longest post title ever
First, let me be very positive and tell you a few reasons why I like seeing happy comments of affirmation like "Great!", "Love it", "Cool", etc etc. I'll start with the simple reasons and then get into a deeper sense of experiencing the world around us.
So, on a basic level, I simply like seeing people's avatars - their faces. This is important and nice to me. We are humans, and we like to see faces. Incidentally, this is generally why face-avatars are more appealing than cartoons or symbols.
Plus, I know that they took a little extra time in addition to the +1. I think most of my new and upcoming friends here on Google+ are not photographers, so they just have a simple and joyous reaction to it. They give nice feedback in a simple, quick manner.
This all stems from an increasing complaint I see from some other photographers that complain about "inane" comments, wishing "these people" would just +1 and move on. I find this to be a very elitist and condescending attitude. The thing is that photographers have been someone "poisoned" by Flickr. And here is why…
Flickr is great in that it allows photographers to comment on the work of other photographers in a thoughtful, critical manner (sometimes, hehe). So, we get used to a certain level of feedback from other people that have strong opinions on composition, color, light, line, shape, contrast, and these sorts of things. But, for the last five years, I've been sharing a new photo every day on http://www.StuckInCustoms.com and my main target has always been non-photographers. And the simple truth is that they just respond "differently". It's not better or worse… just different. Each of them, no doubt, has a deep level of expertise in various other subjects, and if I were to post something about Austria-Hungary, for example, they would probably respond with a paragraph of helpful datapoints.
So I'm very defensive of all the nice people that take the time to comment, re-share, and become part of the community. If you don't like the way people choose to express themselves in Google+, or generally disagree with the comments, then there is no need to get all upset… just uncircle me and save yourself some frustration.
Now, another way to look at it, if you'd like to alter your perspective, is to consider the expansion of the photography audience. Flickr was also poisonous in that it was just photographers commenting on other photographers in a circle of mutual-mental-masturbation. The bad part is that every photographer comes with their own baggage (I know I do), and they bring that baggage into the comments. So, it's a bit like being an oil painter and only hanging your work in a gallery that other oil painters frequent. You'll have interesting discussions, but you'll also hear a lot of talk of what merchants in Arles are producing the best yellow dye.
With Google+, you find a lot of non-photographers. And this is of course the BEST audience for photographers, because they just simply want to see beautiful things in their life. They can sense beauty, and they don't have to have an art-school degree to like something and sense a deep beauty. And every non-photographer has a wonderfully unique life of experiencing beauty and a very personal history of joy, trauma, and the unique events that make them different. So that means that one photo may really speak to one person… perhaps there is a bit of mystery that their imagination fills in… and it becomes very special to them… and, having different neurons fire, they simply don't know what to say but, "Wow."
When I watch Olympic diving and I see some skinny Scandinavian do four flips and a twist and make ZERO splash, I just stare at the TV and say, "Wow." Or, maybe I see a ballet and the dancer makes a little move that I just can't comprehend. I may turn to a friend and say, "Amazing." There are arts and things well beyond me that I can barely grasp, and words fail.
Anyway, I'll end this little post with a story about the photo below, since we can all probably agree that beauty exists and we all experience it differently. To me, this fisherman and his cormorant bird are beautiful. To the fisherman, maybe the fish he will soon catch is beautiful. To the fish, maybe the Li River is beautiful. All of these truths can be held together in delicate concert, and this is why I love capturing it.
For some individuals that attract a lot of traffic (think blogging about various products with a million + followers), wouldn't it be interesting if Google would share up to 50% of the ad revenue with the blogger? Unless you make more than $20 in a year, Google keeps all the ad revenue. But for someone who moves their entire operation over to G+ and creates tons of great content, they would get a decent revenue stream. The best thing for Google+ is for great writers to contribute lots of great content for more readers to use the service. Google doesn't really lose anything if the gain is more than what they give away. My guess is that if the profit sharing is enough, then writers will be dying to move over to G+ to get a piece of the action. I know I would sure consider posting better content and more often if I could get paid to do it.
And more importantly, the remaining family and friends seem stuck hard and fast to their Faceboook or personal blogs, unwilling to even create an account on G+. It's amazing since most of them already have Gmail accounts and setting up a G+ account would take them a whopping 5 seconds! It might be the summer. It might be that it takes more than a week for most people to get the guts (or desire) to try anything new. At this rate, it might take years for people to be willing to try a new social network.
My initial thoughts after week one and 10 million new G+ers was that Facebook could be a ghost town in another year. But at this rate, FB could incorporate many of the G+ ideas into their own platform. As a software architect myself, I realize changing legacy a product with 750 million unique monthly users is a LOT harder than I'm making it sound. But there are some things they could do around circles and setting up permissions to make the FB experience a lot better. If done before the masses leave, FB could actually turn things back into their favor.
I'm still betting on G+ to be the winner in 5 years. But if FB can start to incorporate some of the great G+ additions, then I just might by some of their stock after all.
So many friends and family have resisted jumping into Google+. I've been really surprised how resistant they've all been. But these strategies really should work for Google. I wish them the best. I just hope that the best product wins here (G+ IMHO).
So for me, this news from NASA comes as great news. The impact of greenhouse gases isn't trapping near the amount of heat as predicted. I truly hope this article is one of many more to come.
Social Media News and Web Tips – Mashable – The Social Media Guide
Social Media news blog covering cool new websites and social networks: Facebook, Google, Twitter, MySpace and YouTube. The latest web techno
"I'm a technical lead on the Google+ team. Ask me anything."
U. 15. D. Will Google+ support the OpenSocial standard for platform development? U. 15. D. Will the content I gave a +! be part of a stream
PICS – Contractor Screening & Contractor Management
Contractor Screening & Contractor Management
YouTube - NASA to launch R2 to join Space Station Crew
Create AccountSign In. Home. BrowseMoviesUpload. Hey there, this is not a commercial interruption. You're using an outdated browser, whi