Profile cover photo
Profile photo
Susan Beyer
84 followers -
It's Been an Interesting Life. I'm still enjoying it after almost 70 years and 47 years of marriage to my Prince Charming. I love my family
It's Been an Interesting Life. I'm still enjoying it after almost 70 years and 47 years of marriage to my Prince Charming. I love my family

84 followers
About
Susan's interests
View all
Susan's posts

Post has attachment
Photo

Post has shared content
Any old, I mean really old OSBOURNE users?
Why buy just a video game?
While many of us are celebrating the 30th anniversary of the Amiga – I will have to fire-up the ones sleeping in the garage –, I decided to play with the Commodore VIC-20 a.k.a. the friendly computer. Yeah, the successor of the PET and the precursor of the famous C64. The very same computer Captain Kirk was advertising on TV (https://youtu.be/MxkiXp70mTk). Released in 1981, the Video Interface Chip (VIC) 20 essentially added colors to the PET (with a much affordable price tag of ~$300) and made the home computer really easy to use, assuming you wanted to give up your TV while you were messing with the machine (this was more an issue in Europe than in the US, were having multiple TVs was not uncommon). Nonetheless, it was a pretty limited system. With 5KB of memory out of the factory, once the system has loaded, you really had only access to 3583 bytes to write your programs in Commodore BASIC 2.0 or 6502 assembly. Luckily, one could buy memory extension cartridges (the later ones were pretty advanced and packed with tricks in addition of an amazing 64KB if RAM). But of course, the expansion port was mostly used to snap-in game cartridges. The other cool aspect of the machine is the use of an Atari 2600 9-pin joystick port. Now we can argue on the quality of the games (I will let you judge by yourself, see the short videos – I need to find a good way to capture these movies in the future, without using an emulator of course ;-) –, but I am still having fun trying to land that damn spaceship on Jupiter!        
PhotoVideo
Video
PhotoPhoto
2015-07-26
15 Photos - View album

Post has shared content
Anyone ever had an OSBOURNE? We had both of them. Wow that is history
YAPOCH!
Yet Another Piece of Computer History! When I picked-up this morning this – very heavy – FutureData AMDS FD Z80 64k and its AMDS MD/3 dual floppy unit, I was not suspecting that I was carrying home a part of the local history, originated back in 1978. But before getting into this story itself, let’s have a look at this so-called universal microprocessor development system. It is 1978 and microprocessor based applications are getting increasing momentum in the industry. To develop such novelties of that time, one needed to design the hardware as well as the software from the ground up. In the late 70’s this meant that you had to develop your hardware – essentially pick a CPU – and tediously write and debug the software to make it somehow useful. I always recall the NASA report published in 1968 on Flight Software Complexity, stating in the short that “HW is easy, SW is *&#@% hard”. This is where FutureData gets into the picture. The Californian company – founded in 1975 and purchased in February 1979 by GenRad for ~$5 million – was promising a universal, versatile and modular microprocessor development system. Indeed, the same system could be used to target a wide variety CPUs. You just had to buy and install the right CPU board (8080, 8085, 6800, 6802, Z80, 6502 and later 68000+) as well as its specific boards. One interesting and original feature of the AMDS was the in-circuit simulator. Using this in-circuit emulator/logic analyzer, it was possible to plug it into the CPU socket of your target hardware. The fake CPU was driven by the computer, where your hardware under debug had no idea of the substitution. Although it was a tremendous help – simply imagine how cool it is to have an integral view of the processor running in the real board –, it also introduced some issues. For example, NMIs were trapped and a logic decided if it was issued by the microsystem or the target hardware, which makes it hard to debug timing related issues. My new toy has two – massive – components: the microsystem and the microdisk. The microsystem is in fact a terminal and a chassis. The chassis has a motherboard equipped with 14 expansion slots. Although they have the same physical edge connectors as the S-100 bus, the signals and power lines are different (although equivalent). The microdisk has two floppy drives (8-inch) and is booting the OS and serves as a mass storage for programs (26 sectors of 128 bytes). The system boots into a monitor (BOOT80D V02) and gives access from the floppy drives to an editor, an assembler, a linker, a debugger, a BASIC interpreter and few additional system tools. Very classic! Unfortunately, my Z80 AMDS didn’t come with the RDOS disk (well, it makes our hobby even more interesting). It worth signaling at this stage that this solution was acquired for $19.725 in 1978! And this was an economic pick, compared to what Tektronix or HP wax selling at the time. I will keep you posted as I progress reviving this beast. And now la pièce de résistance: the piece of history announced in the intro. It turns out that this very system was purchased by Rodgers Instruments, a local – but known worldwide – organ manufacturer (Hillsboro Oregon). As a side story, Rodgers Instruments was founded in 1958, and was successively acquired by CBS (the system still has the CBS tags attached), Roland and in 2016 by the Vandeweerd family. In June 1978. Rogers Organ (CMD) decided to acquire this system to develop software for high quality cost effective organs they would eventually manufacture instead of the analog models. The project’s initiators rightfully believed that all future organs will be microprocessor based, and therefore they would need a solid software development system. Indeed, Rogers purchased a license from the National Research & Development Corporation of Great Britain for manufacturing rights to a microprocessor controlled digital organ. The company had the choice between investing into this system and controlling their destiny, or to have all their software developed in the U.K. at Bradford University. As we know today, they went for the local choice! Enjoy the pics…
PhotoVideo
PhotoPhotoPhoto
2016-03-12
15 Photos - View album

Post has attachment
Wait while more posts are being loaded