Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Andrew Robertson
1,734 followers
1,734 followers
About
Andrew's posts

Post has shared content

Post has shared content
Can anyone guess how March's temperatures compared with all of those on record? Any guesses?

Post has attachment
I rarely share adverts but...

Post has shared content
This is about more than science.

It is a neutral discussion not only of the US presidential candidates understanding of how our world works but also awards (and subtracts) points for detailed plans. Clinton wins with 64/100, losing points for not explaining how she will implement some of her plans, Stein comes second with 44/100, losing points for having no details about how to achieve her goals and for general anti-science quackery and, well, you can guess who gets 7/100 and why. But if you're supporting that guy, you won't care anyway.
Folks, I cannot emphasize enough how important vote this is. From global warming to global thermonuclear war, our very futures rarely have depended on such a critical decision point. Here's what the science -- or lack thereof -- says:
Clinton: 64
Stein: 44
Johnson: 30
Trump: 7


Post has attachment
Err... he's got a point I suppose.

Post has shared content
See also 'water is good for plants, therefore hurricanes are good for farms'.

Post has shared content
Nothing to see here, it's all good for us anyway, whatever it is that's not happening.

This is what people mean by 'the climate's changed before'.

Post has shared content
This is a great visual on climate change, check it out.

Post has attachment
Some more physics for you.

Post has attachment
The physics of the Fosbury Flop.
Wait while more posts are being loaded