier years.

Best Documentary Feature:
I haven't seen any of the nominees. I did see both Anita: Speaking Truth To Power and Herman's House, and I thought the former was excellent and am a little surprised it's not on the list. I want to see Citizenfour and I think it's still playing in San Francisco. Oh, and I want to get around to Life Itself at some point.

Best Documentary Short:
Where would I even go to watch any of these? If they're not in a theater within reach of most Americans or available online then the Academy should think about fixing that or maybe closing the category.

Best Live Action Short:
I think these can be seen at one showing at one theater downtown one day next month? Maybe?

Best Animated Short:
These might also show one day next month if I'm lucky? Maybe?

Best Original Score:
Alexandre Desplat: I'll be sure to listen closely when I watch The Grand Budapest Hotel.
Alexandre Desplat: I can't recall a single note of the score of The Imitation Game. Bumped.
Hans Zimmer: I had the good fortune to see Interstellar with a musician and as we walked to dinner afterward we both remarked on how we were pretty sure that the score was incredible, but that it was so well-integrated into the rest of the film that it never really called attention to itself. A few weeks later I was at the cineplex catching several films and between shows I happened to walk past the open door of a theater showing Interstellar. I didn't go in; I just sat right there outside the door for seven or eight minutes letting the music wash over me and giving it my full attention in a way that I couldn't when actually watching the film. It's incredible. I've listened to it several more times on my commute to and from work in the last month. I'm listening to it again while editing this essay. I think it's the most important score in a decade and I think it fundamentally advances the art of what music does for film. I have no idea what the Hollywood Foreign Press Association were thinking when the Golden Globe went to The Theory Of Everything.
Gary Yershon: I barely remember the music of Mr. Turner and I saw it only six days ago! Bumped.
Jóhann Jóhannsson: The Theory Of Everything's music fit well into the film but didn't seem otherwise remarkable to me. Be happy with a Golden Globe.

I'm not sure what I could swap in here - I think perhaps I'm a bad listener.

Best Original Song:
"Everything Is Awesome": This is probably one of my favorite songs of 2014 overall; not just in a film. I saw the film while staying at my brother-in-law's; he woke me up with it the next morning and we both just laughed.
"Glory": This is maybe just my own personal thing, but a song has to appear during the narrative portion of a film rather than merely during the credits for it to work for me. Sorry, Selma - bumped.
"Grateful": Perhaps I should see Beyond The Lights?
"I'm Not Gonna Miss You": Should I see Glen Campbell: I'll Be Me?
"Lost Stars": Begin Again previewed like it would be exactly the film I would expect it to be; is there some reason I should take the time to see it?

I really wish I had something from The Book Of Life to swap in, but the film's stronger songs were its adaptations of preëxisting pop songs rather than original compositions. Phooey.

Best Sound Editing:
Alan Robert Murray & Bub Asman: Perhaps in 2015, American Sniper.
Martin Hernández & Aaron Glascock: Birdman sounded like being backstage at a theater, sure.
Brent Burge & Jason Canovas: I'm confident that there are lots of loud noises in The Hobbit: The Battle Of The Five Armies.
Richard King: The sounds of Interstellar are breathtaking.
Becky Sullivan & Andrew DeCristofaro: I've been on the fence about Unbroken; should I see it?

Best Sound Mixing:
Whoa, Sound Editing and Sound Mixing are different things? Maybe with four of five nominated films shared between the categories the Academy has a hard time telling as well?

Best Production Design:
Adam Stockhausen & Anna Pinnock: I've loved sets in Wes Anderson films since Rushmore and am really looking forward to The Grand Budapest Hotel.
Maria Djurkovic & Tatiana Macdonald: In a weaker field I could see The Imitation Game taking this; it's the strongest part of the film outside of the acting.
Nathan Crowley & Gary Fettis: Four planets, a space station, a spaceship, and the inside of a black hole, and yet everything about these sets feels real (within the overall fiction of the film, of course; perhaps I should have said that they "have realiness") and drives Interstellar forward.
Dennis Gassner & Anna Pinnock: What I took away from the preview was that the production design might be what I most like about Into The Woods.
Suzie Davies & Charlotte Watts: Yes, Mr. Turner takes place in early-nineteenth-century Britain.

I'm going to swap in Fury for The Imitation Game. They take place within a few years of each other and while The Imitation Game has spartan buildings constructed in a hurry in a non-combat area, Fury has tanks!

