A Long Island woman named Michele Catalano posts photos of M-66 explosives (that look to me like extra-large firecrackers) publicly on Facebook. A few weeks later the local cops show up and ask her husband if they have any bomb-making equipment.
Instead of drawing the most likely conclusion, she instead blames this on local Long Island cops MONITORING HER GOOGLE SEARCHES. I am not making this up. And news organizations uncritically reproduce this claim:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/government-knocking-doors-because-google-searches/67864/
Public posts are public, and any number of people could have found it and tipped off the cops, or law enforcement could vacuum up all public photos and do some rudimentary image analysis to match against photos of explosives. We've known for years that police peruse Facebook, after all: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20000550-38.html
The difference is that your Internet searches are supposed to be, well, private. And if somehow curious local cops know what you're privately searching for, that is a big story. Having curious local cops ask you questions about your public photos of explosives is not.
Instead of drawing the most likely conclusion, she instead blames this on local Long Island cops MONITORING HER GOOGLE SEARCHES. I am not making this up. And news organizations uncritically reproduce this claim:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/government-knocking-doors-because-google-searches/67864/
Public posts are public, and any number of people could have found it and tipped off the cops, or law enforcement could vacuum up all public photos and do some rudimentary image analysis to match against photos of explosives. We've known for years that police peruse Facebook, after all: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20000550-38.html
The difference is that your Internet searches are supposed to be, well, private. And if somehow curious local cops know what you're privately searching for, that is a big story. Having curious local cops ask you questions about your public photos of explosives is not.
View 38 previous comments
+Lee Killough was it her former employer or her husband's? The impression I got from the press release was that it had been her husband's former employer.Aug 2, 2013- Sorry, you're right -- the report only implied it was a former employer of someone of the household.Aug 2, 2013
- Aug 3, 2013
- Aug 3, 2013
What I want to know is whether the Atlantic just copied the woman's blog without bothering to verify or look for additional details because they were lazy, or if they deliberately went with it (and that photograph) because they are desperate to spread scare stories, because their publication is not economically viable. Laziness or mendacity; which could it be?Aug 4, 2013
go to asia and see just how dangerous fireworks really AREN'T. light pretty much anywhere, anytime even in the big city. everyone should just post the same picture everywhere. how about this one lol;
http://noisepicnic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/classic_time_bomb3.jpgAug 7, 2013
Add a comment...