Best Cinematography:
Emmanuel Lubezki: Birdman's cinematography broadens our understanding of how film can tell stories.
Robert Yeoman: I can't wait to see how The Grand Budapest Hotel is shot.
Łukasz Žal & Ryszard Lenczewski: I should think about seeing Ida.
Dick Pope: Mr. Turner was shot almost exactly how I expected it to be shot. Bumped.
Roger Deakins: Normally Unbroken is the kind of film I'd see but I just haven't lately been in any kind of mood to watch torture. Based on the preview, though, I'm going to have to bump it - it looks exactly like I'd expect it to look from its genre alone.

Swapping in: Interstellar and Selma. Selma's unique style primarily serves the rest of the film and only occasionally calls attention to itself for how fantastic it is - my friend and I discussing it after seeing it could remember specific shots that we liked but then said "wait, the whole movie was shot that well...". In the film's personal moments, there's a closeness to the camera that is intimate. Interstellar's look moves the audience to awe as no other film this year did.

Best Makeup & Hairstyling:
Bill Corso & Dennis Liddiard: Steve Carell, one of the most recognizable faces in American entertainment of the last ten years, looks nothing like himself in Foxcatcher.
Frances Hannon & Mark Coulier: Okay, that does it, I'm going to watch The Grand Budapest Hotel this weekend.
Elizabeth Yianni-Georgiou & David White: I... guess they're pretty well-made-up comic book aliens in Guardians Of The Galaxy? Are we giving credit for Groot's arborist?

Best Costume Design:
Milena Canonero: Oh come on! I already said I'd watch The Grand Budapest Hotel real soon now!
Mark Bridges: I enjoyed the costumes in Inherent Vice and they seemed faithful to the period and the characters.
Colleen Atwood: Sure, I suppose Meryl Streep is dressed like a witch in Into The Woods.
Anna B. Sheppard & Jane Clive: Should I make the time to see Maleficent?
Jacqueline Durran: Other than that they're faithful to the period I didn't notice a thing about the costumes in Mr. Turner. Bumped.

Swapped in: Selma. Its costumes are every bit as period-accurate as those in Mr. Turner, and Selma is a far better film.

Best Film Editing:
Joel Cox & Gary D. Roach: See you next year, American Sniper.
Sandra Adair: I haven't yet seen Boyhood but if the task of editing a movie filmed over twelve years is as challenging as I imagine it to be I would think that Ms. Adair would win.
Barney Pilling: Now you're just making me feel bad, The Grand Budapest Hotel.
William Goldenberg: You know what would have improved the editing of The Imitation Game? If history had happened that way. Bumped.
Tom Cross: Okay, I'll try to get out and see Whiplash soon.

Into the gap: Selma. It can sometimes be hard to distinguish what part editing plays in the overall quality of a film, but Selma's narrative flow is exactly right to carry its story and message.

Best Visual Effects:
Dan DeLeeuw, Russell Earl, Bryan Grill, & Dan Sudick: I enjoyed Captain America: The Winter Soldier and its visual effects.
Joe Letteri, Dan Lemmon, Daniel Barrett, & Erik Winquist: I enjoyed Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes and its visual effects.
Stephane Ceretti, Nicolas Aithadi, Jonathan Fawkner, & Paul Corbould: I mostly enjoyed Guardians Of The Galaxy and its visual effects.
Paul Franklin, Andrew Lockley, Ian Hunter, & Scott Fisher: We learned something new about black holes ( as a result of the masterful visual effects of Interstellar. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.
Richard Stammers, Lou Pecora, Tim Crosbie, & Cameron Waldbauer: I have not yet seen X-Men: Days Of Future Past, but I speculate that its visual effects are perfectly nice.

No swaps here, and I sort of hope this award works itself out along the lines of "the best film of those that had the best visual effects".

Sorry They're Not On The List / Sorry They're Not More On The List:
Hide Your Smiling Faces (Picture, Director (Daniel Patrick Carbone), Actor (Nathan Varnson), Supporting Actor (Ryan Jones)): If Terrence Malick's The Tree Of Life can be nominated (as it was three years ago), this film which actually succeeds at doing what The Tree Of Life attempted deserves at least some recognition.
Godzilla (Director (Gareth Edwards)): Not all science-fiction action summer blockbusters have to shrink your brain.
Fury (Actor (Brad Pitt), Supporting Actor (Logan Lerman)): The film wasn't marketed as a star vehicle but I found these performances noteworthy in demanding roles.
Nightcrawler (Supporting Actor (Riz Ahmed)): Like Rene Russo's Nina, Riz Ahmed's Rick's weakness and meekness allows him to be an almost-too-perfect victim of Lou Bloom.
The Book Of Life (Animated Picture): I saw this in a theater full of families with young children and could feel the energy of their enjoyment. It's sweet, touching, clever, and I would have thought it would be at least nominated.
The Lego Movie (Animated Picture): With product placement everywhere these days I was rather surprised to find this movie about a specific brand of toy, with an entirely brand-compatible message, that didn't actually feel commercial at all. It reminded me of all my years spent building Starship Enterprises and Lego roller coasters and all the other wonderful things not pictured on the box. Another mystery non-nomination that makes me want to see the nominated films that much more since they're supposedly better.
The Interview (Screenplay (Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg, & Dan Sterling)): I found this movie funny, intelligent, and geopolitically relevant. Poop in satire goes back at least as far as Jonathan Swift; I'm not sure what's up with so many folks with whom I've spoken about the film assuming that the presence of gastrointestinal punch lines makes the film stupid and trivial.
Interstellar (Director (Christopher Nolan)): Like Gravity last year, Interstellar reminds us that IMAX theaters exist for more than just NASA documentaries, Marvel superhero blockbuster, and Pink Floyd laser light shows. Interstellar is a spectacular film; it might be great, I think it's at least good, but most of all it is a spectacle. This is a film that attempts great things for movies and mostly achieves them.

So where does that leave us? We've added some diversity of color to the slate (almost entirely thanks to Selma, Dear White People, and Top Five) but I don't think we even budged the needle on diversity of sex. Well crap. What's the best way for me as a fan to fix that?

If you haven't yet enjoyed #OscarsSoWhite on Twitter (, that's worth a look. I'll leave you with some of my favorites:

#OscarsSoWhite it's going to correct us by pointing out that it's really 1/16 Cherokee (

#OscarsSoWhite they won't even nominate Lego-Americans (

#OscarsSoWhite when it rioted after the national championship the news called it a "reveler" (

#OscarsSoWhite the ceremony is being held in an REI this year (

#OscarsSoWhite they have a black friend (

#OscarsSoWhite it gets off with a warning (

#OscarsSoWhite they asked to touch my hair :-( (, and if you don't get why this is funny, run, don't walk, to Dear White People)

I don't get what this whole #OscarsSoWhite thing is about. Unless my memory is shot he's green and lives in a garbage can (
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
So, you all (hopefully) saw my photos yesterday; if you didn't, you may have seen the media coverage about my employer, Google Australia, installing 2 monorail carriages in our new office space yesterday (e.g.

Now! For those of you who don't know, confession (and story!) time: this was my fault.

At Google, we have (like most large companies do) an internal ticketing system for keeping track of jobs for our building management team ('Facilities', or 'REWS'). This system is usually populated with requests like, you know, 'the door on level X isn't working properly' or 'the pinball machine isn't working' or 'you know what would be awesome? An electric keyboard. We don't have one, can you buy us one please?' or whatever (all real, recent examples, which all got 'fixed').

Sometimes, though, this ticket system is abused by idiots* trying to be funny.

One such example of this was at the start of this year, when one particular idiot† submitted a ticket into this system pointing out that the NSW and Sydney governments had finally announced their long-anticipated plan to remove and scrap Sydney's defunct, expensive-but-useless monorail ( — a classic 'white elephant'). At the time, Google Australia had spread from one office building in Pyrmont to two, and there were rumours of a third coming soon, so this idiot suggested that maybe Google should buy the monorail and install it between the three buildings in a loop, because we're lazy and besides how cool would it be to have a monorail.

Everyone had a chuckle at this lame joke, and then that was it, until a particularly awesome member of our Facilities team, Alecia, replied to the ticket, giving an hilarious and clever feasibility study as to why purchasing the monorail would be a bad plan (and yes, it did include the phrase "more of a Shelbyville idea"). This reply (which I wish I could share with you, but if nothing else it's filled with Google in-jokes and wouldn't make sense to you all) elevated my stupid facilities ticket into legendary status, where it did the rounds of Google and after about a week I think the whole company had seen it.

Joke dies down, everyone's happy. Until about 3 months ago.

About 3 months ago, Alecia sent me an IM saying "Are you free for a meeting now? And by meeting, I mean 'road trip'." Naturally, I was. I arrived at Alecia's desk (Alecia: "I love that I say 'road trip' and you just turn up without asking what it is."), and we head off. Eventually I ask what we're actually doing, and another colleague who was in on the plan tells me: "Monorail shopping!"

Sure enough, Alecia takes us out to a junkyard near the airport, and we all help choose which two monorail carriages we want to purchase and install as meeting rooms in One Darling Island, our new workspace in Sydney (the aforementioned rumoured third building).

Eventually, this brings us to what happened yesterday. After an months of Herculean logistics (and, I'm quite sure, horrifying expense; the SMH article linked above estimates the costs of the installation at $250,000, though I have no idea if that's accurate), yesterday our 2 monorail carriages were brought to the office, and very carefully (I heard tell that the '20cm of clearance' figure in the SMH article was actually an OVER-estimate) lifted into place, where they will become 3 meeting rooms (each carriage will be its own room, and then there will be another casual meeting area at the back)‡. HOW COOL IS THAT??!?

Anyway, check out the linked article - the timelapse footage isn't brilliant, but it will give you an idea of the logistics involved (we actually took some footage of our own, hopefully I can share that with you soon).

So: next time I tell you (as I regularly do) that working at Google is like working at Wonka's Chocolate Factory: remember, I once made a stupid joke about buying a monorail, and MY COMPANY DID IT FOR ME. I bet not many of you can say that§.

* generally, me.
† specifically, me.
‡ you, all being nerds, will be delighted to know that the meeting rooms are to be named "Brockway", "Ogdenville", and "North Haverbrook".
§ my guess: zero.
Monorail Installation
4 Photos - View album
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

Post has shared content
Congratulations to the 1,192 students accepted for our 2013 Google Summer of Code! It was tough for the 177 mentoring organizations to choose from the huge number of applications we received - 5,999 proposals from 4,144 students - and we want to thank everyone who applied. 

Students will now enter the community bonding period where they will get to know their mentors and prepare for the program by reading documentation, hanging out in the IRC channel and familiarizing themselves with their new community before beginning their actual coding in June.

If you are interested in learning more about the 177 organizations that the students will be working with during the summer or important dates, please visit the program website.

We look forward to an exciting and productive summer of coding.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
We are excited to announce the mentoring organizations that have been accepted for this year’s Google Summer of Code program. It was tough, but after reviewing 417 applications, we have chosen 177 open source projects, of which 40 are new to Google Summer of Code. You can visit our Google Summer of Code 2013 program website for a complete list of the accepted projects.

Over the next 14 days students interested in applying for the Google Summer of Code 2013 program can learn more about the 177 accepted open source projects before the student application period begins on Monday, April 22, 2013 at 19:00 UTC.

Each organization has compiled an Ideas Page that students will want to review carefully and consider how they might be able to contribute to the project. Some of the most successful proposals have been completely new ideas submitted by students, so if you don’t see a project on the Ideas Page that appeals to you, don’t be afraid to suggest a new idea to the organization.There are points of contact listed for each organization on their Ideas Page so that students can contact the organization directly to discuss a new proposal. All organizations list their preferred method of communication on the organization homepage, available on the Google Summer of Code program website. Please see our Frequently Asked Questions page for more information.

Congratulations to all of our future mentoring organizations! We look forward to working with all of you during this exciting 9th year of Google Summer of Code!
Add a comment...

Post has attachment
This visualization of Tolkien's works, IMO, is seriously the definition of awesomeness! (via +HackerNews)

Character mentions visualization of "The Lord of the Rings" is esp. awesome. It very clearly shows how the story alternates between the adventures of Frodo and Sam, and the rest of the Fellowship after they get separated.
Add a comment...

Post has shared content
We've just announced that we plan to hold Google Summer of Code 2013!

Historically, Google Summer of Code has brought together nearly 6,000 students with over 300 open source projects to create millions of lines of code. We’re looking for mentors and students to join us in making 2013 the best Summer of Code yet!

The Google Summer of Code program is designed to encourage student participation in open source development. Kicking off in 2005, the program has several goals:

• Inspire young developers to begin participating in open source development
• Provide students in Computer Science and related fields the opportunity to do work related to their academic pursuits during the summer
• Give students more exposure to real-world software development scenarios (e.g., distributed development, software licensing questions, mailing-list etiquette, etc.) 
• Get more open source code created and released for the benefit of all
• Help open source projects identify and bring in new developers and committers

We’ll be offering successful student contributors a 5,000 USD stipend, enabling them to focus on their coding projects for three months. This program is done completely online. Students and mentors from more than 100 countries have participated in past years.

Google will accept applications from open source projects from March 18–March 29, 2013. Student applications will be accepted from April 22–May 3, 2013.

Find full details on requirements for participating, including how to apply and info on the all-important t-shirt at We hope you'll consider participating as a student, mentor, or organization, or just spreading the word about this great program!
Add a comment...

Post has attachment

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded